&w=3840&q=100)
Explained: The TV miniseries controversy that led to cancellation of Diego Maradona trial
A new trial of Diego Maradona's medical team and its negligence will begin now after Judge Julieta Makintach was accused of behaving like 'an actress.' read more
One of the judges, Julieta Makintach, in Diego Maradona's trial has been accused of behaving like 'an actress'. Images: Reuters
The trial of late football legend Diego Maradona's medical team due has been cancelled by an Argentinian court due to a TV miniseries controversy. The trial had already seen weeks of hearings and testimony from over 40 witnesses, but a TV series scandal involving Judge Julieta Makintach has led to its cancellation.
A new trial will have to start from scratch, with three new judges, in a case already long delayed until Maradona's death in 2020, allegedly due to medical negligence.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Judge Makintach forced to step down over TV series controversy
Judge Makintach was forced to step down from the case this week after it emerged she had been involved in a documentary miniseries about the case, potentially breaking a string of ethics rules.
Her colleague, Judge Maximiliano Savarino, annulled the trial, saying Makintach's behaviour had 'caused prejudice' to proceedings that have already heard hours of painful, sometimes tearful, testimony from witnesses including Maradona's children.
More from Football
'I am not calm. I am angry. I hate them!' the footballer's daughter Jana Maradona said outside the court.
Maradona's ex-partner Veronica Ojeda described the events as 'outrageous'. But she added: 'If I have to do it (testify) a thousand times more, I will.'
Gianinna and Dalma Maradona, daughters of late Argentine foorball legend Diego Maradona. Image: Reuters
Maradona died in November 2020 at the age of 60 while recovering from brain surgery.
He was found to have died of heart failure and acute pulmonary edema – a condition where fluid accumulates in the lungs – two weeks after going under the knife.
His seven-person medical team is on trial over the conditions of his home convalescence, described by prosecutors as grossly negligent.
In a trial that kicked off on March 11, prosecutors alleged the former footballer was abandoned to his fate for a 'prolonged, agonising period' before his death.
Daughter Gianinna Maradona told the court her father was kept in a 'dark, ugly and lonely' place, and that his carers were more interested in money than his welfare.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Makintach's unauthorised filming causes uproar
Then the proceedings hit a hiccup, with Makintach coming under scrutiny over alleged unauthorised filming.
She denied any wrongdoing, but after police raids and a week-long suspension of proceedings, evidence came to light that brought the 47-year-old judge's conduct into question.
A trailer for a TV show dubbed 'Divine Justice' was played in court on May 27, showing Makintach stalking the halls of justice in high heels as grim details of the footballing hero's demise were relayed. The public prosecutor Patricio Ferrari accused Makintach of behaving 'like an actress and not a judge' after showing the trailer.
The footage, which sparked an uproar, appeared to contain unauthorised recordings made inside the court, and showed Makintach being interviewed on camera.
Estos son algunos de los videos del documental que estaba grabando la jueza del caso Maradona, Julieta Makintach @videmasi pic.twitter.com/VzQMpuMDx3 — elDiarioAR (@elDiarioAR) May 25, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
She has been suspended from her duties and is being investigated by a judicial disciplinary body, accused of violating impartiality requirements, influence peddling and possibly even bribery.
The prosecution, the complainants and most of the defence lawyers had asked for a new panel of judges to be appointed and the trial restarted.
'There was no other option than nullifying the trial,' said Vadim Mischanchuk, the lawyer for Maradona's psychiatrist, one of the accused.
No date has been set for the new trial, but the prosecution has said it hopes for a restart this year.
Any possible appeals against the May 29 ruling could delay the resumption of proceedings, for which judges will be chosen by an internal court lottery.
Maradona's caregivers risk prison terms of between eight and 25 years if convicted of 'homicide with possible intent' – pursuing a course of action despite knowing it could lead to his death.
'Maradona still not at peace,' said an Argentinian press headline this week.
With agency inputs
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
3 hours ago
- Hans India
'The Night We Met': Democrats Mock Musk-Trump Fallout with Breakup
In a sharp yet humorous twist on political commentary, the Democratic Party has released a satirical video dramatizing the apparent fallout between Elon Musk and Donald Trump—as though it were the end of a rocky romance. Set to the melancholic tune of "The Night We Met" by Lord Huron, the video went viral shortly after its release, portraying Musk's exit from his government advisory role as an emotional breakup with Trump. The tongue-in-cheek montage quickly caught the attention of political observers and social media users alike, mixing pop culture flair with pointed critique. The release comes amid confirmed reports that Musk is no longer serving as a special government employee with the Department of Government Efficiency. Once hailed as a key player in Trump's efforts to slash federal spending, Musk's ambitious reform plans fell short of expectations. According to a White House official cited by Reuters, his departure was finalized Wednesday night in a decision made at the senior staff level. Musk left quietly, without an in-person meeting with Trump, but later thanked the former president on his platform, X, for the opportunity to serve. Though Trump publicly commended Musk's attempts at budgetary reform, behind-the-scenes tensions had reportedly been simmering. Musk recently criticized Trump's flagship tax reform package, calling it overly expensive—a move that allegedly irked senior administration figures. The Democratic Party's viral video captures the drama with wit and style, turning what many view as an inevitable political rift into a moment of cultural satire. In just under two minutes, it skewers the fragility of political alliances with a soundtrack and story familiar to anyone who's lived through a breakup.
