ACLU report warns that Ohio lawmakers are adding to prison population in big and small ways
(File photo of a prison by)
Ohio's jail and prison population continues to swell, the ACLU of Ohio says, thanks to 'mass incarceration by 1,000 cuts.' The civil rights group's Statehouse-to-Prison Pipeline report highlights legislation introduced in the previous General Assembly that's likely to increase the number of people behind bars.
It's the fifth such report the group has published. ACLU Chief Lobbyist Gary Daniels said over that ten year stretch more than 500 measures expanding incarceration have been filed and 76 of those have become law.
'I started with the ACLU of Ohio back in 1995,' he said. 'Our prisons were overcrowded then. Here we are 30 years later, and they remain above capacity.'
According to the report, Ohio's prisons were built to house roughly 37,000 people, but as of December 2024, there were 45,490 people behind bars, or more than 120% of capacity.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Lawmakers filed nearly 80 proposals in the last General Assembly that create a new criminal offense, enhance the punishment for an existing one, or expand the scope of who can be charged. The ACLU classifies these as pipeline bills.
Of those, the governor signed 14 into law. Daniels explained those measures operate on two tracks — the micro and the macro. But both contribute to mass incarceration.
On the macro side, he pointed to House Bill 230, which after failing last session has returned as House Bill 88. The bill increases drug trafficking penalties with a specific emphasis on fentanyl.
'It's not a popular bill to oppose,' Daniels acknowledged. 'We get that.'
'The legislators are absolutely right and correct to be concerned about and searching for solutions and a way out of this,' he argued. But increasing penalties in 27 areas while adding more mandatory minimums isn't the right approach with an already overburdened prison system.
At the same time that lawmakers advance wide-ranging sentencing changes they also regularly file narrower knee-jerk-reaction bills.
'Certain issues make the headlines and boom, all of a sudden, you've got legislation to address it,' Daniels described.
'In Ohio this most recent legislative session,' Daniels continued, 'it was catalytic converter thefts and increasing the penalties for that. It was increasing penalties for retail thefts, assaults on sports officials and referees.'
The share of bills filed each session that would increase incarceration is relatively small. In the most recent General Assembly, the 79 pipeline bills represented just 7.5% of the total. The 14 signed into law account for only 1.3%.
But with the added dimension of time, Daniels argued, those proposals pile up, and they have a meaningful impact on prison populations.
When lawmakers see a problem, they often respond by increasing punishments. But understanding how their limited provision on catalytic converters fits into a broader program of mass incarceration isn't always obvious.
'Term limits are certainly a factor here,' Daniels said.
'They learn this over time,' he explained. 'And sometimes you get people who are well positioned to make an impact and really start fundamentally getting this issue, and then they're right back out of office.'
The consequences of that steady accumulation, Daniels said, show up in the state capital budget.
'You have counties and cities that have been lining up, quite literally at the Statehouse to get new and additional funding to both build new jails and to renovate existing jails,' he explained.
In the last capital budget, lawmakers earmarked $50 million for local jails and more than $250 million for improvements to state prisons.
The ACLU report also highlights some positive moves from lawmakers. One example was legislation reducing the use of driver's license suspensions as a form of punishment. Another directs state corrections officials to help those preparing for reentry to get documents, like a Social Security card, birth certificate or ID card, they'll need to get a job.
But even these bright spots are bittersweet.
Lawmakers continue to 'address the back end of this problem,' Daniels explained. 'What are we doing with people already in prison, in jail, in the criminal legal system instead of looking at, and making those efforts, and turning that focus to can we keep them from getting there in the first place?'
Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
What else is on the June 10 NJ primary ballot? Assembly races
While the top of the June 10 primary ballot is often the most discussed, all 80 seats in the New Jersey General Assembly are also up for reelection and there are more candidates in this year's primary than there have been in decades. Antoinette Miles, state director for New Jersey Working Families, said she attributes this year's Assembly races to the end of the county line system. 'We've been in a reform wave in New Jersey buoyed by the candidacy of now Sen. Andy Kim and continues to be buoyed throughout this election and I don't think you get that without the end of the county line,' she said. 'Even if you look back to two years ago, 2023, we saw a number of legislators leave the state Legislature either due to retirement or similar turnover in that effect, yet we know it was only 11% of legislative seats actually contested.' Miles said that it's exciting the state is 'no longer in era of choiceless primaries' and that 'voters actually get to choose.' She also said that the end of the line will impact incumbents as well because they may use it as an opportunity to 'find their independent footing' because there are some that 'do want to be independent from the political machine or their party boss but haven't had the opportunity to do that.' Ben Dworkin, founding director of the Rowan Institute for Public Policy & Citizenship, agreed that the elimination of the line has made it easier to run. 'Every county of New Jersey's 21 counties had their own way of determining who was on the line,' he said. 'Some were more democratic than others, but with its elimination, it just made it easier for people to run.' This is the first primary in which all 21 counties will use the block ballot design as opposed to the county line design. The line traditionally gave candidates endorsed by the county party preferred ballot placement, and an edge in their efforts, but it was dismantled by a federal judge last year. There are 24 competitive districts on the Democratic side of the aisle while Republicans will see contested races in seven. NJ Primary Election 2025: Our complete guide to voting, governor candidates, local races Campaign finance: How are candidates for NJ governor spending in the last days of the primary campaign? Dworkin also said there is the Fulop factor, referring to the slate of candidates that have joined with Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop under his 'Democrats for Change' effort. He said Fulop entered the gubernatorial primary trying to take the progressive lane but after Newark Mayor Ras Baraka jumped in and 'took that lane away,' Fulop pivoted to a more reform focused candidacy, which Dworkin said has helped him in terms of finding support. 'He's trying to capture the lightning in a bottle that Andy Kim caught last year. He's trying to duplicate that,' Dworkin said. 'Part of his strategy has been to try and take advantage of the fact that there is no line, no ballot geography that automatically hampers one candidate in their effort to take on another and because they're all going to be grouped together he's running his own candidates as the Fulop political reform team.' Miles said there's a 'lot of weight in New Jersey politically that's put in a six-word slogan' but that at the end of the day that's not how voters choose candidates and that in cases of a 'slate effect,' voters will choose who is best for their district. Dworkin said it's still the beginning of this new era so it will take time to see how elections post-line will play out, but candidates that are ambitious or inspired by a local issue may be more inclined to jump into the fray. That doesn't mean actual organization and support with a base willing to do campaign legwork like door knocking and cold calls isn't important. The members in District 15, Assemblywoman Verlina Reynolds-Jackson and Assemblyman Anthony Verrelli aren't facing any challenges during the primary and the district hasn't had any Republicans file to run in the fall. There are also four members of the Assembly who are not seeking reelection: Assemblymen Reginald Atkins, John Allen, Julio Marenco and Assemblywoman Shavonda Sumter. Katie Sobko covers the New Jersey Statehouse. Email: sobko@ This article originally appeared on NJ primary election Assembly races
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Bill limiting protests at public universities awaits Gov. Abbott's approval
The Brief A new bill, SB 2972, limiting protests on Texas public university campuses has passed both the Senate and House. The bill prohibits activities like using amplified sound during class, protesting in the last two weeks of the semester, and wearing masks to conceal identity. Critics, including the ACLU of Texas, argue the bill violates First Amendment rights. AUSTIN - A bill that passed through the Texas legislature last weekend would prohibit certain times and locations of protests on public university campuses. Critics worry the bill is in direct violation of the First Amendment, as well as the Texas Constitution. Senate Bill 2972 defines "expressive activities" in the same manner as the First Amendment and the Texas Constitution, directly citing those documents to include assemblies, protests, speeches, the distribution of written materials, the carrying of signs, and the circulation of petitions. Under the new bill, the following would be prohibited at