Real estate agents caught altering sale agreements
The association's property law committee raised a concern with the Real Estate Institute after members noted real estate salespeople were altering agreements to waive buyers' title requisition rights.
These give buyers time to ensure the title is acceptable, even if an offer is unconditional.
Changes were also being made to allow the early release of buyers' deposits to the vendors.
Law Association president Tony Herring said it was not a widespread issue, but had been noted on a handful of agreements.
He said if the title requisition right was unaltered and there was a problem with it, the purchaser had time to get the defect fixed or to back out of the deal if necessary.
But if it was not, he said, buyers could be put in an impossible position.
"There's not often defects on the title but it does happen, and it happened to me recently where there was a cross-leased title involving four different properties and there was an error on the title.
"To get that fixed is very difficult and very costly and can take quite some time because you need to involve surveyors, banks."
The purchaser's lawyer would have to alert the bank to the problem.
"If there is a defect on the title, the bank will then say 'we are not going to advance the mortgage funds until you've fixed it'. In the meantime the settlement date is coming up and the purchaser has to settle because they are in an unconditional situation, but they cannot raise the money from the bank. Therefore it is catch-22."
Herring said a standard sale and purchase agreement said the person holding the deposit, whether that was a salesperson or a lawyer, needed to hold it for 10 working days, which aligned with the title requisition period. Once that was over and the buyer's conditions were satisfied, it could be released.
"If the deposit is released earlier than that and the vendor spends the deposit - maybe they use it for paying down debt, to put a deposit on a house they are buying or they might go overseas, if the requisition period is activated and the purchaser has to cancel the contract - if that deposit is gone, it makes it much more difficult to get back."
Herring said if someone was using KiwiSaver to pay a deposit, their lawyer had to give a legal undertaking to the provider that if anything went wrong and settlement did not go ahead, the money would be returned. But if something happened and the money had disappeared, that would be much harder.
"It heightens the risk for KiwiSaver first-home buyers."
He said people who discovered a change had been made to an agreement they had signed should seek legal advice.
Real Estate Authority (REA) chief executive Belinda Moffat said her organisation had provided general advice to the sector on the issue.
"Section 123 of the Act requires agents to hold money received in respect of a transaction for 10 working days - unless both parties agree to an earlier release.
"Ultimately, this 10-day rule exists to protect consumers. If a vendor fails to settle, or an issue arises before settlement, if the deposit has already been released it could leave the purchaser with no security that their deposit can be recovered.
"An early release of a deposit is only permitted by court order, or if each party to the transactions signs an authority agreeing to the early release. REA is concerned that some licensees and parties have sought to include an early release clause as an additional clause in the Sale and Purchase Agreement.
"REA does not consider that an early release clause in the Sale and Purchase Agreement meets the purposes of the Act. Such clauses may undermine the consumer protection intent of section 123. Licensees should instead ensure parties give informed authority to early release."
Moffat said she was not able to comment on the current status of any complaints.
"We note further that whether there is a finding of breach of the conduct rules will depend on the facts of each case."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Your money might be invested in Gaza weapons, investment platform says
Smoke billows from Israeli strikes in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip in May, 2024. Photo: AFP The amount of KiwiSaver money invested in weapons companies has increased 40.9 percent this year, a responsible investment platform says. Mindful Money founder Barry Coates said many New Zealanders might be unpleasantly surprised that their money was being invested in companies producing weapons that could be used in conflicts such as that in Gaza or the Ukraine. Mindful Money calculated that KiwiSaver investments in weapons companies are now worth $392.4 million. It said New Zealand investment in the production of weapons used in Gaza, through KiwiSaver and retail investment funds, totalled $71.9 m. Coates said the increase reflected a broader increase in activity in the defence industry around the world. "I think most of the increase is the chase for short-term profits - wars are good for business if you're a weapons company. "There's been an increase in investment in many of these companies that stand to benefit from sales to Gaza or via the US or into the Ukraine conflict." Koura founder Rupert Carlyon said the increase was probably because of weapons' companies strong performance. "They are strong performers with global conflicts and increased defence spending in Europe." He said while the dollar value of the investments was now much larger, funds' allocations might not have moved. "The increased size is a function of larger market capitalisations and larger KiwiSaver balances." The S&P Aerospace and Defense Select Industry index had increased 16.5 percent in the past year and 307 percent in the past decade. Coates said research had shown 80 percent of New Zealanders wanted to avoid investing in weapons companies but it continued. He said there had been a fall in investments in companies linked to social harm such as gambling or alcohol and tobacco. "But not enough and not so much in weapons particularly … it does look to us as though we're seeing the same thing happening in fossil fuels - that something happens in the world and investment funds see greater opportunity and they're increasing their investments … even though many of their clients may may be deeply worried about that." He said KiwiSaver investment in companies producing and selling firearms had also more than doubled. "There's a big increase in hand guns investments … maybe something to do with the Trump administration." The most dramatic individual company increase involved Walmart, where New Zealand KiwiSaver investment reached $115.8 million - representing a 144 percent increase over the year and 40 percent growth in just six months. Although it is best known as a general retailer, Mindful Money called it out because Walmart sells shotguns, rifles, ammunition, and firearm components. Coates said there were 36 weapons-free funds at 13 different providers. He said many people would get a "huge surprise" if they found their KiwiSaver investment was exposed to the Gaza conflict. "I think it's kind of one of the things that people can abstract a bit about weapons and so on but when they've seen the effects on people in Gaza and the complete levelling of the country, then you know, suddenly I think it comes home to them, that they don't want their funds to be invested in that." Earlier in the year, activists put pressure on ASB to divest its KiwiSaver investments from Motorola, which they said was supplying the Israeli military with smart phones and radios. But Carlyon said there should be a conversation about whether it was appropriate for weapons to remain in exclusion categories, "given the volatile world we are living in and the need for most countries to be increasing defence spending". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Kiwisaver provider Simplicity to build 600 long-term rental houses in Queenstown
