Education Department: Proposed budget calls for billions in cuts
Trump added that many of the Education's Department's 'useful functions' — including Title I funding and resources for children with disabilities — 'will be fully preserved' and 'redistributed to various other agencies and departments.'
Now the Trump administration is articulating its specific Department of Education fiscal intentions in its recently released annual White House budget proposal — which will ultimately require Congressional approval.
The department's 2026 budget request advances Trump's plan to 'reach balance and restore confidence in America's fiscal management by eliminating spending that does not support meaningful learning and returning responsibility for services that are better provided by the states, local governments, or civil society organizations to each respectively.'
Added the document: 'Our goal is clear: to make education better, fairer, and more accountable by ending federal overreach and empowering families, schools, and states who best know the needs of their students.'
The Education Department is requesting $66.7 billion — an approximate $12 billion reduction (or about 15%) from the 2025 appropriation.
The proposed budget cut, according to the document, 'reflects an agency that is responsibly winding down.'
As Trump promised, the Education Department's budget request asserts it maintains the current Title I allocations of $18.4 billion.
Title I funds aim to help students from low-income families achieve in the classroom.
'The request recognizes the importance of funds under Title I-A Grants to Local Educational Agencies (LEAs), which serve as a critical source of support for LEAs in communities of concentrated poverty,' the document noted.
'This program also provides considerable flexibility to LEAs on how to use the funds to best address the needs of their students — which is consistent with the Administration's goal to return education back to the states while maintaining support for families and their students.'
More than 108,000 Utah K-12 students benefit from Title I money.
The Education Department also administers the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) that helps schools pay for services for students with disabilities.
The agency's 2026 budget request provides $14.9 billion for the IDEA Grants to States program — about $677 million more than the 2024 appropriation. It also calls for consolidating the Preschool Grant program and the Special Education National Activities programs into the Grants to States program.
The Grants to States program, the request noted, will continue to be allocated to states and LEAs. States will receive additional flexibility to reserve funds for state-level activities — including those currently supported under the National Activities programs.
States, the proposal added, would continue to meet key IDEA accountability and reporting requirements 'aimed at ensuring a free appropriate public education is available to all students with disabilities' while protecting the 'rights of those students and their families.'
The document said the proposals reflect the Trump administration's commitment to increasing flexibility for states 'while limiting federal overreach into schools.'
The National School Lunch Program, which reimburses Utah schools and other states for students receiving free or reduced school meals, is administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture — not the Education Department.
The department's 2026 budget proposal argues that federal support for education in the past has supported programs ill-suited for states.
As a result, the budget proposal added, 'states are forced to hire increasingly large numbers of staff not to serve students, but to apply for competitive grants and manage the bureaucratic red tape imposed by the federal government. … It is time for the federal government to get out of the way of states and localities as they turn their attention to education outcomes instead of compliance with Federal red tape.'
While calling for maintained support for flexible Title I grants to LEAs, the Education Department's 2026 budget includes a proposed 'K-12 Simplified Funding Program,' which would consolidate many currently federally funded grant programs for elementary and secondary education into a single 'state formula' grant program.
'States and localities would have flexibility to use (Simplified Funding Program) funds for any number of elementary and secondary education activities, consistent with the needs of their communities,' the document states.
The budget request notes it would maintain separate funding for Impact Aid and Indian Education — 'both in support of underserved student populations.'
But the Trump administration is not requesting funding for several stand-alone elementary and secondary education programs for 2026.
'These eliminations are part of the Administration's overall effort to restore fiscal discipline and reduce the federal role in education. States and localities, not the federal government, are best suited to determine whether to support the activities authorized under the various programs within their own budgets and without unnecessary administrative burden imposed by the federal government.'
Existing Education Department-funded programs being eliminated as stand-alone programs — and instead being recommended for consolidation into the K-12 Simplified Funding Program — include programs promoting literacy; enhanced library programs; education services for 'Neglected, Delinquent & At-Risk Children'; the McKinney-Vento programs assisting homeless students; rural education programs; and arts education for students, including those with disabilities.
The Education Department budget proposal does not include requests for future funding for the Supporting Effective Educator Development, or SEED, program.
Also eliminated from the budget proposal are funds for migrant education.
'This program has not been proven effective and encourages ineligible noncitizens to access taxpayer dollars stripping resources from American students,' according to the document.
The Education Department's budget document referenced the alarming rate of the nation's eighth graders who are struggling in reading and math — and blames federal control for 'decimating student achievement.'
More local school options such as charter schools, the document argues, are needed to give parents choices for their children's education.
'So the request strategically invests $500 million, a $60 million increase, to expand high-quality charter schools, which have a proven record of improving students' academic achievement,' according to the report.
'These funds would support new and continuation awards that make start-up, replication, expansion, and facility support available to charter schools capable of delivering innovative solutions to meet student needs.'
The 2026 budget proposal provides $1.4 billion for Career and Technical Education (CTE) State Grants — an amount equal to the 2024 appropriation.
Secondary and postsecondary CTE programs, according to the document, 'integrate academic and technical pursuits, introduce students to careers as early as middle school, support attainment of postsecondary credentials of value, and prepare students for career pathways in in-demand, high-wage fields.'
