logo
Sandie Peggie tribunal hears racist jokes were dark humour

Sandie Peggie tribunal hears racist jokes were dark humour

She was placed on special leave after Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying, harassment and patient safety concerns.
Ms Peggie was recalled as a witness by her legal team following an explosive evidence session on Monday, which heard the nurse was accused of racism and homophobic by colleagues and former friends.
In evidence, Ms Peggie told the tribunal jokes she shared about the 2022 floods in Pakistan, which killed 1,739 people, were sent in "dark humour" and were intended to shock the small group of friends in a Benidorm group chat.
The tribunal heard she shared 10 jokes relating to the flooding disaster, including describing the aftermath as looking like a "giant bowl of coco pops".
Another joke shared said there was "too many P***'s" in Britain" and said they could be returned to Pakistan.
Ms Peggie admitted these jokes were "offensive". But she also said there was "too much illegal immigration".
Read more:
The nurse also said she could not remember saying she wanted to throw a packet of bacon at a mosque being built in Kirkcaldy but said that it would have been said it "dark humour" if she did.
She said: "I wouldn't offend any Muslim people by speaking like that in front of them."
Defending the messages joking about Pakistan, Ms Peggie said: "Looking at them, they're distasteful.
"At the time they were sent in dark humour, expecting a shocked reaction from the girls."
Ms Peggie also told the tribunal she used the racial slur 'P***' regularly when growing up and said the community in her neighbour were "quite happy" with this at the time.
Asked by NHS Fife's lawyer Jane Russell KC whether she did not like the Kirkcaldy mosque, Ms Peggie said: "I can't say I didn't like it, but I had a fear of it being built."
The lawyer asked whether this was because Ms Peggie had a "fear of Muslims" and is "frightened" of Sharia law.
Ms Peggie agreed.
She told the tribunal she had used the "Ch***" slur, but said she did not use it to describe restaurants in her neighbourhood.
She said she has "never heard my Chinese neighbours complain" about the term.
Discussing the Dr Upton's use of the female changing room, Ms Peggie said she did not recall describing the medic as a "weirdo".
Ms Peggie said: "I think he looks strange because he is obviously a man who wants to wear women's clothing."
The nurse also rejected evidence from her former friends that she was "homophobic" and "devastated" when her daughter came out as gay.
Read more:
Ms Peggie said she was "originally upset" but only because she feared her daughter would be "ridiculed" by people.
The nurse then told the tribunal: "I don't have any bad feelings towards trans people, I just don't believe they should be in the women's changing room."
Earlier, the tribunal heard from consultant Dr Maggie Currer, who told the tribunal Dr Upton was "chromosomally male".
However, Dr Currer said she did not think it would be appropriate to inform female medical staff of Dr Upton's trans status to check if they were comfortable.
She told the tribunal in "hindsight" that she "could have".
Ms Peggie's lawyer Naomi Cunningham put it to Dr Currer that "Dr Upton is quite simply biologically male".
Dr Currer said: 'She's chromosomally male, as far as I'm aware.
'Although I've not examined Dr Upton she's also in terms of genitalia male, but I have not examined her.'
The evidence in the employment tribunal came to an end, with a third witness - Emma Moore, an administrator at Sex Matters, also giving evidence.
She told the tribunal that she had received an anonymous call from a worker at NHS Fife at the weekend, with the employee telling the organisation that people were "frightened" to talk about the case at work.
In cross examination, Ms Russell KC said Ms Moore's evidence amounted to "no more than you recounting what someone else told you".
Employment Judge Sandy Kemp concluded the tribunal, stating that supplementary statements can be submitted up to August 25, while a date for oral statements from Ms Russell and Ms Cunningham was set for September 1 and 2.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drinking three cups of coffee day could protect against cognitive decline, new study finds
Drinking three cups of coffee day could protect against cognitive decline, new study finds

Daily Record

timea day ago

  • Daily Record

Drinking three cups of coffee day could protect against cognitive decline, new study finds

