Joe Rogan Speaks Out Against ICE Raids: 'That's Crazy'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Podcaster Joe Rogan has spoken out against ICE raids in a recent episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, where he described them as "crazy" and said: "I don't think anybody would have signed up for that."
Newsweek has reached out to a representative for Rogan via email outside of regular working hours for comment.
Why It Matters
Rogan endorsed Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election and interviewed him on his podcast. He also attended Trump's inauguration.
Trump campaigned on a hardline immigration stance, pledging to carry out the largest mass deportation in American history. Trump's administration has said it deported around 100,000 illegal immigrants in the initial months of the presidency. Many individuals have been deported following Trump invoking the rarely used Alien Enemies Act of 1798, something which has been criticized and blocked by judges.
ICE has been conducting raids around the country. Some arrests have been viewed as heavy handed while others have wrongly targeted people suspected of having no legal status in the U.S. The raids have led to nationwide protests.
Joe Rogan looks on during UFC 316 at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey, on June 7, 2025.
Joe Rogan looks on during UFC 316 at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey, on June 7, 2025.
Elsa/Getty Images
What To Know
In an episode that aired on June 18, Rogan was joined by comic and writer Luis J. Gomez and Big Jay Oakerson, a stand-up comedian and podcaster.
Rogan raised the topic of ICE raids, and said: "These ICE raids are f****** nuts man." Rogan then says he was watching a protest on television, and is asked by Oakerson if he thinks the raids are nuts, or the protests are.
"All of it's nuts," Rogan responds.
Gomez then says that he thinks both sides are "taking it a little too hard."
"I don't think if the Trump administration, if they're running and they said, 'We're gonna go to Home Depot and we're gonna arrest all the people at Home Depot. We're gonna go to construction sites and we're going to just like tackle people at construction sites, I don't think anybody would have signed up for that," Rogan said.
It's not the first time that Rogan has spoken about ICE raids. In an April episode of the podcast, he praised Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration but shared his upset at the news that the administration had deported a gay Venezuelan asylum-seeker along with a supposed member of the Tren de Aragua gang.
"It's horrific," he said at the time, adding that it was "crazy," that this could have happened.
A poll from Reuters/Ipsos conducted between June 11-12, which surveyed 1,136 Americans nationwide found that 52 percent of respondents (including one in five Democrats and nine in 10 Republicans) supported deportations of people in the country illegally.
However, 49 percent of people in the poll said that Trump had gone too far with his arrests of immigrants, while 40 percent said he had not.
The clip of Rogan speaking about the ICE raids has been met with a mixed response online.
What People Are Saying
Joe Rogan, speaking on his podcast: "They said, 'We're gonna get rid of the criminals and the gang members first'. And now we're seeing like Home Depots get raided. Like that's crazy."
The Tennessee Holler, a media and news company wrote on X: "You were warned Joe. Yet you signed up for it."
@bullriders1 on X: "Why does Joe Rogan have to start making sense?"
@thatchthoughts on X: "That's exactly what I voted for. Mass deportations."
What's Next
Another round of anti-Trump protests is being planned across the U.S. for July 17. Among their goals are an end to "attacks on Black and brown Americans, immigrants, trans people, and other communities," according to protest organizers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
20 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
‘Alligator Alcatraz': What you need to know about the Everglades detention camp
Florida's decision to build a massive detention facility for undocumented immigrants in the middle of the Everglades is fast becoming one of the most controversial symbols of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. It pits environmental protection and Indigenous rights against political ambitions and border enforcement priorities. And with the facility expected to open soon, the fight over the swamp-bound detention center seems far from over. Dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' by its backers, the project reflects Governor Ron DeSantis and President Donald Trump's aggressive approach to immigration enforcement. Here's what we know so far: Q: What exactly is being built in the Everglades? Florida has begun construction on a 1,000-bed migrant detention center on an old airstrip in the Big Cypress National Preserve, a protected part of the Everglades. The facility, which officials describe as 'temporary,' will consist primarily of large tents and trailers and is expected to house undocumented immigrants detained both within and outside Florida. With support from the federal government, administration of Gov. Ron DeSantis began moving in trucks this week loaded with portable toilets, industrial generators and supplies to establish what state officials are calling 'Alligator Alcatraz.' A private emergency management company was also spotted on site assisting with the rapid setup. Q: Why is it being called 'Alligator Alcatraz'? A: The nickname came from Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, a Trump ally who touted the site in a video posted on social media. He emphasized the remote and hazardous nature of the swamp, saying, 'There's not much waiting for [detainees] other than alligators and pythons. Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide.' The term underscores how the isolation and natural dangers of the area are being used as a deterrent — and potentially a substitute for traditional security infrastructure. Q: Why is the location controversial? A: The Everglades is one of the most important and fragile ecosystems in the United States. Environmentalists and local officials argue that placing a detention center there will damage critical wetlands, disrupt wildlife habitats, and undermine decades of restoration work. Over the past 35 years, more than $10 billion has been spent to restore the Everglades' natural water flow. The site is also historically significant. In the 1960s, there was a failed plan to build a massive international airport in the same area. That project was ultimately scrapped by President Richard Nixon, who called the cancellation 'an outstanding victory for conservation.' Q: How much will it cost, and who is footing the bill? A: The migrant detention facility is among several facilities planned by the state that together will cost around $450 million annually to operate, according to federal estimates. This includes the cost of setting up and running the facility on the site of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport. While the state is responsible for the initial construction and setup, it can seek reimbursement for some of these costs from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Q: Who owns that land? A: The site falls within Miami-Dade County, and the state has offered $20 million to purchase the land. But two recent appraisals pegged the value at nearly $195 million. Despite the lack of a finalized purchase, the state has already invoked emergency powers from a 2023 executive order to take control of the property and begin development. Q: What's the federal government's role in the project? A: The Department of Homeland Security supports the construction of new detention centers in Florida, calling them 'cost-effective and innovative.' Florida will run the facility, with the possibility of reimbursement through FEMA's Shelter and Services Program, which has allocated $625 million for the effort. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has defended the move, saying the previous administration used the program as a 'piggy bank' to support sanctuary cities and migrant services. The current plan redirects those funds to state-run detention infrastructure. Q: What will the facility look like when it's up? A: Picture a remote, temporary 'tent city' with minimal permanent infrastructure, nestled deep in swamplands teeming with dangerous wildlife. It's built within fenced perimeter zones — if fences are added — relying largely on Mother Nature as the security cordon. The stark visuals: rows of white-tan tents, trailers, and utility pods sitting on a cleared airfield, surrounded by dense wetlands, clouds of mosquitoes and lurking reptiles. Q: How many people will the facility hold? A: It is initially designed to hold from 500 to 1,000 detainees when it opens, but there are plans to expand it. Q: When will it open? A: The facility could become operational within 30 to 60 days of the start of construction. Q: Is the airport currently in use? A: Yes. The Dade–Collier Training and Transition Airport is operational, but it's primarily used for general aviation and flight training. While it was initially planned to be a major airport, environmental concerns and the development of flight simulators led to its current role. Q: What are critics saying? A: The plan has triggered widespread outrage: Environmentalists warn that the facility could pollute wetlands and threaten endangered species such as manatees, wood storks, and American crocodiles. Eve Samples, director of Friends of the Everglades, called the risks to water, waste, and ancillary development 'devastating.'Native American leaders, like Betty Osceola of the Miccosukee Tribe, say they were not consulted. Osceola, who lives just three miles from the site, said the gates to the airstrip were locked for the first time she can remember during a Sunday protest. 'The speed at which things are happening—and the secretiveness with which things are happening—is deeply concerning,' she rights advocates say the use of tents in a remote swamp during peak summer heat shows a callous disregard for the health and dignity of detainees. Mark Fleming of the National Immigrant Justice Center called it 'an independent, unaccountable detention system' that 'shocks the conscience.'Alex Howard, a former DHS spokesperson under the Biden administration, was even more blunt: 'You don't solve immigration by disappearing people into tents guarded by gators. You solve it with lawful processing, humane infrastructure, and actual policy—not by staging a $450 million stunt in the middle of hurricane season.' Q: What's the position of local government? A: Miami-Dade County owns the airfield land. County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava has raised objections over the state's aggressive tactics and environmental risks. In a letter to Florida's emergency management chief, she warned that 'the impacts to the Everglades ecosystem could be devastating' and said the state has not given the county enough time to evaluate the plans. Q: Has construction actually started? A: Yes. Trucks and contractors began arriving Sunday, and construction officially began Monday. Attorney General Uthmeier said the facility is scheduled to be operational by the first week of July. The setup includes heavy-duty tents, trailers, solar panels, and large generators. No brick-and-mortar construction is planned, according to state officials. Q: Is this part of a larger immigration crackdown? A: Absolutely. The Everglades project is a symbol of Trump's revived mass deportation efforts. In addition to Florida's new detention site, the administration has also sent migrants to Guantánamo Bay and a megaprison in El Salvador. Trump officials say the number of available detention beds nationally will determine how many people they can deport. They've asked Congress for more funding to expand capacity beyond the current 56,000 detainees—a sharp increase from the Biden administration's final months. Florida, under DeSantis, has passed laws criminalizing the presence of undocumented immigrants in the state and has carried out joint operations with federal agents, arresting over 1,100 migrants in a single week this spring. Q: Will the detention center be permanent? A: Officials insist the facility is temporary, but critics remain skeptical. With emergency powers invoked, federal dollars flowing, and infrastructure rapidly expanding, many worry the tents could outlast their stated purpose. As environmentalist Eve Samples put it: 'Once something's built in the Everglades, it rarely goes away.'
