logo
‘It horrifies me, but I had actually developed a corporate strut': Fintan Drury on Anglo, Paddy Power and Gaza

‘It horrifies me, but I had actually developed a corporate strut': Fintan Drury on Anglo, Paddy Power and Gaza

Irish Times14 hours ago

Fintan Drury
was marching in support of
Palestine
with one of his daughters last year, feeling the same distrust he felt during his 1980s stint as a presenter of
RTÉ's
Morning Ireland.
'I just sort of thought, well, I don't believe what we're being fed. I just don't believe it.'
As
Israel's
onslaught on
Gaza
intensified, his participation in marches became more regular, and so did the sense that he could do something else to counter the official line coming from Israel. He rejects as 'patent nonsense' any perception that the conflict began with the Hamas attacks of October 7th, 2023.
'I thought there was more I could do if I got up off my ass and used my curious mind and my journalistic training.'
READ MORE
This was the catalyst for writing Catastrophe: Nakba II, his sober yet devastating account of Israel's treatment of Palestinians over decades.
He says the subject is too important not to actively promote the book and that means being 'quizzed' by journalists, though he seems keen throughout our conversation to avoid coming across as egotistic – something that will not surprise readers of his 2021 memoir See-Saw, which dwells on the perils of ego.
'Sorry, it sounds sort of pompous,' he apologises soon after explaining how he was counselled to exhume his reporting skills in 2016.
That year Drury wrote a series of articles for The Irish Times from his time as a volunteer at a Syrian refugee camp in Athens. It came after a long spell in the higher echelons of Irish corporate life during which he was, on occasion, the story. Indeed, so much of his career was spent in business that when he identifies journalism as the thing he was 'best at', the self-criticism is implied.
Fintan Drury: 'I wasn't trying to be a hero; that wasn't my mission.' Photograph: Dara Mac Dónaill
Catastrophe opens with a note acknowledging that most books on Palestine and Israel are by authors with more extensive experience of the Middle East. Many are by 'absolutely brilliant minds', he says, but can be academic and dense.
His aim, when he began working on it 'in a serious way' in April 2024, was to provide an accessible narrative 'so even the people who are out marching and protesting and wearing their keffiyehs – the people who are instinctively pro-Palestine – can better understand why they're protesting'.
His research, which saw him travel to the West Bank, Jordan and Lebanon last July, helped confirm his own 'gut' feeling, though he didn't know then how extreme the situation would become.
'I didn't honestly believe at that time that it could be as bad as it is now. And it was bad then. Really, really bad.'
Israel's aggression escalated while he was in the region, obliging him to call off one trip to southern Lebanon after a phone call with a contact in the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (Unifil). He was advised that an elevated security threat meant it would no longer be able to dedicate a minder.
'It's a bit like swimming when you're told not to, and the coastguard getting called out. You're putting other people at risk. I'm a grandfather. I wasn't trying to be a hero; that wasn't my mission, so I didn't go.'
He has been heartened by the 'very positive' public reaction. At the Listowel Literary Festival, interest in Catastrophe was such that his talk was moved to a bigger room, though when someone asked him about solutions, he said he wasn't the right person to offer them.
'It is multifaceted, and it will ebb and flow and change,' he says. 'But the fundamental of the story is pretty clear to me and to a great many others who are there and studying it and observing it for decades. This is a genocide. All bets are off now. This is not right.'
[
Britain and allies sanction two Israeli ministers as Gazan authorities say gunfire kills dozens at food aid site
Opens in new window
]
Authors often have more than one reason for writing a particular book and in his case there were several. Apart from the conflict itself, and the time being right for him to embark upon the project, he sees parallels with Ireland's colonisation that intersect with his own family story.
Drury's maternal grandfather Joseph Connolly was a leader of the Irish Volunteers in Belfast who was imprisoned by the British in 1916 and resumed his republican activities in the city after his release. When it became too dangerous to stay, he fled with his wife and young family to Dublin.
Connolly, who went on to serve twice as a minister under Éamon de Valera, died when Drury was two, but he knew his grandmother well, he says.
'My grandparents were displaced people. They were refugees from Belfast. Is that relevant? Absolutely, it's relevant. Because it's in your history. You understand that Catholics and nationalists who weren't able to get out continued to suffer.'
Catastrophe – the Nakba of the subtitle refers, in the first instance, to the mass displacement of Palestinians in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war – is dedicated to the memory of his Belfast-born mother Róisín Drury, née Connolly. Their discussions about how the plight of Jewish people was shamefully ignored in the 1930s and 1940s would sometimes end with her relief that modern communications meant nothing like the Holocaust could ever happen again.
There will be no credible basis for anyone to claim they did not understand what Israel was doing in Gaza or that they 'somehow missed it', he writes. The book documents an 'institutionalised bias' in the West towards Israel as the 'upholder of Western values' in the Middle East, with Drury despairing at both 'staggering' international inertia and 'chilling' sponsorship of Israel's campaign.
He witnessed what he calls the 'warped' US policy first hand when he reported for RTÉ on Ronald Reagan's 1984 re-election and believes Democrats as well as Republicans have abandoned Palestinians. While Israel's prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu found it easy to 'play' the US in a presidential election year, he says the young mothers he met in Lebanon were livid that such a 'warmonger', as one described him, was permitted to address Congress.
Ireland should be doing more, too, he concludes.
'I think Ireland has done many things really well, I really do, but has Ireland done enough? Time will tell, but right now I don't think so.'
Drury (67) was born in Dublin and raised in Clonskeagh, then a 'sleepy part of south Dublin'. He attended Blackrock College and later UCD – its relocation to Belfield was an early taste of the city's encroachment on the fields of his youth.
From 1981 to 1988 he was a newsman, joining RTÉ despite being told in a screen test that his head was 'shaped like a shovel'. He reported from Belfast and overseas before becoming the co-presenter of Radio 1's then fledgling Morning Ireland in 1985.
But after just two-and-half years he grew restless and left broadcasting at age 29. It wasn't his plan to go into business, yet that's what he did, founding the public relations firm Drury Communications before selling it to its management a decade later to concentrate on his eponymous sports consultancy, which in 2004 rebranded as Platinum One.
He became chairman of RTÉ in mid-2005 but resigned after six months when a perceived conflict of interest arose – over golf. The then government was flirting with adding the 2006 Ryder Cup, which was being held in Co Kildare, to its list of free-to-air television events, but Drury was an adviser to its organisers. Relinquishing the role was 'the right thing', he says.
Does this all seem like a long time ago?
'It was a long time ago,' he says, laughing.
It was that exact Celtic Tiger era, I say.
'Yeah.'
These were hubristic times, as Drury outlines in See-Saw, which is laced with mea culpas about a 'sense of impregnability' borne of live news presenting and his PR and sports management success. It underpinned decisions that led, he writes, 'to a decade of stress that was degenerative of body and soul'.
I had actually developed a corporate strut. When that becomes part of your way, you don't lose the capacity or the facility to make good judgments, but that capacity is dimmed or diminished

