A Daughter's Reckoning With the Indian Boarding School System
At the school, which was operated by the Sisters of Perpetual Adoration, Bernice lived in fear of pinches, slaps, and whipping from nuns, who regularly referred to her and the other students as 'dirty Indians.' Her daily life was heavily regimented. After waking each morning at 5 a.m., she washed up at a communal sink, cleaned her teeth with a towel, and walked a quarter-mile to Mass. She and her siblings were fed corn mush and forced to work long hours in the laundry and garden. They were always hungry. Once, a nun beat Bernice for stealing an apple from the cellar. The few hours of daily education she and her siblings received were designed to 'civilize' them and assimilate them into white Christian culture. Bernice lived at the school until she completed the eighth grade.
As her daughter, Mary Annette Pember, explores in Medicine River: A Story of Survival and the Legacy of Indian Boarding Schools, Bernice was just one of tens of thousands of Native children who were coerced to attend Indian boarding schools across the United States as part of a 150-year project of forcible assimilation. Most Native Americans alive now can trace a family connection to the system, which was funded by the federal government from 1819 to 1969; by the 1920s, a jaw-dropping 76 percent of Native children attended such schools.
Despite its scale and the impact it had on Native communities, the system was little known to the general public until 2021. That spring and summer, the discoveries of what appeared to be hundreds of unmarked graves at the sites of former Indian residential schools in Canada spurred a belated reckoning with the horrific history of such institutions on this side of the border. Canada had designed its residential school system after the U.S. system, wherein children were removed from their families and tribes and made to undergo forced assimilation that stripped them of their tribal languages, traditions, spiritual practices, and kinship connections. At boarding schools in both countries, Native children experienced rampant physical and sexual abuse, labored for long hours, and suffered from malnutrition and cramped conditions that facilitated the spread of disease. But while Canada completed, in 2015, a yearslong Truth and Reconciliation Commission process, with the aim of investigating and coming to terms with what happened at the residential schools, the United States has not yet launched a similar project.
The U.S. government took a belated first step toward such a reckoning in June 2021, after the discovery of the unmarked graves in Canada, when then–Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland, an enrolled member of the Laguna Pueblo whose grandparents were forced to attend Indian boarding schools, announced the creation of the Federal Indian Boarding School Initiative. The initiative was tasked with documenting the government's operation and support of Indian boarding schools, tracing their 'lasting consequences,' and investigating Native children's deaths there. The resulting reports have made clear for the first time the scale of a scheme in which federally funded education was used to assimilate Native children with 'systematic militarized and identity-alteration methodologies' at nearly 500 boarding schools across the country. In one of his last acts as president, Joe Biden issued a formal apology to Native peoples on behalf of the United States for our country's role in running these boarding schools.
Pember, a citizen of the Red Cliff Band of Wisconsin Ojibwe, notes in Medicine River that many Americans learned of the devastating history of Indian boarding schools for the first time when widespread reporting of the unmarked graves in Canada roused public awareness. But for Native communities, the reality of these schools has always been impossible to brush aside. 'For Indians, the most shocking element of the story was not the discovery of the graves,' she writes, 'but the fact that it's taken so long for non-Indians to acknowledge the grim details of this long-ignored history.' Pember has known of it since she was a girl growing up in the 1950s and 1960s. As her mother's 'secret confessor,' she often listened to fairy-tale-like stories of the horrors Bernice endured at the Sister School, as it was known, horrors that left Bernice with 'angst, mysterious headaches, nameless fear, shame, cruelty, and hypervigilance,' all of which Pember was forced to navigate throughout her own childhood and adulthood.
A national correspondent for ICT News who has had a long career covering Native issues, Pember approaches Medicine River as 'part journalistic research, part spiritual pilgrimage.' Throughout her life, Bernice, like many Indian boarding school survivors, was too traumatized to dissect what had happened to her. What motivates Pember's project in Medicine River is a need to face what her mother could not. If she can understand what happened to Bernice at the Sister School—and to other Indian children at schools like it—she will be able, she hopes, to 'move forward as an Indian woman in the world.' This quest threads throughout her archival research and reporting on the boarding school era and its long aftermath, making palpable the very personal costs of America's attempts to acculturate Natives.
Despite the new levels of public consciousness around the existence of Indian boarding schools in the U.S. in recent years, the literature of this history has until now been largely relegated to the niche of academic presses. Pember's accessible blend of the personal and the historical gives Medicine River the potential to further popularize this history. The book could not be more necessary or overdue, especially as we face yet another administration that refuses to reckon with the government's role in the attempted destruction of Native culture.Pember's use of her mother's experience at the Sister School provides readers a touchpoint for comprehending the effects and consequences of assimilationist education. The school was founded in 1883, in what Pember calls a 'microcosm of what unfolded in much of Indian country during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.' During this period, tribes lost hundreds of millions of acres of land to exploitative treaties and legislation. An 1837 treaty with the U.S. government cost several bands of the Ojibwe 13 million acres of land in Wisconsin and Minnesota; an 1854 treaty further circumscribed the Ojibwe to reservations, like that in Bad River, where Pember's family lived. 'Bad River' is a settler term for the river that flows through this part of northern Wisconsin; the Ojibwe call it Mashkiiziibii, or Medicine River, because 'it's said that everything needed for mino-bimadizwin, a good life—food, medicine, and spirit—is available in its coffee-colored waters and along its banks,' Pember writes. The settlers' misguided renaming of the river speaks to their wanton disregard for Native wisdom.
As the government expropriated land from Natives and relegated tribes to reservations where they could not rely on traditional hunting and gathering for subsistence, driving them into desperate poverty, it also employed education as a means of pushing Indian children to abandon traditional ways of life in favor of farming or industrial wage labor. The first federally run Indian boarding school, the Carlisle Indian Industrial School, was founded in 1879, on the site of former army barracks in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Carlisle's founder, Captain Richard Henry Pratt, had lobbied Congress to open an off-reservation boarding school at the barracks after directing a prison for Indians at Fort Marion in Florida, where he found that a combination of isolation and education in the English language were successful 'civilizing' methods. 'Assimilation and indoctrination into the ideals and values of white culture were clearly a means to destroy tribal sovereignty,' Pember writes. The ultimate goal was 'to free up land for white settlement and exploitation.'