NDTV
10 hours ago
- NDTV
"If Somebody Was Mistreated...": Trump On Sean 'Diddy' Combs' Pardon
US President Donald Trump on Friday floated the possibility of pardoning Sean 'Diddy' Combs, stating that he "would certainly look at the facts". At a White House news conference, Donald Trump said that nobody has asked him to pardon the hip-hop mogul. For those who don't know, in a 2012 episode of the reality show Celebrity Apprentice, Donald Trump said that he was friends with Sean 'Diddy' Combs. "I think some people have been very close to asking. First of all, I'd look at what's happening, and I haven't been watching it too closely, although it's certainly getting a lot of coverage,' Mr Trump was quoted as saying by Reuters. His statement came during the Oval Office press conference with the world's richest person, Elon Musk, who recently exited as the chief of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Mr Trump also highlighted that he has not seen Sean Combs and spoken to him in years. "He used to really like me a lot, but I think when I ran for politics... that relationship busted up, from what I read. I don't know -- he didn't tell me that, but I'd read some little bit nasty statements," he added. Donald Trump added that he "would certainly look at the facts" in the much-talked-about case. "If I think somebody was mistreated, whether they like me or don't like me, it wouldn't have any impact on me," he said. Meanwhile, Sean 'Diddy' Combs has pleaded not guilty to five felony counts of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, as well as transportation to engage in prostitution. Combs was taken into custody in September last year and has since been held without bail on multiple federal charges. Donald Trump, who took office in January this year, has extensively used his power to pardon or commute sentences in cases where people have been accused or convicted of federal crimes. This is unusual compared to his predecessor, who usually waited until near the end of their terms to grant clemency. Sean Combs, who faces life in prison if found guilty on all counts, is famous for elevating the hip-hop culture in America. Dozens of lawsuits filed against him have accused him of sexual abuse. Federal prosecutors said that he coerced women to take part in drug-fueled sexual performances, dubbed "Freak Offs", over two decades. At least two women have testified that they were raped by him. Although Sean Combs' lawyers have acknowledged him being abusive at times in romantic relationships, they argue that these women took part in the "Freak Offs" consensually.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a day ago
- First Post
US Supreme Court clears Trump's move to end legal status for 500,000 migrants
The court put on hold Boston-based US District Judge Indira Talwani's order halting the administration's move to end the immigration 'parole' granted to 532,000 of these migrants by Trump's predecessor Joe Biden read more Law enforcement officers, including HSI and ICE agents, take people into custody at an immigration court in Phoenix, Arizona, US, on May 21, 2025. Reuters File The US Supreme Court on Friday let President Donald Trump's administration revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian and Nicaraguan migrants living in the United States, bolstering the Republican president's drive to step up deportations. The court put on hold Boston-based US District Judge Indira Talwani's order halting the administration's move to end the immigration 'parole' granted to 532,000 of these migrants by Trump's predecessor Joe Biden, potentially exposing many of them to rapid removal, while the case plays out in lower courts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As with many of the court's orders issued in an emergency fashion, the decision was unsigned and gave no reasoning. Two of the court's three liberal justices, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor, publicly dissented. The court botched its assessment of whether the administration was entitled to freeze Talwani's decision pending the litigation, Jackson wrote in an accompanying opinion. The outcome, Jackson wrote, 'undervalues the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending.' Immigration parole is a form of temporary permission under American law to be in the country for 'urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit,' allowing recipients to live and work in the United States. Biden, a Democrat, used parole as part of his administration's approach to deter illegal immigration at the U.S.-Mexican border. Trump called for ending humanitarian parole programs in an executive order signed on January 20, his first day back in office. The Department of Homeland Security subsequently moved to terminate them in March, cutting short the two-year parole grants. The administration said revoking the parole status would make it easier to place migrants in a fast-track deportation process called 'expedited removal.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The case is one of many that Trump's administration has brought in an emergency fashion to the nation's highest judicial body seeking to undo decisions by judges impeding his sweeping policies, including several targeting immigrants. The Supreme Court on May 19 also let Trump end a deportation protection called temporary protected status that had been granted under Biden to about 350,000 Venezuelans living in the United States, while that legal dispute plays out. In a bid to reduce illegal border crossings, Biden starting in 2022 allowed Venezuelans who entered the United States by air to request a two-year parole if they passed security checks and had a U.S. financial sponsor. Biden expanded that process to Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguans in 2023 as his administration grappled with high levels of illegal immigration from those nationalities. The plaintiffs, a group of migrants granted parole and Americans who serve as their sponsors, sued administration officials claiming the administration violated federal law governing the actions of government agencies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD GuerlineJozef, executive director of Haitian Bridge Alliance, one of the plaintiffs, expressed dismay at Friday's decision. 'Once again, the Trump administration blatantly proves their disregard for the lives of those truly in need of protection by taking away their status and rendering them undocumented. We have already seen the traumatic impact on children and families afraid to even go to school, church or work,' Jozef said. 'I cannot overstate how devastating this is: the Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to unleash widespread chaos, not just for our clients and class members, but for their families, their workplaces and their communities,' added Karen Tumlin, director of Justice Action Center, one of the groups representing the plaintiffs. Talwani in April found that the law governing such parole did not allow for the program's blanket termination, instead requiring a case-by-case review. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to put the judge's decision on hold. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In its filing, the Justice Department told the Supreme Court that Talwani's order had upended 'critical immigration policies that are carefully calibrated to deter illegal entry,' effectively 'undoing democratically approved policies that featured heavily in the November election' that returned Trump to the presidency. The plaintiffs told the Supreme Court they would face grave harm if their parole is cut short given that the administration has indefinitely suspended processing their pending applications for asylum and other immigration relief. They said they would be separated from their families and immediately subject to expedited deportation 'to the same despotic and unstable countries from which they fled, where many will face serious risks of danger, persecution and even death.' Talwani on Wednesday ordered the administration to resume processing applications for work permits or more lasting immigration status from migrants with parole status from Afghanistan, Latin America and Ukraine.
