Pay pending property tax without interest in Ludhiana, penalty by Aug 15.
Mayor Inderjit Kaur has appealed to the residents to avail themselves of the maximum benefit of the OTS scheme for property tax, wherein the residents can submit the pending property tax without any penalty or interest by August 15.
MC commissioner Aaditya Dachalwal said as per the policy notified by the government in the past, the residents could submit pending property tax without any penalty or interest by July 31.
However, to facilitate the residents at large, the state government had extended the policy and the residents can now submit pending property tax without any penalty or interest by August 15.
The civic body officials said the property tax had to be paid on a self-assessment basis every year. If the property owner fails to pay the property tax, a 20% penalty and 18% annual interest on the pending amount is charged by the MC.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Dementia Has Been Linked To a Common Habit. Do You Do It?
Memory Health
Click Here
Undo
Under this OTS policy, the residents can now submit the pending tax by August 15, 2025, without any penalty or interest. The pending amount can be submitted at the suvidha kendras situated in the zonal offices of the civic body.
Mayor Inderjit Kaur and MC commissioner Aaditya Dachalwal have again appealed to the residents to avail themselves maximum benefit of the policy and submit the pending property tax without any penalty or interest.
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on AI in India: If there is one large society in the world that seems ...
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has expressed admiration for India's embrace of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, predicting the nation could soon become the company's largest market globally. Speaking on Zerodha co-founder Nikhil Kamath 's 'People by WTF' podcast, Altman lauded India's proactive approach to AI, highlighting its potential to drive societal and economic benefits. Responding to Kamath's query about AI's opportunities for India, Altman underscored the 'incredible energy' and willingness of the Indian populace to integrate AI into various aspects of life. 'The excitement, the embrace of AI in India , and the ability for Indian people to use AI to just, sort of, leapfrog into the future, and invent a totally new and better way of doing things, and the economic benefits that come from that, the societal benefits, if there is one large society in the world that seems most enthusiastic to transform with AI right now, it's India,' Altman remarked. Sam Altman is 'coming soon' to India Altman emphasised that India's 'momentum is unmatched anywhere in the world', adding, 'I think India may be our largest market in the world, at some point, in the not very distant future.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Beautiful Female Athletes Right Now Undo He added that the 'energy is incredible' and he is 'looking forward to coming soon.' He further elaborated on the shift from being merely a consumer to a producer in the AI space. 'I feel like the question really is, how do we transition from being a consumer to be a producer, where we can build something that other people use outside of India? That was what I meant. I mean, there's lots of things happening there, but that was the thing I meant. I think that's really happening already in a big way,' Altman said. The OpenAI chief particularly praised the entrepreneurial energy dedicated to building with AI in India, expressing hope for its continued growth. Goodbye, Frequent FASTag Recharges! NHAI Launches Annual Pass for Rs 3,000 AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Independence Day speech: PM Modi urges self-reliance in critical minerals & fertilisers; calls for reduced imports, higher domestic output
PM Modi urges self-reliance in critical minerals & fertilisers India is pushing ahead with plans to achieve self-sufficiency in critical minerals, with exploration already underway at over 1,200 sites, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said during his Independence Day address. Speaking from the Red Fort on the nation's 79th Independence Day, he noted that the global focus on minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements and graphite has grown sharply due to their role in clean energy, electric vehicles, electronics and solar technology. 'What did not receive much attention till yesterday is on the centre stage today. Self-reliance in critical minerals is very essential for India as well,' PM Modi said. He explained that these resources are vital for sectors ranging from energy and defence to advanced technology, and highlighted the launch of the National Critical Mission to drive domestic exploration and production. The Prime Minister also linked mineral self-reliance to reducing India's energy import bill, saying that foreign dependence diverts resources that could otherwise benefit youth, farmers and rural development. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo 'Now we are working towards becoming self-reliant,' he stressed. PM Modi further urged the nation to achieve atma-nirbhar (self-reliance) in fertiliser production, expressing concern over the heavy reliance on imports of urea and phosphatic and potassic (P&K) fertilisers. He called on farmers to use nutrients judiciously to protect soil health and curb demand. 'Indiscriminate use of fertilisers is damaging our soil,' he warned. According to news agency PTI, India imported 56.47 lakh tonnes of urea in 2024-25, down from 70.42 lakh tonnes the previous year, while DAP imports fell to 45.69 lakh tonnes from 55.67 lakh tonnes. Urea production reached 306.67 lakh tonnes in 2024-25, compared to a record 314.07 lakh tonnes the year before. The Centre provides heavy subsidies, Rs 1,77,129.50 crore in 2024-25, to ensure affordable fertiliser prices, with urea sold at Rs 242 for a 45 kg bag, excluding coating and taxes. PM Modi urged industry and youth to innovate and expand domestic production to end import dependence, saying, 'We should not be dependent on others.' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's attack on Goldman Sachs could prompt watering down of Wall Street's independent analysis