But as Pember points out, the federal government had been funding the assimilationist education of Native children long before the founding of Carlisle. In 1792, under President George Washington, the U.S. began a practice of funding the work of missionaries to 'civilize, convert, and educate Indians.' The Indian Civilization Fund Act of 1819 later codified and expanded this policy, leading to a rise in the number of religious Indian boarding schools across the country; by 1877, there were 47. The Sister School on the Bad River reservation joined in this tradition.
While Pember's meticulous recounting of this history can at times drag, when she pulls back from these recitations to draw connections to her mother's experience, Medicine River sings. Bernice may not have been successfully assimilated at the Sister School, but she did learn to be ashamed of being Indian. That shame was fueled by fear and trauma, and fueled Bernice's lifelong stubbornness and rage. 'Her vengeance would be disproving all the prejudices the sisters held about Indians as lazy, dirty, and biologically inferior,' Pember reflects. 'She started work on the outsized chip she forever carried on her shoulder, sometimes nearly collapsing under its weight.' Pember and her brothers were raised in the shadow of that chip on Bernice's shoulder, struggling with her 'harsh and baffling ways' and attempting to avoid the hidden triggers that set off anguished spells of hand flapping and head shaking.Pember completes her exploration of her mother's time at the Sister School and the history of Indian boarding schools within the first half of Medicine River. In the remainder of the book, she moves far beyond that history, without losing sight of how it continues to color the contemporary Native experience. In this, Medicine River stands out against typical historical accounts of the boarding school era, which tend to focus only on what happened between 1819 and 1969. By expanding the frame up to the contemporary moment, both by telling her own life story and by examining the efforts of boarding school survivors to demand accountability from the Catholic Church and the federal government, Pember illuminates how Native cultures have resisted and persisted through centuries of attempts to eradicate their people, and how their long-standing traditions and spiritual practices can light the path forward for healing from the ongoing traumas the schools wrought.
Native researchers, such as the social worker Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart, explain these aftereffects using the theory of historical trauma. In the first phase, a population is subjected to a mass trauma by the dominant culture—for Native Americans, colonialism, wars, and cultural genocide. That population displays physical and psychological responses to the trauma, as Bernice did. Finally, the population that experienced the trauma passes their responses on to their progeny. The historical trauma theory makes sense of 'the high rates of addiction, suicide, mental illness, sexual violence, and other ills among Indian peoples,' Pember writes. She now understands her mother's anger, aloofness, and bitterness as trauma responses, and her own struggles with alcoholism as the only coping mechanism that she was given to handle the anger and fear she inherited.
More effective healing methods could be found in tribes' cultural and spiritual practices. Pember writes poignantly of visiting the remote Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta in Alaska, where Yup'ik peoples have developed a program based on traditional teachings to rapidly respond to crises among a community with high rates of suicide, physical and sexual violence, and substance abuse. Organized around the medicine of kaholian (unconditional love and understanding), the program also promotes traditional Yup'ik practices, such as the open discussion of feelings with elders to address problems—a cultural ideal that developed from the fact that 'in the unforgiving climate of the tundra, survival depends on cooperation, effective conflict resolution, and good mental and physical health,' Pember explains.
Pember herself has turned to Ojibwe traditions and ceremonies to seek healing. Since her mother's death in 2011, she has visited relatives on the Bad River reservation to 'grieve and understand their lost childhood days for them, something they were never permitted to do.' Medicine River itself at once stands as a moving witness to Pember's family's traumas and a rousing demand for accountability from the government and religious organizations that attempted to destroy her tribe.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
We Tracked Down a Killer Grizzly — and It Almost Ended in Tragedy
This story was originally published in the November 1970 issue of Outdoor Life. Harvey Cardinal had not a moment's fore-warning that it was his last day on earth. He must have realized that there was some risk in tracking a grizzly through pockets of very thick spruce. Guides with whom he had worked said afterward that although he'd had no previous encounters with grizzlies, he had a deep respect for them. But Cardinal was carrying a rifle that he considered adequate, an old .303 military Enfield. And if he thought about danger at all that cold January morning, he probably figured that he knew what to expect and could deal with it if it came. Cardinal was 38, a Beaver Indian from the Moberly Lake Reserve southwest of Fort St. John, a town at Mile 50 on the Alaska Highway above Dawson Creek, in northeastern British Columbia. He had been a trapper, hunter, and guide all his life, working for other guides and outfitters in the area. Chunky of build, weighing close to 200 pounds, and about five feet 10 inches tall, he was a strong, husky woodsman, slow of speech and movement, not much afraid of anything except grizzly bears. Unmarried, he spent more time living off the Reserve than on it. The evening before, Cardinal had gone to visit friends at the Doig River Indian Reserve, a Beaver community of about 30 families 50 miles north of Fort St. John. He had heard a strange story there. The natives in that area hold rights to large trapline blocks, within each of which several families are allowed by law to trap. By contrast, whites generally hold trapline rights individually. One of the Doig River Beavers, running his trapline in 40-below cold that morning, had come across the tracks of a bear. The date was January 13, 1970. Ten inches of snow was on the ground, and for 10 days the temperature had stayed below zero, falling to minus 30 degrees or lower night after night. At that time of year and under those conditions, the bear should have been in winter quarters. The fact that it was out and prowling was something of a mystery to the Doig River people, and it stirred up more than a little excitement. The reason will never be known for certain, but I believe that the animal had not hibernated at all during the winter, perhaps because of mild weather. That part of British Columbia had experienced temperatures well above normal all through the fall and early winter, up to the first week in January, when the mercury plummeted and stayed down for more than two weeks. I think this grizzly had not bothered to den up in the warm weather, and when the