
Premier League will see more rule changes next season – when will this ever end? I have NO idea what football rules are
Next season there will be more new rule changes. When will this ever end and are you, like me, baffled and bamboozled in equal measure as to what the actual rules of football are?
2
2
From next season goalkeepers will be penalised for holding on to the ball for more than eight seconds, with the punishment a corner to the attacking team.
Referees are supposed to indicate when a keeper has held the ball for three seconds, giving him five more seconds to release it. Apparently, this new rule has been tried and tested and will be in place for next season.
So what was wrong with the old rule which gave keepers six seconds to release, with punishment in the form of an indirect free-kick? Beats me. It was hardly ever enforced anyway.
The body which has come up with this latest daft tinkering, I meant well-researched brainstorm, the International Football Association Board, must have spent ages on it. Probably in a well-stocked five-star hotel somewhere near Fifa's Swiss Alps headquarters.
The purpose of this newest change is to cut down on time-wasting but how can extending possession from six to eight seconds do that?
And also the fact that the 'old' rule was almost never imposed surely means it was a good rule.
A bit like competent refereeing, if you don't know they are there, chances are the official is doing a decent job.
Every year we are told greedy water companies will clean up their act and every season football makes changes which confuses the hell out of fans. Dirtying the waters, so to speak.
We have had 'golden' goals, 'silver' goals, the advance ten-metre rule, you name it. If anyone can successfully tell me what the current rules around handball are, please let me know.
As for VAR, well let's just say the jury is still out on that one.
We have been told the introduction of Semi-Automated Offside Technology will solve the ridiculous amount of time it has taken Stockley Park assessors to actually reach a decision.
Well, that wasn't true last weekend at the West Ham v Forest game, as that quick check we were promised turned into an excruciating six-minute delay as the offside technology was not working.
And don't get me started on the financial fair play rules.
Professor Brian Cox might be able to name all the stars in the sky but even he would struggle with that.
I'm the first to admit that some changes have been of great benefit. In 1992, the introduction of the backpass rule where keepers cannot handle the ball when it has been deliberately kicked to them by a team-mate is one.
When will this ever end and are you, like me, baffled and bamboozled in equal measure as to what the actual rules of football are?
Karren Brady
Goal-line technology came in 2012 following the uproar over the Frank Lampard World Cup 'goal-that-never-was'. That was another. But in recent seasons the dribble of rule changes has become a downpour.
From allowing the kick-off to be taken in any direction, to teams now requiring a mandatory captain, complete with armband, to additional subs if a player has received a concussion injury.
Have any of these actually improved fans' enjoyment?
Just leave the game alone please. The International Football Association Board should adhere to the wise man, more likely wise woman, who said, if it isn't broke, don't fix it. Or to put it another way, stop bloody tinkering.
I'm just waiting for the first referee next season who awards a corner after a keeper has transgressed this newest rule change.
Cue hundreds of examples by irate fans where the 'offence' was not spotted.
Football. They say it used to be a simple game which involved two jumpers and a ball. Not any longer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
Is it time to start giving 'disruptors' Chelsea some credit?
