Ikea eyes India sourcing beyond textiles
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
While exporting products (largely textiles) from India to the US would mean higher retail prices for American consumers, in India, the expansion of local sourcing would allow Ikea to shore up its overall exports from the market as well as reduce prices for local consumers. Ikea did not comment on whether it would shift sourcing for the US from India to other markets - Europe is the company's biggest supply region, followed by Asia, and most of what Ikea sells in the US is manufactured in other countries.
"Ikea has been exporting from India for close to five decades...with more regionalisation of supplies, India should probably have an opportunity. When Ikea talks about sourcing...it's always with an ambition to export," Antoni told TOI in an interview.
India is staring at a 50% tariff on US exports, putting it at a huge disadvantage over other Asian peers such as Bangladesh and Vietnam, which have been tariffed at a lower rate.
Country retail manager and chief sustainability officer for Ikea India, Susanne Pulverer, said the announcement of the additional 25% penalty happened just last week, and she is hoping trade will not be disrupted much by tariff and non-tariff barriers going ahead.
As Ikea looks to tap into a growing middle class in India, which, helped by higher disposable incomes, is becoming more discerning, the company is expanding its retail footprint in the country with the launch of its first store in New Delhi on Wednesday.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
For Antoni, the priority will be to step up India expansion and make pricing more affordable for consumers by widening local sourcing. "I see only opportunities for us in India, it's our time," Antoni said, hinting at more store launches in the country in the coming months.
Ikea India has set a target of taking its local sourcing to 50% by 2030, which it said is on track. Currently, Ikea's brick-and-mortar stores in the region are only limited to Mumbai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and now New Delhi. It reaches more markets through its online stores.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
23 minutes ago
- Hans India
Trump targets India
For decades, India and the United States have shared a trajectory that felt increasingly like a strategic partnership. Shared democratic values, growing defence ties, mutual concerns over China, and booming trade painted a picture of an upward relationship. That is why President Donald Trump's aggressive targeting of India during his tenure, particularly through punitive tariffs and public criticism, raised eyebrows both in New Delhi and Washington. The easy explanation is Trump's mercurial style. The harder, and more accurate, explanation is that his stance was a calculated geopolitical play. I see at least five clear strategic reasons behind this approach, all deeply connected to his 'America First' doctrine, his transactional view of diplomacy, and the larger chessboard of global power. 1. Trade protectionism and the 'America first' doctrine: Trump was elected on a promise to bring jobs back to America. That meant dismantling trade arrangements he saw as unfair, whether with China, the EU, or even long-standing partners like India. His administration's trade team looked at numbers through a competitive lens. India's growing export footprint, particularly in pharmaceuticals, IT services, and textiles, was not lost on Trump's strategists. The US has long enjoyed a trade surplus with many nations, but India was one of the few developing countries running a significant surplus against America. In Trump's worldview, that surplus was America's loss. The withdrawal of India's preferential trade status under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) was not an impulsive act. It was a calculated signal that friendship did not guarantee special treatment. High tariffs on steel, aluminium, and even niche exports like hand-crafted jewellery or specialty agricultural products were meant to create discomfort in specific industries. The idea was to make political and business leaders in India push their government to open more of the Indian market to US companies. It was economic pressure designed to shift the negotiation table. Trump understood that in trade politics, perception matters as much as policy. He wanted the American voter to see a leader who would fight for them, even if it meant upsetting allies. That consistency in messaging made his stance on India entirely predictable, to those who understood his doctrine. 2. Containing a future economic challenger: While China was Trump's main target in the global economic rivalry, his advisors were not blind to India's trajectory. The Indian economy, with its youthful demographic and expanding domestic market, had the potential to emerge as another formidable Asian giant within two decades. Pre-emptively shaping that rise was part of a long-term calculation. History shows that the US often takes early steps to slow down competitors before they become too large to influence. This may take the form of trade barriers, sanctions, technology restrictions, or control over access to critical global markets. In Trump's calculus, acting now meant shaping the rules of engagement before India's economic clout matched its demographic weight. By exerting pressure, he was sending a message not just to India but to other emerging economies that the US would not hesitate to act against those who could someday challenge its economic primacy. In this sense, India was not an immediate threat, but it is a future possibility that needed to be managed. This approach also reflected Trump's preference for dealing with partners from a position of strength. By putting India on the defensive early, the US could extract concessions more easily, rather than waiting until India was as powerful a rival as China is today. 