cold spell came he just kept on traveling, perhaps goaded by hunger. The trapper who found the tracks was sure of two things: the bear was big, and it was unquestionably a grizzly. The claw marks in the tracks made by the front feet proved that. Nobody in the isolated community at Doig River wanted anything to do with the maker of those tracks if he could avoid it. With few exceptions, the Indians of British Columbia prefer to steer clear of grizzlies. Harvey Cardinal usually shared that feeling, but this was a special case. In midwinter the bear would very likely be carrying a good pelt, prime and unrubbed. Such a pelt, uncured, would be worth around $150 in hard cash. That was money a north-country guide without winter employment could use, and Cardinal made up his mind to go after it. Shortly after daylight the next morning, Cardinal went to the place where the trapper had hit the grizzly tracks. He picked up the trail and followed it into an area of logged-off openings alternating with stands of aspen and thick young spruce. The snow was not deep enough to require snowshoes. When Cardinal did not return at nightfall his friends at the Reserve began to worry. And when nothing was heard from him the next morning the worry mounted into real fear that the bear had attacked and injured or killed him. Half a dozen of the Doig River men made up a search party and set out to investigate. They followed the tracks of Cardinal and the bear for two miles, across openings and through timber and finally into a tangled thicket. There they found what they feared they were looking for —— Harvey Cardinal's body. It was a grisly scene. The ground around the body was tracked-up and bloodstained. The man's clothing had been torn to shreds. He lay on his back with both arms raised in a hands-up position-frozen in the bitter cold of the night. A fair share of the upper body had been devoured. Grizzlies are notorious for their savage possessiveness and short tempers if anything threatens to rob them of food to which they have laid claim. The Indians knew that in all probability the man-eater was in thick cover nearby, perhaps only a few yards away —— watching, working up a murderous rage, getting ready to rush the entire party. There was nothing they could do for Harvey Cardinal at that point and no purpose in risking more lives. This was a matter for the police. The searchers backed off, turned, and hurried for the road. They drove 20 miles south to the store and post office at the little town of Rose Prairie, where the nearest phone was available, and phoned their report to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police at the Fort St. John post. Because a bear was involved, the Mounties contacted the Fort St. John office of the British Columbia Fish and Wildlife Branch, where I am stationed as a conservation officer, and asked for a man to accompany them to the scene. I was in the field that morning. Senior Conservation Officer Jack Mackill, a 20-year veteran with the Branch, took the call and agreed to go along. Mackill and several police officers drove at once to the place where Cardinal had left the road to go into the woods. They were able to get a panel truck to within a half-mile of the scene of the killing, and they followed the tracks from there. Since they were dealing with a grizzly that had reportedly killed a man, Mackill was carrying a 12 gauge shotgun with slug loads. The death scene was fully as horrifying as the Indians had described it. Cardinal's body lay in a thicket, torn and mutilated, and it was obvious that the bear had fed heavily on its victim. Mackill and the police pieced together the story of the attack as best they could from the evidence in the snow. Cardinal had been surprised and killed in a lightning-like attack that came from behind without warning. He had not had time to release the safety of his Enfield, and the leather mittens he'd been wearing were still on his hands. The bear had killed him with a single blow of a forepaw to the side of the head, a blow so savage that it shattered the entire skull. Although the area was badly tracked up, the men could easily imagine what had happened. Apparently the grizzly had lain quietly in ambush, in thick stuff no more than a few feet away, perhaps hidden behind a log or a windfall as bears often do. He must have let Cardinal walk by. Then, once the man was past him, he had exploded in murderous fury, pouncing on his victim in no more than two or three leaps. I doubt that Cardinal felt the blow that killed him, and if he saw or was aware of the bear at all it was for only a fleeting instant. Newspaper accounts, basing their conclusions on the fact that the bear had attacked from the rear, said the animal had deliberately stalked the man through the brush to kill him for food. But those of us who investigated the affair disagree with that version. Fred Harper, a regional wildlife biologist with the Fish and Wildlife Branch who went with me to hunt the grizzly down, summed up our collective opinions. 'The attack probably was unintentionally provoked by the victim,' Harper said. 'He got too close to the bear without knowing it was there, and it jumped him without warning. Though the animal was old and battle-scarred, I do not believe that any of its physical peculiarities were sufficient to have stimulated the attack.' Fresh tracks around the body, apparently made 24 hours after the attack, indicated that the grizzly had been on the kill again that morning. Jack Mackill and the police made their investigation very cautiously, with guns in hand, knowing that the bear was probably lurking nearby and might decide to attack at any instant. When they had put together as much of the story as possible, they covered Harvey Cardinal's body with a blanket and carried it out to their truck, keeping a sharp watch all around throughout the half-mile hike. Fred Harper and I returned to the office in Fort St. John late that afternoon. Jack Mackill told us the story. Nothing quite like it had ever happened before in our part of British Columbia, and we all agreed that the bear had to be destroyed. Whatever the grizzly's reasons for attacking Cardinal, now that it had killed and fed on a human the odds were great that it would repeat the performance. We could not leave so dangerous an animal in the woods. Though this was the first instance of a grizzly turning man-eater that ever came to our attention, it was not the first time one of the big bears had attacked a man in our area. Luckily, the earlier affairs had turned out better. Two such attacks had occurred before my time at Fort St. John. In both cases the victims were big-game guides. In one incident the guide was on foot and escaped the bear by jumping over a 20-foot cliff. The other attack was more unusual, though the grizzly had good reason for what it did. The bear had been wounded by a hunter and had gotten away. The party followed it, and it rushed out of thick bush and attacked the guide while he was on horseback. The man was cut up badly but he remained conscious and walked out for help. The bear disappeared and was never seen again. A third attack happened in late October 1968. The victim that time was an experienced hunter, Mike Markusich of Port Alberni on Vancouver Island. Markusich was hunting moose east of