Ohio business leaders urge support for child care measures in legislature
Ohio businesses say they're ready to implement pending legislation that would improve the child care industry, and in fact, some already have programs in place that they say prove the usefulness of not only business support, but state support in child care.
Ron Holbrook, of Sugar Creek Packing Company, said the food manufacturer works as an example of public-private partnerships and their ability to work. The company has 2,400 employees in two states, and already has two child care facilities open on or near company worksites.
'As an entrepreneurial, growth-oriented company … we have become intimately aware of 'barriers to work' that many Ohioans face, and have implemented programs to help overcome them,' Holbrook said during a meeting of the Ohio House Children and Human Services Committee.
The committee heard supportive testimony on both House Bill 2 and House Bill 41, bills aimed at increasing the funding and capacity for the child care sector.
H.B. 2 is a Republican-led reintroduction from the last General Assembly of a cost-sharing model that would split child care expenses between the state, employers and eligible employees of those companies. Under the 'Child Care Cred Program,' employers would apply for funds to help employees with child care in a first-come, first-served program that would be funded with $10 million, handled by the Ohio Department of Children and Youth.
H.B. 41 is also a Republican-led bill, one that would require the Ohio Department of Children and Youth to establish a grant program 'to expand child care capacity, support the state's workforce and aid in business growth and recruitment,' according to a bill analysis by the Ohio Legislative Service Commission.
The bill would create grants of up to $750,000 to help employers equip themselves with child care facilities and partner with child care providers, governmental agencies, or nonprofits 'on initiatives to create child care capacity.'
The basis of the child care program at Sugar Creek's facilities — one of which is at the Washington Court House campus and another near their Indiana facility — is utilizing the skills the company has of building and maintaining property and furniture, allowing licensed child care providers to run the day-to-day operations of taking care of children.
In their child care facilities, the first slots available go to Sugar Creek employees, and any leftover slots go to other residents of the community.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Child care and other benefits have been a focus for Sugar Creek Packing Company because Holbrook said the leadership of the company, specifically owner John Richardson, sees support for workers as a foundation for a successful company.
'He's always told me in my position that you can't have a successful business in a community that isn't successful, and a community can't be successful if their businesses aren't successful,' Holbrook said. 'Aside from that, we need the employees.'
For the Ohio Association of Goodwill Industries, having the needed services like child care helps the employees of their company, but also brings a solution to areas of the state where residents struggle to pay for child care, but also can't find child care to utilize at all.
In 2023, Goodwill of South Central Ohio became the first Goodwill in the state to open a child care center and only the fourth Goodwill in the Midwest to do so, according to Prince Garuba, executive director of the association.
'This center addresses a critical need in Ross County and the broader Appalachian region, which is classified as a child care desert where access to child care facilities is significantly limited,' Garuba said. 'The demand for more centers in this area was, and remains, urgent.'
Rick Carfagna, a former Republican legislator who is now senior vice president of government affairs for the Ohio Chamber of Commerce, said the cost-sharing model in H.B. 2 is priority legislation for the chamber, and something for which the chamber has heard plenty of support from businesses.
'They want to be a part of the solution, but they also don't want to assume total responsibility for solving the problem either,' Carfagna told the committee.
In Ohio, Carfagna said the child care problem is two-fold: child care is too scarce, and 'when it's available, it's too expensive.'
'We support these measures (in H.B. 2) and we believe that encouraging employers to privately invest in such an employee benefit is an innovative solution to address costs and reduce barriers to employment,' he said.
That loss of employees due to the rising costs and lack of access to child care has already had significant impacts in the country and in the coffers at the state level as well. The chamber is set to release its version of an annual report conducted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation showing state-by-state financial impacts due to a lack of child care.
The 'Untapped Potential' report has not been released for Ohio quite yet, but Carfagna said he'd seen a 'raw copy' that showed a loss of $5.5 billion in economic activity every year for the state 'because of the child care crisis,' and an estimated $1.52 billion in lost annual tax revenue.
The state could be clawing back that money by supporting the child care industry in the areas of cost, capacity, and staffing support, he said. Through the implementation of the grants included in H.B. 41, it could also be funding more programs like those already underway in the state that are using 'dormant or underutilized commercial properties that are ripe for conversion into child care spaces,' he told the committee.
