Aid groups call on Israel to end ‘weaponization' of aid in Gaza
Advertisement
The registration measures were 'designed to control independent organizations, silence advocacy, and censor humanitarian reporting,' they said.
The letter added that the rules violate European data privacy regulations, noting that in some cases aid groups have been given only seven days to comply.
COGAT, the Israeli military body in charge of humanitarian aid to Gaza, denied the letter's claims. It alleged the groups were being used as cover by Hamas to 'exploit the aid to strengthen its military capabilities and consolidate its control' in Gaza.
'The refusal of some international organizations to provide the information and cooperate with the registration process raises serious concerns about their true intention,' it said in a statement on Thursday. 'The alleged delay in aid entry … occurs only when organizations choose not to meet the basic security requirements intended to prevent Hamas's involvement.'
Advertisement
Israel has long claimed that aid groups and United Nations agencies issue biased assessments.
The aid groups stressed on Thursday that most of them haven't been able to deliver 'a single truck' of life-saving assistance since Israel implemented a blockade in March.
A vast majority of aid isn't reaching civilians in Gaza, where tens of thousands have been killed, most of the population has been displaced and famine looms. U.N. agencies and a small number of aid groups have resumed delivering assistance, but say the number of trucks allowed in remains far from sufficient.
Meanwhile, tensions have flared over Israel and the United States backing the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to serve as the main distributor of aid in the besieged territory. The American contractor, meant to replace the traditional U.N.-led aid distribution system in Gaza, has faced international condemnation after hundreds of Palestinians were killed while trying to get food near its distribution sites.
Israel has pressed U.N. agencies to accept military escorts to deliver goods into Gaza, a demand the agencies have largely rejected, citing their commitment to neutrality. The standoff has been the source of competing claims: Israel maintains it allows aid into Gaza that adheres to its rules, while aid groups that have long operated in Gaza decry the amount of life-saving supplies stuck at border crossings.
'Oxfam has over $2.5 million worth of goods that have been rejected from entering Gaza by Israel, especially WASH (water, sanitation and hygiene) items as well as food,' said Bushra Khalidi, an aid official with Oxfam in Gaza.
Aid groups' 'ability to operate may come at the cost of their independence and ability to speak out,' she added.
Advertisement
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
American Military News
26 minutes ago
- American Military News
Trump Says Putin Ready For Deal As Zelenskyy Shores Up Support With Starmer
This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission. Russian President Vladimir Putin is ready to make a deal over the war in Ukraine, US President Donald Trump said on the eve of a summit between the two world leaders in Alaska. Speaking in an interview on Fox News Radio on August 14, Trump said he believes Putin is 'convinced that he's going to make a deal' at the summit to be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson just outside Anchorage, Alaska. He's going to make a deal. I think he's going to, and we're going to find out,' Trump said. In Moscow, Putin praised Trump's efforts to end the war in a short video released by the Kremlin adding the White House was making 'quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities' and to 'reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved.' Hours before Trump spoke, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was in London to discuss security with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'Under any scenario, Ukraine will maintain its strength,' Zelenskyy said following the meeting at 10 Downing Street, the prime minister's residence in central London. 'We discussed in considerable detail the security guarantees that can make peace truly durable,' he added, suggesting such a possibility could arise if the United States succeeds 'in pressuring Russia to stop the killings.' Zelenskyy's visit to London followed his visit to another European capital, Berlin, on August 13, where he attended a video conference with several major European leaders who feared being sidelined by Trump and Putin. Trump appeared to try and allay those fears by saying in the Fox News interview that 'depending on what happens' during the Putin meeting, he could call Zelenskyy to quickly set up a second meeting involving all three leaders. 'Depending on what happens with my meeting, I'm going to be calling up President Zelenskyy, and let's get him over to wherever we're going to meet,' Trump said. 