A new study found coffee and tea consumption is linked to declines in memory and reasoning in people over 60 Scientists have discovered an unexpected link between cognitive decline and the amount of tea or coffee consumed daily by people over 60. They have pinpointed a 'sweet spot' of around three cups of either beverage to maintain mental sharpness. ‌ However, they also found that consuming more than four cups of coffee per day was associated with poorer results. Interestingly, those who drank tea had worse results at the beginning of the study, despite experiencing a slower decline thereafter. ‌ The reasons behind these connections between tea and coffee consumption and cognitive decline remain unclear. The researchers highlighted the need for further studies to unravel this mystery, but suggested it might be related to caffeine content, as reported by News Medical. ‌ In a single cup of tea, there's approximately 28mg to 45mg of caffeine, while a cup of coffee contains around 95mg. This could explain why high tea intake was associated with slower decline, whereas high coffee intake was linked to faster decline. Published in the Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, the research examined the long-term effects of tea and coffee consumption specifically on older adults. It tracked over 8,700 UK adults aged between 60 and 85 for just under a decade. The research took into account people with genetic predispositions for Alzheimer's disease, excluding those with other conditions that could influence the results such as Parkinson's, depression, diabetes, hypertension or consuming more than 14 units of alcohol per week. Participants were asked to disclose their coffee or tea consumption and were categorised into three groups; those who never drank it, those who consumed between one and three cups a day (moderate intake), and those with a high intake who had four or more cups daily. Their cognitive function was then evaluated using computerised tests which required them to solve verbal and numeric reasoning problems, testing their reaction time and memory, as well as a visual memory test using pair matching. ‌ People who either never drank coffee or had a moderate coffee intake exhibited a slower decline in their cognitive ability over time. However, those consuming four or more cups of coffee daily made more errors in pair matching as the years progressed, indicating they experienced a faster cognitive decline. On the flip side, people who had moderate to high tea consumption showed less decline compared to those that never drank tea. Drinking tea also didn't have any significant links to changes in reaction times, pair-matching errors or numerical memory. Researchers have highlighted previous studies that consistently demonstrate tea's superior cognitive benefits compared to coffee. Notably, a 2022 Chinese study found that consuming more than four cups of tea daily can reduce cognitive decline. However, the study does have its limitations as it failed to consider different brewing methods. Therefore, there's no data on whether participants were drinking decaffeinated or caffeinated coffee, what types of tea they were sipping, or how much milk and sugar they added to their brews.

I lost 18st without fat jabs – I didn't cheat my way to a new body by secretly using Ozempic, I put the effort in
I lost 18st without fat jabs – I didn't cheat my way to a new body by secretly using Ozempic, I put the effort in

Scottish Sun

time2 days ago

  • Scottish Sun

I lost 18st without fat jabs – I didn't cheat my way to a new body by secretly using Ozempic, I put the effort in

Kate Evans, 40, a full-time mum from Buckinghamshire, weighed 29st at her heaviest & is frustrated people think she resorted to fat jabs. Here's her secret... NO WEIGH I lost 18st without fat jabs – I didn't cheat my way to a new body by secretly using Ozempic, I put the effort in OPENING my 10th can of cola of the day and gorging on a Chinese takeaway, I felt utterly miserable. Weighing 29st and a size 32, I was practically housebound and struggling to care for my children. It was a conversation with my husband in early 2023 that would shock me into finally losing weight, after years of it spiralling out of control. 5 At 10st 13lb, Kate's happier and healthier after losing 18st without using weight loss injections 5 Kate with husband Dan at her heaviest weight of 29st Today, I'm more than 18st lighter, but to my frustration, there are people who don't believe I lost the weight through diet and exercise. They accuse me of secretly using fat jabs and say I cheated my way to a new body. When my husband Dan told me that day that he was scared I was going to die, I knew his fears were justified. At 38, I was pre-diabetic and could barely walk, with aching joints and breathlessness. I agreed to join a slimming club, but had no idea how I'd lose the excess weight. All my life, I've been big. At 10, I weighed 9st, the weight of an adult woman, because I had a big appetite. BIG APPETITE As a teenager, when I had more independence and money to spend, I'd buy crisps, chocolate and fizzy drinks. I did try a few times to lose weight in my 20s, but always gave up and put it back on, and more. When I met Dan online in 2013, after having my first child in a previous relationship, I was a size 24. He didn't care, though, and saw past my weight. He loved me as I was, and we got married in 2016. I treated food like an emotional crutch. No matter how I was feeling, I turned to it. I look back with horror at what I'd consume daily – litres of fizzy drink, greasy takeaways, piles of buttered toast and chocolate. By the time Dan had that emotional conversation with me, I was only leaving the house once a week to go to the supermarket, and I slept downstairs because getting up to our bedroom was too hard for me. 'No shortcuts exist' I'm an Irish teen who lost almost 60 pounds in 16 weeks following a routine that works wonders He had to take on more than his share, and I could never take the kids to the park or on a day trip. Had Dan not confided his fears in me, I'm not sure if I'd have ever given myself that push to lose weight. Stepping on to the scales at my first slimming club meeting in February 2023, I felt mortified. At 29st 4.5lb, I was by far the biggest person there. But for Dan and my children's sake, I knew I needed to try. So, using the club's plan as a starting point, I began learning about nutrition. I started having fruit and yoghurt for breakfast, a wrap with salad for lunch, and chicken with veg for dinner. I stopped having takeaways and gradually weaned myself off sugary drinks. Attending a weekly meeting and being weighed kept me accountable, and as I started to see the number on the scales go down, I felt motivated to keep going. I began to introduce walking, too. At first, even short distances left me with sore joints and out of breath, but I persevered and it became more enjoyable. 5 Kate ended up practically housebound and struggling to care for her children due to her weight 5 Kate lost the weight to be a better mum 5 Kate's husband Dan was scared she was going to die because of the excess weight Dan was so supportive and relieved I was taking care of myself. By April 2024, I'd lost 17st. I decided to keep going and now weigh 10st 13lb. I don't plan to lose any more, but still attend my weekly club meetings. It's surreal when I walk into a clothes shop and can pick out size-12 dresses. People I haven't seen in a while have walked past, not recognising me, and there was even a rumour in our area Dan was having an affair, because he was spotted with another woman. But that was me! What frustrates me is, after all the effort I've put in, I've been accused of secretly using weight-loss jabs. I've seen it happen online to celebrities, such as TV presenter Alison Hammond, who's lost 11st without jabs, too. Personally, I think it's cheating to use them to lose weight. I put the pounds on and it was up to me to lose them, not rely on pharmaceuticals. When I look back at old photos, I don't recognise that unhealthy, unhappy woman. I've saved my life and am the active, happy wife and mum I always dreamed of being. And I did it all by myself.'

