Industrial strategy targets short-term pain for long-term gain
The government's industrial strategy aims to harness the best of British business, from automotive to video gaming via the City and life sciences, in order to deliver the economic growth on which all else depends.
A year in the planning with a 10-year horizon for delivery, in its final months it was hijacked by a very short-term issue; how to give industries battered by the highest electricity prices in the world a chance of competing now, never mind the 2030s.
The answer, as reported by Sky News last week, is a significant cut to bills not just for "energy intensive users" such as concrete and chemicals that already enjoy support, but to 7,000 manufacturers for whom energy is a high proportion of costs.
They will receive around 15% off their bills from 2027, at an estimated cost of £500m a year.
Exactly who benefits will be decided after consultation but the mechanism for delivering discounts, and how they will be paid for, is already decided, and the answer tells us an awkward truth about the UK's energy market.
To make industrial energy prices more competitive, qualifying businesses will be exempt from paying some of the taxes and levies added to bills to incentivise the building of renewable energy sources.
These so-called "policy-costs", which make up around 15% of energy bills, have been fundamental to the massive expansion of wind and latterly solar power, supported by successive governments over the last two decades.
This race for renewables is intended not just to lower emissions but to deliver more stable and, say Labour, cheaper bills by reducing our exposure to volatile gas prices.
The UK has been hugely successful in the first part, and green technologies are one of the eight high-growth sectors favoured in this industrial strategy.
Yet by choosing to discount "green levies", the government appears to be acknowledging that taxes intended to bring down bills tomorrow are driving prices up and making the UK uncompetitive today.
It also raises the prospect that the heaviest energy users will pay less for the expansion of renewables intended to reduce emissions.
Ministers say that, unlike previous industrial discounts, the cost of this one will not be passed on to other business or domestic customers.
Instead, they say the funding will come from "headroom" created by extending price guarantees offered to renewable suppliers (known as Contracts for Difference) from 10 years to 15, and a "windfall" expected from linking UK carbon pricing to the EU system.
If that sounds like the work of Treasury officials desperate to keep an unfunded £2bn off the books it may well be, but Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds told Sky News the scheme is compatible with the country's long-term energy goals.
He said: "You can do both things together, you can have ambition on climate and be competitive. These changes mean no one is going to have a higher bill to pay for this, no one will have to pay higher taxes to pay for this, but how those costs are represented in the system will change over time to make sure we have competitive industries.
"There'll be no higher borrowing, no higher taxes and no higher bills from anyone else. And ultimately if we get the increase in investment and business activity I believe this could bring about, that produces a stronger economy overall."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
29 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'
Sarah Pochin had asked the Foreign Secretary whether the US felt unable to use the UK-US airbase on Diego Garcia, following the Government's deal with Mauritius over the Chagos Islands. Responding during a statement on the Middle East, Mr Lammy said the MP for Runcorn and Helsby should 'get off social media'. The UK-operated base in the Chagos Islands was not used in the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty has said. He added that the US did not ask to use it, as he answered questions from the Foreign Affairs Committee on Monday. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Pochin said: 'Is he (Mr Lammy) able to explain to the House whether the United States felt unable to use the Diego Garcia base and have to refuel, in a highly dangerous operation three times because of that, because of your deal that you did with the with the Mauritians, that would then tell the Chinese, that would then tell the Iranians?' Mr Lammy replied: 'The honourable lady has got (to) get off social media, has got to get some help… because she is swallowing conspiracy theories that should not be repeated in this House.' The deal over the Chagos Islands follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice which says the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. During the statement on Monday, Mr Lammy was pressed by MPs on the UK's position following the US military action. Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) said: 'Does His Majesty's Government support or oppose US military action against Iran at the weekend?' Mr Lammy replied: 'His Majesty's Government will continue to work with our closest ally, as I was last week in Washington DC.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin (Tunbridge Wells) said: 'What is UK Government policy on whether regime change should be pursued in Iran?' Mr Lammy replied: 'It is not our belief that it's for us to change the regime of any country, that it must be for the people themselves.' SNP MP Brendan O'Hara (Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber) said: 'We've been here for an hour, and still the Foreign Secretary appears incapable of saying whether he supports or condemns America's actions, or whether he regards them as being legal or not. 'And nowhere in this statement does the role of international law even merit a mention. So will the Foreign Secretary take this opportunity now to tell us whether he believes that America's unilateral action was compliant with international law?' Mr Lammy replied: 'I've got to tell (Mr O'Hara), I qualified and was called to the bar in 1995, I haven't practised for the last 25 years. 'It is not for me to comment on the United States' legal validity. I would refer him to article 51 and article two of the UN Charter, and he can seek his own advice.'
BBC News
37 minutes ago
- BBC News
What does the new Industial Strategy mean for Scotland?
Nearly a year since winning an election landslide, and struggling to respond to public impatience for change, some of the Labour government's key policies have been published this key one was the Spending Review for the next three years of day-to-day expenditure and four years of capital with that, and dependent on it, are reviews of defence and infrastructure, the latter having not much to do with Industrial Strategy is the latest, and it does affect Scotland, perhaps quite significantly. So what is it all about, and what could that effect be?The idea of an industrial strategy is for government to support industries of strategic importance, which it needs to retain, such as defence, and those that offer the best hopes for growth and jobs. Let's leave aside the history of governments trying to intervene in the market and support British industry. It's not an impressive saga - due to backing the wrong options, supporting declining industries at great cost, or failing to do enough for those showing most promise. And in doing so, there hasn't been much of a consistent future, according to the new industrial strategy, is about championing eight sectors - for support, reducing some costs (primarily energy), boosting trade, optimising the market, getting obstacles out the way, and getting enough recruits in place with the necessary in government jargon as the IS-8, these include clean energy (that means renewables and nuclear), advanced manufacturing, digital and technology, defence, life sciences, the creative sector, financial services and professional and business economy has an interest in energy-intensive industries seeing their bills cut by quarter - around 7,000 firms making, for instance, steel, chemicals, cars, glass, ceramics and cement. But it's not the main outcome for Scotland could be in the sweet spot for other elements of this strategy across all the sectors targeted for support, if all the published strategy's intentions get followed up, and if UK and Scottish governments can collaborate on joined-up policy. There's defence, including naval shipbuilding on the Clyde and Forth and missiles and radar in and around Edinburgh. Clydeside has a world-leading role in making small satellites. There's finance, in which Edinburgh and Glasgow jointly represent an important cluster for remains a lot of petro-chemicals going on at creative industries include Dundee's gaming and Edinburgh's universities around Scotland punch above their weight, notably on life sciences, spinning out digital and technology firms, and playing a big part in attracting international strategy brings a reminder of a Spending Review commitment to reinstate £750m of funds for a super-computer in Edinburgh. Clean energy Clean energy is the one worth watching most closely. It has the potential to transform much of the Scottish economy as well as the view out to sea and across the landscape where more pylons will requires co-operation from the Scottish government on faster planning, on which there's already some agreement, and the new strategy aims at an accelerated route to grid connections for growth the north of Scotland is set to produce much of the wind resource, there is an incentive to locate the most energy-intensive industries close to that resource, thus reducing the need for all those part of that is set to be the Acorn project of carbon capture and storage, centred on centres could be a feature, as well as making hydrogen energy from Scotland's abundant wind power and fresh may be strategic sites chosen, most likely by competition, to get government backing for clearance and pre-emptive grid links. Co-ordinating policy between Holyrood and Westminster is more likely to founder on nuclear energy, at least so long as the SNP runs the show in has opposed new nuclear power for decades, which hasn't been much of an issue while Torness and Hunterston have generated through their changing. The move to smaller, modular nuclear reactors could be part of the energy mix in Scotland, which is why the Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar, chose the Industrial Strategy launch day to visit Torness power station in East Lothian and point to the jobs and investment that could come from the Scottish government embracing a new generation of nuclear a point of difference between Labour and the SNP, and enthuses industrial trade unions. But the SNP can point to the relatively high cost of nuclear power and to its very long legacy of radioactive SNP government also has a party policy of urging defence industries to diversify to more peaceful products. Labour has also taken aim at that, in an era of fast-increasing defence spend and opportunity to see that grow the Spending Review promised six munitions factories, always available to back up Britain's defence needs. Scotland could hope to secure one of them, but that might require a change of heart in Holyrood, to embrace the business of making UK industrial strategy calls for Scotland to have a growth fund for defence. You can probably see how all this might play into next year's Holyrood ought to be easier progress to made through collaboration on skills, mostly devolved to Holyrood but with signs that Westminster wants to do more on Holyrood's turf. Oil and gas skills On training, the strategy has been met with warnings from the oil and gas sector, including its training body are pointing to the gap between declining jobs for those with oil and gas skills and the rise in employment for those in renewable energy. That strategy requires joined-up government as well. And with Whitehall's hostility to further oil and gas drilling, the energy lobby argues that it doesn't look very also a big decision yet to come with big implications for investment in offshore wind due "shortly" from the UK government - whether to change the single GB market for power to one with zonal prices. That could cut prices in Scotland, but at the expense of hostile responses have come from those sectors that don't gain from this strategy. If government picks winners and priority sectors, it relegates others or it makes of the strongest criticism is from hospitality, with its trade body saying today that this shows the government once again failing to realise the damage being done to the industry, following rampant price inflation, higher payroll tax and a higher minimum the Scottish government comes the response that parts of this were already in the innovation strategy set out more than three years ago by Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes. She is concerned that energy price cuts for industry won't happen for two less welcome parts will require Holyrood ministers to have a closer look at the detail and the implications - economic and political.
STV News
39 minutes ago
- STV News
British nationals evacuated from Israel as Iran conflict continues
The RAF has evacuated 63 British nationals from Israel as Tel Aviv and Tehran continue to exchange fire, the Foreign Secretary has told MPs. David Lammy told the Commons that an RAF A400 had taken the group of British nationals to Cyprus on Monday, from where they will be taken to the UK, adding that more flights will follow. He also confirmed that one British national in Israel had been injured during Iranian missile attacks and had been offered consular support. Downing Street said 'around 1,000' people had requested a seat on an evacuation flight – a quarter of the 4,000 who had registered their presence in Israel or Palestine with the Foreign Office. In his statement to the Commons, Lammy repeated his plea to Iran to return to the negotiating table following America's strikes on its nuclear programme. He said: 'My message for Tehran was clear, take the off ramp, dial this thing down, and negotiate with the United States seriously and immediately. 'The alternative is an even more destructive and far-reaching conflict, which could have unpredictable consequences.' He had previously urged Tehran to engage in negotiations, saying US President Donald Trump's apparent decision last week to delay US military action offered a two-week window for a diplomatic solution. On Monday, he said: 'We can and we must find a negotiated solution. The window has narrowed, but the risks of further escalation are so great and the costs so considerable for Britain and all in the region, that this is the Government's priority.' Lammy's statement came after an air raid by American B-2 stealth bombers and a salvo of submarine-launched missiles hit Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday night. The Foreign Secretary told MPs it was not yet clear how far the attack had set back Iran's nuclear ambitions, but said the need for a diplomatic solution remained. He added: 'Strikes cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades, nor any regime ambition to deploy that knowledge to build a nuclear weapon.' Lammy also told MPs that the Government has withdrawn staff from its embassy in Iran, telling the Commons it is operating 'remotely'. The Foreign Secretary also continued to face questions on the legality of the US strikes, but said it 'must rightly be a matter for the US government in relation to their action' and added: 'This was not our action. We have been clear that we were not involved.' Earlier, Downing Street had said that preventing Tehran from obtaining a nuclear bomb was a 'good thing' for the UK, but declined to comment on whether the US strikes complied with international law. It came as Qatar shut its air space temporarily on Monday to ensure the safety of citizens, residents and visitors. Dr Majed Al Ansari, spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said in a post on X: 'The competent Qatari authorities announce the temporary suspension of air traffic in the country's airspace, in order to ensure the safety of citizens, residents, and visitors.' The Foreign Office advised British nationals in Qatar to 'shelter in place' after a US security alert. The UAE has also closed its air space, according to flight-tracking website Flightradar24. Meanwhile, Israeli jets hit targets in Tehran on Monday including the security headquarters of the Revolutionary Guard Corps and Evin Prison, the regime's main site for detaining political prisoners and human rights activists. In turn, Iran carried out its own strikes against cities in Israel, and sparked fears of a wider regional conflict as it accused the US of crossing 'a very big red line'. Meanwhile, oil prices reached their highest level for nearly six months over fears a regional conflict could restrict supply, especially if Iran decided to blockade the Strait of Hormuz. The jump in prices prompted Trump to post on his Truth Social platform: 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' Lammy told MPs the Government was 'closely monitoring' the energy markets and urged Iran to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, saying a blockade would be 'a monumental act of economic self-harm' and make reaching a diplomatic solution even harder. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
