Macron navigates rocky path to recognizing Palestinian state
By John Irish
French President Emmanuel Macron is leaning towards recognizing a Palestinian state, but diplomats and experts say such a move may prove a premature and ineffective way to pressure Israel into moving towards a peace deal with the Palestinians.
They say it could deepen Western splits, not only within the already-divided European Union, but also with the United States, Israel's staunchest ally, and would need to be accompanied by other measures such as sanctions and trade bans if recognition were to be anything more than a symbolic gesture.
French officials are weighing up the move ahead of a United Nations conference, which France and Saudi Arabia are co-hosting between June 17-20, to lay out the parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security.
If Macron went ahead, France, home to Europe's largest Jewish and Muslim communities, would become the first Western heavyweight to recognize a Palestinian state, potentially giving greater momentum to a movement hitherto dominated by smaller nations that are generally more critical of Israel.
"If France moves, several (European) countries will follow," Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide told Reuters.
Macron's stance has shifted amid Israel's intensified Gaza offensive and escalating violence by Israeli settlers in the West Bank, and there is a growing sense of urgency in Paris to act now before the idea of a two-state solution vanishes forever.
"We must move from words to deeds. Faced with facts on the ground, the prospect of a Palestinian state must be maintained. Irreversible and concrete measures are necessary," Macron's Middle East adviser Anne-Claire Legendre told delegates at a preparatory meeting in New York on May 23.
Diplomats caution that while Macron now favors the move, he has yet to make a final decision, and things could change - including a potential Gaza ceasefire accord - before mid-June.
However, his diplomats are scrambling to ensure the best conditions are in place for him to make the decision, including full assessments at the U.N. conference on the reform of the Palestinian Authority, disarming Hamas or future reconstruction.
ISRAELI LOBBYING
Israeli officials have spent months lobbying to prevent what some have described as "a nuclear bomb" for bilateral relations.
The idea that France, one of Israel's closest allies and a G7 member, could recognize a Palestinian state, would certainly infuriate Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
When Britain and Canada joined France this month to say they could impose concrete measures on Israel and commit to recognizing a Palestinian state, Netanyahu issued a firm rebuke, accusing the leaders of the three countries of antisemitism.
Diplomats say Canada and Britain remain lukewarm for now about recognition, suggesting the priority is to make a difference on the ground, something that may dampen Macron's ambitions.
According to two sources familiar with the matter, Israel's warnings to France have ranged from scaling back intelligence sharing to complicating Paris' regional initiatives - even hinting at possible annexation of parts of the West Bank.
Whether that would materialize seems unlikely, given the likely international fallout fueling one of Israel's greatest fears: deepening isolation, particularly with regard to Europe, its key trade partner.
"(But) the reaction will be negative across the board (in Israel)," Tamir Hayman, Executive Director at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) told Reuters, adding it would feed an ultra-right narrative in Israel that the world is against it. "It would be useless and a waste of time."
SHIFTING FRENCH VIEWS
Macron strongly backed Israel after Hamas' October 7, 2023 attack, which killed 1,200 people and took 250 hostages. But he has steadily sharpened his language against Israel over its actions in Gaza, where the death toll among Palestinians has risen to more than 50,000, according to Palestinian health officials.
"We need to move toward recognition. Over the next few months, we will," Macron said during an interview on April 9.
Even then, he hedged, setting vague conditions and saying he aimed to build momentum with a coalition backing France while nudging Muslim states toward recognizing Israel.
However, there are no indications for now that any new Muslim or Arab states are ready to move towards normalizing ties with Israel.
Saudi Arabia, the ultimate prize for Israeli normalization, is in no position for any rapprochement given the anger in many Muslim countries over events in Gaza.
"Regional peace begins with recognizing the state of Palestine, not as a symbolic gesture, but as a strategic necessity," Manal Radwan, an adviser to the Saudi foreign minister, said in New York on Friday.
She did not mention the possibility of recognizing Israel.
Macron's critics argue that recognition should come as part of negotiations towards a two-state solution - not before - and warning that an early move could weaken incentives for Palestinians to engage.