Mile 135 on the Alaska Highway. In four inches of snow he came across grizzly tracks going into dense spruce. He had no bear license but decided to see where the animal was headed. The bear had a moose kill about 300 yards ahead in the bush and had been feeding there. With its belly full, it had walked 50 feet away and lain down to keep watch, in typical grizzly fashion. As in the case of Harvey Cardinal, the bear let Markusich walk by before it moved. Then it struck. Markusich neither saw nor heard the animal. His first warning of the attack came when the bear's jaws clamped down on his head and face from behind. Before it let him go, he suffered two jaw fractures and severe lacerations on the face, neck, and back. He eventually lost the sight in one eye. (I interviewed him in the hospital not long after the incident, and he could not speak. He had to nod or shake his head in answer to my questions.) The attack lasted only seconds. Then the bear dropped Markusich and ran off. As far as is known it never came back to the moose kill. Markusich was able to walk and drag himself two miles out to the road, where he collapsed and was later picked up by a passing motorist. Jack Mackill and I investigated that case thoroughly. As far as we could determine, the bear had not been wounded earlier. It was protecting its kill and had attacked in blind anger when the man came too close. At daylight the morning after Cardinal was found, Mackill, Harper, and I climbed into a big chopper rented from Okanagan Helicopters, a first-class flying service operating over most of British Columbia. Our pilot was Maynard Bergh, the service's 51-year-old base manager at Fort St. John, who has been flying copters since 1940, has logged over 7,000 hours at their controls, and is rated one of the best in the business. In the seven years I have been stationed at my present post, Maynard has flown me on many game counts and predator-control missions. Countless times he has put me down close enough to a particular animal to enable me to classify it as adult or juvenile and even to determine its sex. If anybody could locate this grizzly from the air, hidden as it would be in dense cover, Bergh was the man. We went armed for what we intended to do. This was no hunt for sport, and we wanted weapons that would kill no matter what the circumstances might be. Harper was carrying a .375 Magnum Browning in Safari grade; Mackill and I had 12 gauge shotguns. Jack's was a Model 12 Winchester with the plug removed, giving him five shots without reloading. Mine was a Browning over-and-under. We carried both buckshot and slug loads. We flew directly to the scene of the killing, and a few minutes of circling revealed a line of bear tracks headed north. The grizzly had cleared out sometime during the night —— we guessed right after dark. He no longer had any reason to hang around in that neighborhood, and the presence of the Indian search party and later the police had almost certainly disturbed him. He was traveling steadily. Tracking the bear from the air, which was the only way we could hope to overtake him, proved very difficult. The terrain was level, as is most of that part of British Columbia except for creek draws and river breaks. The tree cover is aspen with very dense scattered stands of spruce. There are a few clearings devoted to grain crops and the grazing of horses (it's not cattle country), but the bear had avoided the clearings. To follow the tracks we had to fly just above the treetops. The snow on the ground was light and fluffy, and at our height the main rotor of the helicopter blew it into the tracks and filled them instantly. The four of us strained our eyes to the limit. Try as we would, however, we could not follow the track for more than a few hundred yards at a time. Repeatedly it disappeared into thick spruce stands where we could see nothing, leaving us the frustrating chore of circling until we picked it up again. About five years before, oil-exploration crews had cut seismic lines through, the area at one-mile intervals. If it hadn't been for those lines, 35 feet wide and straight as a fire break, I doubt I that we could have stayed on the track. We could spot the trail where the bear had crossed one of the lines, fly on to the next in the general direction he was traveling, and pick up the track again. It took four hours of this aerial tracking to cover eight miles. Probably the bear had made better time than we did. Finally his tracks went into a very thick isolated stand of spruce about a half-mile long and half that wide. We circled the 80-acre tangle twice, but no tracks came out. We were sure we had the grizzly cornered at last. We had decided at the outset that we would kill the bear from the air if we could. Mackill, Harper, and I strongly deplore the aerial hunting of any I game, but this was no time for ethics, or sportsmanship. We had come to I destroy a killer, a man-eater, an animal that was a potential menace to any human he encountered. We meant to do it quickly and humanely. Finally his tracks went into a very thick isolated stand of spruce about a half-mile long and half that wide. We circled the 80-acre tangle twice, but no tracks came out. We searched the 80 acres of bush for 20 minutes without seeing a sign of the bear. Then, in a little opening below us, something big and brown moved out of one thicket and into another. We had no chance for a shot, but at least we knew where the bear was and we had him on the move. It took us 10 or 15 minutes to find him again. Twice during that time Bergh made a quick circle around the perimeter of the spruce to make sure the grizzly had not slipped out. Finally the bear moved into an open place, and we got our first good look at him. To me, one of the most surprising things about that bear hunt was the way the grizzly reacted to the chopper. All the while we were tracking him I had visualized him running at top speed to get away, or turning on us, reared up on his hind feet, cuffing the air in a rage, daring us to come down. But he did nothing of the kind. He showed neither anger nor concern. He just walked away, and even after we started shooting he did not hurry. I got the idea that he was too old to care. The bear was on my side of the copter, and I quickly emptied both barrels of the Browning into him. When we autopsied him later we learned that although my buckshot had not hit a vital organ, some of them had penetrated the body cavity to the stomach and would have killed the bear eventually. Yet he didn't react in any way to those two shots. The grizzly walked out of sight into thick spruce again, but Bergh was directly over him now, just above the trees, and in a minute the bear came into the open once more, on Harper's side 60 feet below us. Fred's 300-grain soft-point from the .375 Magnum smashed into the grizzly's right shoulder and blew up in the lungs and heart. He fell, pushed himself ahead a few feet to the edge of a thicket, and was dead in seconds. Maynard set the helicopter down at the border of the thick stuff, and the four of us climbed out for a closer look at the killer animal we had destroyed. What happened next almost piled tragedy upon tragedy. Jack stepped down from the bubble and walked back along the side of the copter, checking the loads in his Winchester in case