ACLU report warns that Ohio lawmakers are adding to prison population in big and small ways
(File photo of a prison by)
Ohio's jail and prison population continues to swell, the ACLU of Ohio says, thanks to 'mass incarceration by 1,000 cuts.' The civil rights group's Statehouse-to-Prison Pipeline report highlights legislation introduced in the previous General Assembly that's likely to increase the number of people behind bars.
It's the fifth such report the group has published. ACLU Chief Lobbyist Gary Daniels said over that ten year stretch more than 500 measures expanding incarceration have been filed and 76 of those have become law.
'I started with the ACLU of Ohio back in 1995,' he said. 'Our prisons were overcrowded then. Here we are 30 years later, and they remain above capacity.'
According to the report, Ohio's prisons were built to house roughly 37,000 people, but as of December 2024, there were 45,490 people behind bars, or more than 120% of capacity.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Lawmakers filed nearly 80 proposals in the last General Assembly that create a new criminal offense, enhance the punishment for an existing one, or expand the scope of who can be charged. The ACLU classifies these as pipeline bills.
Of those, the governor signed 14 into law. Daniels explained those measures operate on two tracks — the micro and the macro. But both contribute to mass incarceration.
On the macro side, he pointed to House Bill 230, which after failing last session has returned as House Bill 88. The bill increases drug trafficking penalties with a specific emphasis on fentanyl.
'It's not a popular bill to oppose,' Daniels acknowledged. 'We get that.'
'The legislators are absolutely right and correct to be concerned about and searching for solutions and a way out of this,' he argued. But increasing penalties in 27 areas while adding more mandatory minimums isn't the right approach with an already overburdened prison system.
At the same time that lawmakers advance wide-ranging sentencing changes they also regularly file narrower knee-jerk-reaction bills.
'Certain issues make the headlines and boom, all of a sudden, you've got legislation to address it,' Daniels described.
'In Ohio this most recent legislative session,' Daniels continued, 'it was catalytic converter thefts and increasing the penalties for that. It was increasing penalties for retail thefts, assaults on sports officials and referees.'
The share of bills filed each session that would increase incarceration is relatively small. In the most recent General Assembly, the 79 pipeline bills represented just 7.5% of the total. The 14 signed into law account for only 1.3%.
But with the added dimension of time, Daniels argued, those proposals pile up, and they have a meaningful impact on prison populations.
When lawmakers see a problem, they often respond by increasing punishments. But understanding how their limited provision on catalytic converters fits into a broader program of mass incarceration isn't always obvious.
'Term limits are certainly a factor here,' Daniels said.
'They learn this over time,' he explained. 'And sometimes you get people who are well positioned to make an impact and really start fundamentally getting this issue, and then they're right back out of office.'
The consequences of that steady accumulation, Daniels said, show up in the state capital budget.
'You have counties and cities that have been lining up, quite literally at the Statehouse to get new and additional funding to both build new jails and to renovate existing jails,' he explained.
In the last capital budget, lawmakers earmarked $50 million for local jails and more than $250 million for improvements to state prisons.
The ACLU report also highlights some positive moves from lawmakers. One example was legislation reducing the use of driver's license suspensions as a form of punishment. Another directs state corrections officials to help those preparing for reentry to get documents, like a Social Security card, birth certificate or ID card, they'll need to get a job.
But even these bright spots are bittersweet.
Lawmakers continue to 'address the back end of this problem,' Daniels explained. 'What are we doing with people already in prison, in jail, in the criminal legal system instead of looking at, and making those efforts, and turning that focus to can we keep them from getting there in the first place?'
Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge says man held by ICE at Cumberland County Jail to stay in US pending deportation appeal
Jun. 9—A federal judge in Portland has paused a Maine resident's challenge against his immigration detention while the nation's highest immigration court considers his request for protection under the Convention Against Torture as a native of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Eyidi Ambila, 44, has been in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement since September when he finished serving a criminal sentence for two misdemeanors. The American Civil Liberties Union of Maine filed a habeas corpus petition on Ambila's behalf on May 23, arguing his detention at the Cumberland County Jail was unlawful because the ACLU didn't believe ICE was able to deport him. An attorney for the Department of Justice recently said they've had the paperwork since March to deport Ambila, who they said was confirmed for a flight to the DRC before a federal judge temporarily halted the removal process on May 27. "The DRC is ready and willing to accept him," Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lizotte wrote in court records. "It has issued travel documentation to that effect." Ambila's attorneys have said they are not swayed that those temporary travel papers — which expire in September — were enough. On Monday, U.S. District Judge Nancy Torresen ruled that Ambila's habeas corpus case — and his removal — will remain on pause while the Board of Immigration Appeals considers his larger request for protection under the United Nations' Convention Against Torture, which prevents the U.S. from sending people to places where they would suffer torture. Ambila is represented in that court by lawyers at the Refugee and Human Rights Clinic through the University of Maine School of Law. The attorneys said Ambila is entitled to protection "because it is more likely than not that he will be tortured or killed" due to his status as a "deportee from the U.S. with a criminal record who has spent decades outside of the country," according to filings provided by the ACLU. Ambila was 7 years old when he arrived in the United States with his sister and father, the latter of whom was tortured in the DRC as a result of his political activities, according to the filing. After coming to the United States, Ambila's grandfather was "brutally murdered by