Zohran Mamdani won because too many elites lost
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Popular in International
Hell hath no fury like the disappointed haute bourgeoisie. A populist revolt has been brewing among the American left since the global financial crisis dealt a severe economic shock to young college graduates. The surprising primary win of 33-year-old Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani in New York City 's mayoral primary is the latest manifestation of their economic frustration . And it will only get worse. One of the more surprising results of the Mamdani victoryconcerns his base: Younger, well-educated, fairly affluent and living in Brooklyn — especially the more bohemian Williamsburg and Bushwick neighborhoods. Mamdani was much less popular among lower earners who lived in the Bronx. So it's revealing that the relatively well-off turned out enthusiastically for someone who, only a few years ago, promised to seize the very means of production that underpinned their success.The reason may be that Mamdani's supporters tend to be elite, but don't feel elite enough. They are the ones who suffer from what University of Connecticut professor emeritus and complexity scientist Peter Turchin calls elite overproduction . Many children of middle- and upper middle-class households went to college expecting to have a career that brought wealth and status. But there are a limited number of 'elite' jobs. The result is a surplus of aspiring elites who end up resentful and blame a system they deem unfair. Turchin argues that past periods of social unrest were due to an overabundance of disappointed elites. It also explains recent bouts of populism , including the Occupy Wall Street movement.Part of the problem is that the divide between culturally and economically elite jobs has widened. Culturally elite jobs, such as working at a high-profile non-profit, media (ahem), the arts, or a university, all come with a certain cache but most pay far less than those in finance, consulting or corporate law.Based on the government's Current Population Survey between 2022 and 2025, about 12% of the college graduates who live in Brooklyn work in what I call 'creative' industries (arts, media, non-profits). This may seem low, but Brooklyn is one of the largest counties in the country and is very economically diverse. Creative college graduates here take up a smaller share of graduates in other New York Boroughs (between 5% and 11%) and the US's college educated population overall (7%).The creative college graduates in Brooklyn have a median household income of about $125,000. But that does not go far in New York, especially for those from affluent families who expect to replicate their parents' standard of living. When their parents were young, having a college degree ensured much higher relative pay. Big cities were also less expensive back then, and a non-profit job could afford a decent living standard.Only 30% of creative college-educated Brooklynites are homeowners, compared to 76% of college graduates in the rest of country. And it gets worse when they compare themselves to their peers who became part of the economic elite. Brooklyn also houses many people who work in finance, law and consulting. Their median household income is more than $290,000, and 58% own their home (though they tend to be a bit older).Although the cultural and economic elite have always lived alongside each other, the reason the divide is getting wider is because in the last few decades being in a big city such as New York has become necessary to elite success, be it cultural or economic. But cities have also become much more expensive, mainly as the result of increased demand for housing and limited supply. Economically elite jobs have also become even better paid relative to cultural elite jobs.All this is why Mamdani's focus on affordability, his promises to freeze rent, subsidize food costs and impose large taxes on the economic elite, is appealing to so many well-educated voters. To some extent, it is hard to feel sorry for them. They chose to work in professions that pay relatively less given their education. And they are hardly the only ones who struggle with the high cost of living. Don't forget that most college educated workers in New York earn more than those who don't have such degrees, with the median household income in Brooklyn (for all education levels) coming in at $73,000.But this is no comfort for those who feel cheated in a job that a generation ago could have afforded a comfortable lifestyle. It is also a legitimate problem that success in their industry requires living where they can't necessarily afford the lifestyle they want and feel they deserve.Turchin expects the problem will only get worse. Recent shifts in the labor market due to technology suggest the earnings premium from college may shrink further and cause more economic frustration. At the very least, if these voters turn to populism that pushes more price controls on housing and other necessities there will be even more shortages and higher prices for market-priced goods, and the affordability problem will swell, not only for the disaffected cultural elite but for everyone.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
H-1B ban next? India-US ties frosty due to Trump comments, MAGA talks of ban on H-1B Visa
The H-1B Visa, long considered an ideal route for Indian IT engineers to pursue careers in the United States, is facing renewed hostility. At a time when the US President Donald Trump is gunning for India with his steep tariffs, and there is a strain in the Indo-American relations, his support base in the US has started a campaign against Indians already working in the US. As part of the talk, the MAGA (Make America Great Again) crowd is taking an aim at H-1B Visa programme that allows thousands of skilled Indian IT engineers to go to the US every year for work. advertisementThe development comes at a delicate phase in India-US relations, with Donald Trump's allies openly questioning why American firms continue to rely on foreign workers even as large-scale layoffs grip the technology whispers against H-1B Visa from American Right Wing and conservatives are not new, there is an increase in intensity in the last few weeks, particularly after Trump slapped tariffs and accused India of helping Russians in their war against Ukraine. One of the most