To understand what's going on at Stamford Bridge, you need to forget everything you instinctively know about football. No club at the top level has ever attempted to rebuild in the way that Chelsea are since Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital's takeover of the club in May 2022. Unprecedented 10-year contracts, nearly £900m spent on players aged 21 or younger and a bending of certain Premier League profit and sustainability rules (PSR) has allowed a total of £1.6bn to be paid in transfers fees across a three-year period. Chelsea's approach has confused and alienated some football fans - but qualifying for the Champions League, winning the Conference League and then claiming the Club World Cup has changed the conversation. Enzo Maresca will also be the first manager to be entrusted with back-to-back campaigns in what will be the fourth season under this ownership, with a world champions badge to be emblazoned on Chelsea's shirt for the next four years. Internally, Chelsea see their latest victories as vindication of a 'disruptor' approach led by the owners, delivered by the sporting directors and made to work on the pitch by Maresca. However, the disruptors face disruption as their pre-season has been shortened to just two under weeks because of the Club World Cup. Recruitment decisions are coming good Cole Palmer is the poster boy for Chelsea, but other star players like Moises Caicedo, Enzo Fernandez and Marc Cucurella are now delivering on high price tags. Pedro Neto scored three goals in three consecutive games at the Club World Cup for the first time in his senior career, while new signings Joao Pedro and Liam Delap have been bright in their first matches for the club. Players like Benoit Badiashile, Christopher Nkunku and, to a lesser extent, Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall, show that not every transfer has been a roaring success. However, Chelsea have been good at selling players - as highlighted by the sale of unsuccessful £45m signing Joao Felix to Al-Nassr for £43.7m this summer. Noni Madueke generated £52m, Djordje Petrovic was sold for £25m and Ishe Samuels-Smith left for £6.5m this like these balance record-breaking purchases worth £1.6bn by this ownership. About £600m, not including potential sell-on clause revenue, has been made and recent club accounts show an English record of £152m banked for player sales from the 2023-24 remains a high net spend of about £1bn in three years, but Chelsea's owners say these stay on the balance sheet and represent an "investment". The much-criticised approach of offering up to 10-year deals to players has also given Chelsea increased bargaining power when selling players, renewing contracts or simply keeping their wage bill down in the longer term. There is noise that Caicedo, arguably among the best midfielders in the world, is angling for improved terms on his contract signed in 2023 - but that still runs for a further six years and negotiations have yet to formally begin. Manchester City striker Erling Haaland signed a nine-and-a-half-year contract - and, as the old saying goes, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Maresca winning over the fans Chelsea's fans are known for being particularly impatient, perhaps as a result of enjoying such success in the Roman Abramovich era despite constant hiring and firing of coaches. Couple that with Maresca's brusque tone when addressing fan criticism, as well as missing chances to engage with the match-going support last season, and he has faced calls to leave the club as recently as April. However, a comeback win against Fulham was arguably the turning point which led to a triple success of earning Champions League football, winning the Conference League and then Club World Cup. Maresca was never under pressure internally at Chelsea, who took a decision to judge him after his second season, but qualification for the Champions League is viewed as his most important success to date. Repeating that feat remains the main target for next season, along with demonstrating that he is generally making with the fans, Maresca has rapidly improved his standing, especially after winning the Club World Cup. Legitimate criticism remains Is a 12th, sixth and fourth-place finish enough return on a £1bn net investment on players? Chelsea have spent £2bn on players in six years, nearly double teams such as Manchester United, Arsenal and Manchester City, albeit balanced by the best player sales record over that time period. That £2bn figure was inflated by this new ownership and, according to Chelsea's own accounts, their current squad cost £1.4bn, the highest such number ever in the Premier League. Of course, the £87.5m in prize money won at the Club World Cup, plus the £80m-£100m on its way thanks to being in the Champions League, helps. But whether that is a good return divides opinion from within the are trying to achieve something that has never been done, effectively emulating Brighton's successful player-trading model, while also winning big trophies. They had the youngest average starting XI ever recorded in a Premier League season last year, at 24 years and 36 days contrast, the youngest team to win the Premier League was Jose Mourinho's Chelsea in 2004-05 with an average age of 25 years, 250 days, while Liverpool's title winners last season averaged 27 years and 233 days old. To highlight the difference, Chelsea did not use a player over the age of 27 last season and their oldest signing this summer is 23-year-old striker Joao Pedro. Another criticism is of Chelsea's "bomb squad", featuring Raheem Sterling, Ben Chilwell, Renato Veiga, Lesley Ugochukwu, Axel Disasi and Armando Broja, all not involved in Maresca's pre-season plans and have been training in a separate group at Cobham Training and Broga have now signed for Burnley for a reported £40m there are alleged associated party transactions after the sale of the women's team (£200m) and two hotels (£76.6m) helped Chelsea avoid breaking the Premier League's PSR spending rules. Meanwhile, Uefa's stricter financial rules have also seen the club punished. Chelsea have spent a record £75m on agents in 2023-24, too, with a league-high total of £178.6m across the past three seasons. They were also the only club not to agree a front-of-shirt sponsor last season but are confident of finding a new, long-term partner this summer after tendering a contract for £65m-a-season to advertising insiders, while seeking a reputable partner now they are back in the Champions League. The disruptors face disruption Winning the Club World Cup final on 13 June has not been without its was good to his word by giving his players three weeks off but it meant they returned to the Cobham training ground on 4 August - just 13 days before their opening Premier League game against Crystal only pre-season friendlies were against Bayer Leverkusen and AC Milan at Stamford Bridge - although club staff say they are confident of getting players fit in time, while those close to the squad appreciate a proper holiday being fitted in. Chelsea handled the difficult weather, travel and long season exceedingly well in the United States at the Club World Cup, but dealing with an extremely short pre-season is another challenge to take on. When asked by BBC Sport about the impact of the short pre-season, Maresca said: "I don't have the answer, I am quite curious because this is the first time it happened. The focus was just to rest as they played 64 games and didn't stop for one year in a row which never happened before. The focus was recovery and rest."It's strange, it's different, Palace started when we were in USA, we had three weeks off, started two days ago with two friendlies in 48 hours, we will see game-by-game, day-by-day about how we are."Featuring statistical support from Chris Collinson.