'The second meeting is going to be very, very important, because that's going to be a meeting where they make a deal. And I don't want to use the word 'divvy things up,' but you know, to a certain extent, it's not a bad term, OK?' he added. Zelenskyy has said he warned Trump during an August 13 call that Putin was 'bluffing' about his desire to end the war. Trump has warned Russia of 'very severe consequences' if it doesn't halt its war against Ukraine, but fears remain that the exclusion of Kyiv and Brussels in the talks could sideline their desire for the protection of fundamental European and Ukrainian security interests. He gave no details on what consequences Moscow could face if it doesn't put an end to more than 3 1/2 years of war in Ukraine, but he said the aim of the talks, to be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson just outside Anchorage, Alaska, is 'to end the war.' Can Trump-Putin Talks Lead To A Cease-Fire? The talks between Trump and Putin are aimed at finding a path to end the conflict, the biggest in Europe since World War II. Trump has said both sides will have to swap land to end intense fighting that has cost tens of thousands of lives on both sides and displaced millions of Ukrainians. Appearing to be on the outside looking in ahead of the talks, European leaders and Zelenskyy have been scrambling to make their voices heard. Washington appears to be preparing Kyiv and Moscow for major compromises to end the war, with US Vice President JD Vance warning any peace deal will likely leave both sides 'unhappy.' But French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump was 'very clear' in the August 13 call that he wants to achieve a cease-fire at the summit and that Trump had been clear that 'territorial issues relating to Ukraine…will only be negotiated by the Ukrainian president.' 'There are currently no serious territorial exchange schemes on the table…. I think that's a very important point in this regard. And we hope that it can be held in Europe, in a neutral country that is acceptable to all parties,' he added. If Trump's insistence on involving Ukraine is confirmed, it would help ease fears among Ukraine and its allies that leaders of the two superpowers could reach an accord that sells out Europe's and Ukraine's security interests and proposes giving Ukrainian territory to Moscow. 'Trump's thinking is apparently closer aligned with that of the Europeans than first feared by some,' one European official told RFE/RL after the call. Russia has consistently given the idea of a meeting with Zelenskyy the cold shoulder, suggesting it should only happen once the sides are close to signing a peace deal, not just a cease-fire agreement. That moment seems far off given the huge gap between the Russian and Ukrainian positions that persists on several major issues, including territory and security, despite three rounds of direct talks in Turkey since mid-May. The talks come at a pivotal moment, with Trump increasingly frustrated with Putin and the Russian president showing no signs of bending on the Kremlin's maximalist demands. Trump and Putin have held six phone calls, and the White House's lead envoy has traveled to Moscow at least three times. The decision to meet Putin face-to-face — something Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, refused to do following the invasion — reflects Trump's belief that his relationship with the Russian leader will yield a durable peace agreement.
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Our immigration laws let employers feign innocence
Earlier this summer, President Trump's secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, pledged a ' 100 percent American workforce.' The president really does intend to deport every single person here illegally, she claimed. In the meantime, however, if you want to hire someone without the Department of Homeland Security arresting you for it, it's easy. Just attest, on its one page ' Employment Eligibility Verification' form, that you have examined the worker's documentation, that it looks to you genuine, and that, to the best of your knowledge, this person can legally work in the U.S. Sign that, put it in a drawer, and leave it there forever — or, if you're unlucky, until U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids your workplace. If that happens, then after your employee has been whisked away by ICE, just hire someone new using the same form, and put it in the same drawer. That's a nice system — if you're an employer. OK, sometimes employers suffer consequences for such practices. It is rare, however. In fact, since 1986, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has never criminally prosecuted more than 25 employers in any given year. And of those, only a few have been convicted or served prison time. In fact, knowingly hiring ineligible workers is not even considered a crime until, as Homeland Security puts it in a handbook for employers, there's 'a pattern or practice' of it. In 2008, ICE raided a meatpacking plant in Postville, Iowa that ended with nearly 400 workers being arrested. Its owner — charged with conspiracy to