logo
Stay or go? Tehran stalked by doubt as war with Israel hits home

Stay or go? Tehran stalked by doubt as war with Israel hits home

The National5 hours ago

The pictures came in one after the other: a statue of Arash the Archer, a mythological character believed to have shot an arrow marking the border of ancient Iran. Next, a picture of Picasso's Guernica, one of the world's most famous paintings opposing war.
A resident of Tehran sent the pictures via WhatsApp with a message: Iranians are proud nationalists with a long history, and do not want conflict.
'Our nation knows how to resist and stand firm. In difficult times, everyone stands by Iran, regardless of their religion or belief,' the person, a foreign policy researcher, told The National, asking to remain anonymous.
Even Iranians who oppose the country's system of Islamic governance have criticised Israel 's strikes in conversations with The National. The attacks have killed at least 224 people over five days, with more than 1,200 others taken to hospital, said Iran's Health Ministry, including women and children. While deeply rooted in their communities, many Iranians fearing the unknown are deciding to pack up and leave in search of safety.
As Israeli strikes continue and the civilian death toll rises, Iranians are faced with a decision: should I stay or should I go?
'People are going where they think is out of the missiles' reach,' another Tehran resident told The National.
For years, Iran had kept direct conflict with Israel, and other threats, at bay. It supported Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza. It sent military advisers to Syria and Iraq to support Bashar Al Assad and, it said, fend off ISIS, whose presence once extended worryingly close to Iran's own borders.
But now, citing imminent threats from Iran, Israel has attacked, ushering in the worst direct conflict that Iran has seen since the 1980-1988 war with Iraq. Iran, which denies it is seeking nuclear arms, has launched missiles and drones back at Israel, claiming at least 24 lives, Israeli authorities have said.
'Every night, people are gathering in safe areas and waiting for either Israel or Iran to strike. It's a really dire situation,' a resident of Isfahan told The National. 'People are coming together, they have lived in war. It's a really tough situation.'
People are going where they think is out of the missiles' reach
Resident of Tehran
As well as striking remote military and nuclear sites, Israel has also struck densely populated areas of cities such as Tehran, including the busy Tajrish district. As it has done in Gaza and Lebanon, the Israeli military on Monday issued an evacuation warning for part of Area 3 in north-eastern Tehran.
It said it would carry out 'actions to attack the Iranian regime's military infrastructure'. The area houses the city's international exhibition centre and a sports complex.
In a later social media post, US President Donald Trump said 'everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran'. The post was published in English around 3am Iran time. "I just want people to be safe," he later told journalists in explanation for the post.
Many Iranians have criticised the sudden evacuation orders for a city of around 10 million people, a population that swells on weekdays. On social media, users posted panicked messages about family members living in the area that Israel said it would attack.
Despite the threats, some people are not leaving their homes.
'Tehran is a populous and important city and is not being evacuated at all,' the foreign policy researcher said. 'The situation is special, but we are not a nation state that was just created yesterday. We are defending ourselves and adapting to the new circumstances.'
But others, fearing the conflict may escalate further and uncertain of their safety, have either left, or are planning to. Mosques, schools and metro stations are available as shelters, an Iranian government spokeswoman has said, and authorities deny shortages of basic food. But unlike in Israel, Iranian cities do not have networks of official bomb shelters and air defence systems are limited.
Images showed long queues of traffic as people tried to leave Tehran, and social media users posted videos and pictures of the front doors of their homes before leaving.
"People don't know what they are supposed to do in this situation," the Isfahan resident said. "Out of fear, they think the best thing to do is to leave the cities."
The National spoke to one resident of Tehran who had left his home for another city in Iran, and another who was planning his route out.
'It is really scary,' he said. 'I have to find a way to leave the city and probably the country.'
Closures of shops, government offices and other businesses make the Iranian capital feel 'closed', another resident said.
'Look, many people left Tehran,' he told The National. 'Because the offices are closed, it's practically as if Tehran is closed. But people in service jobs and the people that have to stay, they all stayed.'
Some people are going to the holy city of Qom, normally a two-hour drive south of Tehran, while others are heading to northern regions bordering the Caspian Sea, the man added.
Queues are appearing to buy fuel, he said, and sent The National a picture of one petrol station surrounded by cars. 'The petrol stations are operating, they are working, everyone wants petrol," he added. "It's a long queue. People are waiting for one, one and a half hours.'
Iranians hope Mr Trump could end the conflict by placing pressure on Israel to end the attacks. The Iranian military has said its counter-attacks will continue as long as Israel keeps striking. But people have mixed feelings about how willing or able the US President is to de-escalate.
'I hope Trump can stop this," another Tehran resident told The National over the phone. 'Because if he doesn't, it will get much worse, it will be completely insane."
The overwhelming sense is that Iranians do not want any more conflict.
'If only the war would end, somehow,' the Isfahan resident said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

