logo
All you need to know about France's public broadcasting reform

All you need to know about France's public broadcasting reform

Euractiv01-07-2025
PARIS – France's long-overdue public broadcasting reform finally landed in parliament on Monday and immediately ran into a wall of opposition.
Culture Minister Rachida Dati took the floor to present her long-delayed plan to overhaul the country's public media landscape, pitching it as the only way to save a system in decline.
"To grow stronger, public broadcasting must come together," she said, as left-wing MPs tabled over 1,000 amendments to push the bill examination to the autumn.
As it stands, the reform proposes the creation of a new holding company named France Médias , which would merge Radio France , France Télévisions , and the National Audiovisual Institute (INA) under the authority of a single chair and chief executive officer.
That top job – appointed by France's media regulator Arcom, itself headed by a French president appointee – would come with sweeping powers and a five-year term.
A recent report commissioned by Dati's own ministry warned that maintaining the status quo would pose "an existential threat to public broadcasting," citing shrinking audiences, misinformation and ultimately "a loss of legitimacy."
Only a unified strategy under the head of France Médias could secure long-term viability, according to Dati, who rejected any suggestion that editorial independence is under threat.
For trade unions, however, the creation of such a holding company could represent "a risk to pluralism and the freedom of information," as control could potentially be centralised in the hands of a single boss.
Another concern voiced by the public broadcasters' staff, who have been on indefinite strike since Monday, is that the reform might serve merely as a smokescreen for "budget cuts."
"The budgets will be merged, yet no allocation key has been specified for distributing funds among the various broadcasters," Maria Afonso, a trade union representative at France Médias Monde told Euractiv.
"The future CEO will be able to decide how much funding goes to each outlet, without the stations having any say in the matter," she added. Public broadcasting: how many divisions? French public broadcasting is a vast entity comprising dozens of radio and television channels. It employs around 17,000 people directly, along with thousands of freelancers, producers, technicians, and other service providers.
These various entities currently operate as distinct companies, with a combined budget exceeding €4 billion in 2024 – an increase of €228 million compared to the previous year, largely to offset inflation.
At the heart of the current structure are three main players: France Télévisions , which operates seven TV channels; Radio France , home to seven radio stations; and the INA, a public body responsible for archiving and commercialising audiovisual content.
These three organisations, alongside the French state, are also shareholders in the French arm of the Franco-German channel Arte . France Télévisions also co-owns TV5 Monde alongside French-speaking broadcasters from Switzerland, Monaco, Belgium's Wallonia-Brussels Federation, Canada and Quebec.
Then there's France Médias Monde (FMM), created in 2008, which comprises Radio France Internationale, France 24, and Monte Carlo Doualiya. Its remit is to promote France and the French language internationally, and could eventually be folded into the new holding.
Since the scrapping of the television licence fee in 2022, public broadcasting has been funded by a portion of VAT revenue – a measure cemented into law last December – and tightly regulated advertising. For example, Radio France caps its ad time to an average of 17 minutes per day on certain stations.
Elsewhere in Europe, Germany has a similar fragmented landscape of public broadcasters, with each Land having its own TV and radio services. Countries like the UK ( BBC ), Italy ( RAI ), and Spain ( RTVE ) operate through single national organisations instead. A 'political' reform? French President Emmanuel Macron first proposed the reform in 2017, but it was repeatedly postponed: first by the pandemic, then by the collapse of the Barnier-led government last year.
It has now returned under Dati, though opponents criticise it as more of a political totem than a genuine policy, especially as she has been increasingly open about her ambition to run for mayor of Paris in 2026.
'The minister claims public broadcasting is in crisis, but that's simply untrue,' said Anne Guillé-Épée, delegate of the National Union of Journalists (SNJ) at France Télévisions.
She pointed out that France Inter is the country's most popular radio station, its youth audience is growing, and public TV channels broke viewing records during the Olympics.
'With this holding company proposal, the French right is essentially trying to bring public broadcasting to bow,' Guillé-Épée added, also condemning frequent attacks on public media from far-right channels owned by billionaire Vincent Bolloré.
The far-right Rassemblement National wants to privatise public broadcasting, but its MPs may nonetheless support the bill in the French Parliament.
Meanwhile, the culture minister – embroiled in various legal proceedings – can count on backing from her right-wing party, Les Républicains, and from some MPs in Macron's centrist bloc.
The parliamentary debate on the bill is unlikely to conclude this week, with MPs set to take up the matter in autumn.
(mm)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU Commission stays out of US contraceptive destruction row
EU Commission stays out of US contraceptive destruction row