U.S. President Donald Trump's criticism of Goldman Sachs ' research on tariff risks could prompt some analysts to water down their research, investors and academics said, an outcome that could leave investors with less reliable information. The reams of research that banks such as Goldman produce are used by institutional investors, such as hedge funds and asset managers, in deciding how to allocate capital. Trump's comments -- in which he lambasted Goldman, its economics team and CEO David Solomon and accused them of making "a bad prediction" -- have triggered a debate on Wall Street about the possible fallout, according to interviews with banking industry sources and investors. At one Wall Street bank, Trump's comments spurred informal conversations among staff, a source familiar with the matter said. The source said they also discussed how to incorporate government data in the wake of Trump's decision to fire the head of BLS, claiming -- without evidence -- that its data had been politicized. Still, the bank was not considering changing the way research operates. "This is going to come down to a person's ability to withstand a barrage of criticism from the Oval Office, and the extent to which these banks provide support for their chief economists," said Dave Rosenberg of Rosenberg Research, who has worked in the economics departments at several banks. "If we notice that research is being watered down ... then we'll know that this has had an effect." Jack Ablin, chief investment strategist at Cresset Capital, said if banks do start self-censoring, smaller investors who do not have the resources to do their own analysis are likely to suffer most. Trump's criticism is his latest attack on corporate America and other institutions, and is a break from historical norms, where presidents have typically avoided calling out private companies and executives for things they do not like. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 most beautiful women in the world Undo Some companies that have considered passing on tariff costs to customers have faced public criticism, and Trump, who came to politics after running businesses, has intervened directly in private business decisions by making a deal with Nvidia to give a portion of its revenues from sales to China of AI chips to the government. Trump "certainly is taking a number of steps that diverge from the traditional view of the respective roles of the government and private industry," said Henry Hu, a securities law professor at the University of Texas. In a social media post earlier this week, Trump said foreign companies and governments were mostly absorbing the cost of his tariffs, counter to Goldman's research. "Given that sell-side Wall Street analyst predictions have been about as accurate as random guessing, small investors will do just fine with the president exercising his First Amendment right about flawed Wall Street research," a White House official told Reuters. On Wednesday, Goldman's U.S. head economist David Mericle defended its research on CNBC, vowing to "keep doing" what the bank considers informative research. Live Events Goldman declined requests for further comment. Other major banks, including Wells Fargo, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America and Citigroup, declined to comment. REPUTATIONAL RISKS There has already been evidence of self-censorship. A senior JPMorgan Asset Management investment strategist, Michael Cembalest, earlier this year said during a webinar that he refrained from voicing some of his thoughts on U.S. tariffs publicly. Shortly after Cembalest's comments, Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan's CEO, said that he expects analysts to speak their minds. Both Cembalest and the bank declined to comment for this story. Hu said there is a risk involved in even appearing to give way to political pressure. "Goldman's reputational capital is at stake here," he said. "If their views on the economy become biased, and they are shown to be wrong, why would anyone choose Goldman to advise them on anything?" Mike Mayo, banking analyst at Wells Fargo, said independent research is critical for investment bank's reputation. "Investment banks live and die by their reputation and independence. That transcends all other considerations." Wall Street research has long been tightly overseen, one source said, with supervisory analysts reviewing research reports to ensure that language is not inflammatory, emotive or partisan and that reports are objective and cite sources. That person said that if analysts feel unable to speak openly then investors will pay more or take greater risk. Liquidity will suffer and there will be less foreign participation in U.S. markets, the person said. It was large losses by smaller investors that triggered the first major probe of Wall Street research in the aftermath of the dot com stock bubble of the late 1990s. Eliot Spitzer, then New York Attorney General, found that Wall Street analysts had swapped their honest opinions for unwarranted "buy" ratings on companies to help their banks win underwriting and advisory business. The result: a $1.5 billion global settlement payout by Wall Street and lifetime bans for some analysts. It remains to be seen whether the current kerfuffle will have an outsized impact on Wall Street or if it is a storm in a teacup, said Steve Sosnick, market strategist at IBKR. "It does raise a lot of questions," he added.
