Ohio business leaders urge support for child care measures in legislature
Child care worker Marci Then helps her daughter, Mila, 4, put away toys. (File photo by Elaine S. Povich/Stateline.)
Ohio businesses say they're ready to implement pending legislation that would improve the child care industry, and in fact, some already have programs in place that they say prove the usefulness of not only business support, but state support in child care.
Ron Holbrook, of Sugar Creek Packing Company, said the food manufacturer works as an example of public-private partnerships and their ability to work. The company has 2,400 employees in two states, and already has two child care facilities open on or near company worksites.
'As an entrepreneurial, growth-oriented company … we have become intimately aware of 'barriers to work' that many Ohioans face, and have implemented programs to help overcome them,' Holbrook said during a meeting of the Ohio House Children and Human Services Committee.
The committee heard supportive testimony on both House Bill 2 and House Bill 41, bills aimed at increasing the funding and capacity for the child care sector.
H.B. 2 is a Republican-led reintroduction from the last General Assembly of a cost-sharing model that would split child care expenses between the state, employers and eligible employees of those companies. Under the 'Child Care Cred Program,' employers would apply for funds to help employees with child care in a first-come, first-served program that would be funded with $10 million, handled by the Ohio Department of Children and Youth.
H.B. 41 is also a Republican-led bill, one that would require the Ohio Department of Children and Youth to establish a grant program 'to expand child care capacity, support the state's workforce and aid in business growth and recruitment,' according to a bill analysis by the Ohio Legislative Service Commission.
The bill would create grants of up to $750,000 to help employers equip themselves with child care facilities and partner with child care providers, governmental agencies, or nonprofits 'on initiatives to create child care capacity.'
The basis of the child care program at Sugar Creek's facilities — one of which is at the Washington Court House campus and another near their Indiana facility — is utilizing the skills the company has of building and maintaining property and furniture, allowing licensed child care providers to run the day-to-day operations of taking care of children.
In their child care facilities, the first slots available go to Sugar Creek employees, and any leftover slots go to other residents of the community.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Child care and other benefits have been a focus for Sugar Creek Packing Company because Holbrook said the leadership of the company, specifically owner John Richardson, sees support for workers as a foundation for a successful company.
'He's always told me in my position that you can't have a successful business in a community that isn't successful, and a community can't be successful if their businesses aren't successful,' Holbrook said. 'Aside from that, we need the employees.'
For the Ohio Association of Goodwill Industries, having the needed services like child care helps the employees of their company, but also brings a solution to areas of the state where residents struggle to pay for child care, but also can't find child care to utilize at all.
In 2023, Goodwill of South Central Ohio became the first Goodwill in the state to open a child care center and only the fourth Goodwill in the Midwest to do so, according to Prince Garuba, executive director of the association.
'This center addresses a critical need in Ross County and the broader Appalachian region, which is classified as a child care desert where access to child care facilities is significantly limited,' Garuba said. 'The demand for more centers in this area was, and remains, urgent.'
Rick Carfagna, a former Republican legislator who is now senior vice president of government affairs for the Ohio Chamber of Commerce, said the cost-sharing model in H.B. 2 is priority legislation for the chamber, and something for which the chamber has heard plenty of support from businesses.
'They want to be a part of the solution, but they also don't want to assume total responsibility for solving the problem either,' Carfagna told the committee.
In Ohio, Carfagna said the child care problem is two-fold: child care is too scarce, and 'when it's available, it's too expensive.'
'We support these measures (in H.B. 2) and we believe that encouraging employers to privately invest in such an employee benefit is an innovative solution to address costs and reduce barriers to employment,' he said.
That loss of employees due to the rising costs and lack of access to child care has already had significant impacts in the country and in the coffers at the state level as well. The chamber is set to release its version of an annual report conducted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation showing state-by-state financial impacts due to a lack of child care.
The 'Untapped Potential' report has not been released for Ohio quite yet, but Carfagna said he'd seen a 'raw copy' that showed a loss of $5.5 billion in economic activity every year for the state 'because of the child care crisis,' and an estimated $1.52 billion in lost annual tax revenue.
The state could be clawing back that money by supporting the child care industry in the areas of cost, capacity, and staffing support, he said. Through the implementation of the grants included in H.B. 41, it could also be funding more programs like those already underway in the state that are using 'dormant or underutilized commercial properties that are ripe for conversion into child care spaces,' he told the committee.
