Turkish prosecutors investigate main opposition leader in crackdown
The clampdown is centred on Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, who is President Tayyip Erdogan's main political rival and leads him in some polls. The CHP's Imamoglu was jailed in March pending trial on corruption charges, which he denies.
The Istanbul prosecutor's office said in a statement that it launched the probe into CHP leader Ozgur Ozel over comments he made about the chief prosecutor at a rally in Istanbul on Wednesday, criticising the targeting of the opposition.
CHP spokesman Deniz Yucel criticised the decision to open the investigation.
"We will not succumb to this system of lawlessness that you have created," he said on X.
Imamoglu's arrest in March triggered mass protests, economic turmoil and broad accusations of government influence over the judiciary and anti-democratic applications. The government denies the accusations and says the judiciary is independent.
Since his arrest, authorities have detained dozens of CHP members, officials from the Istanbul municipality, and other CHP-run municipalities. Access to Imamoglu's X account was also blocked in Turkey this month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
43 minutes ago
- USA Today
Israel says it has taken first steps of military operation in Gaza City
Aug 20 (Reuters) - Israel's military has taken the first steps of a planned operation to take over Gaza City, Israeli military spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said on Wednesday. Following a clash with Hamas south of Khan Younis in the strip on Wednesday, he said: "We will deepen the attack on Hamas in Gaza City, a stronghold of governmental and military terror for the terrorist organization." Defrin said troops had already begun circling the outskirts of Gaza City and Hamas was now a "battered and bruised" guerrilla force. "We have begun the preliminary operations and the first stages of the attack on Gaza City, and already now IDF forces are holding the outskirts of Gaza City," he said.
New York Post
43 minutes ago
- New York Post
Pope Leo must stand up to Muslim immigrants seeking to remake Europe
As Muslim migration roils Europe, some Catholic bishops are starting to notice. 'For decades, the Islamization of Europe has been progressing through mass immigration,' Polish Bishop Antoni Długosz said July 13, adding that illegal immigrants 'create serious problems in the countries they arrive in.' Bishop Athanasius Schneider of Kazakhstan spoke more bluntly in March: 'We're witnessing an invasion. They are not refugees. This is an invasion, a mass Islamization of Europe.' Advertisement Yet Pope Leo XIV lives in a different dimension. 'In a world darkened by war and injustice . . . migrants and refugees stand as messengers of hope,' Leo said July 25. 'Their courage and tenacity bear heroic testimony to a faith that sees beyond what our eyes can see and gives them the strength to defy death on the various contemporary migration routes.' Leo's comments express more than blissful sentimentality. They reveal the Vatican's role in encouraging open borders and exempting migrants from accountability. Advertisement In Europe's case, that involves deliberate blindness to the violent, totalitarian nature of Islam and many of its followers. This Catholic approach toward Islam reflects the ideas of Louis Massignon, a French scholar from the early 20th century. Massignon described Islam as 'the faith of Abraham revived with Muhammad,' and asserted that Muslims 'have the right to equality among the monotheisms descended from Abraham.' French Catholic scholar Alain Besançon described the results. 'An entire literature favorable to Islam has grown up in Europe, much of it the work of Catholic priests under the sway of Massignon's ideas,' he wrote. Advertisement Asylum seekers from Afghanistan set up tents inside of the Church of Saint John the Baptist at the Beguinage in Brussels on Jan. 7, 2014. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir Besançon attributed that posture to 'an underlying dissatisfaction with modernity, and with our liberal, capitalist, individualistic arrangements,' a dissatisfaction that the Vatican embodies. 'Alarmed by the ebbing of religious faith in the Christian West, and particularly in Europe,' Massignon's advocates 'cannot but admire Muslim devoutness,' Besançon wrote. 'Surely, they reason, it is better to believe in something than to believe in nothing, and since these Muslims believe in something, they must believe in the same thing we do.' Advertisement The Catholic Church officially embraced Massignon's ideas at the Second Vatican Council in two documents. One, Nostra Aetate, focused on the church's relationship with Judaism but additionally addressed Islam: 'The Church regards with esteem the Muslims. They adore the one God . . . they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet.' The other, Lumen Gentium, declared that 'the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator. In the first place among these there are the Muslims, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God.' That passage made the Catholic catechism. But what Besançon called 'indulgent ecumenicism' toward Islam goes beyond words. During John Paul II's papacy, the church embraced outright appeasement. Catholic bishops sold underutilized churches and schools to Muslim groups; many of the churches became mosques. In October 2006, the Capuchin Franciscan friars agreed to help the Union of Islamic Communities and Organizations in Italy (UCOII) build a mosque in Genoa next to a monastery. The friars even helped build the mosque's foundation. Advertisement But the UCOII — affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood — advocates 'an extremist version of the Quran, where Christians, Jews and Westerners are criminalized, as well as women and other Muslims who don't submit to their rule,' Magdi Allam, a convert to Catholicism from Islam, reported for Milan's Corriere della Sera. In 2006, the group also demanded Islamic schools, banks and clerical review of textbooks. Its president, Mohamed Nour Dachan, refused to sign a document pledging Muslims to accept Italy's constitution, denounce terrorism and recognize Israel's right to exist. Seven months earlier, a Vatican cardinal even suggested that Muslim students receive Islamic religious instruction in the hour reserved for Catholic instruction in Italian schools. Advertisement 'If there are 100 Muslim children in a school, I don't see why they shouldn't be taught their religion,' said the late Cardinal Renato Martino, then the president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. 