Ashland County, for example, has a public-private collaborative called the Women's Fund Childcare Initiative, which plans to use donated land in an industrial park for a 12,400 square-feet child care space, after raising more than $4 million from donors to do so.
'These types of partnerships leverage existing facilities operated by trusted organizations within our communities to increase child care capacity,' Carfagna said.
While the measures to improve child care in the state are all important to the chamber, Carfagna also mentioned a component of the governor's executive budget that he and his organization hope to see continue on to the final draft: raising the eligibility for publicly funded child care to 200% of the federal poverty level.
When talking about the cost-sharing model in H.B. 2, Carfagna brought up other states which have implemented pilot programs similar to the model proposed for Ohio.
He said Michigan has now scaled their original pilot program out to now serve about 700 families, in partnership with about 200 employers. The state is kicking in about $3 million for that effort, but the state is also bolstered by publicly funded child care eligibility at the 200% level.
'We actually support that, top priority, keeping what's in the executive budget, but that's a separate issue,' Carfagna said.
Kentucky and Pennsylvania also set their eligibility at 200% of the federal poverty level, though Carfagna acknowledged that raising it from the current level of 145% doesn't come without costs itself.
'If you really want to make the biggest impact, that's the biggest impact,' Carfagna said. 'Now I also know that has the biggest cost to it.'
Budget conversations are ongoing in the Ohio legislature, with a deadline of July 1 to get the budget to the governor for his signature.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House Scrambles to Rename Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' as Backlash Rages
Republicans are hoping that giving President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' a new name will make voters stop hating the president's signature legislation and allow the GOP to keep control of Congress. Recent polls from CNN, CBS, and Fox News found the spending bill—which Republicans narrowly passed in July—has a net favorability rating of -19 percent to -22 percent, making it one of the most unpopular pieces of legislation ever to become law, CNN's polling guru Harry Enten said earlier this month. Republican lawmakers who have tried to sell the bill to their constituents during in-person town halls have been met with furious voters who booed, jeered and even hurled NSFW insults at their representatives. In response, the White House is trying to adopt a more concrete message that will appeal to a wider audience, NBC News reported. GOP strategists have advised lawmakers to pick a new name with some phrases that poll well, such as the 'Working Family Tax Cuts' act or even the 'Trump Working Family Tax Cuts,' according to NBC. The name is justified, Republicans say, because the spending bill eliminates taxes on tips and overtime. The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, however, found the legislation was regressive overall, with most of the benefits going to high-income households. Those earning $460,000 to $1.1 million will see their after-tax incomes rise by more than 4 percent, while households making less than $35,000 will receive just a 1 percent increase, which will be offset by higher health insurance and food costs. The bill cut about $1 trillion from Medicaid and is projected to add $3.4 trillion to the federal deficit over the next 10 years, which will in turn trigger more than $490 billion in additional Medicare cuts, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. An estimated 10 million people will lose health insurance as a result of the legislation, according to the CBO. In a statement, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told NBC News, 'The One Big Beautiful Bill was the largest tax cut for middle class and working families in American history. The White House looks forward to continue working with our friends on Capitol Hill to define what this historic piece of legislation means for Americans across the country.' Trump, for his part, is proud of the alliteration and has no plans to stop calling it the BBB, according to NBC.