poisoning as a result of his political beliefs," the filing states. He and his family were granted asylum based on political persecution. His lawyers say he has spent most of the last three decades in Maine and Massachusetts. The Department of Homeland Security issued a final order of removal against Ambila in 2007 for a felony conviction in 2005. Yet he has legally remained in the United States under an order of supervision requiring him to report regularly to ICE. He was also required to apply for the appropriate travel permission from the DRC, the ACLU said, but was always denied because that country hasn't recognized his citizenship. Ambila's legal team wrote in court records that they were concerned by the temporary status of the embassy travel papers and his lack of citizenship. Coupled with existing conflict in the DRC and his years away, they wrote that Ambila "is likely to face torture by government officials or by violent non-state actors to whom the government turns a blind eye if returned to the DRC." "Not only has the DRC government failed to prevent torture by non-state actors, the government itself arbitrarily arrests, detains, and tortures vulnerable people and those perceived as a threat to the government," the lawyers said. Copy the Story Link We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others. We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion. You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs. Show less
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota Muslim community concerned about President Trump's travel ban
The Brief President Donald Trump's new travel ban went into effect on Monday. The ban targets mainly African and Middle Eastern countries, amid the president's escalating campaign of immigration enforcement. Some in Minnesota's Muslim community are already raising the alarm about the ban. ST. PAUL, Minn. (FOX 9) - President Donald Trump's new travel ban went into effect on Monday. CAIR Minnesota says it will offer "Know Your Rights" presentations to members of the local Somali Muslim community who have questions about the ban. What we know For Minnesota's Muslim community and its allies, President Trump's new travel ban is a cause for concern. "What we know is that this is not about security. It's a continuation of the anti-Muslim and particularly the anti-African ban," said Jaylani Hussein, Executive Director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations-Minnesota. The backstory The executive order which went into effect on Monday affects citizens from a dozen countries, including Somalia, and adds tighter restrictions on travelers from seven other countries. CAIR says Minnesota has the largest Somali population in the United States, and it has already heard from members of the Somali community worried about the new regulations. "The ban is carefully crafted to hide its true and evident intent, which is to discriminate based on religion, race, and nationality," said Munira Mohamed, policy associate for the local chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. During the presidential election, exit polling shows more than half of Muslim voters voted for third party candidate Jill Stein, 21& voted for Trump, while 20% voted for Kamala Harris. CAIR says many Muslims don't regret their decisions in the voting booth because of the Biden administration's stance on Gaza."Banning and bombing are not the same thing. We knew that Muslims in America may suffer more because of this administration. We understood that that was a risk we were willing to take to save the lives of children in Gaza and to end the war," said Hussein. What they're saying CAIR is asking community members, elected officials and neighbors to condemn the travel ban and support the No Ban Act, which would keep future presidents from enacting similar restrictions. "This ban cannot stand. It does not protect our neighbors. In fact, it creates a more racist and non-inclusive society," said Hussein.

2 hours ago
The ACLU demands the US release and return a Dominican woman living legally in Puerto Rico
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico -- In late May, a 47-year-old woman from the Dominican Republic was detained by police in Puerto Rico after she entered a municipal building seeking a permit to sell ice cream on the beach to support herself. Upon being turned over to federal agents, the Dominican woman presented her passport, driver's license and work permits that proved she was living in the U.S. territory legally, her attorney Ángel Robles and the American Civil Liberties Union of Puerto Rico, said Monday. Despite the documents presented, authorities recently transferred her to Texas as part of a federal crackdown on migrants living illegally in U.S. jurisdictions. The woman, whose first name is Aracelis, has not been fully identified because she is a victim of domestic violence. Aracelis is among hundreds of people who have been detained in Puerto Rico since large-scale arrests began in late January, surprising many in the U.S. territory that has long welcomed migrants. Robles and the ACLU demanded Aracelis' release and return to Puerto Rico. 'It's outrageous,' Robles said in a phone interview. 'No charges have been filed against her, and she is not in the system.' Because her name does not appear in a federal database, Robles' request for a bond hearing was denied. 'This case is one of unspeakable abuse,' said Annette Martínez Orabona, the ACLU director in Puerto Rico. The case has fueled already simmering anger against the administration of Puerto Rico Gov. Jenniffer González Colón and local authorities who have been working with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to arrest those believed to be living illegally in the U.S. territory. In a letter sent Monday to the governor and the island's justice secretary, the ACLU accused Puerto Rico's government of violating the Constitution and local laws by providing ICE and U.S. Homeland Security with confidential information on nearly 6,000 immigrants. It also accused ICE of using that data to go on a 'fishing expedition' that it called 'arbitrary and abusive.' A spokesman for Homeland Security Investigations did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In Puerto Rico, undocumented immigrants are allowed to open bank accounts and obtain a special driver's license. The ACLU in Puerto Rico also accused González Colón's administration of not providing protocols to local government agencies for how to deal with such requests from the federal government. The ACLU requested, among other things, that Puerto Rico's government issue an executive order barring public agencies from collaborating with ICE subpoenas not accompanied by a court order. A spokeswoman for the governor did not immediately return a message for comment.