the grizzly was not dead. We were taking no chances. We knew that more than one 'dead' bear had come suddenly to life. Jack's mind was intent on his gun and the bear, and he didn't notice the still-spinning tail rotor of the helicopter. He walked into it and was knocked down as if he had been sledged. Jack escaped instant death narrowly indeed. The spinning rotor struck him on the side of the head, in front of and above the right ear, knocking away a fragment of skull a half-inch wide and half again that long. His doctors said afterward that he came within a hair of being killed outright. Jack was unconscious, and for a minute we thought he was dead. When we saw that he was still alive we gave up all thought of checking out the bear and loaded Jack back into the chopper for the half-hour flight to Fort St. John. Fortunately, the fragile rotor that had felled Jack wasn't seriously damaged and the chopper could still fly. Mackill was treated at the Fort St. John Hospital and at 6 o'clock that evening he was put aboard a Canadian Pacific jet flight for Vancouver as a stretcher patient. Eight hours after the accident, surgeons in Vancouver General Hospital removed bone fragments from his skull. Prompt help and medical skill saved Jack's life. He has recovered completely and has since been transferred to Williams Lake, leaving me the Senior Conservation Officer at Fort St. John. On Saturday, three days after the grizzly killed Cardinal, Harper and I went back to bring in the bear's carcass, for examination, to see whether we could learn the answers to the riddles in the case. We were assisted by half a dozen members of a Fort St. John snowmobile club headed by Grant Slatter. We drove to within two miles of the place in a light truck and went the rest of the way on three snowmobiles. The weather was still bitterly cold, and the grizzly was frozen hard. We rolled the carcass onto one of the snow machines, took it out to the truck, loaded it, and brought it back to Fort St. John to thaw overnight in a Forest Service warehouse there. Grizzlies are notorious for their stench, which is hardly surprising, considering that they feed on carrion much of their lives. By morning this one smelled so bad that we moved it outside for an autopsy. Even there, the job was very unpleasant. Harper and I did the autopsy in 25-below cold. We learned less than we had hoped, but we did prove that we had destroyed the right bear. Its stomach contained human hair, a piece of denim cloth from Harvey Cardinal's shirt, and not much else. The grizzly was a very old male, weighing about 500 pounds and severely battle-scarred. The pelt was poor; its hair was only two or three inches long and was iced up on the back from exposure to snow and cold. The face was scarred, probably as a result of a fight with another bear, but the injuries were old and had healed. Part of the pad on the right-front foot had been torn off. The teeth were badly worn, the two upper canines broken across and split in half. But apparently the bad teeth had not bothered the bear much, for we found two or three inches of fat under his pelt and he showed no evidence of having gone short of food. Hunger may have contributed to his attack on Cardinal, but it was not hunger of long duration. He had come through the winter in good condition. Tests were made to determine whether the bear was rabid, but they proved negative. Read Next: About the only conclusion Harper and I could reach was that the grizzly had jumped Cardinal simply because the man got too close, and had fed on his kill afterward as he would have fed on a moose. One question will never be fully answered: why was the bear out of winter quarters in such frigid January weather? But for that odd bit of behavior, the whole strange affair would never have happened. Unusual as this case was, there is a lesson to be learned from it: grizzly bears are unpredictable, dangerous animals, and humans who deal with them in any way had better keep that fact in mind.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
We Tracked Down a Killer Grizzly — and It Almost Ended in Tragedy
This story was originally published in the November 1970 issue of Outdoor Life. Harvey Cardinal had not a moment's fore-warning that it was his last day on earth. He must have realized that there was some risk in tracking a grizzly through pockets of very thick spruce. Guides with whom he had worked said afterward that although he'd had no previous encounters with grizzlies, he had a deep respect for them. But Cardinal was carrying a rifle that he considered adequate, an old .303 military Enfield. And if he thought about danger at all that cold January morning, he probably figured that he knew what to expect and could deal with it if it came. Cardinal was 38, a Beaver Indian from the Moberly Lake Reserve southwest of Fort St. John, a town at Mile 50 on the Alaska Highway above Dawson Creek, in northeastern British Columbia. He had been a trapper, hunter, and guide all his life, working for other guides and outfitters in the area. Chunky of build, weighing close to 200 pounds, and about five feet 10 inches tall, he was a strong, husky woodsman, slow of speech and movement, not much afraid of anything except grizzly bears. Unmarried, he spent more time living off the Reserve than on it. The evening before, Cardinal had gone to visit friends at the Doig River Indian Reserve, a Beaver community of about 30 families 50 miles north of Fort St. John. He had heard a strange story there. The natives in that area hold rights to large trapline blocks, within each of which several families are allowed by law to trap. By contrast, whites generally hold trapline rights individually. One of the Doig River Beavers, running his trapline in 40-below cold that morning, had come across the tracks of a bear. The date was January 13, 1970. Ten inches of snow was on the ground, and for 10 days the temperature had stayed below zero, falling to minus 30 degrees or lower night after night. At that time of year and under those conditions, the bear should have been in winter quarters. The fact that it was out and prowling was something of a mystery to the Doig River people, and it stirred up more than a little excitement. The reason will never be known for certain, but I believe that the animal had not hibernated at all during the winter, perhaps because of mild weather. That part of British Columbia had experienced temperatures well above normal all through the fall and early winter, up to the first week in January, when the mercury plummeted and stayed down for more than two weeks. I think this grizzly had not bothered to den up in the warm weather, and when the cold spell came he just kept on traveling, perhaps goaded by hunger. The trapper who found the tracks was sure of two things: the bear was big, and it was unquestionably a grizzly. The claw marks in the tracks made by the front feet proved that. Nobody in the isolated community at Doig River wanted anything to do with the maker of those tracks if he could avoid it. With few exceptions, the Indians of British Columbia prefer to steer clear of grizzlies. Harvey Cardinal usually shared that feeling, but this was a special case. In midwinter the bear would very likely be carrying a good pelt, prime and unrubbed. Such a pelt, uncured, would