Canadians could get more affordable version of Ozempic in early 2026. Here's how
Ozempic is a social media darling — with celebrities singing its praises and people posting about major weight loss. But a patient can pay $400 a month for such medications, says Dr. Sanjeev Sockalingam, Obesity Canada's scientific director and a professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto.
He says his patients have been frustrated and disappointed by the "prohibitive" cost.
But now, several companies say they intend to market cheaper versions of such drugs. Here's what medical experts say:
What are these medications?
Injectable prescription drugs, sold as Ozempic and Wegovy, and the pill Rybelsus all contain the ingredient semaglutide. This class of medication, known as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1s), regulate blood sugar levels and appetite.
Health Canada previously approved Ozempic to treat diabetes and Wegovy for weight loss. Nearly 33 per cent of Canadians (10.6 million people) were obese in 2023, according to a recent study.
How much could the price come down?
Novo Nordisk, maker of Ozempic and Wegovy, will effectively lose its price protection on those drugs in Canada in January, opening the door to generic versions.
Mina Tadrous, an associate professor who evaluates pharmaceutical prices at the University of Toronto, says three or four companies have them in development or are starting the paperwork.
Tadrous says the number of companies affects pricing.
"The classic framework is that if you only have one, it comes down from the list price to 75 per cent," Tadrous said. "If we have two, it goes down to 50 per cent and if we have three it hits 25 per cent."
Three manufacturers could bring the price down to $100 from $400 for the same strength of semaglutide product, Tadrous estimates.
Have the generic medications been approved?
Not yet. Health Canada needs to consider each company's application to make and sell generic versions of the injectable medication, known as a biosimilar.
Since they won't require new clinical trials, they could be available within weeks of Health Canada's approval — "grandfathered" in, based on the original trials, says Sockalingam.
"It's really about the equivalency of the medication in terms of its availability in the body and its metabolism."
Will insurance cover them?
Semaglutide is already listed on the Ontario drug formulary — a list of publicly covered medications for those over age 65, people living in long-term care homes, and for people receiving Ontario Works or disability payments.
That means as soon as a generic form is available, those on public drug insurance plans could switch to it, and private insurance plans like those offered by employers likely will do the same, Tadrous says.
Dr. Kaberi Dasgupta, a professor of medicine at McGill University and a researcher, says this would be good news for people who have excess weight and resulting complications but who can't currently afford the branded medications.
Generic versions will "open the door for many more people," Dasgupta said.
What's involved in taking these medications?
Dasgupta says it's important for people taking semaglutide to have it prescribed by a physician and then monitored.
"We should be insisting on having publicly accessible good diet and physical activity supports because we live in a society where people are gaining more and more weight," Dasgupta said.
In England, for example, semaglutide is recommended with at least 13 hours of counselling on diet and physical activity.
What about drug shortages?
Because some medications also treat Type 2 diabetes, doctors and health-care policy experts continue to watch supply chains to prevent shortages.
Dr. Harpreet Bajaj, an endocrinologist with LMC Healthcare in Brampton, Ont., recalls many times when patients with diabetes had to go off Ozempic or other GLP-1 medications because none was available.
"Having a biosimilar, which is made by an entirely new pharmaceutical company and maybe … made in a more cost-effective way would also relieve some pressures on any future shortages that we might expect," Bajaj said.
