logo
UK is turning into place we don't recognise… migrant boat disrupting Dunkirk tribute tells you all you need to know

UK is turning into place we don't recognise… migrant boat disrupting Dunkirk tribute tells you all you need to know

The Sun23-05-2025

IF you ever wanted a powerful symbol of what is wrong with Britain and its ruling class, then take a look at what happened in the Channel this week.
Hoping to mark the 85th anniversary of Operation Dynamo — the evacuation of our brave troops from Dunkirk in World War Two — a flotilla of more than 60 'Little Ships' set off from Ramsgate, Kent.
6
6
6
But their 45-mile trip to France was disrupted when Border Force and the French navy demanded the boats make way for a dinghy bringing illegal immigrants to our shores, perhaps including terrorists among them.
What on earth would our ancestors have made of this, I wonder?
An attempt to mark our shared identity, history and collective sacrifice being disrupted by people from distant nations who are breaking our laws?
While nobody in Westminster has yet said anything about this incident, I think it perfectly symbolises a major dividing line in our country.
A line between those who cling to the things that once defined a country they both recognise and love, and those who are seeking to radically transform this country into something that most British and English people no longer recognise at all.
If you think I'm taking things a bit far, then I'd urge you to consider two points.
First, the reality of what is now unfolding in the English Channel.
4,500 boats — equivalent to filling an entire town almost the size of Luton.
And, astonishingly, one data analyst this week predicted that nearly 46,000 illegal migrants will cross this year, smashing all records to date.
But what we also learned this week, thanks to new figures released by the Office for National Statistics, is that our country and its population are being transformed much more rapidly and profoundly by legal immigration.
'Drop' in migrant numbers is nothing to celebrate... there are still 1,180 people arriving in the UK every DAY
While Keir Starmer and Labour will try to distract you in the days ahead by pointing to the fact the overall rate of net migration into Britain last year fell sharply, to 431,000, meaning nearly half a million more people arrived than left, just look at the bigger picture.
For a start, who voted for adding a city the size of Bristol to our country every year?
Seriously, who voted for a level of net migration that is still huge by historical standards — 80 per cent higher than the yearly average during the 2010s and seven times higher than the level of the 1990s, before Tony Blair and New Labour forced us into this mass immigration experiment.
When millions of people voted for Brexit, which many saw as an attempt to lower immigration, did they think that nearly a decade on from that vote the net migration figure in this country would be 100,000 higher than it was at the time of the referendum?
As a result of these mind-boggling trends, today, one in every 25 people in this country arrived in the last four years, according to the Spectator magazine.
Let me say that again.
One in every 25 people arrived in the last four years.
While Keir Starmer was recently criticised by the Left for suggesting we are 'at risk' of becoming an ' island of strangers ', I think he was too soft.
We are already an island of strangers.
How is it possible, you might ask, to maintain and unify a population that is undergoing this scale of rapid demographic change and in which millions of people only arrived in the last few years and so have no roots in our long identity, history and culture?
6
6
Furthermore, while the Labour Party wax lyrical about 'regaining control', can I ask them another simple question?
If net migration was close to half a million people last year while at the same time our leaders built only 218,000 homes in England, then how on earth will we ever solve our housing crisis, bringing down the soaring cost of homes and rent for hardworking Brits?
Between 2013 and 2024, according to the policy wonks at the Centre for Policy Studies, the 'housing deficit' in this country, meaning the number of homes we need, surged by 1.7million and immigration accounted for close to 1.6million, or 94 per cent, of this total.
The message is crystal clear, even if nobody in Westminster will be honest with you about it.
You can have available and affordable housing for the hardworking, tax-paying British people, or you can have mass uncontrolled immigration.
You cannot have both.
And look, too, at how these insane numbers are transforming our economy.
In the aftermath of the vote for Brexit, countless politicians told you that we would switch to a policy of lower but 'high skill' immigration — that we would attract the best of the best.
'ISLAND OF STRANGERS'
But now look into the detail of those numbers, released this week.
Here's just one bonkers statistic.
Of the nearly 3.6million migrants from outside Europe who arrived in Britain, since 2021, just 16 per cent of them came on work visas.
Think about that.
Once you exclude students, relatives and asylum seekers, only around one in eight of the millions of people who have flooded into our country came primarily to work.
I'm not an economist but I would bet my house that this is one very big reason why our economy is now in the toilet, with low rates of growth and dismal levels of productivity.
We should be attracting people who want to work, not providing a safety net for people who are taking more out of our economy than they are putting in.
And, lastly, look at how all this is transforming our culture and identity, leaving the country unrecognisable to millions of ordinary Brits.
Another stat we learned this week is that 81 per cent of all immigration onto these islands is now coming from outside Europe — typically India, Pakistan, Nigeria and China, which have radically different cultures, identities and histories.
Given all this, then, is it really any surprise that according to one pollster this week, close to half of all British people, including the vast majority who plan to vote for Nigel Farage and Reform, openly agree with the line: 'I sometimes feel like a stranger in my own country.'
I know I do.
And you know what?
I suspect that were those brave soldiers in Dunkirk, our ancestors, returning to the Britain and England of today, they would too.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kemi Badenoch says office managers should be able to ban women from wearing face coverings
Kemi Badenoch says office managers should be able to ban women from wearing face coverings