Fintan Drury
After Anglo Irish Bank supremo Seán FitzPatrick persuaded him to join the Anglo board, he served as non-executive director for six years until May 2008, leaving six months before the bank failed.
FitzPatrick's post-collapse recollection that Drury brought him and then taoiseach Brian Cowen together for a July 2008 meeting and round of golf did no one any favours, with Drury and Cowen, his friend, still being asked about it at an Oireachtas inquiry seven years later. (No banking was discussed that day, they said.)
FitzPatrick's distraction-creating move convinced Drury of FitzPatrick's 'utter selfishness', he notes in the memoir. Cowen, meanwhile, remains a friend and was one of the early readers of Catastrophe.
[
Fintan Drury: Brian Cowen put country first, party second
Opens in new window
]
I ask him about his realisation that when FitzPatrick said he wanted board members who would 'never be afraid' of expressing their opinion, he was flattering his ego.
'Yeah, and men, in particular, we're more susceptible to that,' he says.
He mentions his use of the phrase 'corporate strut', which he suspects he acquired in those Anglo days.
Fintan Drury: 'I was a good chairman in the sense that I helped [Paddy Power] grow. But I was horrified when I looked back.' Photograph: Dara Mac Dónaill
'It horrifies me, and it would have horrified me before – it wasn't a conscious thing – but when I looked back on it, I had actually developed a corporate strut. When that becomes part of your way, you don't lose the capacity or the facility to make good judgments, but that capacity is dimmed or diminished.'
He also regrets that 'the blinkers were on' during his tenure as Paddy Power chairman, when he says his old curiosity was subsumed by passive subscription to corporate Ireland, blinding him to the societal consequences of gambling. Efforts to
regulate the industry are 'nowhere near tough enough'
, he says.
'I was a good chairman in the sense that I helped the company grow. But I was horrified when I looked back, and I wished I'd never been chairman.'
[
From the archive: Banking inquiry: Drury's evidence was worth the wait
Opens in new window
]
The memoir, as well as his articles for The Irish Times and business publication The Currency, gave him a 'certain level of confidence' that he could write, though he has been reluctant to call himself a journalist again.
'There was a discussion with [Catastrophe publishers] Merrion Press about how to describe me on blurbs, and initially I was kind of resistant to that, because I think I have an old-fashioned sense of what a journalist does,' he says. (The blurb says he 'returned to journalism' in 2016 but introduces him as 'an author and opinion writer'.)
The principles of his news years are deeply rooted, nonetheless. When he says he watches 'really good interviewers' flail amid the 'stonewalling, stonewalling, stonewalling' of Israel's spokespeople, I ask if he thinks it is correct to invite them on air when this outcome can be anticipated.
'I would have suffered the constraints of Section 31 of the Broadcasting Act, and I don't believe in censorship. I am strongly of the view that censorship of any description is not of value. So I think it is better to attempt to interview them, and every so often you might make a little breakthrough,' he says.
'I think their own Sphinx-like intransigence, and same old weary lines, reinforces to most of the audience – which is more intelligent than we ever give them credit for – that that's what it is.'
Sport being the other through line of his life – he played soccer for UCD – Drury is now chairman of not-for-profit Sport Against Racism Ireland.
'The work of any NGO, trying to get funds, is hard,' he says, adding that he would like to see the Government 'crack the whip' so the private sector does more.
'A lot of private-sector companies benefiting from migration aren't investing any money at all in supporting initiatives that make migrants feel part of our community, feel cared for, feel respected, and that's a real shame. I would much rather you include that than any bolloxology about Fintan Drury.'
Catastrophe: Nakba II by Fintan Drury is published by Merrion Press

