logo
Trump's campaign against law firms sees setback as judge blocks order

Trump's campaign against law firms sees setback as judge blocks order

The ruling on Tuesday in favour of WilmerHale marks the third time this month that a federal judge in Washington has deemed Trump's series of law firm executive orders
AP Washington
US President Donald Trump's campaign against the legal profession hit another setback as a federal judge struck down an executive order that sought to sanction one of the country's most prestigious law firms.
The ruling on Tuesday in favour of WilmerHale marks the third time this month that a federal judge in Washington has deemed Trump's series of law firm executive orders to be unconstitutional and permanently barred their enforcement.
The cornerstone of the American system of justice is an independent judiciary and an independent bar willing to tackle unpopular cases, however daunting. The Founding Fathers knew this! wrote US district judge Richard Leon.
To permit the order to stand, Leon wrote, would be unfaithful to the judgment and vision of the Founding Fathers".
The firm applauded the ruling from Leon, an appointee of former Republican president George W Bush.
The court's decision to permanently block the unlawful executive order in its entirety strongly affirms our foundational constitutional rights and those of our clients. We remain proud to defend our firm, our people, and our clients, a spokesperson for the firm said.
The ruling was similar to the one from Friday by a different judge that rejected a Trump edict against the firm of Jenner and Block and another one from earlier in the month in favour of the firm Perkins Coie.
Taken together, the decisions have marked a blunt repudiation of Trump's actions, which the law firms have called an affront to the legal system and inconsistent with the foundational principle that lawyers can represent clients or causes without government reprisal.
The firms faced executive orders that sought to impose the same set of punishing sanctions, including mandating the suspension of attorney security clearances and barring employees from accessing federal buildings.
The orders have been part of a broader effort by the president to reshape American civil society by targeting perceived adversaries in hopes of extracting concessions from them and bending them to his will.
In his ruling, Leon said the provisions of the order against WilmerHale constitute a staggering punishment for the firm's protected speech! The Order is intended to, and does in fact, impede the firm's ability to effectively represent its clients! He added: The Order shouts through a bullhorn: If you take on causes disfavoured by President Trump, you will be punished! Several of the firms singled out for sanctions have either done legal work that Trump has opposed, or currently have or previously had associations with prosecutors who at one point investigated the president.
The order against WilmerHale, for instance, cited the fact that the firm previously employed former Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller, who led an investigation during Trump's first term into potential ties between Russia and Trump's 2016 campaign.
Other major firms have sought to avert orders by preemptively reaching settlements that require them, among other things, to collectively dedicate hundreds of millions of dollars in free legal services in support of causes the Trump administration says it supports.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump imposed tariffs on India to put additional pressure on Russia, says White House
Trump imposed tariffs on India to put additional pressure on Russia, says White House

Indian Express

time29 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Trump imposed tariffs on India to put additional pressure on Russia, says White House

US White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday (Aug 20) said that President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on India to put additional pressure on Russia to end its aggression against Ukraine. During her press briefing, Leavitt stated that the intent behind the move was to deter Moscow from pursuing the war in Ukraine. 'Look, the president has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He's taken actions, as you've seen, sanctions on India and other actions as well. He's made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end, and he has scoffed at the ideas of others that have been raised that we should wait another month before any meeting takes place,' she said. Leavitt further said that the US president aims to bring peace in the world 'as quickly as possible.' 'The president wants to move and he wants to bring this war to an end as quickly as possible… With all of those European leaders leaving the White House, including the NATO Secretary General, they all agree that this is a great first step. And it's a good thing that these two leaders are going to be sitting down together, and the president expects that to happen,' she said. 'The President met with all of these European leaders at the White House 48 hours after sitting down with President Putin on American soil. In fact, there was so much progress in the readout that was given to these European leaders immediately following his meeting with President Putin that every single one of them got on a plane 48 hours later and flew to the United States of America,' Leavitt added. Trump's much-anticipated meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders concluded at the White House on Monday (Aug 18). Describing the discussions as 'very good', the leaders indicated a possibility of a peace deal between the warring countries, Russia and Ukraine. European leaders, including Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, flew to Washington to attend the discussions backing Zelenskyy. Trump confirms talks between Putin and Zelenskyy Trump said that he has called Putin and has begun setting up a meeting between his Russian counterpart and Zelenskyy. Following this, there would be a trilateral meeting including the US president, Trump said. The location of the talks is yet to be determined. 'At the conclusion of the meetings, I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelenskyy. After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 'Again, this was a very good, early step for a War that has been going on for almost four years. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff are coordinating with Russia and Ukraine,' he added. Meeting with Putin should be held 'without any conditions', says Zelenskyy Zelenskyy said that he wanted to approach talks with Russia without any preconditions, highlighting that setting terms could lead Moscow to do the same, potentially jeopardising the negotiations. 'That's why I believe that we must meet without any conditions,' he told reporters. 'We had a truly warm, good and substantial conversation,' Zelenskyy said about his meeting with Trump. (With inputs from agencies)

US may provide air support to back a Ukraine peace deal, says Trump
US may provide air support to back a Ukraine peace deal, says Trump

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US may provide air support to back a Ukraine peace deal, says Trump

