&w=3840&q=100)
Trump's campaign against law firms sees setback as judge blocks order
The ruling on Tuesday in favour of WilmerHale marks the third time this month that a federal judge in Washington has deemed Trump's series of law firm executive orders
AP Washington
US President Donald Trump's campaign against the legal profession hit another setback as a federal judge struck down an executive order that sought to sanction one of the country's most prestigious law firms.
The ruling on Tuesday in favour of WilmerHale marks the third time this month that a federal judge in Washington has deemed Trump's series of law firm executive orders to be unconstitutional and permanently barred their enforcement.
The cornerstone of the American system of justice is an independent judiciary and an independent bar willing to tackle unpopular cases, however daunting. The Founding Fathers knew this! wrote US district judge Richard Leon.
To permit the order to stand, Leon wrote, would be unfaithful to the judgment and vision of the Founding Fathers".
The firm applauded the ruling from Leon, an appointee of former Republican president George W Bush.
The court's decision to permanently block the unlawful executive order in its entirety strongly affirms our foundational constitutional rights and those of our clients. We remain proud to defend our firm, our people, and our clients, a spokesperson for the firm said.
The ruling was similar to the one from Friday by a different judge that rejected a Trump edict against the firm of Jenner and Block and another one from earlier in the month in favour of the firm Perkins Coie.
Taken together, the decisions have marked a blunt repudiation of Trump's actions, which the law firms have called an affront to the legal system and inconsistent with the foundational principle that lawyers can represent clients or causes without government reprisal.
The firms faced executive orders that sought to impose the same set of punishing sanctions, including mandating the suspension of attorney security clearances and barring employees from accessing federal buildings.
The orders have been part of a broader effort by the president to reshape American civil society by targeting perceived adversaries in hopes of extracting concessions from them and bending them to his will.
In his ruling, Leon said the provisions of the order against WilmerHale constitute a staggering punishment for the firm's protected speech! The Order is intended to, and does in fact, impede the firm's ability to effectively represent its clients! He added: The Order shouts through a bullhorn: If you take on causes disfavoured by President Trump, you will be punished! Several of the firms singled out for sanctions have either done legal work that Trump has opposed, or currently have or previously had associations with prosecutors who at one point investigated the president.
The order against WilmerHale, for instance, cited the fact that the firm previously employed former Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller, who led an investigation during Trump's first term into potential ties between Russia and Trump's 2016 campaign.
Other major firms have sought to avert orders by preemptively reaching settlements that require them, among other things, to collectively dedicate hundreds of millions of dollars in free legal services in support of causes the Trump administration says it supports.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
India weighs legal uncertainties around Trump tariffs as trade pact talks start this week
India is weighing legal uncertainties surrounding Trump tariffs as it prepares for the next round of trade talks this week, an official said. The official said these developments could influence India's approach to the proposed bilateral trade pact with the US. A team of US officials is visiting here from June 5 to hold talks with their Indian counterparts on the proposed pact. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like O novo dispositivo que os idosos usam para ajudar na neuropatia (dor nos nervos) A arte do herbalismo Undo Though India is looking for a balanced and a mutually beneficial trade agreement with the US, "what we get as compared to other countries, will determine what we ultimately finalise in the deal", the official said. The US is negotiating trade pacts with over 75 countries, including China. It has already finalised a pact with the UK. Live Events Asked if some kind of interim trade deal can be agreed upon before July 9, the official said a lot of uncertainties are there at present because of developments like the Trump administration's plan to further increase tariffs on steel and a stay on a court order against the US authorities' decisions on tariffs. But within the constraints of uncertainties, India has to find pathways which are good for the country, the official added. A US court of international trade on May 28 had ruled that present Trump tariffs were illegal under the international emergency economic powers act. The administration later filed an appeal and got a stay on this order. On April 2, US President Donald Trump announced reciprocal tariffs against several countries, including India. It imposed an additional duty of 26 per cent on India, but later suspended it till July 9. However, the 10 per cent baseline duty on all the countries remains. India has already reserved its right to impose retaliatory tariffs against US duties on steel and aluminium. It has also sought consultations under the WTO norms on US tariffs on auto components. If India is considering taking similar measures in more products, the official said India will protect its interests. "We will see what is good for India... accordingly we will take decisions," the official said, adding, "Today a lot of uncertainties are there... because of that court order... we will discuss how to address these issues... lot of uncertainties are there".
