China backtracking on Arctic ambitions
China is expected to reshape its Arctic policy, backtracking on its ambition to become a major polar power by 2030, the South China Morning Post has reported, citing insiders. The shift comes amid intensified scrutiny from Arctic nations and the potential for US-Russia cooperation in the region.
Beijing first outlined its vision for a 'Polar Silk Road' in a 2018 white paper, positioning it as an extension of its Belt and Road Initiative. The plan implied increased access to the Arctic's abundant natural resources and an expanded role in the region's governance, the SCMP reported on Sunday.
However, China's self-designation as a 'near-Arctic state' – despite being 1,400km (870 miles) south of the Arctic Circle with no territorial claims in the region – faced pushback from Arctic nations, including Russia, which controls over half of the region's coastline and has long prioritized protecting its sovereignty, the article claimed.
'The Chinese interest was really first announced quite aggressively in the white paper [with] the term near-Arctic state that everybody seems to have had problems with,' the insider told the SCMP. China has since dropped the term, and there appears to be a retreat or a significantly reduced interest in the Arctic, the source added.
Beijing has reportedly shifted its focus on the development of heavy icebreakers and conducting polar research while downplaying its broader ambitions.
The development comes as the US and Russia have held discussions on potential economic cooperation in the Arctic as part of recent bilateral contacts.
Other observers note that Beijing's continued push for building heavy icebreakers indicates that its interest in the Arctic has not declined.
'I believe China is still very interested in many of the opportunities that exist to become more involved in Arctic science and commerce,' Duncan Depledge, an Arctic expert and lecturer in geopolitics and security at the UK's Loughborough University, told the outlet.
China's deepening partnership with Russia, reinforced by shared rivalry with the US over the past few years, led to a 'no-limits' partnership with Moscow, the report said.
However, US President Donald Trump's shift on Ukraine, pushing for a ceasefire and restoring ties with Moscow, has created uncertainty for Beijing, according to Depledge. Trump has shown interest in the Arctic, and a potential US-Russia deal on regional cooperation could follow negotiations on Ukraine.
China is likely to face challenges, especially if Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin strike an Arctic deal, according to Depledge. In such a scenario, Russia would have to decide whether to align with China, cooperate with Trump, or maintain a balance between the two, the expert added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Western Europe blocks peace in Ukraine
NATO-aligned European countries are obstructing peace efforts in Ukraine, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov has said. Several EU member states are deliberately undermining negotiations and prolonging the conflict, he told TASS in an interview published this week. In May, under pressure from US President Donald Trump, Kiev agreed to direct talks with Russia, a step Moscow called logical and overdue. It marked the first such negotiations in three years and involved senior officials. Both sides pledged to stay in contact, completed a 1,000-for-1,000 prisoner swap, and exchanged ceasefire proposals. EU and NATO leaders, however, were 'relentlessly encouraging Kiev to continue hostilities,' Ryabkov said, citing a steady flow of weapons, military equipment, and pledges of continued support. He added that acts of sabotage and provocation were being planned and carried out, along with disinformation efforts aimed at disrupting the negotiation process. Last week, Kiev launched a coordinated drone strike on multiple Russian air bases and blew up railway bridges, causing the derailment of both civilian and freight trains. At least seven people were killed and more than 120 injured, including children. Russian authorities labeled the strikes 'terrorism' and accused Ukraine of trying to derail US-backed peace efforts. Some military analysts suggested that such attacks would not have been possible without Western intelligence support. Ryabkov also accused certain EU leaders of meddling in US domestic politics by pressuring Trump to adopt former President Joe Biden's more aggressive pro-Ukraine stance. As an example, Ryabkov cited German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who met with Trump in Washington earlier this week. Merz urged the US to intensify its involvement and increase pressure on Russia. He had earlier lifted restrictions on German-supplied weapons to Ukraine, a move Ryabkov said contradicted efforts toward a political settlement. Ryabkov's remarks were echoed by Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, who accused Brussels of fully aligning with Kiev's military aims and called the EU a 'war party.' 'The main signals from Brussels and European capitals now relate to... plans for the militarization of Europe, which is clearly at odds with the mood of the presidents of Russia and the United States,' Peskov added. According to Germany's Kiel Institute, the EU has provided nearly €50 billion in support to Ukraine since the beginning of the full-scale conflict in 2022, in addition to significant bilateral aid from member states.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia ready to hand over remains of 1,212 troops to Ukraine