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Leeds' new No 1 declares himself 'fully fit and ready to go' ahead of Premier League debut as Daniel Farke reveals where Illan Meslier is in pecking order
Lucas Perri is adamant that he is 'fully fit' and ready to go as Leeds United's No 1 in the Premier League. Perri, 27, made his debut on Saturday in Leeds' friendly against Milan in Ireland but played just 45 minutes before Karl Darlow came on for the second half. Leeds signed the goalkeeper from Lyon for £15.6M on July 26 but the Brazilian only started training with his team-mates this week after a minor injury initially kept him out. 'Yeah I'm totally fit,' said Perri. 'I had a minor hamstring problem a few weeks ago so they took a slow approach with my return but now I'm fully fit, 100 per cent and ready to go. 'Defensively we are doing a pretty good job during pre-season and offensively, we are scoring goals. We're ready and we are ready to fight.' During his debut in front of a sell-out crowd in Dublin, Leeds fans got a glimpse of Perri's enormous 50 metre throws and he revealed that it took a show of faith from his goalkeeping coach at Botafogo, Daniel Correia, before he started to use it in matches. 'I've loved to throw since I was young. In training at Botafogo, I used to do it a lot in training but not so much in games and the goalkeeping coach said I should start to do this in games,' said Perri. 'Then I started to recognise the patterns of what works and what doesn't but I've had the far throws since I was a kid.' Perri wore the No 1 shirt - which was previously held by Illan Meslier - in Ireland and Leeds manager Daniel Farke confirmed that Meslier was left behind for the trip as he wasn't needed. Leeds begin their top-flight campaign against Everton next Monday night at Elland Road. 'We decided to play two goalkeepers so it was not necessary for him (Meslier) to travel,' said Farke. 'I wanted to give Lucas Perri the first 45 minutes and Karl (Darlow) is ahead of him (Meslier) in the pecking order.' On giving Perri the No 1 shirt, Farke added: 'It's quite normal. We invested - by our standards - a big sum to bring Lucas in. 'I don't give any guarantees away about who's starting but of course Lucas is likely to play a role for us (against Everton) and for that, we decided to give him the No 1 shirt. 'It's not a decision against Illan. It's also for the confidence of Lucas to make him welcome and show why we signed him.'


The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Darwin Nunez departs Liverpool after three eventful years
Liverpool have sold striker Darwin Nunez to Saudi Pro-League club Al-Hilal for £46.2m, concluding his three-year tenure at Anfield. Nunez, who joined from Benfica for an initial £64m (potentially rising to £85m), scored 40 goals in 143 appearances for Liverpool, including seven in 47 games last season. The Uruguay international had expressed a desire to leave in January and attracted interest from Napoli and AC Milan, though neither met Liverpool's valuation. Nunez's sale contributes to Liverpool's summer transfer income of approximately £190m from various player departures, including Luis Diaz. Liverpool are now seeking to sign another attacker to bolster their squad, having had a £110m bid for Newcastle 's Alexander Isak rejected, and are hesitant to make a second offer.