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Kemi Badenoch says office managers should be able to ban women from wearing face coverings

Office managers should be able to ban employees from wearing burkas, Kemi Badenoch has said. The Tory leader hit out at the Islamic traditional dress and said she had 'strong views about face coverings' and would not allow people into her constituency surgeries if they wore them. Her remarks came after Reform's chairman Zia Yusuf quit following a row over the subject after his colleague MP Sarah Pochin urged the Prime Minister to ban the burka 'in the interests of public safety'- before rejoining on Saturday night. Mrs Badenoch said Britain could enforce a ban on burkas but what needs to be addressed are pressing issues around integration. She added that sharia courts and first-cousin marriage are an 'insidious' barrier to integration. She said: 'If you were to ask me where you start with integration – sharia courts, all of this nonsense sectarianism, things like first cousin marriage – there's a whole heap of stuff that is far more insidious and that breeds more problems. 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear.' She added: 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face, and I also believe that other people should have that control. 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear; it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' France is just one of a number of countries that have already banned the burka. But Mrs Badenoch said: 'France has a ban and they have worse problems than we do in this country on integration. So banning the burka clearly is not the thing that's going to fix things.' If employers started to tell staff to remove any religious clothing, they could face legal issues under equality and human rights laws on the grounds they were being discriminating. An organisation would have to demonstrate its ban was for a legitimate reason, such as ensuring health and safety or enabling effective communication.

So much for smashing the gangs! Starmer claims the secret to solving the small-boat crisis is a crackdown on people smugglers, but soft-touch French judges let them walk free from court with merely a slap on the wrist
So much for smashing the gangs! Starmer claims the secret to solving the small-boat crisis is a crackdown on people smugglers, but soft-touch French judges let them walk free from court with merely a slap on the wrist

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

So much for smashing the gangs! Starmer claims the secret to solving the small-boat crisis is a crackdown on people smugglers, but soft-touch French judges let them walk free from court with merely a slap on the wrist

