Trump signs order dismantling decades of Syria sanctions
The administration said its lifting the sanctions without conditions, but hopes the move to end Syria's isolation in global financial markets will encourage the government headed by the U.S.-designated terrorist Ahmed al-Sharaa to fulfill a number of criteria related to countering terrorism, integrating the Syrian Kurdish forces, respect for minorities, and establishing ties with Israel.
'Neither the president nor the secretary of State are nation building, they're not dictating,' Ambassador to the Republic of Türkiye and Special Envoy for Syria Tom Barrack said.
'They're not requiring, they're not giving the framework of the democratic model that needs to be implemented to their architectural desire. They're saying we're going to give you an opportunity.'
The move was welcomed by the Syrian Emergency Task Force (SETF), a nongovernmental organization that has worked to track war crimes in Syria by Assad and his forces and advocate for lifting sanctions on the country under the new government.
'We are proud of this amazing achievement and grateful for Ambassador Thomas Barrack, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and President Donald Trump for giving Syria a chance at democracy,' SETF's Advocacy Director, Veronica Zanetta-Brandoni said in a statement.
'It is now the responsibility of the new Syrian government to ensure safety and security, the transition to democracy, and economic prosperity for all Syrians.'
The SETF said the administration's move continues efforts to hold Assad accountable.
'We are pleased to see commitment to accountability for the crimes committed by the Assad regime and by the terrorists of ISIS. This means helping the Syrians gather and analyze the documents and excavate the mass graves to determine the fate of more than 100,000 missing persons, including Americans Austin Tice and Dr. Majd Kamalmaz, and to lay the groundwork for trials of the major perpetrators,' said Stephen J. Rapp, the former U.S. ambassador-at-large for global criminal justice and SETF's board member ambassador.
Trump announced during a speech in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on May 13 that he was lifting sanctions on Syria and blasted 'interventionists' and 'neocons' as wrecking 'far more nations than they built.'
Brad Smith, acting undersecretary of the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence at the Department of the Treasury, said the administration reserves the right to reimpose sanctions on Syria if it feels its actions are harming U.S. interests or violating criteria laid out.
Sanctions will remain on Assad and officials sanctioned for human rights abuses, corruption, terrorism and other violations.
'While we remain hopeful for the country's future and its new government, we are also clear eyed that threats to peace remain,' Smith said in a briefing with reporters previewing the president's executive order.
'The United States will remain ever vigilant where our interests and security are threatened, and Treasury will not hesitate to use our authorities to protect U.S. and international financial systems.'
A senior administration official, speaking on background under the terms of agreement for the call with reporters, said that Trump is not interested in using sanctions as leverage against Syria to pressure establishing ties with Israel and joining the Abraham Accords, the 2020 agreement that brokered ties between Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain.
'The way to entice them to get to the Abraham Accords is to make it fruitful for them on an economic basis, on a civilization basis, on a peace and prosperity basis, and that's all coming together,' the official said.
In response to a question related to Israel's control of the Golan Heights, which it seized from Syria during the Six-Day War in 1967, the official described the borders currently in the Middle East as an 'illusion.
Trump, in his first term, recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, while much of the international community refers to it as occupied. Israel seized additional Syrian territory near its border following the fall of Assad. The status of that territory could be a component of a peace deal between Jerusalem and Damascus.
'The lines that were drawn at 1948 and 1926 and 1967 and 1974 are all illusions,' the official said, saying they were 'based on facts that were there at the time.'
'It doesn't matter what the line is, if you don't trust each other on the other side of the line, that's going to continue forever,' the official said.
Trump's executive order will begin to unravel decades of layered sanctions against Syria. The country was designated a State Sponsor of Terrorism in 1979, although the State Department did not immediately return a request for comment if that designation would be lifted. A fact sheet provided by the White House said that the Secretary of State will review Syria's designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism.
The secretary will also review the sanctions designation of Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham's as a Foreign Terrorist Organization — the group that overthrew Assad.