harbor the undocumented for profit, aiding and abetting document fraud and aiding and abetting aggravated identity theft — was released wearing a GPS ankle bracelet and told not to leave northern Iowa. The immigration charges against him were eventually dropped. That's anecdotal, but indeed, that's the pattern or practice of enforcement. Which is not to say no wrists get slapped. When Immigration and Customs Enforcement raided another meatpacking plant in Bean Station, Tenn., in 2018 (97 workers detained, 54 held for immigration proceedings, 10 arrested on federal criminal charges), the company's owner — charged with wire fraud, tax evasion, conspiracy to harbor illegal immigrants and violating labor and environmental laws — was sentenced to 18 months in the same minimum-security prison camp where Jared Kushner's father and the former CEO of Enron whiled away their time. And bear in mind, his punishment is widely viewed as among the most severe ever for an employer after an ICE raid. Under Trump, ICE still likes meatpacking plants. It raided one in Omaha earlier this year and detained 100 workers. 'I don't understand why in the hell they were using false ID when they can get a visa,' its owner claimed, referring to people he'd hired. 'I was dumbfounded.' He didn't know they were using false ID? The phrase 'knowingly hiring ineligible workers' means two things in the legal sense. While it obviously includes a direct awareness that a person isn't eligible to work, it can also mean constructive knowledge of the same. Black's Law Dictionary defines 'constructive knowledge' as knowledge 'that one using reasonable care or diligence should have,' while the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services defines it as 'knowledge which may fairly be inferred through notice of certain facts and circumstances which would lead a person, through the exercise of reasonable care, to know about a certain condition.' Then there's this federal court description of it: 'a mental state in which the defendant is aware that the fact in question is highly probable but consciously avoids enlightenment.' According to the Pew Research Center, there are as many as 8.3 million undocumented people working in the U.S. This gives employers ample opportunity to consciously avoid enlightenment regarding their legal status. Such avoidance, in fact, is standard practice — aided and abetted by the Department of Homeland Security and its one-page form. Who loses in this state of affairs? About 8.3 million people, who are compelled by it into fear and limbo — and, for some, arrest, prison sentences, upheaval and deportation — while their employers feign innocence. Either employers and employees should both pay a price, or no one should. Any other practice is unjust.
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bolton: Trump tariffs may push India closer to Russia, China
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton on Wednesday said President Trump's tariffs may push India further away from the U.S. and into deeper alliances with Russia and China. The president previously threatened to impose a 25 percent tariff on India for purchasing oil from the Kremlin absent of similar punishments for China, who purchases more fuel from Russia. 'I can tell you the reaction in India to that, particularly with no tariffs slapped on China, which bought an awful lot more oil and gas from Russia, is the Indians are incandescent about this and there's talk of Putin coming to India later this year,' Bolton said during a Wednesday appearance on CNN's 'AC360.' 'There's talk of Prime Minister Modi of India going to China for the first time since 2018. Obviously, both Moscow and Beijing are going to try to bring India closer to them,' he added. China and the U.S. engaged in a high stakes trade war earlier this year, where tariff rates soared to triple digits, resulting in market scares and consumer anxiety about skyrocketing prices. Trump and his counterpart Xi Jinping agreed to lower rates to a moderate 10 percent for American exports and 30 percent for products imported from China. The president has shied away from engaging in another war with leaders in Beijing with tariffs over their dealings with the Kremlin. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi was notably close to Trump during his first term. The two held rallies together in both India and Texas to celebrate bilateral relations. At the time, Trump said India was 'America's greatest, most devoted, and most loyal friends.' But his tone has become more pointed over the country's tariff rates. 'What people don't like to say about India — they're the highest tariff nation. They have the highest tariff of anybody. We do very, very little business with India because their tariffs are so high,' Trump said last week. 'So we settled on 25 percent, but I think I'm going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours, because they're buying Russian oil. They're fueling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be very happy,' he added.
