Father who murdered daughter in play-fight could have sentence increased
A father who fatally stabbed his 14-year-old daughter in the heart during a play-fight could have his sentence increased on Thursday after his case was referred to the Court of Appeal.
Simon Vickers was jailed for life with a minimum term of 15 years in February after being found guilty of the murder of his daughter, Scarlett, with sentencing judge Mr Justice Cotter claiming the killing happened in a 'momentary but devastating act of anger'.
During his trial at Teesside Crown Court, Vickers, 50, had given different accounts of what happened in the seconds before he stabbed a kitchen knife 11cm into Scarlett's lung and heart at their home in Darlington on July 5 last year.
The Solicitor General has referred his sentence to the Court of Appeal under the Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme, with the case set to be heard by three senior judges in London on Thursday.
Vickers' trial heard how Scarlett's mother, Sarah Hall, was making spaghetti bolognese on the evening of July 5 2024, and she and her daughter threw grapes at each other for fun.
Ms Hall grabbed some tongs and snipped at her partner of 27 years, and when he complained he had been hurt, Scarlett implied her father was being 'wimpy'.
Ms Hall told jurors that during the play-fighting, she turned away to serve the family's evening meal and then heard Scarlett say 'ow'.
She said she immediately saw that their only child was pouring with blood, with Scarlett bleeding to death at the scene.
Ms Hall made a 999 call and told the operator they had been 'messing about' and that her partner had thrown something at their daughter, and he 'didn't realise'.
Vickers told a paramedic that his daughter had lunged towards him during a bout of play-fighting, the court heard, but a jury convicted him of murder by a majority of 10-2 in January.
Sentencing him, Mr Justice Cotter said the version of events that the defendant told the jury – that he had accidentally swiped the knife across the work surface and into his daughter's chest without realising – was 'unconvincing and wholly implausible'.
Vickers had drunk wine and smoked cannabis that night, but the judge was not sure that alcohol had contributed to the offence, which he was convinced was caused by 'a flash of anger'.
Mr Justice Cotter said: 'It stole one young, precious life, ruined your life, your wife's life and Scarlett's relatives and friends.'
He continued: 'You have never accepted exactly what happened, although you have accepted it was your actions that caused her death.
'Your beloved daughter deserved that you told the truth. You have not done so.'
The hearing before Lord Justice Stuart-Smith, Mr Justice Goose and Mrs Justice Eady is set to begin at 10.30am on Thursday at the Royal Courts of Justice.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Convicted nurse faces wait for appeal ruling
A nurse jailed for murdering four elderly patients has been told he faces a wait to find out the outcome of his appeal against his convictions. Colin Campbell, previously known as Colin Norris, was found guilty in 2008 of killing four women and attempting to kill a fifth by injecting them with insulin. Doris Ludlam, 80, Bridget Bourke, 88, Irene Crookes, 79, and Ethel Hall, 86, were inpatients on orthopaedic wards where Campbell worked in Leeds in 2002 and developed unexplained hypoglycaemia. Campbell denied any wrongdoing and over the past 14 days, the Court of Appeal has heard from both his lawyers and also the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), who opposed the appeal. He unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 2009 and applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) in 2011, who said previously that the prosecution had relied on "wholly circumstantial" evidence. The CCRC referred the case to the Court of Appeal in London four years ago. The appeal hearing finished on Friday after closing statements from Michael Mansfield KC, for Campbell, and James Curtis KC, for the CPS. Mr Mansfield previously told the court that Campbell's appeal was a "straightforward case" and that the judges "must conclude that these convictions are unsafe". However, Mr Curtis said the court must uphold the convictions, adding that the jury in Campbell's trial were "provided with the necessary relevant facts and issues, from a plethora of highly qualified and clinically experienced witnesses". Lady Justice Macur, sitting with Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken, said after closing submissions: "It will come as no surprise that we are going to reserve judgment." She added: "There may be ancillary matters for which we will call you back. We will know once you have the draft judgment." A judgment is expected in writing at a later date. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North. Convicted nurse appeal 'straightforward', court told New evidence may prove nurse's conviction 'unsafe' HM Courts and Tribunals Service