America's big bunker-buster that can sink Iran's nuclear programme
America's big bunker-buster that can sink Iran's nuclear programme

The National

time29 minutes ago

  • The National

America's big bunker-buster that can sink Iran's nuclear programme

The key weapon that America will bring to the conflict is its undoubtable ability to smash Iran's nuclear centres buried deep below ground. The US Air Force is the only military to have the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator that weighs an astonishing 18,600kg and can penetrate up to 100 metres of reinforced concrete. It is as close nearest thing to a nuclear bomb without being one. The US also has heavy bombers that are virtually the only aircraft that can drop it – the B-2 Spirit and the B-52. There have been reports backed up by satellite photos of six B-2s and four B-52s stationed at the Diego Garcia airbase in the Indian Ocean, 4,000km from Iran. Washington can also provide a fleet of air-to-air refuelling tankers to assist Israel's fighters, as well as the world's biggest and most advanced air force. But given that the Israeli air force has pummelled Iran's surface-to-air missiles and radar defences, the number of targets is diminishing. Already there are reports of the main refuellers – the Boeing KC-46A Pegasus and Boeing KC-135 Stratotankers – heading to Europe. 'Istar soak' But another key feature that America can provide is its extensive military surveillance satellite system that delivers what is called 'Istar soak'. While Israel has three spy satellites the US has dozens that give it persistent Istar (Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance) coverage that will allow it to track Iranian missile launches as well as senior commanders, regime figures or nuclear scientists. This will enable 'dynamic strikes' in which commanders see a target of opportunity and can bring immediate firepower in. They will also potentially help track where Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles might be, as well as centrifuges used in their manufacture. Tomahawk attack The US has fleet of about eight Arleigh Burke DDG-51 guided-missile destroyers in the region, most guarding the aircraft carrier the USS Carl Vinson. The US Navy warships each carry between eight and 10 Tomahawk cruise missiles. If it was decided that more Iranian airbases had to be destroyed, Tomahawks would be sent in, much as they were in the scene from Top Gun Maverick. The USS Nimitz carrier, with its 90 aircraft, is also steaming to the area from the Pacific and will arrive in days. America can also offer its special forces for strike missions, its intelligence and surveillance aircraft and its military satellites that would vastly increase the information-gathering mission. There is also the possibility that America will send more of its own air defences to Israel and possibly the Gulf. It has a Thaad high-altitude interceptor battery near Tel Aviv and Patriot missile batteries in the region. There is also the Central Command based in Doha, Qatar, staffed by high-ranking US and western officers who would be able to co-ordinate all of the offensive operations. War spreads? While others have remained apart from the conflict, countries such as Britain could be drawn in if, for example, Tehran was to fire one of its Fatah-1 hypersonic missiles on to the UK's airbase in Cyprus. This would be to cause a political problem and to destabilise the western alliance as the UK would have to choose whether to join Israel in the war, despite being at diplomatic loggerheads over the country's conduct in Gaza. Similarly, France has a number of military bases in the region that could be attacked and, alongside Britain, warships in the area.