be worth around $150 in hard cash. That was money a north-country guide without winter employment could use, and Cardinal made up his mind to go after it. Shortly after daylight the next morning, Cardinal went to the place where the trapper had hit the grizzly tracks. He picked up the trail and followed it into an area of logged-off openings alternating with stands of aspen and thick young spruce. The snow was not deep enough to require snowshoes. When Cardinal did not return at nightfall his friends at the Reserve began to worry. And when nothing was heard from him the next morning the worry mounted into real fear that the bear had attacked and injured or killed him. Half a dozen of the Doig River men made up a search party and set out to investigate. They followed the tracks of Cardinal and the bear for two miles, across openings and through timber and finally into a tangled thicket. There they found what they feared they were looking for —— Harvey Cardinal's body. It was a grisly scene. The ground around the body was tracked-up and bloodstained. The man's clothing had been torn to shreds. He lay on his back with both arms raised in a hands-up position-frozen in the bitter cold of the night. A fair share of the upper body had been devoured. Grizzlies are notorious for their savage possessiveness and short tempers if anything threatens to rob them of food to which they have laid claim. The Indians knew that in all probability the man-eater was in thick cover nearby, perhaps only a few yards away —— watching, working up a murderous rage, getting ready to rush the entire party. There was nothing they could do for Harvey Cardinal at that point and no purpose in risking more lives. This was a matter for the police. The searchers backed off, turned, and hurried for the road. They drove 20 miles south to the store and post office at the little town of Rose Prairie, where the nearest phone was available, and phoned their report to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police at the Fort St. John post. Because a bear was involved, the Mounties contacted the Fort St. John office of the British Columbia Fish and Wildlife Branch, where I am stationed as a conservation officer, and asked for a man to accompany them to the scene. I was in the field that morning. Senior Conservation Officer Jack Mackill, a 20-year veteran with the Branch, took the call and agreed to go along. Mackill and several police officers drove at once to the place where Cardinal had left the road to go into the woods. They were able to get a panel truck to within a half-mile of the scene of the killing, and they followed the tracks from there. Since they were dealing with a grizzly that had reportedly killed a man, Mackill was carrying a 12 gauge shotgun with slug loads. The death scene was fully as horrifying as the Indians had described it. Cardinal's body lay in a thicket, torn and mutilated, and it was obvious that the bear had fed heavily on its victim. Mackill and the police pieced together the story of the attack as best they could from the evidence in the snow. Cardinal had been surprised and killed in a lightning-like attack that came from behind without warning. He had not had time to release the safety of his Enfield, and the leather mittens he'd been wearing were still on his hands. The bear had killed him with a single blow of a forepaw to the side of the head, a blow so savage that it shattered the entire skull. Although the area was badly tracked up, the men could easily imagine what had happened. Apparently the grizzly had lain quietly in ambush, in thick stuff no more than a few feet away, perhaps hidden behind a log or a windfall as bears often do. He must have let Cardinal walk by. Then, once the man was past him, he had exploded in murderous fury, pouncing on his victim in no more than two or three leaps. I doubt that Cardinal felt the blow that killed him, and if he saw or was aware of the bear at all it was for only a fleeting instant. Newspaper accounts, basing their conclusions on the fact that the bear had attacked from the rear, said the animal had deliberately stalked the man through the brush to kill him for food. But those of us who investigated the affair disagree with that version. Fred Harper, a regional wildlife biologist with the Fish and Wildlife Branch who went with me to hunt the grizzly down, summed up our collective opinions. 'The attack probably was unintentionally provoked by the victim,' Harper said. 'He got too close to the bear without knowing it was there, and it jumped him without warning. Though the animal was old and battle-scarred, I do not believe that any of its physical peculiarities were sufficient to have stimulated the attack.' Fresh tracks around the body, apparently made 24 hours after the attack, indicated that the grizzly had been on the kill again that morning. Jack Mackill and the police made their investigation very cautiously, with guns in hand, knowing that the bear was probably lurking nearby and might decide to attack at any instant. When they had put together as much of the story as possible, they covered Harvey Cardinal's body with a blanket and carried it out to their truck, keeping a sharp watch all around throughout the half-mile hike. Fred Harper and I returned to the office in Fort St. John late that afternoon. Jack Mackill told us the story. Nothing quite like it had ever happened before in our part of British Columbia, and we all agreed that the bear had to be destroyed. Whatever the grizzly's reasons for attacking Cardinal, now that it had killed and fed on a human the odds were great that it would repeat the performance. We could not leave so dangerous an animal in the woods. Though this was the first instance of a grizzly turning man-eater that ever came to our attention, it was not the first time one of the big bears had attacked a man in our area. Luckily, the earlier affairs had turned out better. Two such attacks had occurred before my time at Fort St. John. In both cases the victims were big-game guides. In one incident the guide was on foot and escaped the bear by jumping over a 20-foot cliff. The other attack was more unusual, though the grizzly had good reason for what it did. The bear had been wounded by a hunter and had gotten away. The party followed it, and it rushed out of thick bush and attacked the guide while he was on horseback. The man was cut up badly but he remained conscious and walked out for help. The bear disappeared and was never seen again. A third attack happened in late October 1968. The victim that time was an experienced hunter, Mike Markusich of Port Alberni on Vancouver Island. Markusich was hunting moose east of Mile 135 on the Alaska Highway. In four inches of snow he came across grizzly tracks going into dense spruce. He had no bear license but decided to see where the animal was headed. The bear had a moose kill about 300 yards ahead in the bush and had been feeding there. With its belly full, it had walked 50 feet away and lain down to keep watch, in typical grizzly fashion. As in the case of Harvey Cardinal, the bear let Markusich walk by before it moved. Then it struck. Markusich neither saw nor heard the animal. His first warning of the attack came when the bear's jaws clamped down on his head and face from behind. Before it let him