Dasgupta, who also treats diabetes, said in her experience in Quebec, sometimes the medication is more accessible through the province's publicly funded plan for those who fulfil the medical criteria than through some private insurers that focus more strongly on cost.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Here's why 3 rural Wisconsin hospitals are deemed 'at-risk' of closing
Three rural hospitals in Wisconsin are defined as "at-risk" of closing, according to a reputable center for health services research. The list of the rural hospitals from each state was released after U.S. senators requested the information from the center and then attached it in a letter to President Donald Trump, among others. Here are the hospitals named in Wisconsin and why they are in the limelight. A rural hospital is labeled as at risk when it meets one or both of two criteria, according to the documents: the hospital is in the top 10% Medicaid payer mix of rural hospitals across the country, and that the hospital has experienced three consecutive years of negative total margin. Here are the three hospitals deemed at-risk in Wisconsin: Holy Family Memorial MCHS Oakridge Aspirus Stanley Hospital More: Meet Dr. Dolly Paw-ton: Facility dog helps patients at Marshfield Children's Hospital The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research is part of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The center, according to their site, seeks to improve the health of individuals, families, and populations by understanding the problems, issues, and alternatives in the design and delivery of health care services. More: Manitowoc's Aurora Medical Center earns 4th straight 'Rural and Community Health' honor U.S. Sens Edward J. Markey, Ron Wyden, Jeffrey A. Merkley, and Charles E. Schumer wrote to President Trump, Majority Leader John Thune, and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson in response to the reconciliation package that ultimately Trump signed on the Fourth of July. They sent the letter on June 12. The senators argued that the health care cuts could impact vulnerable, rural hospitals. "Enacting these drastic health care cuts that will kick millions of people off their health insurance coverage, rural hospitals will not get paid for the services they are required by law to provide to patients," authors wrote, adding that the hospitals will face "deeper financial strain that could lead to negative health outcomes for the communities they serve." More: Derrick Van Orden claims credit for Wisconsin's extra Medicaid dollars after voting to cut the program The bill, now signed into law, is projected to cut $1 trillion mostly from Medicaid and Affordable Care Act insurance plans and eliminate insurance coverage for 11.8 million people over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, as reported by USA Today. About one in five Wisconsinites are covered by Medicaid. Tom Ackerman covers breaking news and trending news along with general news for the Springfield State Journal-Register. He can be reached at tackerman@ This article originally appeared on State Journal-Register: Cuts to Medicaid could lead to 3 Wisconsin hospitals closing
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Adaptive Biotechnologies to Report Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results on August 5, 2025
SEATTLE, July 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation (Nasdaq: ADPT), a commercial stage biotechnology company that aims to translate the genetics of the adaptive immune system into clinical products to diagnose and treat disease, today announced it will report financial results for the second quarter 2025 after market close on Tuesday, August 5, 2025. Company management will webcast a corresponding conference call beginning at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time / 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time. Live audio of the webcast will be available on the 'Investors' section of the company website at: The webcast will be archived and available for replay within 24 hours after the event. About Adaptive Biotechnologies Adaptive Biotechnologies ('we' or 'our') is a commercial-stage biotechnology company focused on harnessing the inherent biology of the adaptive immune system to transform the diagnosis and treatment of disease. We believe the adaptive immune system is nature's most finely tuned diagnostic and therapeutic for most diseases, but the inability to decode it has prevented the medical community from fully leveraging its capabilities. Our proprietary immune medicine platform reveals and translates the massive genetics of the adaptive immune system with scale, precision and speed. We apply our platform to partner with biopharmaceutical companies, inform drug development, and develop clinical diagnostics across our two business segments: Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) and Immune Medicine. Our commercial products and clinical pipeline enable the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of diseases such as cancer and autoimmune disorders. Our goal is to develop and commercialize immune-driven clinical products tailored to each individual patient. ADAPTIVE INVESTORSKarina Calzadilla, Vice President, Investor Relations and FP&A201-396-1687investors@ ADAPTIVE MEDIAErica Jones, Associate Corporate Communications Director206-279-2423media@
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What causes obesity? A major new study is upending common wisdom.