Ashland County, for example, has a public-private collaborative called the Women's Fund Childcare Initiative, which plans to use donated land in an industrial park for a 12,400 square-feet child care space, after raising more than $4 million from donors to do so.
'These types of partnerships leverage existing facilities operated by trusted organizations within our communities to increase child care capacity,' Carfagna said.
While the measures to improve child care in the state are all important to the chamber, Carfagna also mentioned a component of the governor's executive budget that he and his organization hope to see continue on to the final draft: raising the eligibility for publicly funded child care to 200% of the federal poverty level.
When talking about the cost-sharing model in H.B. 2, Carfagna brought up other states which have implemented pilot programs similar to the model proposed for Ohio.
He said Michigan has now scaled their original pilot program out to now serve about 700 families, in partnership with about 200 employers. The state is kicking in about $3 million for that effort, but the state is also bolstered by publicly funded child care eligibility at the 200% level.
'We actually support that, top priority, keeping what's in the executive budget, but that's a separate issue,' Carfagna said.
Kentucky and Pennsylvania also set their eligibility at 200% of the federal poverty level, though Carfagna acknowledged that raising it from the current level of 145% doesn't come without costs itself.
'If you really want to make the biggest impact, that's the biggest impact,' Carfagna said. 'Now I also know that has the biggest cost to it.'
Budget conversations are ongoing in the Ohio legislature, with a deadline of July 1 to get the budget to the governor for his signature.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
List: Republican candidates for NJ governor
The Brief Nearly a dozen candidates are competing for the chance to succeed Gov. Murphy. In the Republican primary, former state Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli has President Trump's endorsement. Primary election day is Tuesday, June 10. Polls close at 8 p.m. NEW JERSEY - Nearly a dozen candidates are competing in New Jersey for the chance to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. MORE: Who is ahead in the NJ governor race? Polls, candidates, updates MORE: How to vote in New Jersey In the Republican primary, former state Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli has President Donald Trump's endorsement. ***Click on each name to jump to their section. Jack Ciattarelli Jon Bramnick Mario Kranjac Justin Barbera Ciattarelli, a Somerville native and business founder, is making another run for New Jersey governor. This time, he has the backing of President Trump. Ciattarelli nearly unseated Murphy back in 2021 and finished second in the 2017 GOP primary. This time, he says he is focused on tackling New Jersey's affordability crisis, citing rising taxes, tolls, and fees. Spadea is an entrepreneur and host of the Bill Spadea Show on NJ101.5 FM. Spadea says he's focused on New Jersey's budget and ending the illegal immigration crisis, which he claims costs taxpayers too much. Bramnick says he wants to create a government efficiency panel with private residents and business leaders to identify waste and areas for improvement. He's been in the State Senate since 2022 and was an Assemblyman for nearly two decades prior from 2003-2021. Kranjac is the former mayor of Englewood Cliffs, serving from 2016 to 2024. He calls himself a political outsider determined to change Trenton. Since leaving office, he has continued as a corporate attorney and venture capitalist. Barbera is a contractor and real estate developer from Burlington County. A Marlton native, Barbera's career includes work as a general contractor, insurance claim mitigator, freight carrier, and owner-operator of a CDL A flatbed and commercial snow service operation. Primary election day is Tuesday, June 10. Polls close at 8 p.m. Click HEREfor more information. Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill survey: According to a May survey, 44% of registered New Jersey Republican voters said they would vote for former state Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, while 18% support talk radio host Bill Spadea. A month ahead of the primary, 23% of GOP voters said they were undecided. SurveyUSA: The poll conducted in May only asked voters about Ciattarelli, who "has favorability ratings of 40%-36% among the broader electorate and 63%-19% among Trump voters," accordin gto the New Jersey Globe. Trump endorsement: President Trump has endorsed Ciattarelli in May and campaigned for him in a virtual rally.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Debate within the debate: Should Pennsylvania's tipped minimum wage rise too?
HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — The overall debate is not new. Neither are the arguments: All surrounding states — even West Virginia, supporters of raising Pennsylvania's base pay from $7.25 are always sure to note — have higher minimum wages than Pennsylvania. But raising it could cause consumer prices to rise and cost jobs, opponents always say. But within that familiar debate — this time over House Bill 1549, which would raise minimum wage to $15 (and eventually beyond) for most Pennsylvanians at different rates depend on which counties they call home — is the question of whether if that happens, employers of tipped workers (like restaurants who employ servers) should have to pay more than the $2.83 per hour, before tips, they're currently required to pay. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now What's already true, and wouldn't change under any plan, is: For tipped workers who don't earn much, employers have to make up the difference between tipped minimum wage and full minimum wage. But under the proposed bill, tipped minimum wage would rise to 60 percent of regular minimum wage — or, for example, $9.00 when minimum wage in a given county rises to $15. The problem with that, according to restaurant industry leaders? 'What this tripling of the base wage would mean, is restaurants would need to recoup those additional expenses somehow,' said Joe Massaro of the Pennsylvania Restaurant & Lodging Association (PRLA). New Rite Aid locations listed for closure in Pennsylvania: court docs Massaro cited the experience of Washington, D.C., where years ago, the city's Democratic mayor and city council previously overturned a law — backed by other Democrats and approved by voter referendum — that would have required restaurants to pay employees full minimum wage before tips. Now leaders there have paused a minimum wage hike, under a subsequently passed referendum, due to go into effect July 1. D.C. restaurants recouped the higher wages 'mostly by adding service charges to the bill,' Massaro said. 'And when that service charge is added, then consumers customers pay less in tips, so servers were reporting making less money after the change.' Massaro said the average tipped Pennsylvania employee earns $27 per hour. PRLA backs a proposed amendment by State Rep. Robert Leadbeter (R-Columbia) to House Bill 1549, which would exclude employers of tipped workers from the proposed minimum wage hike. The overall legislation enjoys strong support by Democrats, who narrowly control the commonwealth's House of Representatives, but faces tougher odds in the Republican-controlled Senate, which would need to pass the bill before it could go to Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, who supports raising Pennsylvania's minimum wage. Including Pennsylvania, 20 states have minimum wages equal to the federal minimum of $7.25 per hour. But most are in the south or mountain west; New Hampshire is the only northeastern state aside from Pennsylvania with a $7.25 hourly minimum wage. Minimum wages among states bordering Pennsylvania range from $8.75 in West Virginia to $15.50 in New York. Among all states and territories, Washington, D.C.'s $17.50 hourly minimum is highest, followed by California's $16.50. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
S.C. senator attempt to stop state lawmaker pay increase
COLUMBIA, S.C. (WSPA) – A legal battle is underway over state lawmakers giving themselves more money. One senator said the way it was done is unconstitutional, but the lawmaker who pushed for the increase the state's new budget, lawmakers voted to more than double their in-district compensation, increasing it from around $1,000 a month to $2,500 a month. The move was led by Republican Senator Matt Leber (R – Charleston), who said it's not a pay raise but a reimbursement to help public servants cover travel and district costs. Leber sponsored a bill that had the same language and said he will try to pass the bill in January. He said lawmakers have not gotten a raise in in-district expense since 1994, and they need to adjust for inflation. Therefore, he said it's not a salary raise. 'If we don't make this at least affordable for the everyday person to run for office, then we're not going to get the everyday person to run for office,' Leber said. 'It's just going to be elites up there running everything, and they love this argument. ' Not everyone agrees on the decision. '$1,000 a month arrives in legislators bank accounts via direct deposit. There are no receipts required to submit for reimbursement. It's just $1,000 deposit into the account. Legislators are free to expend those funds however they deem appropriate,' said Senator Wes Climer (R – York). The increase was passed as an amendment to the budget and Climer said it wasn't the right way to do it. 'Regardless of how you feel about a legislative pay raise, this is the wrong way to do it. Violate the principle that the legislature cannot take the people's money and appropriate it to themselves in real time,' Climer added.'The proviso method is there for us to use more difficult for the current crop of legislators to continue to work. I felt like it was right to go for it now. ' Climer is now suing the State Treasurer's Office, and said the South Carolina Constitution bans lawmakers from increasing their own compensation before an election. He and retired Senator, Dick Harpootlian, have asked the South Carolina Supreme Court to step in, arguing the vote violates the state constitution. 'We are standing here and have filed the suit in order to protect or to defend the constitutional safeguards against the general assembly,' Climer added. Governor Henry McMaster chimed in on the issue last week. 'They are the ones that are trying to pay those expenses. In good faith, if they use that money for the in-district expenses as they're supposed to, then if that amount is legitimate, then that's a proper law,' McMaster said. The South Carolina Supreme Court has issued a scheduling order requiring the state to respond to the injunction request by next Monday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.