'If we said 'no' until we saw equivalent treatment for the Christian minorities in Muslim countries, I would say that we were placing ourselves on their level.' In 2008, the Catholic bishops of England and Wales asked Catholic schools to reserve prayer rooms for Muslim students and to adapt bathroom facilities for ritual cleansing before prayer. But the worst example of appeasement took place in Belgium. As part of a campaign to force the government to grant amnesty, Belgium's Catholic bishops turned their churches into homes for Muslim migrants, making them squatters. An Afghan refugee seen at the altar of the Church of Saint John the Baptist at the Beguinage on Jan. 30, 2014. REUTERS Advertisement In May 2006, more than 30 Belgian churches served such a purpose. About 300 Africans occupied Antwerp's Magdalena Chapel. Other churches held as many as 700 squatters. At Our Lady of Succor Church in Brussels, squatters lived in small tents donated by Catholic relief agencies, conducted Muslim services, erected computer tables near the pulpit and even set fires on the floor. Friar Herwig Arts described a scene at Antwerp's Jesuit chapel: migrants 'removed the tabernacle [and] installed a television set and radios, depriving us of the opportunity to pray in our own chapel and say Mass.' He went on, 'For me, the place has been desecrated. I feel I cannot enter it anymore.' Advertisement Belgium's bishops were not amused. Arts was chided by Belgium's leading clergy. 'Solidarity cannot be limited to one's own nation, said the late Cardinal Godfried Danneels, then the country's leading prelate. Monsingor Luc van Looy, then the bishop of Ghent, even said 'illegal fugitives' were 'entitled to a good place in our society. Arts has been silent on the topic ever since. But two decades later, Kazakhstan's Bishop Schneider refuses to stay silent: 'This is a global political agenda by the powerful of the world to destroy Europe.' Leo thus faces an existential challenge, one that blissful sentimentality cannot answer: Will he allow a church that played a pivotal role in creating European civilization to perform a more decisive part in destroying it? This article first ran in The Spectator's US edition.
.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Miami Herald
43 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Should countries recognize Palestine? New poll finds consensus among Americans
Most Americans believe it is time for the world to recognize Palestinian statehood, according to new polling. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos survey, 58% of respondents said that all countries in the United Nations should recognize the state of Palestine. Meanwhile, 33% said they disagreed and 9% did not provide an answer. The poll — which sampled 4,446 U.S. adults — was conducted after the leaders of France, Canada and the U.K. announced their intention to officially acknowledge Palestinian statehood. The vast majority of U.N. member states, about 147 out of 193, already recognize Palestine as a sovereign nation, leaving the U.S. and many of its western allies as global outliers. The survey appears to mark a shift in U.S. public opinion, with an increasing number of Americans favoring recognition of Palestinian statehood. By comparison, in a May 2023 YouGov poll, just 37% of respondents said the U.S. government should formally acknowledge the state of Palestine. A plurality of respondents were uncertain. The Reuters/Ipsos poll — which has a margin of error of about 2 percentage points — also found that most Americans, 59%, believe Israel's military actions in Gaza have been excessive. About one-third of respondents said they disagreed. Additionally, 65% said that the U.S. should 'take action in Gaza to help people facing starvation.' Twenty-eight percent said they disagreed, including 41% of Republicans. The survey comes nearly two years into Israel's war in Gaza, which has left over 62,000 Palestinians dead, according to Gaza health officials. Many of the territory's inhabitants now face starvation amid Israeli restrictions on aid, and hundreds have been killed while trying to get food, according to U.N. officials, who said the instances could 'constitute crimes against humanity.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has denied anyone is starving in the enclave, while President Donald Trump has said there is 'real starvation' in the ravaged area. The conflict began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas militants invaded southern Israel, killing some 1,200 civilians and taking more than 200 hostages. Hamas on Aug. 18 said it accepted a ceasefire proposal brought by Arab negotiators, according to the Associated Press. Israeli officials — preparing for an assault on Gaza City — have not yet weighed in. The same day, Trump seemed to downplay the proposal, writing on Truth Social, 'We will only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas is confronted and destroyed!!! The sooner this takes place, the better the chances of success will be.'