go, he suffered two jaw fractures and severe lacerations on the face, neck, and back. He eventually lost the sight in one eye. (I interviewed him in the hospital not long after the incident, and he could not speak. He had to nod or shake his head in answer to my questions.) The attack lasted only seconds. Then the bear dropped Markusich and ran off. As far as is known it never came back to the moose kill. Markusich was able to walk and drag himself two miles out to the road, where he collapsed and was later picked up by a passing motorist. Jack Mackill and I investigated that case thoroughly. As far as we could determine, the bear had not been wounded earlier. It was protecting its kill and had attacked in blind anger when the man came too close. At daylight the morning after Cardinal was found, Mackill, Harper, and I climbed into a big chopper rented from Okanagan Helicopters, a first-class flying service operating over most of British Columbia. Our pilot was Maynard Bergh, the service's 51-year-old base manager at Fort St. John, who has been flying copters since 1940, has logged over 7,000 hours at their controls, and is rated one of the best in the business. In the seven years I have been stationed at my present post, Maynard has flown me on many game counts and predator-control missions. Countless times he has put me down close enough to a particular animal to enable me to classify it as adult or juvenile and even to determine its sex. If anybody could locate this grizzly from the air, hidden as it would be in dense cover, Bergh was the man. We went armed for what we intended to do. This was no hunt for sport, and we wanted weapons that would kill no matter what the circumstances might be. Harper was carrying a .375 Magnum Browning in Safari grade; Mackill and I had 12 gauge shotguns. Jack's was a Model 12 Winchester with the plug removed, giving him five shots without reloading. Mine was a Browning over-and-under. We carried both buckshot and slug loads. We flew directly to the scene of the killing, and a few minutes of circling revealed a line of bear tracks headed north. The grizzly had cleared out sometime during the night —— we guessed right after dark. He no longer had any reason to hang around in that neighborhood, and the presence of the Indian search party and later the police had almost certainly disturbed him. He was traveling steadily. Tracking the bear from the air, which was the only way we could hope to overtake him, proved very difficult. The terrain was level, as is most of that part of British Columbia except for creek draws and river breaks. The tree cover is aspen with very dense scattered stands of spruce. There are a few clearings devoted to grain crops and the grazing of horses (it's not cattle country), but the bear had avoided the clearings. To follow the tracks we had to fly just above the treetops. The snow on the ground was light and fluffy, and at our height the main rotor of the helicopter blew it into the tracks and filled them instantly. The four of us strained our eyes to the limit. Try as we would, however, we could not follow the track for more than a few hundred yards at a time. Repeatedly it disappeared into thick spruce stands where we could see nothing, leaving us the frustrating chore of circling until we picked it up again. About five years before, oil-exploration crews had cut seismic lines through, the area at one-mile intervals. If it hadn't been for those lines, 35 feet wide and straight as a fire break, I doubt I that we could have stayed on the track. We could spot the trail where the bear had crossed one of the lines, fly on to the next in the general direction he was traveling, and pick up the track again. It took four hours of this aerial tracking to cover eight miles. Probably the bear had made better time than we did. Finally his tracks went into a very thick isolated stand of spruce about a half-mile long and half that wide. We circled the 80-acre tangle twice, but no tracks came out. We were sure we had the grizzly cornered at last. We had decided at the outset that we would kill the bear from the air if we could. Mackill, Harper, and I strongly deplore the aerial hunting of any I game, but this was no time for ethics, or sportsmanship. We had come to I destroy a killer, a man-eater, an animal that was a potential menace to any human he encountered. We meant to do it quickly and humanely. Finally his tracks went into a very thick isolated stand of spruce about a half-mile long and half that wide. We circled the 80-acre tangle twice, but no tracks came out. We searched the 80 acres of bush for 20 minutes without seeing a sign of the bear. Then, in a little opening below us, something big and brown moved out of one thicket and into another. We had no chance for a shot, but at least we knew where the bear was and we had him on the move. It took us 10 or 15 minutes to find him again. Twice during that time Bergh made a quick circle around the perimeter of the spruce to make sure the grizzly had not slipped out. Finally the bear moved into an open place, and we got our first good look at him. To me, one of the most surprising things about that bear hunt was the way the grizzly reacted to the chopper. All the while we were tracking him I had visualized him running at top speed to get away, or turning on us, reared up on his hind feet, cuffing the air in a rage, daring us to come down. But he did nothing of the kind. He showed neither anger nor concern. He just walked away, and even after we started shooting he did not hurry. I got the idea that he was too old to care. The bear was on my side of the copter, and I quickly emptied both barrels of the Browning into him. When we autopsied him later we learned that although my buckshot had not hit a vital organ, some of them had penetrated the body cavity to the stomach and would have killed the bear eventually. Yet he didn't react in any way to those two shots. The grizzly walked out of sight into thick spruce again, but Bergh was directly over him now, just above the trees, and in a minute the bear came into the open once more, on Harper's side 60 feet below us. Fred's 300-grain soft-point from the .375 Magnum smashed into the grizzly's right shoulder and blew up in the lungs and heart. He fell, pushed himself ahead a few feet to the edge of a thicket, and was dead in seconds. Maynard set the helicopter down at the border of the thick stuff, and the four of us climbed out for a closer look at the killer animal we had destroyed. What happened next almost piled tragedy upon tragedy. Jack stepped down from the bubble and walked back along the side of the copter, checking the loads in his Winchester in case the grizzly was not dead. We were taking no chances. We knew that more than one 'dead' bear had come suddenly to life. Jack's mind was intent on his gun and the bear, and he didn't notice the still-spinning tail rotor of the helicopter. He walked into it and was knocked down as if he had been sledged. Jack escaped instant death narrowly indeed. The spinning rotor struck him on the side of the head, in front of and above the right ear, knocking away a fragment of skull a half-inch wide and half again that long. His doctors said afterward that he came within a hair of being killed outright. Jack was unconscious, and for a minute we