prominent voices to again start an online campaign against H-1B Visa is politician Marjorie Taylor Greene. Quoting Trump as he announced tariffs against India, Greene wrote on her X account on August 4: 'End Indian H1-B Visas replacing American jobs instead and stop funding and sending weapons to the Obama/Biden/Neocon Ukraine Russia war.' It is as if tariffs against India have given a fresh impetus to MAGA crowd on this subject. The Right Wing influencers in the US are now increasingly and openly talking against Indian IT engineers. They are demanding that H-1B Visa should be either modified to stop Indians or should be scrapped altogether. One such person, Peter St Onge, recently wrote: 'The H1B program was sold as bringing geniuses from Tokyo and Munich. Instead, we got millions of discount coders while Americans who *did* learn to code can't find a job.'Another account — Right Angle News network — wrote on August 14 after someone created a website where Americans can check vacancies marked for H-1B workers and then apply there. The account noted, 'A website has been created that lets American citizens see job listings only H-1B workers were meant to see, and every time an American applies, it blocks a foreigner from getting the job. Do some damage.'These are just a few examples of thousands of similar messages that have come online in the last 20 days against the H-1B Visa programme. The conversation is also fuelled by certain measures that the Trump administration is already considering for limiting scope of H-1B Visa. Lottery out, wages in?advertisementEarlier this month US officials revealed details of a proposal. Drafted by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the proposal suggests replacing the current lottery system with a wage-based selection process for H-1B applicants. The change would mean preference for higher-paying positions, potentially shutting out fresh graduates and entry-level professionals, many of whom come from India on relatively modest proposal comes in middle of a conversation that MAGA crowd is pushing, which is America is for Americans first. Steve Bannon, an influential podcaster and former advisor of Trump, recently said, "I don't think you should have any foreign students in the country right now. No H1B visas. Instead of stapling a green card to their diploma, staple an exit visa. You get 30 days to hang out with classmates, do alumni stuff, then leave."US Vice President JD Vance too has weighed in on the issue. Last month he accused Microsoft of misleading Americans over the availability of talent. "We want the very best and the brightest to make America their home. But I don't want companies to fire 9,000 American workers and then to go and say, 'We can't find workers here in America.' That's a bulls**t story," he reportedly too have seemingly stepped in. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently warned companies against favouring foreign workers over American citizens. Acting chair Andrea Lucas was categorical: "Unlawful bias against American workers, in violation of Title VII, is a large-scale problem in multiple industries nationwide. The law applies to you, and you are not above the law."For India, the stakes could hardly be higher. Nearly 207,000 H-1B visas went to Indian nationals in FY 2024, showing the dependence of the country's tech workforce on the program. Any change in rules or worse, a ban could upend career prospects for thousands and strain the very foundation of India-US cooperation in the technology sector.- Ends
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
US revokes 6,000 student visas linked to crimes and terrorism
The United States has revoked over 6,000 international student visas after investigations revealed violations of law, overstays, and direct involvement in serious crimes. The US State Department confirmed that the cancellations included cases connected to large-scale action underscores Washington's increasing scrutiny of international student visas. With more than 1.1 million foreign students enroled in US colleges during the 2023-24 academic year, authorities have grown concerned about the misuse of education visas for unlawful OFFENCES LEAD TO MAJORITY OF CASESOf the total cancellations, about two-thirds, nearly 4,000 visas, were linked directly to criminal offences. These included assault, burglary, and driving under the influence (DUI). Officials noted that such incidents not only violated US laws but also posed threats to campus and community scale of the enforcement reflects the government's tougher approach towards individuals who fail to comply with immigration rules. Many of the affected students were found to have overstayed their permitted duration of stay, in addition to committing LINKS UNDER REVIEWA smaller but significant number of cases, between 200 and 300, were tied to terrorism. The revoked visas in these cases were processed under a specific section of the Immigration and Nationality Act dealing with terrorism and security grounds. The exact details of these links have not been decision reflects Washington's wider focus on preventing student visas from being misused by individuals with extremist ties. It also highlights the national security dimension of what is often considered primarily an educational VETTING AND POLITICAL RESPONSEThe move comes at a time when the Trump administration has paused and restarted visa processing for international students, adding stricter are now required to share social media details publicly for scrutiny, while officers are tasked with identifying individuals who may promote extremist ideologies or antisemitic visa revocations also carry political weight, with debates intensifying between Republicans and Democrats on how far enforcement should the administration has defended the cancellations as necessary for security, critics have warned of risks to due process and the international reputation of American higher education.- EndsMust Watch
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Data sovereignty is a strategic imperative