3. Strategic signalling to China: On the surface, pressuring India while confronting China might seem counterintuitive. Both Washington and New Delhi have strong strategic incentives to counter Chinese expansionism in the Indo-Pacific. Yet, Trump's approach to foreign policy was rarely linear. He often believed in unsettling the board to keep all players guessing. By targeting India economically, Trump demonstrated to Beijing that the US could turn its attention to any Asian power if it served American interests. This was regional signalling at its most deliberate. China would take note that even a US partner like India was not immune to pressure, which reinforced Trump's reputation for unpredictability. In the Indo-Pacific, perception often matters as much as action. By showing that the US could recalibrate relationships in unexpected ways, Trump added an element of uncertainty to China's strategic planning. If Beijing thought it could predict American behaviour based solely on alliances, this tactic disrupted that assumption. This kind of signalling also had a secondary purpose, reminding India that alignment with the US did not automatically guarantee immunity from American economic leverage. The subtext was clear: partnerships are conditional, and conditions can change quickly in a transactional framework. 4. The Pakistan factor and South Asian balancing: No analysis of Trump's India policy is complete without considering Pakistan. During Trump's presidency, Washington was deeply involved in negotiations with the Taliban to end the long-running war in Afghanistan. Pakistan's cooperation was indispensable in facilitating talks and influencing Taliban factions. Trump's public warmth toward Pakistan, including his earlier meetings with Prime Minister Imran Khan, more recently with Army Chief Asim Munir at the White House, were not sentimental; but a calculated carrot. The corresponding stick was applied to India, ensuring that the balance in South Asia did not tilt too heavily in New Delhi's favour. Historically, US–Pakistan relations have been marked by transactional exchanges - military aid, political backing, or strategic support in exchange for cooperation on specific issues. Trump applied this same logic. By keeping India under trade pressure, he maintained a level of parity in regional optics that made Pakistan feel its role was still valued. From Trump's perspective, keeping Islamabad engaged meant keeping the Taliban talks alive, which was a major foreign policy priority for his administration. For India, this dynamic was a reminder that US policy in South Asia is never solely about one bilateral relationship. 5. Bargaining leverage for strategic deals: Trump's diplomacy was built on leverage. To him, leverage often meant making the other side feel economic discomfort until they were more inclined to make concessions. India's large and growing economy made it an attractive target for this approach. The withdrawal of GSP benefits, the imposition of tariffs, and the public criticism were all part of a toolkit meant to push India toward agreement in other areas - defence purchases, energy imports, and greater market access for US firms. The logic was simple: if the cost of disagreement was high enough, India would be more open to negotiation. For instance, while raising tariffs, the US was simultaneously pressing India to buy more American oil and liquefied natural gas. Defence deals for fighter jets, drones, and helicopters were on the table. The US was also pushing for greater access to India's e-commerce and agricultural markets, sectors with enormous potential for American corporations. Trump treated these as interlinked discussions rather than isolated issues. Pressure in one domain was meant to yield advantage in another. The strategy was not unique to India, but its application to a democratic partner was unusual enough to draw global attention. Long-term implications: Trump's targeting of India created turbulence in the short term. New Delhi responded firmly by resisting tariffs, filing complaints with the WTO, and making it clear that strategic partnerships could not be leveraged purely through economic threats. Yet, beneath the public disagreements, the fundamentals of the US–India relationship remained steady. Defence cooperation continued, the Quad initiative gained momentum, and backchannel diplomacy ensured communication lines stayed open. In a way, Trump's pressure tested the resilience of the partnership. However, the episode carries a cautionary lesson. If the US treats India solely as a competitor to be contained rather than a partner to be cultivated, it risks encouraging New Delhi to diversify its strategic options. This could mean deeper engagement with Europe, a recalibrated relationship with Russia, or even selective cooperation with China on trade matters. India's takeaway should be clear, strategic autonomy is not optional. It is the foundation of sustained influence in a world where alliances shift rapidly. Economic diversification, resilient domestic manufacturing, and the capacity to stand firm in negotiations are non-negotiable priorities. The bigger Picture: Trump's punitive stance toward India is not a personal grudge or an emotional whim. It was a calculated extension of his worldview, one that is transactional, competitive, and unapologetically centred on American