The first batch of 1,212 bodies of dead Ukrainian servicemen has been delivered to a designated exchange point and is ready to be handed over to Kiev, the Russian Defense Ministry has said. Moscow had decided to return the bodies of over 6,000 Ukrainian soldiers in a unilateral humanitarian gesture during talks between the two sides in Istanbul on Monday. The Russians tried transferring the remains on Saturday, but Kiev's representatives failed to show up at the exchange point on the border between Belarus and Ukraine. 'The Russian side is fully ready to fulfill all agreements on the return of the bodies of the dead Ukrainian soldiers and the exchange [of prisoners],' Russian Lieutenant General Aleksandr Zorin, who was a member of Moscow's negotiating team in Istanbul, told journalists. However, he warned that the transfer of the remains could fail yet again, saying that there are 'signals' that it could be postponed until next week. 'Russia is waiting for confirmation from Ukraine,' he said. 'I have no comment regarding the rhetoric that it is some sort of a political decision. It is a purely humanitarian action. Not the first of such kind and, regrettably, not the last one,' he said about the Russian decision to hand the remains over to Ukraine. Kiev had refused to accept the bodies of its fallen soldiers on Saturday, claiming that it hadn't agreed on the date of the transfer and accusing Moscow of 'humanitarian issues for informational purposes.' Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova reacted to the move by saying that Ukraine 'does not need its people; neither dead nor alive.' 'There is no nation or ethnic group in the world that would refuse to bury its soldiers. But there is the Kiev regime, which professes a misanthropic ideology and is committing genocide against its own people,' Zakharova insisted. A member of the Russian parliament's International Affairs Committee, Dmitry Belik, told RT that one of the reasons for Vladimir Zelensky's government failing to take back the bodies of its soldiers could be Ukraine's unwillingness to pay compensation to their families.
Russia Today
11 hours ago
- Russia Today
US diverted military aid for Kiev to Middle East
US President Donald Trump's administration has diverted a large military aid package his predecessor promised to Kiev to American forces in the Middle East, Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky has told ABC. The package included thousands of anti-drone missiles Ukraine desperately needs to fight Russia's long-range unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), he said. The Ukrainian leader raised the issue in an interview with ABC News' Martha Raddatz which aired on Sunday. When asked about the importance of US support, Zelensky admitted that the Ukrainian military was struggling to deal with Russian UAVs on its own. 'We have a lot of problems with these Shaheds,' he said, referring to Russian Geran-2 long-range drones, which Kiev claims to be Shahed-family UAVs allegedly supplied to Moscow by Tehran. Both Russia and Iran have previously denied the allegations. The Ukrainian leader then revealed that Kiev had not received a major aid package it was 'counting on.' Former US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin promised Ukraine 20,000 anti-drone missiles that were based on a 'special technology,' Zelensky claimed. Austin served as the secretary of defense under Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden. '[This] morning, my minister of defense told me that the United States moved them to the Middle East,' Zelensky said, adding that, without the US military assistance, Russia has 'more chances' of winning the war and Ukraine will have 'much more losses.' Earlier this week, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Pentagon was 'redirecting a key anti-drone technology earmarked for Ukraine to American forces' in the Middle East. President Trump has frequently questioned continued military support for Ukraine, and has pushed Moscow and Kiev to reach a peace deal. Earlier this week, he also said that it might be better to let Russia and Ukraine continue fighting 'for a while' before 'pulling them apart.' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth – a critic of the US involvement in the Ukraine conflict – skipped a NATO meeting this week focused on coordinating military aid to Ukraine, in the first such instance since the conflict escalated in 2022. According to the WSJ, the Trump administration 'inherited' the authority to provide Ukraine with $3.85 billion worth of weapons but has refrained from doing so. Moscow has repeatedly condemned foreign arms shipments to Kiev by arguing that they do not change the course of the conflict, only lead to escalation, and extend human suffering.