But Trump's order will terminate the 2004 national emergency declaration related to Syria, and revoke five executive orders that constitute the basis of that program.
'The [executive order] will also direct certain actions with respect to waivers of applicable statutory sanctions, export controls and other restrictions,' a second senior administration official described to reporters on a call providing background of the president's actions. The sanctions lifting will allow international transactions and communications to take place with the Syrian government and state-owned entities, like the Central Bank and other financial institutions.
The U.S. began imposing a number of layered sanctions on Syria in response to the outbreak of the civil war in that country in 2011 and responding to evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly carried out by the Assad regime.
Assad is currently in exile in Russia.
'The second part of the [executive order] is that it contains provisions that will ensure that sanctions remain on Assad, his cronies and other destabilizing regional actors, including terrorists, as well as those that proliferate weapons of mass destruction, in addition to counter narcotics,' the second official said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Stanford Daily Sues Trump Administration
Stanford University's student newspaper is suing the Trump Administration over what it says is the government's attempts to target international students for immigration actions over the expression of pro-Palestinian views. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression filed the lawsuit Wednesday in federal court in San Jose, Calif., on behalf of the Stanford Daily, as well as two unnamed former students. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem are named as defendants. A spokesperson for Stanford University told Reuters that the student newspaper is an independent organization and that the university is not involved in the lawsuit. 'In the United States of America, no one should fear a midnight knock on the door for voicing the wrong opinion,' Conor Fitzpatrick, an attorney at FIRE, said in a statement. 'Free speech isn't a privilege the government hands out. Under our Constitution it is the inalienable right of every man, woman, and child.' The lawsuit has requested a preliminary injunction to block the government from attempting to deport students over pro-Palestinian speech while the case is ongoing. 'Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Trump administration are trying to turn the inalienable human right of free speech into a privilege contingent upon the whims of a federal bureaucrat, triggering deportation proceedings against noncitizens residing lawfully in this country for their protected political speech regarding American and Israeli foreign policy,' the complaint says. The Stanford Daily was previously on the losing end of a Supreme Court case in 1978 over the search of its offices and seizure of evidence related to a crime—a protest demonstration where police officers were injured—that it had reported on but was not criminally involved in. That case ultimately led to Congress' passage in 1980 of the Privacy Protection Act, which protects journalists in such cases. Here's what to know about the new case and why the newspaper is once again hoping to defend not just its own student writers but a wider class of people whose rights it believes are being infringed. Targeting of foreign students The Trump Administration has used two provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to target foreign-born students and censor pro-Palestinian speech, according to the lawsuit. The first provision, known as the Deportation Provision, gives the Secretary of State the authority to deport a noncitizen if he ''personally determines' their lawful 'beliefs, statements, or associations' 'compromise a compelling United States foreign policy interest,'' the lawsuit states. Rubio cited the provision to justify the attempted deportation of Palestinian Columbia graduate student Mahmoud Khalil, who had acted as a liaison between student protestors and university administrators during pro-Palestinian student demonstrations in 2024, and was arrested by immigration officers on March 8. In an April memo to an immigration judge overseeing Khalil's case, Rubio said that although Khalil's 'past, current or expected beliefs, statements, or associations … are otherwise lawful,' the Deportation Provision allows Rubio to 'personally determine' whether Khalil should be allowed to remain in the U.S. (Khalil was released from custody in June, and in July his attorneys filed for a preliminary injunction challenging the government's attempts to deport him on a separate immigration charge that alleges he misrepresented himself on his green card application). The second provision, known as the Revocation Provision, allows the Secretary of State to revoke a visa or documentation at his discretion. The Trump Administration has used this provision to revoke the visa of and detain Tufts University Ph.D. student Rumeysa Öztürk, who had co-authored a pro-Palestinian op-ed in the Tufts Daily before her detention and has since been released. 