The requested programs, the document added, reflects the need to prepare American workers for the 'historic amount of in-demand and high-quality jobs that will help rebuild the American economy by supporting states.'
The Education Department's 2026 proposed budget would set a maximum Pell Grant award of $5,710 for award year 2026-2027 — a decrease of $1,685 over the 2024-2025 award year.
Pell Grants are financial 'grants' awarded to undergraduate students from low-income families. They have been a traditional pathway for many Americans to pursue higher education.
The proposed award modifications, according to the document, will continue to cover the average in-state tuition and fees of attending a community college.
'The President is committed to fulfilling his promise to preserve the Pell Grant program; however, the growing funding shortfall created by past congressional decisions makes it necessary to decrease the maximum award,' according to the document.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ken Calvert has served California for decades. Newsom's plan could end his dominance
Last year Republican Rep. Ken Calvert, the longest-serving Republican of California's delegation, narrowly held his seat against a former federal prosecutor, Democrat Will Rollins. This year he faces eight challengers, and the possibility that his area, California District 41, could be redrawn to give Democratic candidates the advantage. Gov. Gavin Newsom is proposing what lawmakers are calling an emergency redistricting plan for California, aimed at turning at least five red congressional seats blue. Calvert's Inland Empire district is one of those targets. Newsom floated his plan after Texas began redrawing its political lines to eliminate five Democratic seats. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is pushing the proposal with the backing of President Donald Trump, who wants to bolster the GOP's House majority in next year's midterm election by skewing voting districts in Republicans' favor. 'Donald Trump called up Governor Abbott for one simple reason: to rig the 2026 elections,' Newsom said in a statement, vowing to 'fight fire with fire.' But he faces some hurdles. Unlike Texas, where the legislature sets political boundaries, California relies on an independent citizens' commission to draw voting lines. California voters approved the redistricting commission for state offices in 2008, empowering the bipartisan body to set boundaries based on geographic areas and 'communities of interest,' which can include cultural and economic characteristics. In 2010, voters added congressional districts to the process. To circumvent that, Newsom would ask California voters to approve new boundaries that would remain in place through 2030. He plans to release proposed voting maps next week. Then the state legislature has to authorize a ballot measure by Aug. 22 to place the redistricting plan on the November ballot. Newsom wants to redraw California map: Here's an overview of where we stand Last week Newsom hosted Texas lawmakers who fled the state to delay a vote on its redistricting effort. And on Monday he sent Trump a letter outlining California's counteroffensive. 'You are playing with fire, threatening to destabilize democracy, while knowing that California can neutralize any gains you hope to make,' Newsom wrote. Although the governor has been leading the charge for redistricting, his office said the legislature is handling the maps. 'That is not something our office is actively involved in,' Brandon Richards, a spokesperson for the governor's office, told CalMatters in an email. Calvert didn't comment on how the redistricting proposal would affect his district, but said the plan undermines California's citizen-led redistricting process. 'I strongly oppose the scheme being orchestrated behind closed doors by Sacramento politicians to take constitutionally afforded power away from the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission and replace it with a process that would allow legislators to draw district maps that are gerrymandered to benefit themselves and their political allies,' Calvert said in a statement to CalMatters. 'A partisan political gerrymander is not what the voters of California want as they clearly stated when they passed the VOTERS FIRST Act and participated in the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission process.' If voters approve the new maps it could put Calvert's seat at risk. Previous redistricting in 2021 added the liberal Coachella Valley to conservative parts of western Riverside County, making it a more competitive race. Rollins brought a tightly run campaign and $8 million war chest to the fight and lost by just 3% in November. With even more Democrat-friendly boundaries and a wide field of candidates that include business executives, an educator and a pop star, the swing race would likely attract renewed national attention and campaign donations. This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: California redistricting Ken Calvert seat
The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
School choice may be the fix to DC's crime crisis
Washington, D.C., faces a serious crime crisis, with violence and homicide rates dangerously high. Even government officials have been targeted. While the Trump administration's plan to increase federal involvement may help temporarily, relying on permanent federal intervention is unsustainable. The long-term solution requires tackling root causes — especially chronic disengagement from education, which is widespread in D.C.'s traditional public schools and contributes significantly to youth crime. In the 2023–2024 school year, more than half of all high school students in Washington, D.C., were chronically absent, meaning they missed 10 percent or more of the school year. This absenteeism represents a failure to keep students connected to constructive environments and opportunities for success. When young people are not in school, evidence overwhelmingly shows they are at much higher risk of engaging in criminal behavior. The academic outcomes for D.C. public school students further illustrate the crisis. On recent standardized tests, only about 32 percent of students in grades 3–5 met or exceeded expectations in English Language Arts, a slight improvement from the previous year but still alarmingly low. Just 11 percent of high school students met or exceeded math standards. These outcomes are a direct reflection of an education system unable to provide the foundation students need for success, making disengagement and subsequent criminal activity more likely. Charter schools offer a proven, evidence-based alternative that can disrupt this cycle. Unlike traditional public schools in D.C., charter schools provide students with 30 to 50 percent more instructional