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker expected to announce bid for 3rd term, sources say
The Brief Gov. JB Pritzker is expected to announce a bid for a third term in office this week, sources told Fox 32. His name has been floated as a top contender in the 2028 Democratic primary race for president. Pritzker would be the first Illinois governor since the 1980s to run for a third term. CHICAGO - Gov. JB Pritzker is expected to announce his bid for a third term as governor of Illinois this week. Sources told Fox 32 that invitations were sent out for an event on Thursday, where he is expected to announce his third campaign for the governorship. What we know While speculation has grown about Pritzker's plans for another run next year, his name has been thrown around as a potential presidential candidate in 2028. Running for re-election as governor could make for awkward timing if he tries to run for the presidency halfway through a third term. Pritzker, 60, was first elected in 2018, defeating one-term incumbent Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican. During his first term, he oversaw the passage of several progressive measures, from recreational marijuana legalization, codifying abortion rights, and a $50 billion infrastructure package. He also led the state's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Other pieces of legislation have been controversial, especially among more conservative voters. The state did away with cash bond, a reform critics have argued would allow people accused of crimes to be set free from jail. The governor also pushed for a change in the state's personal income tax code to allow for a graduated rate system, but voters rejected the proposal in 2020. The governor went on to easily win re-election in 2022 over former downstate Republican State Sen. Darren Bailey. The State of Illinois has no term limits for governor, one of only 13 states without a limit. The last Illinois governor to run for a third term was Republican Jim Thompson, who was the state's longest-serving executive from 1977 to 1991. He was elected to four consecutive terms. Big picture view Pritzker, an heir to the Hyatt Hotel fortune who is worth about $3.7 billion according to Forbes, has also been making more of a name for himself on the national stage in recent months. He's earned headlines for calling out "do nothing Democrats" during a speech in New Hampshire, a key primary election state, and going on late night talk shows. Earlier this month, he appeared with two other Democratic governors in front of the U.S. House Oversight Committee to field questions about Illinois' sanctuary city laws originally passed under his predecessor. He excoriated House Republicans after the hearing for accomplishing "nothing" after hours of partisan back-and-forth jabs. Pritzker has also been a frequent and vocal critic of President Donald Trump. Most recently, Pritzker compared the Trump administration to the Nazi regime during his budget address in February. He also called out Trump's accelerating of immigration enforcement around the state, including Chicago. Trump has at times returned fire. Earlier this month, when fielding questions about his immigration policies, Trump called Pritzker "probably the worst in the country." Another campaign for governor also means that Pritzker will likely have to select a new running mate because his current lieutenant governor, Juliana Stratton, is running for an open U.S. Senate seat.
New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Majority of Democrats vote to table effort to impeach Trump for striking Iran
A majority of House Democrats banded together with their Republican peers to table an effort to impeach President Trump over his strikes against Iran. In an overwhelming 344 to 79 vote, the House opted to shelve a single article of impeachment from Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), who has repeatedly pushed to oust Trump in recent months. A whopping 128 Democrats voted against impeachment. 'I take no delight in what I'm doing,' Green declared prior to the vote. 'I do this because no one person should have the power to take over 300 million people to war without consulting with the Congress of the United States of America.' Green had accused Trump of engaging in abuse of power by ordering the weekend strikes against Iran's Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow facilities. 3 Rep. Al Green has repeatedly pushed to impeach President Trump. Bloomberg via Getty Images 3 Democratic leadership carefully argued that impeachment is a distraction. AP House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) promptly brought up a vote on whether to table the impeachment push. Several Democrats, such as Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) argued in favor of impeaching Trump after he announced the attacks; however, only Ocasio-Cortez voted against tabling the article of impeachment. Democratic leadership refrained from criticizing Green too sharply, but implied the impeachment effort was distracting from more pressing concerns, such as the party's opposition to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Trump survived two impeachment attempts during his first administration. 'I understand that the Constitution is going to be meaningful or it's going to be meaningless,' Green added in his push for impeachment. Green infamously heckled Trump's address to the joint session of Congress earlier this year before getting escorted out of the lower chamber. The congressman has long clamored for impeaching Trump. 3 President Trump survived two impeachments during his first term. AFP via Getty Images Back in February, Green had pushed to impeach Trump over the president's suggestion that the US could take control over the Gaza Strip. In April, he again vowed to bring up articles of impeachment against Trump. Green made similar attempts during the first Trump administration as well. A month prior, Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) pulled his articles of impeachment against Trump amid backlash from his party.