Underlining divisions within the EU, one European diplomat said: "It is our view that this recognition would not be helpful now or encourage more action within the member states."
Others say recognition must be twinned with other measures such as a Europe-wide ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian territories and specific sanctions on Israeli officials.
French officials say they will not be swayed by such criticism or by the Israeli pressure.
"If there is a moment in history to recognize a Palestinian state even if it's just symbolic then I would say that moment has probably come," said a senior French official, adding that Macron may also want to leave a trace in history before his presidential mandate expires in 2027.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
11 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
INTERVIEW/ Philip Davidson: China's military buildup targets deterrence of U.S. and partners
The 'incredible' expansion of China's military forces is eroding the deterrent effect that the United States, Japan and other countries have enjoyed over the past six decades, warned a retired commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command. 'With its military capability, along with its diplomatic and economic weight, China is strongly messaging that the West and Western institutions are in decline and that Chinese institutions are on the rise,' Adm. Philip Davidson told The Asahi Shimbun in a recent interview. In 2021, the last year when he led Indo-Pacific Command, Davidson warned that a conflict could occur in the Taiwan Strait by 2027. 'I don't think it is China's current strategy to proceed to force or coercion,' Davidson said about Taiwan during the interview. 'Their current strategy is to erode everything around Taiwan, the diplomatic environment, the economic environment and the military environment, in a way in which the international community just becomes inured and everybody will accept that's the way things are.' Excerpts from the interview follow: * * * Question: Will you share your assessment of the current environment of the Asia-Pacific region? Davidson: The security environment for the United States and Japan is the most serious in the last 35 years since the end of the Cold War with the Soviet Union. When I traveled to Taiwan just about two years ago, they certainly described their security environment as the most severe that they had experienced in their modern history. (It is) a quite difficult period in which China has stated plainly that its long-term objective is to supplant the global leadership role of countries like the United States and Japan that have led the international community for more than 70 years now and replace it with one that's led by the Chinese Communist Party. I think that's the most severe threat to the United States and Japan. Q: Specifically, what is the threat that China poses? A: It is the incredible expansion of all of its military forces throughout the 21st century, particularly over the last 13 years or so (after Xi Jinping took office as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party). China has greatly expanded its sea, air and ground forces, as well as its rocket and nuclear forces, when the United States and Japan have been essentially stagnant in their force levels. With its military capability, along with its diplomatic and economic weight, China is strongly messaging that the West and Western institutions are in decline and that Chinese institutions are on the rise. The real threat is that (China's military expansion) has served to erode the conventional deterrent that the United States, Japan and other allies and partners have exhibited in the region and provided in the security environment for these 60 years or so. Q: What is China's intention of deploying naval ships around the world and conducting military exercises? A: For more than a dozen years now, China has been making global deployments, whether to the Persian Gulf, the North Arabian Sea, South America or Europe, to demonstrate that they have a military capable of engaging globally. They're also trying to demonstrate that they're a rising power that's challenging the United States and Western nations like Japan in their capability to cast global doubt on our leadership and our long-term trajectory of power. Q: How do you assess the capabilities of China's large warships and fighter jets? A: China is definitely increasing the numbers of its warships and weapons, but the United States and Japan still hold the edge in capability. The capabilities of modern weapons that countries like the United States and Japan possess, such as the Aegis Weapon System, the F-35 stealth fighters and the SM-2 and SM-3 surface-to-air missiles, exceed those of Chinese weapons. There have been 170-plus attacks (from Yemen's Houthi rebels) using drones, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles against U.S. Navy forces in the Red Sea in the last 20 months, and we've defeated all of them using our missiles and electronic warfare systems. In addition to the capability of those systems, we also possess the edge in the talent of our people and the way we fight. We have much more experience in warfare than China has, and our deep relationship and exercises in our alliance help keep our nations side by side in demonstrating that capability and upholding the talent of our people. Q: China has been forging ahead with an arms buildup toward the goal of making the People's Liberation Army a 'world-class military' by 2049, the centenary of the founding of China. How should Japan and the United States respond? A: The power of deterrence relies on the collective will (of allies and partners). Each nation needs to show what they're capable of. When Xi and other Chinese leaders pull back the curtain and see nations (in the Asia-Pacific region) working collectively against China's objectives, or in support of (their) collective objective, that's a really difficult place for them to be. When they draw back that curtain and see not only the U.S.