logo
Cranswick launches review after Lincolnshire pig farm abuse claim

Cranswick launches review after Lincolnshire pig farm abuse claim

BBC News20-05-2025

The UK's largest pork supplier has launched an independent review into its animal welfare policies and livestock operations after claims staff were abusing piglets at a farm run by the business.Cranswick, based in Hessle in East Yorkshire, suspended using Northmoor Farm in Lincolnshire after covert footage, filmed by Animal Justice Project (AJP), appeared to show workers holding piglets by their hind legs and slamming them to the ground, using a banned method of killing the animals known as "piglet thumping".Asda, Morrisons, Sainsbury's and Tesco suspended using the farm after the footage emerged last week.Cranswick said it would not sell on any pigs that were based at the farm.
In a statement, chief executive Adam Couch said the business was reviewing the welfare of its operations."We take seriously any instance, anywhere in our supply chain, where behaviour fails to meet those standards," he said."We are therefore instigating a new, fully independent, expert veterinarian review of all our existing animal welfare policies, together with a comprehensive review of our livestock operations across the UK."We will provide a further update on this work in due course."According to AJP, other footage appeared to show the botched killing of a sow that left the animal screaming. Another sow was also apparently shown being beaten with metal bars.Under the Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing Regulation, using blunt trauma to kill pigs is illegal in England.AJP's founder, Claire Palmer, called for an "independent public inquiry into pig farming practices and regulatory failures".
Announcement of the independent review came as Cranswick revealed revenues had grown by 6.8% to £2.72bn for the year to March, compared with the previous year, due to demand for its luxury products and record Christmas trading.The firm said fresh pork export revenues lifted by more than 10% after it benefited from the reinstatement of a contract with China.Meanwhile, the company also revealed that pre-tax profits grew by 14.6% to £181.6m for the year.
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taxpayer foots huge bill to prosecute 66-year-old grandmother for accidentally smashing the leg off a neighbour's garden gnome... that she'd already tried to pay for
Taxpayer foots huge bill to prosecute 66-year-old grandmother for accidentally smashing the leg off a neighbour's garden gnome... that she'd already tried to pay for

Daily Mail​

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Taxpayer foots huge bill to prosecute 66-year-old grandmother for accidentally smashing the leg off a neighbour's garden gnome... that she'd already tried to pay for

A neighbourly feud involving a damaged garden gnome resulted in a 15-month legal ordeal for a law-abiding grandmother. Lorraine Hutton branded the draconian saga 'an enormous waste of time and public money', after being accused of deliberately damaging the 18-inch ceramic ornament. Mrs Hutton, 66, admitted she had accidentally broken off one of the gnome's legs while moving it from a communal pathway outside her flat in Bournemouth, and said she had already apologised to its owner, Lilijana Cekauskiene. She also said she posted £20 through her neighbour's letterbox to cover the damage. But Mrs Hutton was horrified when Mrs Cekauskiene reported the damage to Dorset Police and accused her of breaking the gnome 'provocatively'. The 66-year-old was then ordered to attend a police station for interview and formally charged with criminal damage. A convoluted court saga followed, which is thought to have cost the taxpayer thousands of pounds – including £4,000 to pay for Mrs Hutton's legal aid, £1,000 for her psychiatric evaluation, a £55-per-hour Lithuanian interpreter for Mrs Cekauskiene and magistrates' court costs, which can be upwards of £1,000 a day. Fifteen months and three court dates later, and Mrs Hutton has been formally exonerated of any crime – and she criticised the police and the Criminal Prosecution Service (CPS) for wasting taxpayers' cash by allowing the case to go to court. 'This has just been an enormous waste of time and public money,' she said. 'We have been to court three or four times for this case. I have never been in trouble with the police in my life, not even a parking ticket, and for people of my generation to have to go to court is embarrassing. 'I'm 66 and disabled. I don't see how it was in the public interest to take it to court.' Official statistics show that Bournemouth had the worst crime rate in the south-west of England in 2024. Crimes involving possessing an offensive weapon were up 22.9 per cent and shoplifting offences rose by 5.5 per cent. Meanwhile, in 2022/23, 77 per cent of burglaries went unresolved. But Wessex CPS, which brought the case against Mrs Hutton, insisted it was in the public interest. A spokesman said: 'In this case, we decided that there was sufficient evidence and that it was in the public interest to proceed.' A spokesman for Dorset Police added: 'We will always carry out an investigation into reported criminal damage incidents irrespective of the type of damage alleged to have been caused. A case is then submitted to the CPS, who will then decide whether or not to bring a case before the courts.'

Princess Diana's brother Earl Spencer 'frustrated at pace of probe into claims he was abused at boarding school in the 1970s'
Princess Diana's brother Earl Spencer 'frustrated at pace of probe into claims he was abused at boarding school in the 1970s'

Daily Mail​

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Princess Diana's brother Earl Spencer 'frustrated at pace of probe into claims he was abused at boarding school in the 1970s'