Obesity is uncommon among Hadza hunter-gatherers in Tanzania, Tsimane forager-farmers in Bolivia, Tuvan herder-farmers in Siberia, and other people in less-developed nations. But it's widespread among those of us in wealthy, highly industrialized nations. Why? A major study published this week in PNAS brings surprising clarity to that question. Using objective data about metabolic rates and energy expenditure among more than 4,000 men and women living in dozens of nations across a broad spectrum of socioeconomic conditions, the study quantified how many calories people from different cultures burn most days. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. For decades, common wisdom and public health messaging have assumed that people in highly developed nations, like the United States, are relatively sedentary and burn far fewer daily calories than people in less-industrialized countries, greatly increasing the risk for obesity. But the new study says no. Instead, it finds that Americans, Europeans and people living in other developed nations expend about the same number of total calories most days as hunter-gatherers, herders, subsistence farmers, foragers and anyone else living in less-industrialized nations. That unexpected finding almost certainly means inactivity is not the main cause of obesity in the U.S. and elsewhere, said Herman Pontzer, a professor of evolutionary anthropology and global health at Duke University in North Carolina and a senior author of the new study. What is, then? The study offers provocative hints about the role of diet and some of the specific foods we eat, as well as about the limits of exercise, and the best ways, in the long run, to avoid and treat obesity. - - - Is diet or inactivity causing obesity? 'There's still a lively debate in public health about the role of diet and activity' in the development of obesity, Pontzer said, especially in wealthy nations. Some experts believe we're exercising too little, others that we're eating too much, and still more that the two contribute almost equally. Understanding the relative contributions of diet and physical activity is important, Pontzer noted, because we can't effectively help people with obesity unless we first tease out its origins. But few large-scale studies have carefully compared energy expenditure among populations prone to obesity against those more resistant to it, which would be a first step toward figuring out what drives weight gain. So, for the new study, Pontzer and his 80-plus co-authors gathered existing data from labs around the world that use doubly labeled water in metabolism studies. Doubly labeled water contains isotopes that, when excreted in urine or other fluids, allow researchers to precisely determine someone's energy expenditure, metabolic rates and body-fat percentage. It's the gold standard in this kind of research. They wound up with data for 4,213 men and women from 34 countries or cultural groups, running the socioeconomic gamut from tribes in Africa to executives in Norway. They calculated total daily energy expenditures for everyone, along with their basal energy expenditure, which is the number of calories our bodies burn during basic, biological operations, and physical activity energy expenditure, which is how many calories we use while moving around. - - - A new theory of how our metabolisms work After adjusting for body size (since people in wealthy nations tend to have larger bodies, and larger bodies burn more calories), they started comparing different groups. Anyone expecting a wide range of energy expenditures, with hunter-gatherers and farmer-herders at the high end and deskbound American office workers trailing well behind, would be wrong. Across the board, the total daily energy expenditures of the 4,213 people were quite similar, no matter where they lived or how they spent their lives. Although the hunter-gatherers and other similar groups moved around far more throughout the day than a typical American, their overall daily calorie burns were nearly the same. The findings, though counterintuitive, align with a new theory about our metabolisms, first proposed by Pontzer. Known as the constrained total energy expenditure model, it says that our brains and bodies closely monitor our total energy expenditure, keeping it within a narrow range. If we start consistently burning extra calories by, for instance, stalking prey on foot for days or training for a marathon, our brains slow down or shut off some tangential biological operations, often related to growth, and our overall daily calorie burn stays within a consistent band. - - - The role of ultra-processed foods The upshot is that 'there is no effect of economic development on size-adjusted physical activity expenditure,' Pontzer says. In which case, the fundamental problem isn't that we're moving too little, meaning more exercise is unlikely to reduce obesity much. What could, then? 'Our analyses suggest that increased energy intake has been roughly 10 times more important than declining total energy expenditure in driving the modern obesity crisis,' the study authors write. In other words, we're eating too much. We may also be eating the wrong kinds of foods, the study also suggests. In a sub-analysis of the diets of some of the groups from both highly and less-developed nations, the scientists found a strong correlation between the percentage of daily diets that consists of 'ultra-processed foods' - which the study's authors define as 'industrial formulations of five or more ingredients' - and higher body-fat percentages. We are, to be blunt, eating too much and probably eating too much of the wrong foods. 'This study confirms what I've been saying, which is that diet is the key culprit in our current [obesity] epidemic,' said Barry Popkin, a professor at the Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an obesity expert. 'This is a well-done study,' he added. Other experts agree. 'It's clear from this important new research and other studies that changes to our food, not our activity, are the dominant drivers of obesity,' said Dariush Mozaffarian, director of the Food is Medicine Institute at Tufts University in Boston. The findings don't mean, though, that exercise is unimportant, Pontzer emphasized. 'We know that exercise is essential for health. This study doesn't change that,' he said. But the study does suggest that 'to address obesity, public health efforts need to focus on diet,' he said, especially on ultra-processed foods, 'that seem to be really potent causes of obesity.' Related Content He may have stopped Trump's would-be assassin. Now he's telling his story. He seeded clouds over Texas. Then came the conspiracy theories. How conservatives beat back a Republican sell-off of public lands