Ravens set up home on Lincolnshire TV and radio mast
"It's a bird that is traditionally being found in the west of the UK – particularly Wales, Cumbria, places like that," he said."But in the last 25 years a population of these birds has begun to spread to the east, and they're now breeding in many central locations."Mr Thomas said Lincolnshire was now home to about 20 breeding pairs, with the birds traditionally nesting on crags, rock faces or very large trees."Of course, in Lincolnshire there are not many of those," Mr Thomas said."So what they've basically done is they've substituted that by using anything that is tall, [such as] a radio mast, a bridge, anything like this."The Belmont birds have built their nest out of twigs and other materials on a platform on the steel tower.The mast is used to transmit television and radio broadcasts to about two million people across Lincolnshire and East Yorkshire.The chicks have left the nest, although Mr Thomas said they were likely to use the site again.
Ravens are the largest members of the crow family and are famously kept at the Tower of London.There is a legend that the London landmark would fall down if the ravens ever left – and Caroline Morris, head of sustainability at Arqiva, said she hoped that fate would not befall the Belmont transmitter."We're proud to have supported this remarkable species as its numbers continue to grow across the east of England," she said. "They've certainly been one of the more unusual visitors to one of our structures."Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
My father finally acknowledged my stepmother's cruelty. How do I ask him to reconsider their marriage?
I have a stepmother who my brother and I really despise. She has made our relationship with our dad really hard, and has tried to stop him seeing us at points. She has resented us since we were little. My dad has recently admitted that he thinks she is jealous of us and has a lot of regret for the way we were treated in the past. The trouble lies in the fact that he has said if anything happens to him (ie if he dies first) we would need to make an effort with her will-wise, to ensure we were treated fairly, as he doesn't quite trust she would do the right thing. It feels incredibly hard to acknowledge this and agree when he has essentially admitted he doesn't trust her with his dying wish. I also find it really hard to deal with the fact he is finally acknowledging how cruel she has been, but still insists we have a relationship. It makes me think he's a coward. I really want to bring this up to him, but have no idea how to say: 'Do you not think you should reconsider your marriage, based on the way in which you have shown you don't trust your wife, and believe she is jealous of your children?' Eleanor says: First non-philosophical thing: if you haven't already, I think you should get legal advice about the will. Is it that he might die intestate, and he's hoping you'll all sort it out? Or has he made arrangements, but worries she might challenge them? Legal advice would clarify what can be done now to avoid a horrible tangle later. That's hard – nobody likes to get into the details about their dad's death. Or indeed their own. But it'll be so much harder, emotionally and legally, if your first advice about a possible estate conflict only comes after he's died. To your question. You said you weren't sure how to say what you wanted to say. When we say 'I can't figure out how to say such-and-such', I always think the answer is to just say the such-and-such. You wrote it: 'Do you not think you should reconsider your marriage, based on the ways you don't trust your wife, and believe she's jealous of your children?' A heady thing to say, for sure. But it's not the word choice that makes it heady. You'd be asking your dad why he's still married. You can soften the phrasing, but it's the content of that question that makes us flinch, not the way of asking it. More frightening still is the fact that he might have an answer. Through your (and my) eyes that question is almost rhetorical: why stay married to someone you don't trust and who's mean to your kids? However, the fact that they are still married and that he wants you to have a relationship with her means that, for him, there might well be an answer. He might have considerations on the other side of the scale that outweigh the fact that she's mean to his kids. Maybe he likes her enough. Maybe he doesn't want to be alone. Maybe he thinks he's too old, he's not willing to make the change. Maybe he thinks the conflicts between her and his kids aren't his concern. Maybe what look like obvious dealbreakers to you are just some considerations among many for him. The point is, your real question for him might be an even bigger flinch. Not just 'why won't you act on your judgment?', but 'why isn't it your judgment that you should leave?' It's possible he has bona fide answers – things that, to him, are more important than the way she treats you. It is hard to say which would hurt more: him not being brave enough to act on what he values, or this being exactly what it looks like when he does. I truly don't know which of these it is. I feel for you the same in both cases. I don't know whether you should ask him either question out loud; I don't know how conversations with him tend to go, or whether his answer would make you feel better. I do know that when someone isn't acting on what they say they see, it isn't always that they lack the courage of their convictions. Sometimes they're showing us their convictions through inaction.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Is YOUR name going extinct? Find out with our search tool
The names Jack, Harry and Emily are dying out, according to data that shows how monikers common in the 90s are going out of fashion. Jack, which sat atop the boys' names popularity list every year between 1996 and 2008, last year ranked 22nd, with just 1,711 babies being given the name. This is a fall of more than 4,000 (70 per cent) compared with 10 years ago, marking the biggest decrease of all 6,000-plus boy names. Harry, also once top of the charts, has had tumbled by 3,600 (67 per cent) and now sits 20th, with a continuing downward trajectory. For girls, Emily and Jessica saw the biggest falls in the past 10 years, from 3,991 to 1,170 (-70 per cent) and 2,995 to just 483 (-84 per cent), respectively. Both names were among the most common in the 1990s. The Daily Mail has built a new search tool which shows how your name has risen or plummeted in popularity over the last few decades. To use our interactive below, first select your gender, then search for your name in the box and select it from the dropdown menu. It will then tell you how many babies of your sex and name were born this year and how popular it is, how it has changed from its heyday, and in