In 2006, Clive Humby, a mathematician and data scientist, delivered a talk titled 'Data is the new oil'. He emphasised that similar to oil, data is valuable, but only when refined and processed. When first coined, the metaphor highlighted the economic potential of data as a resource. While this remains relevant, the value of data has today expanded to become a strategic asset of national power and influence. Control over the collection, storage, processing, and flow of data is now fundamental to a nation's strategic sovereignty. India generates about 20% of global data but holds only a 3% share of global data centre capacity. It therefore remains deeply reliant on foreign-controlled digital infrastructure. (Shutterstock) Algorithms, fuelled by vast datasets, shape nearly every aspect of our daily lives. They influence what we buy, how we commute, what food we order, what information we see on social media, and how we access services. This promotes convenience and efficiency, but there is also a darker side. The algorithms operate with little transparency and can become instruments of strategic surveillance and behavioural modification. For example, the algorithmic curation of information on social media platforms can influence public opinion and political outcomes. Cambridge Analytica claimed to have influenced the 2016 US election by harvesting data from millions of Facebook users to build detailed psychographic profiles. Using this information, they deployed microtargeted political ads tailored to voters' personalities, fears, and beliefs, often exploiting polarising issues like immigration, Islamophobia, and racial biases. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly amplified the risks associated with data. Unlike earlier uses of data that supported routine processes, AI uses data to forecast outcomes and influence real-time decision-making. This gives unprecedented power to those who control the data and the models trained on it. AI systems could also quickly spread bias and disinformation in ways that are difficult to detect or regulate. There is also the risk of data colonisation. This term refers to scenarios where countries provide citizen behaviour, biometric records, health data and cultural patterns to foreign companies. These companies train AI systems on this data but do not share the value that is generated, mirroring colonial-era raw material extraction. Apart from creating technological dependency, there is also a fear that national decision-making can be subtly shaped by algorithms optimised for foreign interests. Sovereign control over data has thus become crucial for national security. Countries like the US and China have embedded data sovereignty into their strategic doctrines. The US asserts data sovereignty through a mix of legislation and technological dominance. Laws such as the CLOUD Act and FISA 702 allow US authorities to access data held by American companies, even when stored overseas. Through dominance in cloud services (Amazon, Microsoft, Google), foundational AI models, and data infrastructure, the US retains strategic control over much of the world's data flows. Export controls on semiconductors and AI chips further reflect America's intent to maintain its global tech leadership. China pursues a more State-centric and restrictive model of digital sovereignty. Through laws like the cybersecurity law (2017), data security law (2021), and personal information protection law (2021), China mandates that critical data generated within its borders be stored locally and imposes strict controls on data exports. It has also cultivated national technology champions such as Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, and Xiaomi, while maintaining tight state oversight of digital platforms. China's Great Firewall embodies the country's concept of cyber sovereignty, which holds that each nation has the absolute right to regulate and control its own digital space. India generates about 20% of global data but holds only a 3% share of global data centre capacity. It therefore remains deeply reliant on foreign-controlled digital infrastructure. From Aadhaar and CoWIN to DigiYatra and UPI, India has made impressive strides in building public digital platforms. Yet, most Indian entities and startups still store and process data through foreign cloud providers. Even if servers are located within India, jurisdictional control often lies with the host nations of these corporations. This legal loophole has significant national security implications. The dangers are not limited to infrastructure disruption alone. Foreign access to sensitive data can enable sophisticated forms of cognitive warfare, where targeted misinformation, psychological operations, and algorithmic manipulation could be used to fracture social cohesion, manipulate public opinion, and erode trust in institutions. In a country as socially diverse as India, influence campaigns can be deeply destabilising. The Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act was enacted in 2023, but its substantive provisions have not yet come into force. The act allows transfer of personal data to any country or territory outside India, except where the government restricts such transfers explicitly by official notification. While sectors like banking, telecom, and insurance already mandate data localisation, others, such as healthcare, education, and e-commerce, lag in compliance and clarity. India must, therefore, move beyond viewing data as a mere economic asset and treat it as a pillar of national resilience and strategic autonomy. Policies must ensure not just localisation, but jurisdictional clarity and public trust. Cloud systems hosting critical infrastructure must be subject to Indian law, not foreign statutes. AI models trained on Indian data must be accessible to Indian institutions. Without a robust domestic AI infrastructure, India risks becoming a digital colony, exporting raw data while increasing its dependency on foreign solutions for cutting-edge solutions. Finally, cognitive warfare must enter the mainstream of national security thinking. The manipulation of narratives, emotions, and opinions through algorithmically targeted content is no longer in the realm of a dystopian future, but rather a present menace. India must craft an information warfare doctrine to deal with this very real threat. In today's world, data is the new battlefield, and its control will shape national futures. For India, asserting data sovereignty is not just a technological challenge but a strategic imperative. Lieutenant General (retired) Deependra Singh Hooda is the co-founder of the Council for Strategic and Defence Research and a senior fellow at the Delhi Policy Group. The views expressed are personal