Princess Diana 's brother is understood to be frustrated at how long police are taking to investigate claims he was sexually abused at boarding school. Grandmother Sally Jane Carr was arrested almost exactly a year ago after a Mail on Sunday probe identified her as the matron Earl Spencer alleges he and other boys were molested by in the 1970s. Ms Carr, 68, was last weekend seen walking her dog near her terraced home in the Midlands. In his memoir, A Very Private School, Earl Spencer, 61, told how a matron groomed him and other boys at Maidwell Hall preparatory school in Northamptonshire. Police announced they had opened an investigation on June 10 last year and the MoS understands Ms Carr was arrested the next day. She was released on conditional bail. In January, Northamptonshire Police confirmed its probe had widened, with another ex-pupil claiming to have been abused. The MoS understands Earl Spencer met detectives this year to give a statement about his allegations. But one ex-pupil at the school said the Earl has grown frustrated at the pace of their probe and is concerned they are 'dragging their feet'. In his memoir, the Earl, who attended the school near Market Harborough from the age of eight to 13, said the matron, whom he did not name, had 'first kissed me on the lips' before she 'promoted me to the second rank of her reverse harem: those she intimately touched' Northamptonshire Police said: 'Investigations of this nature are complex and often take this amount of time due to the large amount of information that needs to be collated and processed.' In his memoir, the Earl, who attended the school near Market Harborough from the age of eight to 13, said the matron, whom he did not name, had 'first kissed me on the lips' before she 'promoted me to the second rank of her reverse harem: those she intimately touched'. He wrote that he had established the matron married at least twice but he was unable to find her, suspecting she had moved abroad or was dead. The MoS was able to establish the woman was Ms Carr and that she became a nurse looking after patients with severe mental illness.

We're furious after developers said they are going to reduce the height of our 6ft privacy fence – we're fighting back
We're furious after developers said they are going to reduce the height of our 6ft privacy fence – we're fighting back

The Sun

time29 minutes ago

  • The Sun

We're furious after developers said they are going to reduce the height of our 6ft privacy fence – we're fighting back

RESIDENTS have been left fuming after a housing developer said it would trim down their 6ft-tall privacy fence. Bellway wants to reduce the height of the barrier surrounding part of the Ingleby Manor estate in Ingleby Barwick, North Yorkshire, which presently prevents entry to the land beyond it. The developers also say it was always in their plans to trim the fence height from 1.8m to just 0.45m, although residents claim this would expose them to anti-social behaviour. Other locals have also slammed the plans, saying they are worried about young children being able to access a pond - which is connected with the estate on the land. They argue that they haven't been properly consulted on the project, and some even say they may have not bought their homes in the first places if they knew what they did now. The boundary fence was constructed initially to keep the development secure during the building of a number of homes, which was completed in 2021. One resident living in on Breton Drive, which backs into the fence, said the new barrier would be "absolutely tiny" if trimmed. She claimed that there had been "loads of problems" in the woods behind the fence, saying that children were taking drugs and drinking alcohol in the covered area. The resident, who did not want to be named, even alleged that women had been attacked beyond the fencing, reports TeesideLive. She also explained that young children would no longer be protected from the pond, which fills up during the winter months. The local added: "It's really stressing people out, properties will be completely exposed, but Bellway won't move on it.' She also claimed that "none" of the residents would have bought their homes if they had known the fence would eventually be trimmed down. Your kids are breaking law if they kick their ball over neighbour's fence, High Court rules after couple sued next door The distressed local continued: "If the fence comes down we are not going to feel safe living here. We have tried to resolve this [with Bellway], but are just not getting anywhere." Another homeowner on the street claimed her family were not informed that the fence was going to be changed in any way when they purchased the property five years ago. On top of this, they said Bellway had not notified or consulted them about the cutting of the fence height - with them only finding out when two people from Bellway knocked on her family's door. Echoing other residents, she also claimed there had been "anti-social behaviour, burglaries, and fly-tipping" nearby, and she fears the fence's trimming would put their family's safety at risk. Bellway claimed in a statement that the original planning conditions meant the height of the fencing would have to be reduced - in order for public right of way access to be facilitated via footpaths from the estate. The company explained that the current fence had been installed in order to prevent "unauthorised access" during construction. However, while it understood the concerns of some residents, it said it has to adhere to the plans - otherwise it could risk enforcement action. Our picturesque countryside views are ruined by 6ft tall 'Great Wall of China' fence next door… so we got our revenge By Douglas Simpson FURIOUS villagers have succeeded in having a 6ft tall fence, that was blocking beauty spot views, torn down. Residents hit out at their local council for building the large "out of place" steel structure. The massive 200 meter long, 6ft tall, spiked steel fence was built by Monmouthshire County Council in Clydach, Wales. Residents were given no notice that the fence was to be erected at a cost of £40,000. Furious with the hideous construction locals campaigned to have the fence removed. It blocked beauty spot views of the Brecon Beacons National Park leaving local residents infuriated and demanding it be taken down. Furious locals could see the fence on the hillside from their back gardens and said it failed to blend in. A heated council meeting in April saw residents fume at the local council with one branding it "disgusting." County council officials have now agreed to take down the fence, forking out an additional £20,000 for its removal. Made of steel spikes, locals blasted the fence as "disgusting" and said it was "absolutely hideous." A spokesman said a landscape plan for the site, used on customer marketing materials and shared with house buyers, showed three footpath entrances from roads next to the boundary. However, residents have disputed this, claiming these designs were absent in other previously produced plans. At these given points, the height of the fence is set to be reduced from 1.8 metres to just 0.45 metres. Stockton West MP Matt Vickers has joined in the fight, calling on Bellway to retain the fence at its current height. His office said that a number of residents had reached out to him, asking for the fence to remain unchaged. While some homeowners who oppose the change have been in touch with Stockton Council, the authority said it was not in any discussions with Bellway - adding the fence was not subject to any planning conditions. Correspondence between residents and the local council seen by the Local Democracy Reporting Service said the row was a 'civil matter' between homeowners and the developer, and it had no power to intervene. 1

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store