Texas universities: Using devices to amplify sound during class hours while engaging in expressive activities. Engaging in expressive activities during the last two weeks of the semester. Camping or setting up tents on campus. Wearing a mask or other disguise while engaging in expressive activities. Lowering the U.S. flag with the intent to raise another flag. Engaging in expressive activities between 10 p.m. and 8 a.m. Note that these are limited and expanded upon individually within the bill's text. The Senate passed the bill 21-10 on May 14. The House passed it 97-39 on May 28. What they're saying The bill's text says it may not be construed to limit freedom of speech or expression as protected by the First Amendment or Texas Constitution. Critics wonder how this is possible, saying the bill in its entirety is an imposition of prohibitions on rights defined in those texts. Caro Achar, the engagement coordinator for free speech at the ACLU of Texas, released the following statement to that point. "S.B. 2972 threatens the free expression of all Texans, regardless of political beliefs. This bill imposes broad restrictions that allow school officials to restrict how, when, and where Texans can speak on campus — undermining the First Amendment rights of students, faculty, staff, and the general public." Dig deeper The new bill comes on the heels of recent major protests on Texas university campuses, largely related to the conflict between Israel and Palestine, as well as developments with mass deportations. At one UT Austin protest in April 2024, 79 pro-Palestine protesters were taken into custody. The university was later found to have violated several institutional rules when handling the incident. Feds to screen social media of migrants, foreign students for antisemitic activity Columbia must notify students before handing records to Congress amid antisemitism probe ICE detains U of M student at Twin Cities campus, officials say What's next SB 2972 now awaits Gov. Greg Abbott's signature. According to the ACLU, he is expected to sign it into law. If he neither signs nor vetoes the bill, it will become law without his action. The Source Information in this article comes from Texas Legislature Online, the ACLU of Texas and previous coverage by FOX 7.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Protests erupt over immigration raids in Los Angeles
Protests erupted in Los Angeles over ongoing Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in the city. Federal agents have raided multiple workplaces in the fashion district, a Home Depot and other local areas, according to the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California. Hundreds of people, including children, were detained by ICE agents on Friday at the Edward Roybal Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles, the ACLU said. ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons said in a statement Saturday, "The brave men and women of ICE were in Los Angeles arresting criminal illegal aliens including gang members, drug traffickers and those with a history of assault, cruelty to children, domestic violence, robbery, and smuggling." Large crowds began gathering near the federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles Friday protesting the immigration raids and leading to some reported clashes with authorities. Lyons said that the "violent rioters will be held accountable" and vowed that ICE will continue to make arrests. "What took place in Los Angeles yesterday was appalling. As rioters attacked federal ICE and law enforcement officers on the LA streets, Mayor Bass took the side of chaos and lawlessness over law enforcement," Lyons said Saturday. Mayor Karen Bass, meanwhile, condemned the ICE raids in a statement. "As Mayor of a proud city of immigrants, who contribute to our city in so many ways, I am deeply angered by what has taken place. These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. My Office is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations. We will not stand for this," Bass said. Bass told KABC that neither she nor the Los Angeles Police Department were aware that the ICE raids were going to happen. Some protesters could be seen throwing objects at vehicles and others tried to block vans from leaving on Friday, KABC reported. Shortly after 7 p.m. the Los Angeles Police Department declared an unlawful assembly, warning protesters they risked being arrested if they remained in the area. LAPD officers were seen lining the streets near the federal building, KABC reported. The LAPD said in a social media post late Friday that officers had reported a "small group of violent individuals" were throwing large pieces of concrete. "Once again, an UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY has been declared. You must leave the area. The use of less lethal munitions has been authorized by the Incident Commander," the LAPD said in the post. The Department of Homeland Security said the targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles is "despicable." "Mayor Bass, ICE is not responsible for "sowing a sense of terror" the protestors YOU enabled are," DHS said. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said the FBI has already made arrests for "obstructing our operations." Federal law enforcement operations will proceed as planned this weekend in Los Angeles County, U.S. attorney Bill Essayli added. -ABC News' Luke Barr and Vanessa Navarrete contributed to this report.