Simplicity Living directors (from left) Shane Brealey, Anna Brealey, Sam Stubbs, and Andrew Lance on site at an earlier development in Auckland. Photo: Supplied Kiwisaver provider Simplicity is to spend hundreds of million dollars on building up to 600 long-term rental houses in Queenstown. It has bought a six-hectare site on Ladies Mile for the build-to-rent development aimed at answering the need for affordable housing in the central Otago town. The head of Simplicity, Sam Stubbs, said the development stacked up financially and socially, and was the sort of investment that Kiwisaver funds should be looking at . "This is another example of the sort of thing our Kiwisaver scheme can help make possible. We think it's a good long-term investment for our members and helps provide warm, dry homes for Kiwi families, in a region that urgently needs them." He said it was the first development outside of Auckland for its housing arm, Simplicity Living. "We've been looking around the country, and Queenstown is the obvious place, which needs good long-term rental options for people who work in the town -- nurses, teachers and cops some of whom are now commuting from Cromwell now." Stubbs said Simplicity had looked at expanding into Wellington and Christchurch, but was not convinced at the moment. He said the capital had infrastructure risks such as earthquakes and water, while the commercial return in Christchurch did not not stack up because an oversupply of properties has lowered returns. Location of the planned Simplicity housing development in Queenstown. Photo: Supplied / Simplicity Living Queenstown mayor Glyn Lewers said the development was "much-needed". "The addition of up to 600 new Build-to-Rent homes will be a game changer for our community, offering secure long-term rentals. "It's a tangible step forward in delivering [part] of the Joint Housing Action Plan - working with developers to facilitate and deliver diverse housing options." The development site is located near Remarkables Park, close to planned schools, shops, and transport links. The homes would be built primarily using concrete, brick, and local schist, with high thermal and acoustic ratings, solar panels, rainwater harvesting and common use facilities. The Shotover Bridge is a 10-minute walk away, and Queenstown Airport is just a five-minute drive away. Simplicity is currently building just under 900 homes in various parts of Auckland. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
1News
7 hours ago
- 1News
Warning after real estate agents caught altering sale agreements
House buyers, particularly those using money from KiwiSaver, may be being put at risk by real estate agents altering sale and purchase agreements, the Law Association warns. The association's property law committee raised a concern with the Real Estate Institute after members noted real estate salespeople were altering agreements to waive buyers' title requisition rights. These gave buyers time to ensure the title was acceptable, even if an offer was unconditional. Changes were also being made to allow the early release of buyers' deposits to the vendors. Law Association president Tony Herring said it was not a widespread issue, but had been noted on a handful of agreements. He said if the title requisition right was unaltered and there was a problem with it, the purchaser had time to get the defect fixed or to back out of the deal if necessary. ADVERTISEMENT But if it was not, he said, buyers could be put in an impossible position. "There's not often defects on the title but it does happen, and it happened to me recently where there was a cross-leased title involving four different properties and there was an error on the title. "To get that fixed is very difficult and very costly and can take quite some time because you need to involve surveyors, banks." The purchaser's lawyer would have to alert the bank to the problem. "If there is a defect on the title, the bank will then say 'we are not going to advance the mortgage funds until you've fixed it'. In the meantime, the settlement date is coming up and the purchaser has to settle because they are in an unconditional situation, but they cannot raise the money from the bank. Therefore, it is catch-22." Herring said a standard sale and purchase agreement said the person holding the deposit, whether that was a salesperson or a lawyer, needed to hold it for 10 working days, which aligned with the title requisition period. Once that was over and the buyer's conditions were satisfied, it could be released. "If the deposit is released earlier than that and the vendor spends the deposit — maybe they use it for paying down debt, to put a deposit on a house they are buying or they might go overseas, if the requisition period is activated and the purchaser has to cancel the contract — if that deposit is gone, it makes it much more difficult to get back." ADVERTISEMENT Herring said, if someone was using KiwiSaver to pay a deposit, their lawyer had to give a legal undertaking to the provider that if anything went wrong and settlement did not go ahead, the money would be returned. But, if something happened and the money had disappeared, that would be much harder. "It heightens the risk for KiwiSaver first-home buyers." He said people who discovered a change had been made to an agreement they had signed should seek legal advice. Real Estate Authority (REA) chief executive Belinda Moffat said her organisation had provided general advice to the sector on the issue. "Section 123 of the Act requires agents to hold money received in respect of a transaction for 10 working days – unless both parties agree to an earlier release. Ultimately, this 10-day rule exists to protect consumers. If a vendor fails to settle, or an issue arises before settlement, if the deposit has already been released it could leave the purchaser with no security that their deposit can be recovered. "An early release of a deposit is only permitted by court order, or if each party to the transactions signs an authority agreeing to the early release. REA is concerned that some licensees and parties have sought to include an early release clause as an additional clause in the Sale and Purchase Agreement. "REA does not consider that an early release clause in the Sale and Purchase Agreement meets the purposes of the Act. Such clauses may undermine the consumer protection intent of section 123. Licensees should instead ensure parties give informed authority to early release." ADVERTISEMENT Moffat said she was not able to comment on the current status of any complaints. "We note further that whether there is a finding of breach of the conduct rules will depend on the facts of each case."