time, effectively giving students up to four additional months of schooling each year. This extra time in the classroom correlates with improved academic performance and stronger student engagement. A landmark study conducted by Harvard and Princeton researchers demonstrated that winning a lottery to attend a New York City charter school almost completely eliminated the chance of incarceration for male students in the study sample. The same study also found a 59 percent reduction in teen pregnancy rates for female students who attended charter schools through the lottery. Another study, published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, found that winning a lottery to attend a school of choice in Charlotte, N.C., halved the rate of criminal activity among high-risk male students. And research on Milwaukee's voucher program found that students attending charter schools were significantly less likely to commit crimes by their mid-twenties compared to matched peers in public schools. Despite delivering compelling results, D.C.'s charter schools face significant funding disparities compared to traditional public schools. Though only a few studies have examined the precise funding differences between charter schools and public schools, one found that charter schools in D.C. receive approximately 41 percent less funding per pupil than public schools, averaging $17,525 per student compared to $29,808 per student — a gap of $12,283. This significant disparity limits charter schools' ability to expand facilities, attract qualified staff and improve programs. Meanwhile, demand for charter school seats far exceeds supply, with 17,047 students on waiting lists during the 2021–2022 school year, reflecting strong parental preference for alternatives to the struggling traditional system. Despite this funding disparity, evidence shows that public charter schools in Washington, D.C., specifically, continue to outperform traditional public schools. The success of charter schools in other cities demonstrates what could be achieved if D.C. removed these barriers and increased support. New York City's Success Academy, whose student population is 98 percent non-white and predominantly low-income, achieved remarkable academic results: 96 percent of students passed state math exams and 83 percent passed English Language Arts exams. This starkly contrasts with New York City's overall public school proficiency rate of around 49 percent, illustrating that well-supported charter schools can deliver superior outcomes even among disadvantaged populations. Washington, D.C. must view charter school expansion and equitable funding as integral parts of its strategy to reduce crime. Increasing access to quality education through charter schools addresses the root causes of criminal behavior by keeping youth engaged in structured, rigorous environments that foster academic achievement and discourage delinquency. Ultimately, no city can arrest or incarcerate its way out of a crime crisis. Long-term, sustainable solutions demand investments in education and opportunity. The District of Columbia has a proven tool in charter schools to disrupt the cycle of violence and provide at-risk youth with a pathway out of crime and into success. It is time for policymakers to remove funding disparities, lift arbitrary caps, and prioritize school choice as a core component of public safety reform in the nation's capital.
USA Today
5 minutes ago
- USA Today
Is Ivanka Trump returning to the White House? Dana White says she will help plan UFC event
President Donald Trump's daughter Ivanka Trump said she was stepping back from politics after her father's first term, but now she may be back to help plan a potential UFC fight at the White House next year. UFC CEO Dana White told "CBS Mornings" he discussed the event in an Aug. 11 call with the president, who said he wanted Ivanka involved in the planning. "So Ivanka reached out to me, and her and I started talking about the possibilities, where it would be and, you know, I put together all the renderings," he said on CBS. The White House did not comment on Ivanka Trump's role in the event, and her representatives did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ivanka Trump was heavily involved in Donald Trump's first term as an adviser. But when the now-president announced his third campaign, she said she was stepping back from politics. Since Donald Trump has returned to office, sports has become part of his politics with appearances at several sporting events, professional athletes on a presidential council and, of course, his love for golf. More: Which Trump presidential events did Melania, Don Jr., Ivanka, Eric, Tiffany and Barron attend? Ivanka Trump was a senior adviser under 45th president Ivanka Trump was a senior adviser to the president during his first term, frequently appearing at his side. By the end of his term, she was under attack for taking on something of an unofficial diplomat role in key foreign trips. Her husband Jared Kushner was also a senior adviser to the president. Ivanka Trump is the eldest of the president's two daughters. Her mother was Donald Trump's first wife Ivana, who passed away in 2022. Her two brothers also by Ivana are Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, who are managing the Trump Organization. Before her father went to the White House for the first time, Ivanka Trump was also an executive vice president at the Trump Organization. When her father announced his re-election campaign in 2022, she posted on Instagram to say that, while she loved her father, she was prioritizing her three young children this time around. In those years when the 45th president was somewhat of a political pariah, Ivanka Trump was called to testify before the House committe investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol and in the New York civil fraud case. 'Politics is – it's a pretty dark world. There's a lot of darkness, a lot of negativity, and it's just really at odds with what feels good for me as a human being,' she said on the "Lex Fridman Podcast' in July 2022, according to CNN. "And, you know, it's a really rough business. So for me and my family, it feels right to not participate." Ivanka has still made some appearances during second term While she may be out of the spotlight in Donald Trump's second term, Ivanka Trump has not been completely absent from her father's return to power. In fact, she attended a UFC fight with her father in Newark in June and one in Miami this summer, and photographs show her talking with White alongside the president at the Jersey match. Here are some other appearances Ivanka Trump has made since her father returned to the White House: Contributing: Jennifer Sangalang, Michael Collins, Saman Shafiq, Gabe Hauari, USA TODAY Network Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @
