Rep. Ritchie Torres demands probe of Park Slope Food Co-op
The Park Slope Food Co-op is cooking up anti-Israel hate — and must be investigated by the city and state, a Bronx congressman urged this week.
Rep. Ritchie Torres fired off letters Friday to NYC Mayor Eric Adams, Gov. Kathy Hochul and other city and state honchos demanding the state Division of Human Rights and NYC Commission on Human Rights probe allegations of 'an insidious pattern of harassment, intimidation, and discrimination' against Jews — or anyone who is pro-Israel at the crunchy Brooklyn co-op.
'Anti-discrimination laws must be rigorously and impartially enforced — without exception,' the Bronx Democrat wrote Friday.
Advertisement
3 Rep. Ritchie Torres called on both the city and the state to probe the well-known Park Slope Food Co-Op for discrimination.
Matthew McDermott
The socialist-leaning Union Street institution has long been locked in a holy war over Middle East politics, highlighted by members in 2012 voting down joining an international boycott of Israel products during a contentious meeting that became ripe for mockery by Comedy Central's 'The Daily Show With Jon Stewart.'
But in the wake of Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 terror attacks on Israel and the ensuing war in Gaza, members who support the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement have seized control of the co-op's governance, according to Torres and members sympathetic to Israel.
Advertisement
'The cumulative effect is the creation of a hostile environment for Jews, particularly those who affirm a connection to the Jewish homeland,' wrote Torres, who is mulling a run a run for governor.
Zara Watkins, a co-op member who opposes the BDS movement, said she was menaced and cursed at last Halloween for wearing a costume paying tribute to the Israeli-made product Sabra hummus.
One man 'seething with rage' repeatedly circled her while 'muttering' under his breath, and another dropped an F-bomb and gave her the finger over her costume, she recalled.
3 Zara Watkins, a co-op member, paid tribute to Israel with a Sabra Hummus costume – but faced backlash from other members.
Obtained by the NY Post
Advertisement
'It really shook me up,' said the lawyer, adding her complaints to the co-op's 'dispute resolution committee' were blown off.
Jewish co-op member Ramon Maislen said he tried to thwart efforts by a pro-boycott campaign, known as the Park Slope Food Co-op Members for Palestine, to take over the PSFC's leadership last year by running for a seat on the co-op's board of directors.
Maislen, 43, said he not only lost to the pro-BDS faction, but was verbally abused by Israel-hating members on many occasions despite trying to broker a peaceful solution.
He and other members said they fear it's only a matter of time before the new leadership institutes a boycott on Israel products, without having members vote on it.
Advertisement
'We feel let down by the co-op's leadership, which has done nothing to fester out the hatred that has been simmering,' said Maislen, who heads a political action committee called 'Brooklyn BridgeBuilders' that has raised more than $56,000 to help defeat anti-Israel Park Slope Councilwoman Shahana Hanif in the June 24 Democratic primary.
3 The Park Slope Food Co-op has more than 16,000 members.
J.C. Rice
The real estate developer filed his own complaint with the state Human Rights Division in October over alleged harassment against members opposing the campaign to boycott Israeli products.
The harassment allegedly included pro-BDS members spewing Nazi slogans at Jews and sneering they 'smell of Palestinian blood.'
The complaint is still pending.
Reps for Park Slope Food Co-op Members for Palestine could not be reached for comment, but they wrote in an open letter that they back a boycott on Israel-made products to ensure the co-op is 'not supporting an apartheid government and unfolding genocide.'
Joe Holtz, co-founder of the food co-op, said the PSFC 'is against discrimination of any kind' and declined further comment.
Advertisement
The co-op, founded in 1973, requires its 16,000-plus members to work 2.75-hour shifts every six weeks, in exchange for the privilege of purchasing heavily discounted groceries and voting on store policies.
The city intends to review 'the troubling events at the co-op' and will respond to Torres 'with more information,' said mayoral spokeswoman Sophia Askari.
'Mayor Adams has been clear that far too often we see antisemitic propaganda masquerading as activism, and it has led to an unacceptable rise in antisemitism throughout our city and country,' said Askari.
'This is on full display in incidents at the Park Slope Food Co-op — where Jewish people are being harassed simply for being Jewish.'
Hochul spokesperson Matthew Janiszewski said the governor has a long history of taking 'aggressive action to fight antisemitism in New York,' but he added the office cannot comment on pending investigations before the Division of Human Rights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers
Washington, D.C. will pause the implementation of a measure that is set to eliminate the city's tipped wage system, as the yearslong debate over the law's adverse impacts continues to divide the District's left-leaning lawmakers. The D.C. Council on Tuesday voted 8–4 to pump the brakes on Initiative 82, the 2022 ballot referendum that mandated employers pay service workers the full minimum wage, as opposed to the traditional lower base pay that employees supplement with gratuities. (Employers were already required to make up the difference if an employee's take-home pay with tips did not equal the minimum wage.) Initiative 82 requires yearly increases to the city's tipped wage—which was previously $5.35 per hour—until it meets D.C.'s full minimum base pay—set to increase next month to $17.95 per hour—in 2027. July was supposed to see the tipped wage rise from $10 to $12. The Council's vote will delay that increase until October as Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, advocates for overturning the law entirely. This saga has been ongoing. D.C. voters weighed in on the issue in June 2018 when a majority approved Initiative 77, a ballot referendum that also abolished the tipped wage. But the Council countermanded that in October of that same year by a vote of 8–5, leading to a public outcry from some who said the government was undoing the will of the people. Indeed, the issue has long polarized a city that is dominated by liberal and progressive politics and politicians, some of whom have confronted that good intentions do not equal good outcomes. Restaurants often operate on thin profit margins; many simply cannot afford an explosive increase in labor costs. And a great deal of service workers themselves—who are in an industry that is not exactly known for being conservative politically—opposed the abolition of the tipped wage, knowing it could lead to a drop-off in job opportunities, hours, take-home pay, and viable restaurants. That was the general message Bowser sought to convey in a press conference last month when she announced her FY26 budget would push to overturn Initiative 82. "DC restaurants are facing a perfect storm—from increased operating and supply costs, to higher rents, and unique labor challenges," her presentation said. It also cited an April article in The Washington Post that noted food establishments in the District have been "pushed to the brink." That outcome should not have been a surprise. As I wrote in 2018 after Initiative 77 passed: In the wake of Seattle's 2015 minimum wage hike, the University of Washington conducted a study to explore long-term effects. While the policy is still too young to definitively assess the total impact on restaurants, findings suggest that food-service establishments hit a proverbial fork in the road: switch to a counter-service model or make the place an extravagant dining experience. The former all but eliminates tipping, hampering staff opportunity to maximize income. The latter increases prices drastically for the consumer, turning a casual lunch outing into an elitist affair. Somewhat puzzlingly, it also found that a significant portion of restaurant base wages surpassed $19 an hour, whereas positions paying the minimum plunged. That suggests an unfortunate trend: Many restauranteurs appear to be adapting to the higher wage requirements by prioritizing high-skill employees while kicking low-skill workers to the curb—the very people that Initiative 77 purports to help. Meanwhile, over in San Francisco, researchers from Harvard analyzed the dining scene and found that for every additional dollar added to the tipped wage, there was an additional 14 percent chance that a median rated restaurant (3.5 stars on Yelp) would close. Those aren't great odds for mom-n-pop neighborhood staples—particularly of the hole-in-the-wall variety—many of which are located in the District's low-income areas. Fast-forward to today, and those dire predictions are already becoming reality across D.C., even before the full minimum wage hits restaurants. "We're watching a beloved bar back, a beloved busser, a dishwasher have their jobs taken away," Valerie Graham, a D.C. restaurant worker, told Reason's Justin Zuckerman in his recent documentary about the fight to end the tipped wage. Chef Geoff Tracy, who owns two restaurants in D.C., meanwhile estimated that the law would add $400,000 to his payroll costs each year. There are countless more examples. It is understandably jarring for some to wrap their heads around the fact that many workers would prefer a lower minimum wage. It may not pop on a poster or in a chant at a rally. But economic reality is often more complicated than a protest sign can pithily convey. The post D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers appeared first on
Associated Press
18 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Israel says rockets fired from Syria for the first time since Bashar Assad's fall