Euractiv

timean hour ago

  • Euractiv

EU Commission stays out of US contraceptive destruction row

The European Commission will not step in to stop the destruction of €10 million in USAID-funded contraceptives, despite pressure from NGOs and MEPs, several internal sources said. The supplies, which are still usable, were part of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), much of which has been dismantled since US President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January. According to Commission sources, it is now up to Belgium, where the stock was stored, and France, where it is to be destroyed, to find a solution. They added that there are 'no signs' of any upcoming EU action. 'The Commission cannot do anything; it is up to the member states to act,' said one source to Euractiv. When asked last week, the Commission told Euractiv that it was 'closely monitoring' developments. Several MEPs, including French Green lawmaker Mélissa Camara, have been pressing the Commission since media revealed on 23 July that the stock was facing destruction, but have received no reply. Acting on the stock would place the Commission in a delicate position, as it faces pressure from civil society and MEPs while seeking to avoid antagonising Donald Trump amid threats of a trade war and the war in Ukraine. Discussions still ongoing According to diplomatic and NGO sources, including the French Family Planning Association, at least some of the stock has been shipped to France for incineration, although the location has not been confirmed. Major waste firms Veolia and ENGIE have denied involvement. On 11 August, Belgium's foreign ministry told Euractiv that it was exploring 'all possible avenues to avoid the destruction of these products, including temporary relocation solutions.' 'To avoid jeopardising the outcome of the discussions, we are not in a position to provide further information,' a ministry spokesperson said, suggesting not all stocks have been destroyed. 'Our message now is, 'prove to us that the stocks still exist,'' said Sarah Durocher, president of the French Family Planning association. On 1 August, France's health ministry said it had no authority over the case, noting that requisition is only possible in the event of a shortage, which is not the case in France. The International Planned Parenthood Federation says the destruction could deprive 1.4 million women and girls in Africa of contraception. The Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition estimates it could lead to 174,000 unintended pregnancies and 56,000 unsafe abortions. (de)

Germany's Merz on the defensive at home over Israeli arms ban
Germany's Merz on the defensive at home over Israeli arms ban

Euractiv

time12 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Germany's Merz on the defensive at home over Israeli arms ban

On Friday, Friedrich Merz's launched an embargo on exporting some arms to Israel. By Monday morning, it's already clear that many in his Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party hates him for it. By stopping the flow of weaponry that could be used in the bombardment on the Gaza Strip, the chancellor is effectively heralding a new era in the two countries' relationship. For a start, the development marks the first time that Berlin has effectively imposed sanctions on Israel over the current war. That's proven unpopular inside his party, since Merz's allies accuse him of abandoning Israel – making matters worse, they say he did not consult them first. And they have not been shy about making themselves heard. 'The CSU was not involved in the decision; we consider it to be questionable', Alexander Hoffmann, who leads the Bavarian sister group of the CDU in the parliament, told daily BILD . Other MPs took to social media and TV to make their displeasure known. Foreign policy deputy Roderick Kiesewetter called it a 'serious political and strategic mistake' in a social media post. I n the late 2000s, then-Chancellor Angela Merkel, a long-time rival for Merz, declared Israel as Germany's Staatsräson, making protection of the country a key national interest. By stopping the flow of arms, Germany was breaking 'a long-standing friendship and trust, while Staatsräson remains an empty, unbelievable shell', Kiesewetter said. 'This will not free a single hostage.' Matthias Hauer, a state secretary at the research ministry, said the move was a 'disastrous signal'. Meanwhile, a nother Christian Democrat MP , Carsten Müller, 'strongly condemned' the move online. On Saturday, Merz sent out his head of cabinet, Thorsten Frei, hoping to quell the discontent. 'There must be no doubt whatsoever that the basic principles of German policy towards Israel remain unchanged', he told dpa . Simultaneously, the chancellor's office sent out a three-page document, published by daily Welt , with additional explanations in hopes of heading off criticism. One reason cited for the move – avoiding 'social conflicts in Germany and Europe' – added fuel to the fire. 'We must not allow foreign policy decisions to be influenced by the anti-Semitic mob on our streets', said Dennis Radtke, an MEP who heads the workers' wing in the party. A Sunday emergency meeting of the party's foreign policy experts with Merz advisor Günter Sautter was quickly scheduled to quell the rebellion. Meanwhile, Merz himself took to the air waves to address both public and party at once. 'The principles of German policy towards Israel remain unchanged,' he told public broadcaster ARD in an interview . Berlin would 'continue to help [Israel] defend itself', Merz added. However, he added 'we cannot supply weapons to a conflict that is now trying to be resolved exclusively by military means'. Israel's plans to occupy the entire region could cause 'hundreds of thousands of civilian victims and require the evacuation of the entire city of Gaza', the German politician said. "Where should these people go?" (jp)

