
The Taliban had very few cards to play against Britain. Now that's changed
Now, suddenly, the Taliban leadership in Afghanistan find themselves in possession of a card that may be more valuable than they could have imagined.
The database of 25,000 Afghans who were seeking asylum in Britain, mistakenly leaked and believed to be in the hands of the country's rulers, gives them an immediate source of leverage.
'After the reports were published in England, it became clear how significant this leak was,' a senior Taliban official in Kabul tells The Telegraph. 'No one thought the list would matter this much to British authorities or the public. But now, the order is to arrest as many individuals as possible to use them as a tool of diplomatic pressure against England.'
Along with most of the world, Britain does not recognise the Taliban as Afghanistan's legitimate government. Four years after the fundamentalist movement seized power in 2021, only Russia has granted the Taliban official recognition, having struck them from its list of banned terrorist organisations.
As the Taliban marched into Afghanistan's capital, Britain closed its embassy in Kabul and evacuated the ambassador and all his staff. Today the UK's Mission to Afghanistan is based over 1,200 miles away in Qatar's capital, Doha.
The diplomats at this small post maintain what the Government calls 'limited and pragmatic' engagement with the Taliban when necessary.
But the Taliban hopes that such contact has suddenly become far more necessary. If the British Government cares about the fate of the 25,000 Afghans on the list, it will want the Taliban to refrain from harming them and perhaps cooperate with bringing them safely to the UK.
If so, the Taliban will surely demand a price. The official says that the regime's demands might range from 'pushing England to ease its restrictions on recognising the Emirate, to pressuring it not to block others from doing so'.
The Taliban already have one card to play. The Telegraph previously revealed that a British couple, Peter Reynolds, 79, and his wife Barbie, 75, were arrested in Afghanistan not because they broke local laws but rather because the Taliban wanted to use them to place pressure on Britain.
The couple, who have lived in Afghanistan for 18 years and hold joint British-Afghan citizenship, are being held separately in Kabul. Their daughter, Sarah Entwistle, told The Telegraph earlier this year that she was increasingly concerned about their well-being.
With the British Government under additional political pressure to ensure the safety of the Afghans on the leaked list, the Taliban will be able to raise the stakes.
They will have every interest in talking up the threat to the 25,000 people named in the database. Hence Taliban officials claim to have been hunting for them ever since the leak occurred in 2022.
They say that a special unit has been established to locate them and border guards ordered to prevent their departure from Afghanistan.
'The border forces have had the list for the past few months and have orders not to let anyone leave,' said one Taliban official. 'These people are seen as traitors, and the plan has been to find as many of them as possible.'
The Taliban also claim to be tracking down the families of those named and keeping them under constant surveillance. 'We've been calling and visiting their family members to track them down,' said the Taliban official, adding that 'senior figures in the establishment in Kandahar are pressuring officials in Kabul to find them'.
How much of this is true and how much is calculated exaggeration remains uncertain. But the Taliban will play the new card in their hands for all it is worth. .
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Home Office's top civil servant received £20K performance-related bonus in his £455K pay package as number of small boat arrivals spiralled
The Home Office 's top civil servant received a £455,000 pay package including a £20,000 bonus as small boat arrivals spiralled. On top of his £200,000 annual salary Sir Matthew Rycroft received a £50,000 'exit payment' – of which £30,000 was tax-free – when he stepped down as permanent secretary at the end of March. The Home Office's annual accounts – which set out sums in £5,000 brackets – showed the mandarin received a performance-related bonus payment of £20,000 to £25,000. It was significantly higher than his £5,000 to £10,000 bonus the previous year. From the start of the financial year covered by the report to the date of Sir Matthew's departure on March 28, official figures show 38,023 small boat migrants reached Britain. It was a rise of 26 per cent on the 30,288 who arrived in the equivalent period in 2023-24. Sir Matthew also received £179,000 in pension benefits for the year. It brought his total remuneration package to £455,000 to £460,000. Sir Matthew, now 57, announced in February to staff he was leaving the Home Office 'for pastures new'. One migrant was pictured jumping off an overloaded dinghy - for unknown reasons - as it set off from Gravelines beach He was knighted in the 2023 New Year's Honours List for 'services to British diplomacy, development and domestic policy'. At the time, some senior political figures expressed surprise at the gong. In all, senior Home Office civil servants received bonuses totalling between £80,000 and £120,000 last year. Director General of the Border Force Phil Douglas received a total package of £275,000 to £280,000, the report showed. He, too, was paid a £10,000 to £15,000 bonus on top of his £145,000 to £150,000 salary, plus pension contributions. Dan Hobbs, the Director General of Migration and Borders, received a bonus of up to £5,000 on top of his £130,000 to £135,000 salary, bringing his total package to £265,000 to £270,000, including £128,000 in pension benefits. Border Security Commander Martin Hewitt, a former chief constable, is on £200,000 to £205,000 a year, the report confirmed. Second permanent secretary Simon Ridley was paid £170,000 to £175,000, plus £82,000 in pension benefits. The accounts, published today set out how civil servant's bonuses are performance-related. 'Bonuses are based on performance levels attained and are made as part of the appraisal process,' it said. In November 2023 MPs were left exasperated at the lack of detail Sir Matthew was able to provide about the cost of the Rwanda asylum scheme, which was then in development. Following a series of exchanges where Sir Matthew and his second-in-command Simon Ridley were unable to answer questions, committee chairman Dame Diana Johnson asked: 'Do we have any figures about anything?' Dame Diana is now a Home Office minister, and overlapped at the department with Sir Matthew from last July's election until his departure. The figures came as migrants were seen sprinting across a French beach to reach a dinghy. In scenes reminiscent of the opening sequence of Oscar-winning 1981 movie Chariots of Fire, the migrants ran through surf on the beach at Gravelines, near Calais, this morning. Several hundred migrants are thought to have reached Britain today. Since Labour came to power 45,746 have arrived, not including today's unconfirmed number.