'We gave you a visa to come and study and get a degree, not to become a social activist that tears up our university campuses,' Rubio told reporters in May. 'If we've given you a visa and then you decide to do that, we're going to take it away.' The complaint argues that both provisions are unconstitutional when applied to protected speech: 'The First Amendment cements America's promise that the government may not subject a speaker to disfavored treatment because those in power do not like his or her message. And when a federal statute collides with First Amendment rights, the Constitution prevails.' The plaintiffs argue that the government's deportation threats and actions have amounted to violations of First Amendment rights. Since March, noncitizen writers of the Stanford Daily have declined to cover pro-Palestinian protests and asked to remove previous articles on the topic, fearing that such reporting could jeopardize their legal immigration status, according to the lawsuit. 'There's real fear on campus and it reaches into the newsroom,' Greta Reich, the student newspaper's editor-in-chief, said in a statement. 'I've had reporters turn down assignments, request the removal of some of their articles, and even quit the paper because they fear deportation for being associated with speaking on political topics, even in a journalistic capacity. The Daily is losing the voices of a significant portion of our student population.' The Trump Administration has also cracked down on international students more broadly. In April, the government quietly revoked the visas of thousands of students who had allegedly committed minor legal infractions before abruptly reversing the policy. The Administration has also used international students as a bargaining chip to compel university administrations to comply with certain demands, such as by attempting to revoke Harvard University's authority to enroll international students. And the government has heightened its scrutiny of student visa applicants, including vetting applicants' social media profiles for 'a history of political activism.' The Trump Administration's response 'DHS doesn't arrest people based on protected speech, so the plaintiffs' premise is incorrect,' DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement to media outlets. 'DHS takes its role in removing threats to the public and our communities seriously, and the idea that enforcing federal law in that regard constitutes some kind of prior restraint on speech is laughable.' A bench trial challenging the Trump Administration's alleged 'ideological deportation' policy concluded last month and a final ruling is expected this or next month. That lawsuit was filed by the American Association of University Professors and the Middle East Studies Association. During the course of the trial, a government memo unearthed in court revealed that officials had warned Rubio about potential legal scrutiny of deportation attempts because their basis could be considered constitutionally protected speech. 'Anyone who has any position that is against what the American government says they should think, they're immediately 'anti-American,'' David Rozas, an immigration attorney who represented Alireza Doroudi, an Iranian student who was detained for weeks and ultimately chose to self-deport, told TIME in May. 'America was built on discourse,' he added. Trump's immigration agenda, he said, is 'going to stifle American growth and the American dream.' '225 years after the Alien Friends Act expired, the danger of nighttime raids on noncitizens for perceived thoughtcrime is reality once more. Secretary Rubio and the Trump administration's war against noncitizens' freedom of speech is intended to send an unmistakable message: Watch what you say, or you could be next,' the complaint says. 'Message received.'
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Israel is weighing its options in Gaza. Here are 4 scenarios for where things may be heading
Israel has routed its enemies across the region but has yet to return all its hostages from the Gaza Strip. Hamas appears to have been decimated militarily but has kept up insurgent attacks . Gaza is in ruins and experts say it is sliding into famine , and long-running ceasefire talks seem to have broken down .