thought he was dead. When we saw that he was still alive we gave up all thought of checking out the bear and loaded Jack back into the chopper for the half-hour flight to Fort St. John. Fortunately, the fragile rotor that had felled Jack wasn't seriously damaged and the chopper could still fly. Mackill was treated at the Fort St. John Hospital and at 6 o'clock that evening he was put aboard a Canadian Pacific jet flight for Vancouver as a stretcher patient. Eight hours after the accident, surgeons in Vancouver General Hospital removed bone fragments from his skull. Prompt help and medical skill saved Jack's life. He has recovered completely and has since been transferred to Williams Lake, leaving me the Senior Conservation Officer at Fort St. John. On Saturday, three days after the grizzly killed Cardinal, Harper and I went back to bring in the bear's carcass, for examination, to see whether we could learn the answers to the riddles in the case. We were assisted by half a dozen members of a Fort St. John snowmobile club headed by Grant Slatter. We drove to within two miles of the place in a light truck and went the rest of the way on three snowmobiles. The weather was still bitterly cold, and the grizzly was frozen hard. We rolled the carcass onto one of the snow machines, took it out to the truck, loaded it, and brought it back to Fort St. John to thaw overnight in a Forest Service warehouse there. Grizzlies are notorious for their stench, which is hardly surprising, considering that they feed on carrion much of their lives. By morning this one smelled so bad that we moved it outside for an autopsy. Even there, the job was very unpleasant. Harper and I did the autopsy in 25-below cold. We learned less than we had hoped, but we did prove that we had destroyed the right bear. Its stomach contained human hair, a piece of denim cloth from Harvey Cardinal's shirt, and not much else. The grizzly was a very old male, weighing about 500 pounds and severely battle-scarred. The pelt was poor; its hair was only two or three inches long and was iced up on the back from exposure to snow and cold. The face was scarred, probably as a result of a fight with another bear, but the injuries were old and had healed. Part of the pad on the right-front foot had been torn off. The teeth were badly worn, the two upper canines broken across and split in half. But apparently the bad teeth had not bothered the bear much, for we found two or three inches of fat under his pelt and he showed no evidence of having gone short of food. Hunger may have contributed to his attack on Cardinal, but it was not hunger of long duration. He had come through the winter in good condition. Tests were made to determine whether the bear was rabid, but they proved negative. Read Next: About the only conclusion Harper and I could reach was that the grizzly had jumped Cardinal simply because the man got too close, and had fed on his kill afterward as he would have fed on a moose. One question will never be fully answered: why was the bear out of winter quarters in such frigid January weather? But for that odd bit of behavior, the whole strange affair would never have happened. Unusual as this case was, there is a lesson to be learned from it: grizzly bears are unpredictable, dangerous animals, and humans who deal with them in any way had better keep that fact in mind.

Business Insider
9 hours ago
- Business Insider
I've spent a decade writing and editing greeting cards. I hate most 'thank you' notes — with one huge exception.
Although I've worked in the greeting-card industry for years, I hate most thank-you notes. I don't need thank-you notes for wedding or birthday gifts — they're often sent out of obligation. The thank-you cards that really matter come from the heart, and when they're not expected. I have a secret: I really hate thank-you notes. Now, for most people, that might not be the biggest deal. After all, the heyday of the greeting card has long since passed, and these days, plenty of folks don't send mail at all. However, those people also likely didn't spend a decade working in the greeting-card industry. There's a big difference between 'obligatory' thank-you cards and ones from the heart Throughout my career, I've edited and written cards for places like Hallmark, American Greetings, and Lovepop. One of the most useful things I learned was a term called "obligatory sending" — the idea that you're "required" to send certain cards if you don't want to seem rude. Most thank-you notes fall into this category, especially the sort that get sent en masse, such as after a graduation or wedding. Let's be clear: I'm not against gratitude, and I understand why my mom insisted I write thank-you notes as a kid. However, in my opinion, gifts should always be about sharing something with a person you care about — not the gratitude they show in return. Personally, I don't need a "thank you for the toaster" note after an event like a bridal shower. The hosts already invited me to share their big moment, usually throwing an elaborate party in the process. Consider my present a "thank you for including me," and let's just call it even. (Rinse and repeat this approach with any graduations, baby showers, birthday parties, or other big shindigs.) This doesn't mean I hate all thank-you cards, though. In fact, it's quite the opposite. To me, the ones that matter are the ones that you were never obligated to send. They're cards from my mentees at work, sharing the ways that they've grown thanks to my help. Or ones I've received during tough times that tell me how much I've helped someone in the past and remind me I have a support system, too. They're the thank-yous that are unexpected, but never unwanted — ones that come straight from the heart. One experience always reminds me of the power of genuine gratitude over obligatory politeness A few years ago, my mom was sick with terminal cancer. During chemo, she had trouble eating and drinking much of anything, and she had an intolerance for any cold or spicy foods. By that point, my mom was reluctant to go to most restaurants. She hated feeling like a "bother" to the staff, and too often, waiters would interpret her requests for ice-free drinks and spice-free foods as high-maintenance customer nitpicking. However, we found sanctuary when we visited a nearby Indian restaurant, Taj Palace. The welcoming staff took my mom's concerns seriously without making her feel singled out. When the owner learned that masala chai (a type of tea) was one thing my mom could almost always enjoy, he insisted we stop by whenever it would help — and he was always ready with a cup (or several). After my mom died, my family brought Taj Palace a card to let them know and, more importantly, to ensure they knew how much their kindness had meant to us. Five years later, the thank-you card from my family is still on the wall, prominently displayed next to the counter. Whenever I see it, it reminds me that even the smallest things, like a cup of tea, may have a huge impact — and that saying "thank you" really does matter, and sometimes a card is the best way to do so. I still hate most thank-you notes, and you won't find me writing the "obligatory" sort anytime soon. But for those who've made a real difference? Well, those are the cards that I'll always want to send.