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Our two-tier justice system is turning Lucy Connolly into a martyr
Court of Appeal judges may believe that they were right to deny early release to Lucy Connolly, the 42-year-old Northamptonshire childminder who is serving 31 months in prison for an offensive tweet about asylum seekers. But even if they maintain that her sentence was just, I think they would have been wise to let her out anyway – for a simple and pragmatic reason. Keeping her locked up is eroding public faith in the justice system. Because, almost every single day now, we read of criminals being convicted of what seem like far worse crimes than hers – and yet somehow avoiding jail. Indeed, some of them manage to avoid it more than once. In 2022, a paedophile in South Shields admitted three charges of 'making indecent images of children' (as the law calls it), as well as one charge of possessing extreme pornography (which involved bestiality). As the judge at the time noted, however, 'You identify as transgender and that has caused issues for you and anxiety for you in how you would cope with that if you were sent immediately to prison.' Well, I suppose it would, although why we're meant to worry about prison being unpleasant for paedophiles, I'm not sure. But at any rate, he wasn't sent to prison. And nor was he sent there this week, when he was hauled back to court after breaching a sexual harm prevention order. On this occasion, the judge (a different one this time) said: 'You would undoubtedly be at risk of physical or sexual assault in custody because of your presentation in a male prison.' These words are of course wonderfully kind and compassionate. But, just for a moment, let's set aside questions of 'identity', and ask: which do we think is the worse crime? Writing something horrible on the internet about asylum hotels? Or downloading images of children being sexually abused – thus boosting the market for such images, and ensuring that more children will be sexually abused in future? Now, I haven't conducted a nationwide opinion poll on the above question. But I'm fairly confident that I can guess what the result would be. And I'm equally confident that I'm not alone in remembering the name 'Lucy Connolly' every time I read about some thug or pervert sauntering off with a suspended sentence. I don't for a moment deny that what Mrs Connolly wrote was awful. Nor do I deny that she broke the law. Yet our two-tier justice system is contriving to turn her into a martyr. So, even if the powers that be have no sympathy for her, they should at least look after their own interests. Which means letting her out. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Convicted nurse appeal 'straightforward', court told
The appeal of a former nurse who was convicted of murdering four elderly patients is a "straightforward" case, the Court of Appeal has heard. Colin Campbell, formerly known as Colin Norris, was found guilty in 2008 of killing four women by injecting them with insulin and was sentenced to life imprisonment. Doris Ludlam, 80, Bridget Bourke, 88, Irene Crookes, 79, and Ethel Hall, 86, were inpatients on orthopaedic wards where Campbell worked in Leeds in 2002 and developed unexplained hypoglycaemia. However, the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which referred the case to the Court of Appeal four years ago, said prosecutors had relied on a "wholly circumstantial" case. Campbell, originally from Glasgow, was also found guilty of attempting to murder another inpatient, with his sentence carrying a minimum term of 30 years. On the 13th day of the appeal hearing in London, judges heard closing submissions from Campbell's barristers. In written submissions, Michael Mansfield KC said: "The appellant submits that this is a straightforward case in which this court must conclude that these convictions are unsafe." Campbell, who denied any wrongdoing and said he did nothing to cause hypoglycaemia, unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 2009 and applied to the CCRC in 2011. James Curtis KC, representing the Crown Prosecution Service, told the court there were "certain matters to which we take exception" from the defence's closing submissions. "There are a number of matters that I would seek to issue corrections on, things we firmly disagree with my learned friend on," he said. The appeal before Lady Justice Macur, Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken is due to conclude on Friday. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North. New evidence may prove nurse's conviction 'unsafe' HM Courts and Tribunals Service