Axios
39 minutes ago
- Axios
Colorado lawmakers tap reserve, end tax breaks to fill budget gap
Democratic leaders at the state Capitol outlined plans Tuesday to increase taxes, cut services and tap reserve funds to close a $1 billion budget hole spurred by President Trump's "big, beautiful bill." State of play: The legislation will generate fierce debate about how the state should manage its money when lawmakers return Thursday for a special legislative session. The core of the Democratic plan eliminates a handful of corporate tax breaks worth a combined $300 million to $400 million. The five-bill package will limit the business tax deduction, remove corporate tax breaks on foreign-sold goods and crack down on corporate profit shifting to tax haven countries. The intrigue: The most controversial proposal is lowering the state's 15% financial reserve by $200 million to $300 million, dropping it to 13% at a time when fiscal analysts are warning about a potential recession. Yes, but: Those moves are not enough to close a roughly $750 million gap. Instead, lawmakers will punt $300 million in spending cuts to balance the $44 billion state budget to the governor in consultation with the legislative Joint Budget Committee in the coming weeks. The governor is expected to move quickly to implement cuts by Sept. 1. What they're saying: "We're looking forward to rolling up our sleeves and making sure we can maintain strong fiscal stewardship here in Colorado," Gov. Jared Polis told Axios Denver in a recent interview. Between the lines: More than most states, Colorado is susceptible to changes in federal taxes because they affect state income taxes. The federal tax bill, known as H.R. 1, reduced the state's individual and corporate income taxes by an estimated $1.2 billion, according to the governor's office. The other side: Republican state lawmakers are touting the cuts from Trump's tax bill and pushing back against Democratic efforts to generate new tax revenue, suggesting spending cuts are what is most needed. Sen. Byron Pelton (R-Sterling) plans to introduce legislation requiring voter approval for any bill that changes state tax liability caused by federal tax law. What's next: Beyond the budget, Democratic lawmakers also plan to introduce legislation to stabilize the state's health care marketplaces amid projections that thousands of residents could lose their insurance and enable Planned Parenthood to accept Medicaid payments.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Georgia Republicans, against backdrop of 2026 election, push to eliminate state income tax
ATLANTA (AP) — As the 2026 election looms, Georgia Republicans seeking higher office met Tuesday to begin exploring plans for Georgia to eliminate the state's personal income tax. The Republican contenders for lieutenant governor sat on the committee spearheaded by Republican Burt Jones, who currently holds the role and is running for governor with U.S. President Donald Trump's endorsement. 'If we want to continue to stay competitive in the state of Georgia and continue to be the number one state to do business, we've got to be looking for ways to keep us competitive and make it where we have a competitive advantage over states that we are competing with all the time," Jones said. Most of the lawmakers on the panel praised the idea as one that would help working families and small businesses after hearing from Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform and a prominent conservative lobbyist for tax cuts. Currently, eight states, including Florida and Tennessee, don't tax individuals' income, according to the Tax Foundation, a tax policy think tank. Other states, including North Carolina and Louisiana, have reduced income taxes or are on their way to eliminating them. In Georgia, Democrats oppose the idea, saying it would benefit the wealthy rather than low-income people, who would face other levies. Atlanta Democrat Sen. Nan Orrock said Tuesday that eliminating the income tax would hurt vital services across the state by reducing state revenue, especially amid federal cuts to programs such as food stamps, education grants and disaster relief. 'I can go on and on with needs that we have now in many areas that would argue for having a robust revenue to meet the needs of our citizens," said Orrock. Norquist said states still generate revenue after cutting income taxes. One reason is that when businesses know states are on track to eliminate income taxes, he said, they start investing there, and residents flock over too. 'When you attract more people into the state and more investment into the state, you end up with both more money for individuals but also more tax revenue at lower rates,' said Norquist. Georgia income taxes are expected to bring in $20 billion for the state in 2026, accounting for almost half of state revenue, according to the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute Georgia Republican Gov. Brian Kemp signed into law this year income tax rebates of up to $500 and a reduction in taxes to 5.19% in January for all income earned in 2025. That's part of a long-term plan to cut Georgia's income tax rate to 4.99%, which could happen as early as next year. The law already took Georgia's former system of tax brackets and created a flat income tax. The state has also paid rebates on income taxes to taxpayers in recent years, thanks to billions in surplus cash, Higher-income taxpayers collect the most benefits from income tax reductions. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found two-thirds of the income tax cut benefits would flow to the highest-earning 20% of Georgians. Republicans said that was only natural because most Georgians in the lowest 20% of the income distribution are mostly exempt from state income taxes. Democratic gubernatorial candidates haven't ruled out tax reductions. Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms has suggested eliminating the state income tax for public school teachers, but said eliminating income taxes altogether would hurt funding for schools and raise costs for lower-income families. Republicans are still forging ahead. 'While the mechanics are up for debate, I think it's clear that the end goal is not,' said Sen. Appropriations Committee Chairman Blake Tillery, a Vidalia Republican who is running for lieutenant governor. ___ Kramon is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.