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dublin rally urges Govt to protect Ireland's neutrality
Dublin rally urges Govt to protect Ireland's neutrality

RTÉ News​

timean hour ago

  • RTÉ News​

Dublin rally urges Govt to protect Ireland's neutrality

Demonstrators have marched through Dublin calling on the Government to protect Ireland's neutrality. Around a thousand people walked from the Garden of Remembrance to Leinster House chanting "Save our neutrality, keep our Triple Lock". Around a thousand people marched through Dublin city this afternoon calling on the government to protect Ireland's neutrality. The protest was led by Opposition and Independent TDs, peace and anti-war groups and Palestine solidarity groups. It arises from Government plans for new legislation that would change how Ireland decides to deploy members of the Defence Forces abroad to serve on international peacekeeping missions. The General Scheme of the Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 would remove what is known as the Triple Lock. Under the current system, Ireland cannot send peacekeepers overseas without the go ahead from the United Nations, the Government and the Dáil. The Government's plan is to take away the requirement for the UN's go ahead. "We've a proud [peacekeeping] tradition ... why should we ask Vladimir Putin, a brutal aggressor for his permission as to where Irish men and women can go to peacekeeping. That is an out-of-date concept," Tánaiste Simon Harris said previously. The plan would also increase the number of troops that can be deployed without a Dáil vote from 12 to 50. The draft legislation will be examined over a period of eight weeks, after which a bill will be sent for Government approval. This proposal has faced strong criticism from opposition politicians, who say the move undermines Ireland's neutrality.