DAMASCUS (AP) — The Israeli army said two rockets were fired from Syria into open areas in the Israel-controlled Golan Heights on Tuesday, marking the first time a strike has been launched toward Israel from Syrian territory since the fall of former Syrian President Bashar Assad in December. Syrian state media reported that Israel shelled the western countryside of Syria's Daraa province after the rocket launch. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a U.K.-based war monitor, also reported Israeli airstrikes that caused 'violent explosions' around the city of Quneitra and in the Daraa countryside. A group calling itself the Mohammed Deif Brigades — named after a Hamas military leader killed by an Israeli strike in Gaza last year — claimed the attack in a post on Telegram. The group first surfaced on social media a few days before. 'Until now, it's just a Telegram channel. It's not known if it is a real group,' said Ahmed Aba Zeid, a Syrian researcher who has studied armed factions in southern Syria. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said in a statement that Israel considers 'the Syrian president directly responsible for every threat and firing toward the State of Israel' and warned of a 'full response' to come 'as soon as possible.' Israel has been suspicious of the Islamist former insurgents who formed the new Syrian government, led by President Ahmad al-Sharaa, and has launched hundreds of airstrikes on Syria and seized a U.N.-patrolled buffer zone on Syrian territory since Assad's fall. Syria's foreign ministry said in a statement carried by the state-run TV channel that it has 'not yet verified the accuracy' of the reports of strikes launched from Syria toward Israel. 'We affirm that Syria has not and will not pose a threat to any party in the region,' the statement said. It condemned the Israeli shelling, which it said had resulted in 'significant human and material losses.' The U.S., which has warmed to al-Sharaa's government and recently moved to lift some sanctions previously imposed on Syria, has pushed for Syria to normalize relations with Israel. In a recent interview with the Jewish Journal, al-Sharaa said he wants to see a return to a 1974 ceasefire agreement between the two countries but stopped short of proposing immediate normalization, saying that 'peace must be earned through mutual respect, not fear.'
CNBC
19 minutes ago
- CNBC
New Elizabeth Warren report chronicles '130 days of Elon Musk'
Sen. Elizabeth Warren's office issued a report Tuesday chronicling Elon Musk's "130 days" in President Donald Trump's administration, accusing the billionaire of using his government perch to enrich himself and his businesses. "Musk and individuals acting on his behalf have been involved in dozens of questionable actions that raise questions about corruption, ethics and conflicts of interest," says the report by the Massachusetts Democrat's office. The 14-page report outlines more than 100 times that Warren's team believes Musk abused his role as a "special government employee" to benefit his private interests. It accuses Musk of violating "norms at an astonishing pace," actions that it calls "scandalous behavior regardless of whether it subjects him to criminal prosecution." The White House did not respond to CNBC's request for comment on the report. CNBC also reached out for comment to Musk, Quinn Emanuel partner Alex Spiro and Omead Afshar, a Tesla vice president. They did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk last week wrapped up his official government service leading DOGE, or Department of Government Efficiency," which is engaged in a broad effort to slash federal government spending. His four months leading DOGE as a special government employee were marked by unprecedented upheaval to the federal workforce and government agencies. Warren's team accuses Musk of using the federal government to promote his businesses. Musk, who is the world's richest person, is CEO of Tesla, SpaceX and artificial intelligence startup xAI. For instance, it highlights the time the White House lawn was turned into a temporary Tesla showroom. It also outlines more than two dozen instances where the Trump administration or government agencies "have entered or explored new lucrative contracts" with Musk's companies, such as Customs and Border Protection exploring using Starlink technology in surveillance towers. The report also outlines six times that the Trump administration or federal agencies halted enforcement actions against any of Musk's companies, or the times that DOGE targeted government agencies investigating the companies. For instance, it says that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration closed an investigation into Tesla for "allegedly violating workplace safety rules." "Musk's companies have received or are being considered for large contracts with the federal government, with foreign governments, and with other private sector companies," the report says. The report is not the first time that Musk has come under fire for alleged conflicts of interest during his DOGE tenure. Three Democratic senators, including Warren, sent a letter last week urging the Justice Department and other authorities to probe whether DOGE employees broke conflict-of-interest laws by owning stocks in companies that may have benefited from their government-cutting work.