-Japan alliance but also improvements in the U.S.-Japan-South Korea trilateral relationship as well as in Japan's relationships with South Korea, the Philippines or many of its partners in Southeast Asia and the Pacific, that's not a good picture for them to make a conflict decision on. (The Chinese leaders) see that collective capability and will out there, and it is deterring the potential for coercion and force use in the region. Q: You told a U.S. Senate committee hearing in 2021: 'Taiwan is clearly one of their ambitions. … And I think the threat is manifest during this decade, in fact in the next six years.' What was your intention? A: It wasn't the entirety of my thesis. The charge for the Indo-Pacific Command commander is to prevent a 'coerced'—which is the operative and most important term--unification between Taiwan and China. You see many of the activities that China is doing in the military space, such as blockade rehearsals, and in the diplomatic space to isolate Taiwan from its partners. China has engaged in a military buildup within the South China Sea and also implemented the National Security Law in Hong Kong. We've seen a great international city basically disappear. I was trying to describe that the potential for a coerced outcome was much closer than people might have thought—that (it could happen sooner than) 2049 or 2035 (a waypoint year for Xi's goal of making China a 'great modern socialist country'). I was really concerned about the six years (through 2027, when Xi's third term ends), and the timing of his entering a potential fourth term is a factor in that. Q: China has repeatedly conducted military exercises around Taiwan in recent years in a show of force. What is China's goal? A: I don't think it is China's current strategy to proceed to force or coercion. Their current strategy is to erode everything around Taiwan, the diplomatic environment, the economic environment and the military environment, in a way in which the international community just becomes inured and everybody will accept that's the way things are. That's a very dangerous place to be. The coercion and force piece relates to the fact that China continues to repeat that they are not taking force off the table. We have to take them at their word. Q: Japan plans to raise its defense spending to 2 percent of its gross domestic product by fiscal 2027, but concerns remain about an escalating arms race. Can't we restrain China's high-handed behavior without increasing our defense outlays? A: I do not think that we can reverse the erosion of our conventional deterrent without increasing our defense budgets. It's not a decision that we take lightly, but we're going to have to invest to restore our deterrent. China has deployed many warships and numbers do matter. The great capacity that China has here is a concern. The United States can work much more closely with Japan, South Korea, Australia and the Philippines, all of which have incredible shipbuilding capability and complementary capability. Japanese and Americans have worked closely on advanced programs, such as the Aegis system, the F-35 and the SM-3. Deepening our relationship in defenses and industries, especially shipbuilding, would help all of our needs. (This article is based on an interview by Atsushi Okudera, a senior staff writer.) * * * Retired Adm. Philip Davidson commanded U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, America's oldest and largest military combatant command with about 380,000 members, between 2018 and 2021. He previously commanded U.S. Fleet Forces Command and the U.S. 6th Fleet. Davidson currently serves as an advisory committee member for Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA.
Nikkei Asia
12 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
EU pushes for China trade 'rebalancing' as Trump factor looms
BRUSSELS -- Gaps between Brussels and Beijing on trade issues show little sign of narrowing even as negotiations accelerate ahead of a possible call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. European Union trade chief Maros Sefcovic and Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao met on the sidelines of an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ministerial conference in Paris on Tuesday -- their third meeting since March. The two sides have agreed to convene again later this month, as they prepare for a high-level EU-China summit in July.
Nikkei Asia
15 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Australia and EU revive trade talks amid Trump turmoil
CANBERRA -- Australia and the European Union will resume stalled talks on a trade deal, as turmoil sparked by U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff blitz pushes countries to bolster trade alternatives to America. Australian Minister for Trade Don Farrell met with EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic in Paris on Wednesday. He told Australia's Sydney Morning Herald that both sides agreed to restart negotiations for a trade pact.