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
Israel is weighing its options in Gaza. Here are 4 scenarios for where things may be heading
Israel has routed its enemies across the region but has yet to return all its hostages from the Gaza Strip. Hamas appears to have been decimated militarily but has kept up insurgent attacks. Gaza is in ruins and experts say it is sliding into famine, and long-running ceasefire talks seem to have broken down. So where do we go from here? Both Israel and Hamas have embraced visions for how the war should end, but mediators from two American administrations, Egypt and Qatar have yet to bridge the gaps. There are at least two other scenarios in which the war goes on indefinitely, at an unimaginable cost to Gaza's 2 million Palestinians, the Israeli hostages and their families. Here's a closer look. Full reoccupation of Gaza For days now, Israeli media have reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is on the verge of ordering the full reoccupation of Gaza for the first time since Israel withdrew soldiers and settlers two decades ago. He is expected to meet with his security Cabinet late Thursday, possibly to make a decision. That would mean sending ground troops into the few areas of Gaza that haven't been totally destroyed, the roughly 25% of the territory where much of its 2 million people have sought refuge, including the sprawling coastal displacement camps of Muwasi. It would lead to countless more Palestinian deaths and more mass displacement, and it could put the roughly 20 remaining living hostages at serious risk. It would also leave Israel in full control of the territory, obliged by international law to provide security and ensure the basic needs of the population are met. Reoccupation would spark outrage internationally and further isolate Israel and the U.S. There is also opposition within Israel, from those who fear for the hostages and former security chiefs who have warned of a quagmire. But it has strong support among Netanyahu's far-right governing partners, who have long called for the reconquest of Gaza, the relocation of much of its population to other countries, and the rebuilding of Jewish settlements. A ceasefire in line with international demands Hamas has said it will release all the remaining hostages in return for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel, a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a lasting ceasefire. Those demands were adopted by the Biden administration and the U.N. Security Council over a year ago, and enshrined in the ceasefire agreement finalized by the Trump administration in January. That brought about a six-week ceasefire, the release of 25 living hostages and the remains of eight others, and a flood of humanitarian aid. The two sides were supposed to use that pause to negotiate a more lasting ceasefire. Instead, Israel ended the truce in March, demanding another temporary ceasefire and the release of some of the remaining hostages. Israel fears that withdrawing from Gaza would allow Hamas to eventually rebuild its military machine and maintain influence in the territory even if doesn't hold formal power, paving the way for another Oct. 7-style attack. Netanyahu may also fear that his far-right allies would follow through on threats to bring down the government if he agrees to such terms. That could spell the end of his 16 nearly unbroken years in power, leaving him more vulnerable to long-running corruption charges and inquiries into the security and intelligence failures around the 2023 attack. A ceasefire on Israel's termsNetanyahu has said he will end the war once all the hostages are returned and Hamas is defeated or agrees to disarm and go into exile. But even then, he says Israel will pursue plans to relocate much of Gaza's population to other countries through what he refers to as 'voluntary emigration.' The Palestinians and much of the international community see the plan as forcible expulsion in violation of international law. Netanyahu says Israel is willing to agree to a temporary ceasefire in which Hamas would release several living hostages and the bodies of others in return for the release of Palestinians imprisoned by Israel, a flood of humanitarian aid and a partial Israeli pullback. They would then negotiate an end to the war, but Israel would require Hamas' disarmament. Hamas has said it is willing to hand over power to other Palestinians but will not lay down its arms as long as Israel occupies lands the Palestinians want for a future state. It also wants guarantees that Israel will not resume the war, as it did in March. Further military escalation could yield more concessions. But Hamas has already lost thousands of fighters and nearly all of its top leaders in Gaza, where it no longer controls many areas. Its strongest allies, Iran and Hezbollah, have been severely weakened. The hostages are the last bargaining chip held by Hamas, which also has a strong culture of martyrdom. A forever war It's quite possible the war continues in its current state. Israel could continue carrying out daily strikes across the territory, which it says have only targeted militants but have frequently killed adult civilians and children. Hamas could keep up a low tempo of hit-and-run attacks, occasionally killing Israeli soldiers. Additional measures to get more food into Gaza may stave off famine and allow aid to be distributed more safely. The hostages could survive in captivity for months or even years. Israel is set to hold elections in October 2026 — and likely earlier — which could bring in new leadership even if Netanyahu keeps his coalition intact. Which scenario unfolds will largely depend on U.S. President Donald Trump, who has provided crucial military and diplomatic support to Israel, and who proved he has leverage over Netanyahu when he brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Iran after 12 days of war in June. Trump has said he wants to end the war in Gaza and bring the remaining hostages home, but he has exerted no public pressure on Israel and appears to have fully accepted its terms for a ceasefire. Asked on Tuesday whether he would support Israel reoccupying Gaza, Trump said, 'It's going to be pretty much up to Israel.' ___ Follow AP's war coverage at