How Donald Trump's stance on Iran conflict is dividing his Maga base
How Donald Trump's stance on Iran conflict is dividing his Maga base

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

How Donald Trump's stance on Iran conflict is dividing his Maga base

US President Donald Trump 's support for Israel as it attacks Iran has divided his base, with many supporters angered over what they see as a betrayal of his 'America First' pledge. The Trump administration initially distanced itself from Friday's opening strikes conducted by Israel against Iran, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio stressing that the US was not involved. But within hours, Mr Trump praised Israel's 'excellent' military strikes and told Iran it must make a deal 'before there is nothing left' of the country. The US is also moving assets in the Middle East region to help Israel as it defends against Iranian missile strikes, and Mr Trump has said 'it's possible' the US could get involved. Prominent members of the often-hawkish Republican Party have long advocated for war with Iran, with either US or Israeli strikes, but Mr Trump has cast himself as a ' peacemaker and unifier ' and promised to keep the US out of new wars. Since taking office in January, he has pushed for a lasting ceasefire in Gaza, a Russia-Ukraine peace deal and a nuclear agreement with Tehran. None of these efforts have yielded concrete results. Now, the Make America Great Again movement that propelled Mr Trump to the White House is taking note of his support for Israel. For one of the first times since he took office in January, the isolationist coalition that wants to end all US military action overseas is showing signs of upset. Republican representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a passionate Trump supporter and a prominent member of the Maga movement, said anyone wishing for war with Iran was 'disgusting' and lamented America's previous military engagements in the Middle East. 'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/Maga,' she wrote on X. 'Wishing for murder of innocent people is disgusting. We are sick and tired of foreign wars. All of them.' Mr Trump told The Atlantic on Saturday that he gets to determine what 'America First' means. 'For those people who say they want peace – you can't have peace if Iran has a nuclear weapon. So for all of those wonderful people who don't want to do anything about Iran having a nuclear weapon – that's not peace,' he said. Representative Thomas Massie, a prominent Maga Republican who has voted against sending military aid to Israel, posted a poll he ran that showed most respondents agreed with his stance. As Israel began attacking Iran last week, Charlie Kirk, a pro-Israel Maga loyalist, held a live podcast to ask his pro-Trump audience what they thought of events. 'The emails are so largely overwhelmingly against Israel doing this, I'd say it's probably a 99 to one,' Mr Kirk said. 'No issue currently divides the right as much as foreign policy,' he later posted on X. 'I'm very concerned based on (everything) I've seen in the grassroots the last few months that this will cause a massive schism in Maga and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful presidency.' Further complicating matters for Mr Trump is his past handling of the conflict. In 2018 he unilaterally withdrew the US from the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated under his predecessor Barack Obama, calling it the 'worst deal ever". But since returning to the White House, he has now spent nearly six months trying to get Iran to agree to a similar deal to constrain its nuclear programme. He had criticised former president Joe Biden last year for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, only to find himself advocating for diplomacy. Saagar Enjeti, a presenter on the right-wing Breaking Points YouTube show, has said Mr Trump is letting down his isolationist supporters. 'Trump has now praised Israel's strike, affirmed US material support, and Israeli media is reporting his public opposition was a disinformation campaign to mislead Iran,' he said. 'So in other words Trump, not Israel, has made a mockery of all of us who wanted to avoid this war.'

UAE President calls Iranian President, affirms commitment to de-escalate tension
UAE President calls Iranian President, affirms commitment to de-escalate tension

Khaleej Times

timean hour ago

  • Khaleej Times

UAE President calls Iranian President, affirms commitment to de-escalate tension

President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan expressed UAE's solidarity with Iran and its people in light of the recent Israeli military strikes targeting Iran. Sheikh Mohamed emphasised the UAE's commitment to supporting de-escalation efforts and reducing regional tensions. The remarks came during a phone call with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, in which both leaders discussed the serious implications of the escalating conflict on regional peace and security. Sheikh Mohamed stressed that the UAE is actively engaged in diplomatic consultations with key stakeholders to help calm the situation and avoid further instability. He reaffirmed the UAE's support for any steps that contribute to restoring calm and promoting dialogue. The call underscores the UAE's broader regional approach of prioritising diplomacy and peaceful resolution of conflicts amid growing concerns over a widening confrontation in the middle east.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store