Zelenskyy says no to territorial concessions: ‘Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier'
Zelenskyy says no to territorial concessions: ‘Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier'

Euractiv

time2 days ago

  • Euractiv

Zelenskyy says no to territorial concessions: ‘Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier'

Ukraine won't surrender land to Russia to buy peace, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned Saturday, after Washington and Moscow agreed to hold a summit in a bid to end the war. Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump will meet in the US state of Alaska next Friday, to try to resolve the three-year conflict, despite warnings from Ukraine and Europe that Kyiv must be part of negotiations. Announcing the summit on Friday, Trump said that "there'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both" sides, without providing further details. "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier," Zelenskyy said on social media hours later. "Any decisions against us, any decisions without Ukraine, are also decisions against peace. They will achieve nothing," he said, adding that the war "cannot be ended without us, without Ukraine". Zelenskyy also urged Ukraine's allies to take "clear steps" towards achieving a sustainable peace, during a call with Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer. National security advisors from Kyiv's allies -- including the United States, EU nations and the UK -- were gathering in Britain on Saturday to align their views ahead of the Putin-Trump summit. French President Emmanuel Macron, following phone calls with Zelenskyy, Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, said "the future of Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukrainians" and that Europe also had to be involved in the negotiations. Later Saturday, in his evening address, Zelenskyy added: "There must be an honest end to this war, and it is up to Russia to end the war it started." A 'dignified peace' Three rounds of talks between Russia and Ukraine this year have failed to bear fruit, and it remains unclear whether a summit could bring peace any closer as the warring sides' positions are still far apart. Tens of thousands of people have been killed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with millions forced to flee their homes. Putin has resisted multiple calls from the United States, Europe and Kyiv for a ceasefire. Putin, a former KGB officer in power in Russia for over 25 years, has ruled out holding talks with Zelenskyy at this stage. Ukraine's leader has been pushing for a three-way summit and has frequently said meeting Putin is the only way to make progress towards peace. Far from the war The summit in Alaska, the far-north territory which Russia sold to the United States in 1867, would be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva in June 2021. Nine months later, Moscow sent troops into Ukraine. Zelenskyy said of the location that it was "very far away from this war, which is raging on our land, against our people". The Kremlin said the choice was "logical" because the state close to the Arctic is on the border between the two countries, and this is where their "economic interests intersect". Moscow has also invited Trump to pay a reciprocal visit to Russia later. Trump and Putin last sat together in 2019 at a G20 summit meeting in Japan during Trump's first term. They have spoken by telephone several times since January with Trump trying to broker peace in Ukraine without making a breakthrough. On Friday, Putin held a round of calls with allies, including Brazil, China and India, in a diplomatic flurry ahead of the Alaska summit. In a 40-minute phone conversation Saturday between Putin and President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, the Brazilian leader reiterated his support for dialogue "and the pursuit of a peaceful solution", his office said. The US president had earlier imposed an additional tariff on India for buying Russia's oil in a bid to nudge Moscow into talks. He also threatened to impose a similar tax on China, but so far has refrained from doing so. Fighting goes on Russia and Ukraine continued pouring dozens of drones onto each other's positions in an exchange of attacks in the early hours of Saturday. A bus carrying civilians was hit in Ukraine's frontline city of Kherson, killing two people and wounding 16. The Russian army claimed to have taken Yablonovka, another village in the Donetsk region, the site of the most intense fighting in the east and one of the five regions Putin says is part of Russia. Four people were killed as of Saturday morning in Donetsk after Russian shelling, Ukrainian authorities said. In 2022, the Kremlin announced the annexation of four Ukrainian regions – Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson – despite not having full control over them. Russia had previously annexed the Crimean peninsula from Ukraine in 2014. As a prerequisite to any peace settlement, Moscow demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of the regions and commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Kyiv said it would never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged that getting land captured by Russia back would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store