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
‘Powell is impossible': Donald Trump slams US Fed chair for being ‘too late' after private hiring hits 2-year low
U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday redoubled his calls for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates, noting that payroll processing firm ADP reported that job creation slowed in May. "ADP number out. 'Too Late' Powell must now lower the rate. He is unbelievable. Europe has lowered nine times," Trump said in a Truth Social post. ADP reported on Wednesday that U.S. private payrolls increased far less than expected in May, increasing by only 37,000 jobs last month after a 60,000 rise in April that was revised downward. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast private employment increasing 110,000 following a previously reported gain of 62,000 in April. Wednesday's ADP data came ahead of a more comprehensive employment report that will be released on Friday by the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trump, a Republican, has hammered Powell for months in often personal attacks, with his calls for the Fed chair's resignation weighing on U.S. stocks and financial markets. Trump's repeated attacks have raised questions about the continued independence of the U.S. central bank under the Trump administration, although the U.S. president last month said he would not remove the Fed chair before his term ends in May 2026. Sectors including business services, and education and health shed jobs, pointing to a weakened demand for workers. Economists anticipate the US labour market will show more signs of cooling in the coming months. The Federal Reserve's rate setting committee is scheduled to meet on June 17-18 and announce the monetary policy decision. The central bank kept interest rate steady at 4.25-4.5% range in its May meeting for the third time in a row, highlighting the uncertainty over the health of the US economy from the tariff wars sparked by Trump. Powell had then said the risks of higher unemployment and inflation have risen, and the current policy stance leaves the Fed 'well positioned' to address economic developments 'in a timely manner. The US President has on previous occasions assailed Powell on the topic of interest rates. After Trump's first meeting with the Fed Chair on May 29, the Federal Reserve stated that the two discussed the economy, but not Powell's outlook for interest rates. The argument put forward in favour of the rate cut by Trump is that there is 'no inflation' and so Powell should cut rates, though such a move might not necessarily reduce the borrowing costs consumers face.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Iran, hit by high inflation and threatened by Trump, seeks comfort in gold; imports triple in a year
Many Iranians reportedly keep their savings in gold and US dollars at home, avoiding banks due to fears of financial instability or government confiscation. The country itself has used gold transactions for weapons deals with sanctions-hit Russia read more Iran is turning increasingly to gold as citizens and businesses seek refuge from soaring inflation and escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly threats from former US President Donald Trump's administration. Local gold prices surged more than 80 per cent in Iranian rial terms over the past year, significantly outpacing the global benchmark's increase of 45 per cent. The West Asian nation imported a record 100 tons of gold valued at about $8 billion in the financial year ending in late March, tripling its previous annual imports, according to government data. The actual figure could be nearly double, with substantial amounts coming from neighbouring markets like the United Arab Emirates and Turkey, according to analysts cited by Financial Times. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Sanctions spurring gold accumulation Analysts link this sharp rise to Iranians investing in gold to protect their savings amid economic instability, sanctions, and the looming threat of military confrontation with the United States and Israel. The Central Bank of Iran has reportedly accumulated large gold reserves, potentially at historic levels, as a buffer against future sanctions. While the central bank has not publicly commented, an economist familiar with the matter said, 'No one in the world can stop Iran from importing gold[…]The global gold market is opaque. Gold takes up little space and much of it arrives through neighbouring countries.' Demand high despite price volatility Price volatility has occasionally impacted investors, with gold coin prices briefly exceeding IR1 billion ($2,200) in March before retreating following the resumption of nuclear talks with the US, which briefly raised hopes for sanctions relief. Nonetheless, demand for gold remains robust due to considerable challenges impeding a nuclear agreement. US officials continue demanding that Iran halt uranium enrichment, a stance Tehran firmly rejects. Trump's ongoing 'maximum pressure' policy, combined with threats of additional sanctions targeting Iran's crucial oil exports, further fuels economic uncertainty. Many Iranians reportedly keep their savings in gold and US dollars at home, avoiding banks due to fears of financial instability or government confiscation. 'It's like wine that just sits in storage,' FT quoted Mohammad Keshtyaray, a member of Iran's Gold and Jewelry Special Committee, as saying. Gold for weapons? Additionally, gold transactions help Iran circumvent international sanctions. US analysts from C4ADS, as reported by The Washington Post earlier, revealed that Russia transferred 1.8 tons of gold bars worth approximately $104 million to Iran as payment for Shahed-136 drones. Further gold transactions between Russia and Iran are reportedly planned, though details remain unclear.