Sandie Peggie NHS Fife tribunal: 'Mass discrimination' legal action warning if nurse wins case over Beth Upton
Sandie Peggie NHS Fife tribunal: 'Mass discrimination' legal action warning if nurse wins case over Beth Upton

Scotsman

time2 days ago

  • Scotsman

Sandie Peggie NHS Fife tribunal: 'Mass discrimination' legal action warning if nurse wins case over Beth Upton

Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It has been one of the most contentious and high-profile employment tribunals in modern British legal history and its outcome could wield significant influence at a time when policies and guidance around gender are in a state of flux. All eyes are on the Dundee employment tribunal that has heard every blow and counter in the case brought by Sandie Peggie against NHS Fife. In legal proceedings that have made headlines around the UK, the nurse is pursuing a claim for sexual harassment, belief discrimination and victimisation against both the health board and Dr Beth Upton, a trans woman colleague at Kirkcaldy's Victoria Hospital with whom she clashed over a women's changing room. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad With the final evidence sessions concluding last week, the legal teams of those involved have until August 25 to provide any supplementary statements effectively summarising their case. The tribunal will then briefly reconvene at the start of September for two days for oral submissions alongside any legal questions. Supporters of nurse Sandie Peggie protest outside the employment tribunal hearings in Dundee. Picture: Lisa Ferguson | Lisa Ferguson Only then will the panel, helmed by employment judge Sandy Kemp, be in a position to issue a written ruling. But while many tribunal judgements are given relatively quickly after the final submissions have been made, the intricacies of this particular case mean it could be weeks, if not months, before a legally binding decision is announced. One source indicated 'the end of 2025' as a 'likely timeframe', given the panel has to consider not just the evidence from more than 15 witnesses, but thousands of pages of documentation. When the moment eventually arrives, the implications could well be far reaching. Around the UK there are a number of ongoing employment tribunals and other legal cases which span the kind of gender-critical and trans issues that have been discussed at length throughout the Peggie tribunal. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And according to gender-critical campaign and advocacy groups involved in various legal activities, there is likely to be similar employment tribunal cases in Scotland - and potentially, even a large, class-action style legal action. 'There are more employment tribunals' Susan Smith, co-founder of For Women Scotland, the gender critical group that successfully fought the Scottish Government all the way to the Supreme Court over sex-based protections, said there were other women planning legal action around such issues. She indicated there may also be cases similar to the judicial review brought to the Court of Session in April by parents in the Scottish Borders, which ultimately led to a judge ordering that Scottish state schools must provide single sex toilets for pupils. Ms Smith said: 'I know there are more employment tribunals. It's always hard to say how many, because people are at different stages of the process, but I understand there are a couple of court dates that have been set. Susan Smith, left, celebrated with colleagues and supporters of For Women Scotland after the Supreme Court ruling that the word 'woman' in the 2010 Equality Act refers to a biological woman. Picture: Lucy North/PA | PA 'There is also consideration underway about whether judicial reviews will be brought against anyone at any point for not adhering to the law. It can be a difficult process, but ultimately, we're not going anywhere. And if things aren't being done, we're keeping an eye on what we need to think about doing.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Maya Forstater, chief executive of the Sex Matters group, stressed the law on single sex spaces was 'already clear' in the wake of April's landmark Supreme Court ruling. The court decision set out the terms 'woman' and 'sex' refer only to a biological woman and biological sex in the Equality Act. But should the Dundee tribunal find in Ms Peggie's favour, Ms Forstater said it would 'help bring home to foot-dragging employers all over the country that complying is not optional'. 'Any employer that continues to flout health and safety regulations concerning toilets, changing rooms and washing facilities is putting itself at risk not only of a high-profile legal case involving a single brave claimant like Sandie, but a mass discrimination and harassment case taken jointly by large numbers of female employees,' she said. Appeal could lead to legal precedent being set As is to be expected, the extent of the repercussions of the Peggie case depends on the ruling the Dundee tribunal issues, which could be fully or partly in favour of one side or the other, and the similarity of circumstances in future cases. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Either way, the outcome will be consequential, not least because there is little in the way of existing case law around the question of workplace changing rooms. And although judgements in Scottish tribunals are not binding in England, Wales or Northern Ireland due to the separate legal jurisdictions, they can be used as persuasive arguments by the parties involved. One legal source familiar with the Peggie case said in the event the judgement goes to appeal - a process that could end up in the Supreme Court - the outcome could set a legal precedent similar to that seen in the case of Ms Forstater's High Court appeal win against an employment tribunal in 2021, which found her gender-critical beliefs fell under the Equality Act. Above all, the source said, the Peggie case would be a 'cautionary example' to public bodies 'not to play fast and loose with the law and its interpretations'. Nurse Sandie Peggie, centre, alongside Maya Forstater, left, and employment lawyer, Margaret Gribbon, outside the Scottish Parliament after a meeting with MSPs in June. Picture: PA | PA Such developments could prove important in a case such as that brought to a Newcastle tribunal by a group of nurses, who are challenging the decision by the NHS foundation trust in County Durham and Darlington to allow one of their trans colleagues to use female changing rooms. The group has filed claims at an employment tribunal on the grounds of sexual harassment, discrimination, victimisation and breaches of the right to a private life, under article eight of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case is not scheduled to be heard until October. But it has been reported the Royal College of Nursing has urged the trust to comply with statutory provisions laid down in the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, which require all changing rooms to be male or female-only except when they are 'single lockable rooms'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Smith said if Ms Peggie wins her case, it will become all the more important for health boards, and Scottish ministers, to ensure they are complying with existing legislation. 'The immediate implications for the NHS in Scotland will be to ensure that they have lawful policies,' she said. 'It might focus minds at health boards that they are going to have to take some responsibility for sorting things out. They can't leave these kinds of policies to graduates with no background in law or human resources, and they're going to have to review all their policies for staff and patients. 'They are responsible whether they like it or not' 'Ever since the Supreme Court ruling, we have been pushing the government on policies which we don't regard as lawful, especially around schools and prisons. Their argument a lot of the time is that these organisations, like the NHS, are arms-length and that it's not up to the government to provide guidance, even though they've done just that in the past. They are responsible whether they like it or not.' Ms Smith added: 'A lot of organisations are putting off any changes because of the false narrative that's been created, which says the ruling is not law until the statutory guidance is approved by Parliament. But that's utter rubbish - the law is what the Supreme Court says it is. Unfortunately, a lot of people choose not to believe that.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Sandie Peggie | Lisa Ferguson Ms Smith also suggested the intense scrutiny of NHS Fife's processes and practices may prevent other public bodies from contesting similar cases raised at employment tribunals in the future, describing it as a 'real embarrassment' for the health board. 'Even if they were to win at this stage, which I don't think is likely, I am sure it would go to appeal, and ultimately, they would lose,' she said. They have spent a vast amount of taxpayers' money on this, and it's been humiliating to hear some of the evidence, and the gossiping and bitchiness in the workplace. 'I think there'll be more cases and I think there will be more settlements. Wiser lawyers will be telling their clients that it is better for them to swallow whatever disadvantage comes from settling, because they're not going to win in the long term.' Political pressure and cost concerns The Peggie judgement will also have repercussions for NHS Fife. Already, senior figures in Scotland and elsewhere have reflected at length on the case, with many calling for changes even before a judgement is issued. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As part of cross-party condemnation of the health board, Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay is among those who have said senior managers should step down over its handling of the case, while SNP MSP Michelle Thomson has called on the members of NHS Fife's board to consider their positions. Elsewhere, Scottish Labour's Carol Mochan has said Holyrood's health committee should investigate the way in which the health board has handled the case. NHS Fife has come under extensive criticism. Picture: Fife Free Press | Fife Free Press That criticism is likely to continue, especially as the costs of defending the tribunal case mount up. NHS Fife has confirmed that as of the end of June, it had spent more than £258,000 on legal costs relating to the tribunal - a sum that includes counsel fees and services provided by NHS Scotland. But given the hearings that have taken place since then, one source suggested the total bill could reach in the region of £500,000 to £700,000 if not more. That sum would exclude any remedy made in Ms Peggie's favour should the health board lose its case. 'The costs of defending such a case, and eventually paying compensation, is likely to be enormous,' Ms Forstater said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store