Irish neutrality protest: Hundreds march through Dublin city demanding triple-lock safeguard
Irish neutrality protest: Hundreds march through Dublin city demanding triple-lock safeguard

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Irish neutrality protest: Hundreds march through Dublin city demanding triple-lock safeguard

About 400 people marched through Dublin city centre on Saturday, demanding the protection of the Republic's neutrality, with some calling for a referendum on the Government's plan to remove the triple lock. Amid heavy downpours, the protesters marched from the Garden of Remembrance chanting: 'Save our neutrality, keep the triple lock!' And 'No to Nato!' Traffic was brought to a halt as the march proceeded down O'Connell Street towards Leinster House. The march organised by Together for Neutrality, a coalition of political parties and civil society organisations, was in opposition to the Government's proposal to remove the triple lock system, described by Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald on Saturday as a 'very dangerous course of action'. READ MORE The Government has repeatedly argued that the triple lock – mandating that overseas deployment of Irish troops must be approved by the Government, Dáil Éireann , and the United Nations – allows permanent members of the UN Security Council, such as Russia and China, to veto the deployment of Irish troops for peacekeeping missions. The Sinn Féin leader said the Government would do better arguing for reform of the UN, 'rather than trying to sidestep it'. She claimed the Government's reasoning is 'just one of the lines that they spin to try and justify what is an unjustifiable attack on the triple lock and on Irish neutrality. If they wish to abolish, damage and undermine Irish neutrality ... put it to a referendum.' Agreeing that UN reform should be pursued rather than removal of the lock, Labour spokesman on defence Duncan Smith said such change would be 'difficult and will be a long way off'. He said no country should be able to veto Irish peacekeeping efforts. 'We're not unaware that we do need a more sophisticated policy, but we don't need to remove the triple lock to do those things,' he said. Mr Smith said mandates can be secured through the UN General Assembly, though he acknowledged these 'may not be legally enforceable'. Protesters, meanwhile, said there was 'no coherent argument' for removing the triple lock, believing a referendum should be called. 'There's a false sense of security in Ireland that this would go to a referendum ... It can just be taken away from us without our say and people don't realise it,' said Kirsten Farrelly, one of the protesters on Saturday. She believes the Government has been 'incredibly sneaky in how they've put this across ... Getting cosier with Nato puts more of a target on our head.' Ms Farrelly added: 'I don't want our country to be involved in any way with the war machine. We could be a leading light in peace and crafting a path where people can see peace in the future and avoid conflict, and what's happening now is, 'might is right'.'

Taoiseach says UN being ‘eroded', calls for world powers to de-escalate Iran-Israel conflict
Taoiseach says UN being ‘eroded', calls for world powers to de-escalate Iran-Israel conflict

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Taoiseach says UN being ‘eroded', calls for world powers to de-escalate Iran-Israel conflict

World powers must use their influence with Israel and Iran to bring about a return to a rules-based international order where dialogue and diplomacy are used to resolve disputes, the Taoiseach has said. Speaking to reporters in Cork on Saturday, Micheál Martin said Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear programme and Iran's retaliatory missile attack on Tel Aviv are worrying developments that only add to the trauma experienced by civilians across the Middle East, 'It is deeply concerning that we have so much conflict in the Middle East. It is dangerous in terms of its impact on civilian populations in the first instance. We see the horrors of Gaza – Syria is coming out of the embers of a horrible civil war,' he said. 'A war that's been planned for a decade' - why Israel has attacked Iran and what happens next Listen | 21:11 Mr Martin said Iran should have engaged proactively years ago about its nuclear programme and set about dismantling it. It is important that the West continues its engagement with Iran even though the current situation could 'make that very difficult', he said. READ MORE 'There has to be a return to a rules-based international order. At the moment, it is receding before our very eyes. It is being eroded; the United Nations (UN) is being eroded and that is a matter of deep concern to us,' he said. 'We want to see a peaceful resolution to the conflict. We believe in dialogue, and we believe in diplomacy, so we would say, to the world powers in particular, to use their influence and stop the hostilities to bring about a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of all hostages.' Mr Martin said a failure to de-escalate the tensions between Israel and Iran would have serious consequences. He said the International Atomic Energy Agency had previouslywarned of the consequences that would arise if Iran did not engage fully with the agency on its nuclear programme. He said the agency also said the bombing of nuclear installations is hugely concerning. Mr Martin was speaking to reporters while attending a ceremony at Cork Airport to officially name the main airport artery Rory Gallagher Avenue in honour of the Cork guitarist.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store