President Trump has ruled out deploying U.S. troops to Ukraine but suggested potential air support as part of a peace deal. Despite this offer and security guarantees, uncertainty remains as Russia launched a major air assault. Trump indicated a possible meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin, while allies discuss further sanctions and security measures for Ukraine. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he had ruled out putting U.S. troops on the ground in Ukraine, but said the United States might provide air support as part of a deal to end Russia's war in the country.A day after Trump pledged security guarantees to help end the war at an extraordinary White House summit , the path to peace remained uncertain as the U.S. and allies prepared to work out what military support for Ukraine might include."When it comes to security, (Europeans) are willing to put people on the ground. We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably ... by air," Trump said in an interview with the Fox News "Fox & Friends" did not elaborate. Later, in an interview with radio host Mark Levin, Trump characterized his negotiating style in trying to end the war as "probably instinct more than process."Hours after Zelenskiy 's meetings in Washington , Russia launched its biggest air assault in more than a month on Ukraine, with 270 drones and 10 missiles launched, the Ukrainian air force said. The energy ministry said the strikes caused big fires at energy facilities in the central Poltava region, home to Ukraine's only oil conceded that Russian President Vladimir Putin might not want to make a deal after all, saying, "We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks."The nature of U.S. military aid for Ukraine under a peace deal was unclear. Air support could take many forms, such as missile defense systems or fighter jets enforcing a no-fly zone. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that U.S. air support was "an option and a possibility," but, like Trump, she did not provide any details."The president has definitively stated U.S. boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine, but we can certainly help in the coordination and perhaps provide other means of security guarantees to our European allies," she said at a news Monday's summit in Washington, Russia, which has often said that it agreed with the idea of security guarantees for Kyiv, reiterated its long-standing position that it "categorically" rejected "any scenarios involving the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine."Analysts say more than 1 million people have been killed or wounded in the conflict, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February MEETING? Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy hailed the White House talks as a "major step forward" toward ending Europe's deadliest conflict in 80 years and setting up a trilateral meeting with Putin and Trump. Zelenskiy's warm rapport with Trump contrasted sharply with their disastrous Oval Office meeting in discussed Budapest as a venue for a summit involving Zelenskiy and Putin with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Tuesday, a White House official where delegations for the two countries have met previously, has also been mentioned, a senior administration official is one of the few European places that Putin could visit without fear of arrest on International Criminal Court charges as Orban maintains close ties with the Russian leader. It was unclear whether Ukraine would accept Hungary as a venue. Neutral Switzerland also said it would be ready to host Putin for any peace talks. "They are in the process of setting it up," Trump told radio host Levin about a Putin/Zelenskiy meeting. But Trump cast doubt on whether he would attend. "Now I think it would be better if they met without me. ... If necessary, I'll go," he said. Trump, asked by Levin how he balanced the interests of all the parties involved, said, "Well, it's probably instinct more than process. I have instincts."There has been so far no confirmation from Russia that a potential bilateral meeting between Putin and Zelenskiy is being Trump's call to Putin on Monday, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said only that the discussion included the idea of "raising the level of representatives" in peace talks from both countries - but he did not elaborate to what Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in remarks published on Tuesday that contacts involving national leaders must be prepared "with the utmost thoroughness" and cannot be pursed for the sake of "media coverage or evening broadcasts."Ukraine's allies held talks in the so-called Coalition of the Willing format on Tuesday, discussing additional sanctions to crank up the pressure on Russia. The grouping has also agreed that planning teams will meet U.S. counterparts in the coming days to develop security guarantees for Ukraine. NATO military leaders were expected to meet on Wednesday to discuss Ukraine, with U.S. General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, expected to attend virtually, officials told has shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia's military control, following his summit with Trump on Friday in Alaska. Neil Melvin, a director at the International Security at the Royal United Services Institute think-tank, said Russia could drag out the war while trying to deflect U.S. pressure with a protracted peace said both Ukraine and its European allies on one side and Russia on the other were striving "not to present themselves to Trump as the obstacle to his peace process.""They're all tiptoeing around Trump" to avoid any blame, he said, adding that Trump's statements on security guarantees were "so vague it's very hard to take it seriously."(Reporting by Tom Balmforth, Elizabeth Piper, Matthias Williams, Anastasiia Malenko, Rachel More, Madeline Chambers, Sabine Siebold, Susan Heavey, Andrea Shalal, Yuliia Dysa, Idrees Ali, Sam Tabahriti and Lidia Kelly; Writing by Andy Sullivan, Daniel Trotta and Matthias Williams; Editing by Gareth Jones, Frances Kerry, Cynthia Osterman and Stephen Coates)

US to now scrutinise 'Anti-Americanism' in immigration requests
US to now scrutinise 'Anti-Americanism' in immigration requests

Economic Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

US to now scrutinise 'Anti-Americanism' in immigration requests

Immigrants seeking a legal pathway to live and work in the United States will now face new scrutiny over alleged 'anti-American' activity as part of their benefit requests, according to updated guidance by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The revised policy manual directs officers to consider whether applicants have previously supported, endorsed, or promoted anti-American or terrorist ideologies. Antisemitic activity and affiliation with antisemitic organizations will also weigh heavily against applicants in cases where officers exercise discretion. Expanded vetting through social media USCIS has also widened the scope of social media checks to cover more categories of benefit requests. Reviews for anti-American activity will now be added to that vetting. The agency said such behaviour will be treated as a strongly negative factor when deciding whether to grant immigration benefits. 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and supporting the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible,' said USCIS spokesman Matthew Tragesser. Impact on discretionary analysis The updated policy emphasizes that compliance with immigration laws will remain a key factor in decision-making. Officers will now be guided to deny applications where evidence shows support for terrorist groups, antisemitic terrorism, or the promotion of anti-American ideologies. The changes also extend to EB-5 investor petitions and other applications where issues of national security, fraud, misrepresentation, or criminal misuse are involved. With this update, USCIS underlined that while immigration benefits offer opportunities to live and work in the United States, they are considered a privilege and not an entitlement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store