French judges were last night accused of 'going soft' on criminals orchestrating a wave of small-boat crossings to Britain after a string of convicted people smugglers were allowed to dodge prison. An investigation by The Mail on Sunday can today expose how criminals convicted of involvement in people trafficking have been allowed to walk free with a slap on the wrist by French courts – even when they were caught red-handed. In one of the most shocking cases, a married couple were last week handed suspended sentences and allowed to return home to Germany despite being caught with an inflatable dinghy, 50 life jackets and phones full of the numbers of migrants willing to pay thousands of pounds to make the perilous Channel crossing to England. And in another astonishing verdict, a suspected Iraqi people smuggler allegedly involved in last weekend's record number of small-boat crossings was 'given the benefit of the doubt' and acquitted by a French court, even though police found a 20-seat inflatable boat in the boot of the car he was in. A delighted Ibrahim Hussein, 36, blew kisses at the three judges who cleared him. Details of the extraordinary leniency by judges in northern France come as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch last night demanded the freedom to deny migrants benefits – a move currently restrained by European human rights laws. Writing in today's MoS, Mrs Badenoch said it was 'fundamentally unfair' that after five years migrants can claim the same benefits as UK citizens regardless of whether they have paid taxes. French police officers were last weekend photographed on a beach idly watching as dozens of migrants waded into the Channel and climbed on to a dinghy. Writing in today's MoS, Mrs Badenoch said it was 'fundamentally unfair' that after five years migrants can claim the same benefits as UK citizens regardless of whether they have paid taxes France is reportedly poised to demand millions of pounds in extra cash to help intercept Channel migrants. Ministers are close to agreeing a deal to lift a ban on French police stopping boats in shallow water. But president Emmanuel Macron is expected to demand that the UK stump up even more money to pay for the law enforcement. The UK is already paying Paris £480million over three years to stop the Channel crossings. Now our exclusive investigation of the French courts can reveal: A man from Azerbaijan was convicted of people smuggling after being caught delivering an 18ft inflatable boat and its engine – but walked free from court in Dunkirk with a suspended sentence. A Bosnian who admitted transporting four boats to smugglers escaped with an eight-month suspended sentence. The woman, 19, who lived in Germany, said she had just passed her driving test and 'wanted to get away to France'. A 19-year old from Chad also got a suspended sentence in Boulogne on Wednesday after collecting hundreds of thousands of pounds from UK-bound migrants. Critics last night warned the paltry sentences risked torpedoing Keir Starmer's repeated pledge to 'smash the gangs' in a bid to secure the UK's borders. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'So much for Starmer's vow to smash the gangs. Despite being paid hundreds of millions of pounds, the French are clearly barely lifting a finger to stop this evil trade in illegal immigrants which has led to dozens of deaths. 'The French are taking Starmer and the UK taxpayer for a ride.' And Alp Mehmet, of Migration Watch UK, said French judges had 'gone soft', adding: 'It's a disgrace. These pathetic and weak judgments make it open season for these ruthless criminals.' There were extraordinary scenes in a court in Dunkirk last Monday when Afghans Idris Osman, 37, and his wife Tahmina, 36, walked free after being convicted of involvement in a people smuggling operation. Family members, who had travelled from their home in Germany, cheered after the couple were handed eight-month suspended sentences and banned from France for ten years. Three days earlier, they were arrested after their German-registered Mazda was seen close to a beach at Leffrinckoucke, near Dunkirk. A search revealed an inflatable boat, outboard motor, cans of fuel and 50 life jackets. Brazen Idris Osman attempted to blame his wife, saying: 'She's the one who has the contacts with the man who organised the trip – a Kurd named Djmal. I thought we were going to Belgium for a wedding and that we were transporting a recreational boat.' The couple were paid around £3,600 for the trip, the court heard. On the same day, Syrian Taher Al Arrag, 45, and Iraqi Ibrahim Hussein, 36, appeared in a French court accused of offences related to people smuggling last weekend. Some 1,200 migrants arrived in the UK last Saturday – a record for a single day this year. Pictured: a group of people believed to be migrants carry a boat which may be used to cross the Channel. The social media footage comes as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch last night demanded the freedom to deny migrants benefits – a move currently restrained by European human rights laws French gendarmes stopped the pair in an Opel Vectra in Neufmoulin, near Abbeville. In the boot, police found five 20-litre cans of fuel, a 20-seat inflatable boat, an outboard engine and 35 life jackets. Both said they were going to use the boat to get to Britain themselves, despite leaving their families in Germany. Hussein, who had been in the passenger seat, was acquitted after judges gave him the 'benefit of the doubt'. Al Arrg was convicted of 'aiding the illegal movement of foreigners' and jailed for a year, with the possibility of parole after two months. In another case, a man from Azerbaijan, referred to only by the initials RR, was arrested on May 25 after his car spun out of control during a police chase. Officers found a boat, fuel and 42 life jackets in the car. He was also arrested on May 18 while delivering a boat and its engine to a beach. But at a court in Dunkirk on May 30, judges gave him a one-year suspended sentence. Germany is a key part of the supply chain for boats used by the gangs. Boats from Turkey with Chinese-sourced engines are transported to German warehouses before being covertly moved to the French coast.