Metro
24 minutes ago
- Metro
British spies and SAS soldiers' personal details leaked in Afghan data breach
The personal details of British spies and special forces personnel were included in the Afghan data breach that led to an unprecedented superinjunction, it has emerged. It was previously reported that a list accidentally sent in an insecure email by a military official contained information relating to almost 19,000 Afghans who helped to support British forces in the fight against the Taliban. Following the lifting of the two-year superinjunction on Tuesday, it has been revealed that the document also held data relating to more than 100 British people. They included MI6 spies as well as special forces and SAS personnel. The data breach, which happened in February 2022, was only discovered by the government when an extract was posted on Facebook 18 months later. More Trending Then-Defence Secretary Ben Wallace asked a judge for an injunction to prevent the information contained in the dataset being published. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. However, the judge instead placed the case under a superinjunction, preventing any details about the breach or the injunction itself from being published. Meanwhile, the largest covert evacuation in peacetime history was launched to get Afghans out of the country, out of concern their lives could be at risk from the Taliban. The programme, named the Afghanistan Response Route, has cost around £400 million so far and could cost around £850 million by the time it ends. Got a story? Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ Or you can submit your videos and pictures here. For more stories like this, check our news page. Follow on Twitter and Facebook for the latest news updates. You can now also get articles sent straight to your device. Sign up for our daily push alerts here. MORE: Molly-Mae Hague reveals secret for glowing and blemish-free skin is ZO Skin's Complexion Pads MORE: Model's fury at phone snatchers after thieves take her mobile twice in three months MORE: Belgian ticket inspector given warning for using 'bonjour' in Dutch-speaking region


The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ex-minister says no ‘fierce opposition' to Afghan route amid data breach fallout
Conservative ex-ministers offered no 'fierce opposition' to plans to bring Afghan refugees to the UK via a secret route following a data breach, the former armed forces minister has said. James Heappey, who was armed forces minister at the time the data breach came to light, said claims he had backed a 'new entitlement' for people affected by the breach but not eligible for other schemes were 'untrue'. His comments on social media on Thursday appeared to contradict those of former immigration minister Robert Jenrick, who said he and former home secretary Suella Braverman had 'strongly opposed' plans for the Afghan Response Route in 'internal meetings'. But Mr Heappey, himself a former Army officer who served in Afghanistan, said the cross-government committee responsible for the policy 'tried to extend entitlements by the smallest number possible'. He said: 'This was led by legal advice & I don't recall fierce opposition. There was frustrated resignation that it was necessary.' Mr Heappey did, however, recall 'rancorous' meetings in which departments 'fought fiercely for their priorities and/or to avoid unresourced responsibility'. He also denied that a new 'secret route' was not under consideration at the time he resigned as armed forces minister in March 2024. The data breach, which saw a defence official release the details of nearly 19,000 people seeking to flee Kabul in 2022, became public on Tuesday after an unprecedented superinjunction banning reporting of the breach was lifted. Since then, Conservative former ministers have sought to distance themselves from the handling of the breach and the subsequent creation of a secret relocation scheme, the Afghanistan Response Route, in April 2024. Along with Mr Jenrick's claims of having opposed the route prior to his resignation in December 2023, Ms Braverman herself has said there is 'much more that needs to be said about the conduct of the MoD (Ministry of Defence), both ministers and officials'. Former veterans minister Johnny Mercer claimed he had 'receipts' regarding the previous government's actions in relation to Kabul, and has described the handling of the breach as 'farcical'. Sir Ben Wallace, who applied for the initial injunction as defence secretary, has said he makes 'no apology' for doing so, saying it was motivated by the need to protect people in Afghanistan whose safety was at risk. Mr Heappey backed up his former boss, saying the superinjunction was 'needed' to protect people from 'mortal danger'. He said: 'The intelligence assessment was clear: if the Taliban got their hands on the list, violent and even lethal reprisal was likely.' Mr Heappey added that, although a review by retired civil servant Paul Rimmer found there was now little threat to those on the list as a result of the breach, this did not mean the threat had never existed. He also sought to defend the individual responsible for the leak, saying they had been 'incredibly dedicated to those we served with in Afghanistan'. Grant Shapps, who was defence secretary by the time the superinjunction was granted, has not yet publicly commented on the revelations. The data breach saw a dataset of 18,714 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme released in February 2022 by a defence official who emailed a file outside authorised government systems. Defence sources have said that details of MI6 spies, SAS and special forces personnel were included in the spreadsheet, after they had endorsed Afghans who had applied to be brought to the UK. The Ministry of Defence only became aware of the blunder when excerpts from the dataset were posted anonymously on a Facebook group in August 2023, and a super-injunction was granted at the High Court in an attempt to prevent the Taliban from finding out about the leak. The leak also led to the creation of the secret Afghanistan Response Route, which is understood to have cost about £400 million so far, with a projected final cost of about £850 million. A total of about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. The official responsible for the email error was moved to a new role but not sacked. The superinjunction was in place for almost two years, covering Labour and Conservative governments. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has apologised on behalf of the Conservatives for the leak, telling LBC: 'On behalf of the government and on behalf of the British people, yes, because somebody made a terrible mistake and names were put out there… and we are sorry for that.' Meanwhile, Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee has demanded to see intelligence assessments relating to the data breach 'immediately' as MPs and peers begin inquiries over the incident. The Commons Defence Committee has also indicated it will call former ministers to give evidence on the breach, and Mr Heappey said he would be 'happy to contribute' to the committee's inquiry.