what years the name reached its peak position in the charts. You can then compare your name against up to five more names of any gender. Our tool comes as official data yesterday crowned Muhammad as the most popular boys' name in England and Wales for the second year running. More than 5,700 boys were given the name in 2024, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). This represents a significant 23 per cent rise since the year before – the first time it topped the list – when around 4,660 boys were named after the Islamic prophet. It tops our biggest risers list. In 1996, just 441 baby boys were given the name Muhammad. Mohammed entered the top 100 boys' names for England and Wales 101 years ago, debuting at 91st in 1924. Its prevalence dropped considerably in the lead up to and during WW2 but began to rise in the 1960s. That particular iteration of the name was the only one to appear in the ONS' top 100 data from 1924 until Mohammad joined in the early 1980s. Muhammad, now the most popular of the trio, first broke into the top 100 in the mid-1980s and has seen the fastest growth of all three iterations since – seeing a 12-fold increase in the past three decades. Another popular name rising the charts is Arlo, an old English word for 'fortified hill' which saw a rise from 397 in 2014 to 2,220 in 2024 for a total change of 1,823 (459 per cent). Olivia held onto the top spot for girls for the ninth year running, with 2,761 girls being given the name by their parents last year. Despite still being top pick, the name is falling fastly out of fashion – down by 1,963 since 2014 (-42 per cent). Amelia (2,448) also held on to the second spot for the third year in a row, but Isla (2,056) dropped out of the top three after being replaced by Lily (2,185). Names inspired by pop culture have proved popular, with Maeve – which surged in popularity after the 2019 debut of Netflix's Sex Education, starring Emma Mackey as the fiercely intelligent Maeve Wiley – growing the most of all girls' names. Just 61 infants were given the name in 2014, compared to 1,264 last year, a rise of 1,204 – or 1,974 per cent. Otis, the lead from the same show played by Asa Butterfield also saw a rise in popularity at the same time, from 164 in 2014 to 762 in 2024. Hollywood is also a popular inspiration, with Margot (1,243) – a name shared Australian Barbie actress Margot Robbie – has seen steady rises in popularity over the past few years, peaking this year in 28th place, a rise from 44th in 2023. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister appears to have killed off his own name for good. Keir did not appear in the list of names last year. This could mean it has gone extinct completely, although the ONS hides actual figures for names with fewer than three instances.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
My father finally acknowledged my stepmother's cruelty. How do I ask him to reconsider their marriage?
I have a stepmother who my brother and I really despise. She has made our relationship with our dad really hard, and has tried to stop him seeing us at points. She has resented us since we were little. My dad has recently admitted that he thinks she is jealous of us and has a lot of regret for the way we were treated in the past. The trouble lies in the fact that he has said if anything happens to him (ie if he dies first) we would need to make an effort with her will-wise, to ensure we were treated fairly, as he doesn't quite trust she would do the right thing. It feels incredibly hard to acknowledge this and agree when he has essentially admitted he doesn't trust her with his dying wish. I also find it really hard to deal with the fact he is finally acknowledging how cruel she has been, but still insists we have a relationship. It makes me think he's a coward. I really want to bring this up to him, but have no idea how to say: 'Do you not think you should reconsider your marriage, based on the way in which you have shown you don't trust your wife, and believe she is jealous of your children?' Eleanor says: First non-philosophical thing: if you haven't already, I think you should get legal advice about the will. Is it that he might die intestate, and he's hoping you'll all sort it out? Or has he made arrangements, but worries she might challenge them? Legal advice would clarify what can be done now to avoid a horrible tangle later. That's hard – nobody likes to get into the details about their dad's death. Or indeed their own. But it'll be so much harder, emotionally and legally, if your first advice about a possible estate conflict only comes after he's died. To your question. You said you weren't sure how to say what you wanted to say. When we say 'I can't figure out how to say such-and-such', I always think the answer is to just say the such-and-such. You wrote it: 'Do you not think you should reconsider your marriage, based on the ways you don't trust your wife, and believe she's jealous of your children?' A heady thing to say, for sure. But it's not the word choice that makes it heady. You'd be asking your dad why he's still married. You can soften the phrasing, but it's the content of that question that makes us flinch, not the way of asking it. More frightening still is the fact that he might have an answer. Through your (and my) eyes that question is almost rhetorical: why stay married to someone you don't trust and who's mean to your kids? However, the fact that they are still married and that he wants you to have a relationship with her means that, for him, there might well be an answer. He might have considerations on the other side of the scale that outweigh the fact that she's mean to his kids. Maybe he likes her enough. Maybe he doesn't want to be alone. Maybe he thinks he's too old, he's not willing to make the change. Maybe he thinks the conflicts between her and his kids aren't his concern. Maybe what look like obvious dealbreakers to you are just some considerations among many for him. The point is, your real question for him might be an even bigger flinch. Not just 'why won't you act on your judgment?', but 'why isn't it your judgment that you should leave?' It's possible he has bona fide answers – things that, to him, are more important than the way she treats you. It is hard to say which would hurt more: him not being brave enough to act on what he values, or this being exactly what it looks like when he does. I truly don't know which of these it is. I feel for you the same in both cases. I don't know whether you should ask him either question out loud; I don't know how conversations with him tend to go, or whether his answer would make you feel better. I do know that when someone isn't acting on what they say they see, it isn't always that they lack the courage of their convictions. Sometimes they're showing us their convictions through inaction.