Reeves considers energy bill subsidy for manufacturers
Reeves considers energy bill subsidy for manufacturers

Times

time3 hours ago

  • Times

Reeves considers energy bill subsidy for manufacturers

Rachel Reeves is scrutinising proposals to provide a £1 billion annual subsidy to manufacturers after being warned that Britain faces rapid deindustrialisation if she fails to reduce energy costs. The chancellor is considering lowering energy costs for industry amid fears that they are holding back investment and the country's competitiveness. The plans include a scheme by which taxpayers would compensate manufacturers when the price of electricity rises above a fixed level and the companies would pay the government when the price falls below the agreed level. Several European countries have adopted a similar model, including France, Denmark, Greece and Hungary. The proposal has been seen by Sir Keir Starmer, Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, and Reeves. A source close to Reynolds said industrial energy prices were a 'live issue', while a No 10 source confirmed that measures to lower costs were under 'serious consideration'. Reeves is preparing for Wednesday's spending review and the subsequent publication of the industrial strategy for eight key areas of the economy that the government has promised to promote to bolster economic growth. Industry argues that the price it pays for energy is double that paid by European competitors and four times that of America, which is leaving Britain at a disadvantage. It affects not just the country's existing steelmakers, ceramic industry and chemical businesses but also attempts by the government to attract new technologies, such as energy-hungry data centres. In a document seen by The Sunday Times, the industry lobby group Make UK warned the government: 'If we do not address the issue of high industrial energy costs in the UK as a priority we risk the security of our country. We will fail to attract investment in the manufacturing sector and will rapidly enter a phase of deindustrialisation.' Rain Newton-Smith, chief executive of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), warned the chancellor last week that high energy prices were an 'anchor on our ambition, a crack in our economic security and must be fixed'. The plan being drawn up by Make UK, which it calls a contract for difference, would cost £1.1 billion a year for five years from 2027 to provide a guaranteed energy price. But the organisation argues this 'upfront cost' should be considered in the context of its estimates that it would generate a medium-term boost for the economy of about £3 billion a year — or 0.1 per cent of gross domestic product — and also provide more tax revenue. It claims the policy is politically expedient for the government as it would help the red wall constituencies in the Midlands and northern England where Labour is vulnerable to the threat posed by Reform. The biggest energy-intensive companies already receive a subsidy through the British Industry Supercharger scheme, which was set up by the Conservatives in 2024 and which the Financial Times reported last week could become more generous under plans being considered by ministers. But this does not benefit many industrial companies, which still say they are struggling with high energy prices. When she appeared at an event hosted by the CBI last week, Reeves told the audience of business leaders: 'We know that one of the questions that we need to answer is how we're going to make energy more affordable, particularly for some of our most intensive energy-using businesses where the price differential with other countries is just too acute for many to be competitive. That's a question we know we need to answer and we will answer in the industrial strategy in a few weeks.' Other ideas being presented to the government include stepping up drilling in the North Sea, which is likely to create tensions with Miliband. Solving the energy situation is regarded as a crucial plank of the industrial strategy, which the business secretary put out for consultation six months ago to look at eight sectors: advanced manufacturing; clean energy; the creative industries; defence; digital; financial services; life sciences and professional and business services. The result of the consultation had widely been expected to be published alongside Reeves's spending review but it is not now expected for another two weeks. It is understood that the delay has been caused by a desire to resolve the issue of industry energy costs. Stephen Phipson, chief executive of Make UK, said: 'If we don't want to lose the big corporates we have to get competitive and the government is going to have to make tough choices.' Jakob Sigurdsson, chief executive of the FTSE 250 Lancashire chemical business Victrex, said the industry was not 'asking for handouts' but needed a government policy to ensure it was viable. His energy bill is £12 million — double what it was before Russia's invasion of Ukraine pushed up oil prices — while profits are £60 million. 'When you look at it from a global perspective, for the price of power we're paying four to five times the price for electricity that a Chinese company would be paying,' he said, with a similar situation compared to the US. 'It's a cost disadvantage for us so a sound energy policy and how we deal with pricing mechanisms is paramount,' he said. 'This is not going to be solved through incremental changes. There needs to be a bold energy shift.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store