advantage. Every action, from the tariffs to the GSP withdrawal, fit into a broader pattern. His objectives are multi-layered, extract more from partners, contain potential challengers early, maintain leverage over rivals, and send strategic messages to adversaries. In Trump's eyes, the end goal was always the same: advance US interests without compromise. India, for its part, must read this as a case study in future-proofing its foreign policy. The US will remain a critical partner, but partnership does not mean protection from pressure. National interest, not sentiment, must be India's guiding principle. In the great game of global power, emotional narratives are short-lived. Strategy endures. Trump understood that well. India must, too. (The writer is the Chief Spokesperson of BJP, Chairman for Nation Building Foundation, and a Harvard Business School certified Strategist)
News18
an hour ago
- News18
US, China agree to 90-day tariff truce, easing trade tensions
Washington, DC [US], August 15 (ANI): The United States and China have agreed to extend their tariff truce for 90 days, CNN reported, citing an executive order signed by President Donald Trump. This move averts an immediate surge in duties that could have severely impacted trade between the world's two largest economies. Notably, the tariffs on Chinese goods would have skyrocketed to 54 per cent from 30 per cent, while Chinese tariffs on US exports would have jumped to 34 per cent from 10 per a joint statement with the US, China confirmed the 90-day trade truce extension and said it would maintain the 10 per cent tariffs it has imposed on American goods during that Joint statement follows bilateral negotiations held in Sweden last month, it said. The extension comes after Trump imposed a slew of 'reciprocal" tariffs on trading partners around the world, which have raised the United States' effective tariff rate to levels not seen since the Great Depression, as per to CNN, higher tariffs on Chinese goods, America's second-largest source of imports, would have almost certainly raised the costs many American businesses and consumers could pay — or already are paying — because of increased import taxes Trump has meeting in Sweden in July, Chinese negotiators went as far as to say that a deal was reached. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, both of whom attended the meeting, disputed that, saying nothing was final without Trump's word. 'We'll see what happens. They've been dealing quite nicely. The relationship is very good with President Xi and myself," Trump had said on Monday. A White House fact sheet on the extension said trade discussions with China have been 'constructive" and quoted Trump saying: 'We're getting along with China very well."At the conclusion of last month's meeting with Chinese trade officials, Bessent said he warned his Chinese counterparts that continuing to purchase Russian oil would bring about huge tariffs under legislation in Congress that allows Trump to impose levies up to 500 per cent. (ANI)
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Scorpio Daily Horoscope Today, August 15, 2025: The wrong words could backfire today
Today, finding balance between giving and receiving is essential for your well-being. While your generosity is a beautiful quality, remember that accepting help and kindness from others nourishes your spirit too. Avoid overextending yourself or feeling guilty when you receive support. Healthy relationships require mutual exchange. Embracing this balance creates harmony in your personal and professional life. Trust that allowing yourself to receive replenishes your energy and strengthens connections with those around you. Scorpio Love Horoscope Today In love, balancing giving and receiving fosters a deeper emotional connection. Share your love and care, but also allow your partner to support and nurture you. Avoid one-sided efforts that cause imbalance. For singles, being open to receiving love and kindness attracts fulfilling relationships. Mutual exchange creates trust and warmth. Today's balance invites harmony and growth in your love life. Scorpio Career Horoscope Today At work, balancing your contributions with receiving recognition or assistance improves teamwork. Avoid taking all responsibility alone or refusing help. Collaborative balance enhances productivity and morale. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Express appreciation for support and offer help generously. This mutual flow builds strong professional bonds and leads to success. Balance in work relationships nurtures growth and satisfaction. Scorpio Money Horoscope Today Financially, balancing spending and saving is important today. Give generously when possible but also prioritize your own financial security. Avoid feeling guilty about receiving money, gifts, or assistance. Healthy money management includes both generosity and self-care. Trust that balanced financial exchanges bring stability and abundance. This approach reduces stress and encourages wise planning. Scorpio Health Horoscope Today Health benefits when you balance giving energy with replenishing it through rest and self-care. Avoid burnout by listening to your body's needs and accepting help. Embrace practices that restore your strength and calm your mind. Balanced energy flow supports healing and vitality. Today, graceful balance nurtures your overall health and happiness. Discover everything about astrology at Times of India , including daily horoscopes for Aries , Taurus , Gemini , Cancer , Leo , Virgo , Libra , Scorpio , Sagittarius , Capricorn , Aquarius , and Pisces . Read your detailed Horoscope Today and Horoscope Tomorrow here.
