logo
How the mushroom murder trial gripped Australia

How the mushroom murder trial gripped Australia

Yahoo07-07-2025
The 'mushroom murder trial', as it has popularly become known, has gripped Australia over the past 11 weeks.
More than that, it's prompted worldwide headlines, multiple daily podcasts, and even YouTube videos of self-proclaimed 'body language experts' assessing defendant Erin Patterson's every move.
There's an ABC drama series in the works.
Acclaimed Australian author Helen Garner has been in the courtroom.
But why did this tragedy, in which three people died and a fourth was lucky to survive, grip the public consciousness in way no other contemporary Australian case has?
On 29 July 2023, in a sleepy town called Leongatha in the foothills of the Strzelecki Ranges in Victoria, a very normal woman called Erin Patterson made an ostensibly very normal lunch of beef wellington.
She was cooking for her in-laws, Gail and Don Patterson, Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, and Heather's husband Ian. Erin's estranged husband, Simon Patterson, was also invited, but chose not to attend.
Simon and Erin had two children, a boy and a girl, who did not attend the lunch either.
Shortly after the lunch, all four guests were admitted to hospital with suspected gastroenteritis. Erin Patterson also presented to hospital, but refused to be admitted.
Within a few days, Gail, Don, and Heather all died as a result of what was later confirmed as poisoning with Amanita phalloides, better known as death cap mushrooms.
Ian survived, but he was lucky. He spent seven weeks in hospital and needed a liver transplant.
The questions became, how did the mushrooms get into the beef wellington? Was this an awful accident or something more sinister?
These questions became the focus of very significant public and media attention.
Erin Patterson spoke to the media in the days after the incident. She presented as your typical, average woman of 50.
That is, in my opinion, where the obsession with this case began.
This case had the feel of a Shakespearean drama: multiple deaths within one family, death by poison, and a female protagonist.
The juxtaposition between the normality of a family lunch (and the sheer vanilla-ness of the accused) and the seriousness of the situation sent the media into overdrive.
Then there were the lies. Patterson lied about foraging for mushrooms, and about having cancer to encourage the guests to attend.
The location also played a huge part. Leongatha is known for its staggering natural beauty and thriving food and wine scene. It's hardly a place where the world expected a mass murderer to live.
However, the perception that rural areas are utopias of safety and social cohesion, and cities are dark and dangerous places, is a myth.
One study by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare paints a different picture.
For serious assault cases that resulted in hospitalisation, for major cities the rates were 65 per 100,000 people. In rural areas, this rose to 1,244 people per 100,000.
And for murder, in very remote areas the rate was five per 100,000 population, but fewer than one per 100,000 in urban areas.
Then there was Erin Patterson's unusual behaviour. She disposed of the desiccator in which the mushrooms she had foraged were dehydrated. She used multiple phones, one of which underwent multiple factory resets on in the days following the lunch. One of these resets was done remotely after police seized her phone.
There are also the much-discussed plates. The court heard she prepared her meal on a different-coloured plate to those of her other guests so they were easily identifiable.
The public latched onto these details, each providing a new talking point around water coolers or spurring new Reddit threads dedicated to unpacking their significance.
Ultimately, after three months, Erin Patterson was charged with three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder. She pleaded not guilty.
The trial lasted 40 days. The prosecution alleged Patterson intentionally poisoned her guests, whereas the defence suggested it was all an awful, tragic accident.
The jury took six-and-a-half days to deliberate. During that time, various media outlets did everything they could to keep the story on the front page.
Bizarre pieces began appearing online from credible sources such as the ABC, profiling people who had attended court.
They included stories of people turning down work to attend the court daily, cases of friendships blossoming during the trial between regular attendees, and the outfit choices of locals turning up every day to watch the drama unfold.
There were also articles profiling local cafe owners and how they felt about being at the centre of the legal theatrics. The daily podcasts continued even when news from the courtroom didn't.
The vibe felt more appropriate for a royal visit than a triple murder trial.
It seemed everyone in Australia was gripped by one event, united in a way few other things could manage. We all waited with bated breath to see what the 12 men and women of the jury would decide.
The end to this strange and unique criminal case came on Monday 7 July.
The result? Guilty on all four counts. Erin Patterson is formally a mass murderer, though many in the court of public opinion had reached the same conviction months earlier.
Leongatha will always be known for being the setting of (arguably) the most infamous multiple murder case in Australian history. It will join Snowtown in South Australia (home of the 'bodies in the barrel' murder case), Kendall in New South Wales (where William Tyrrell disappeared), and Claremont in Western Australia (the murder or disappearance of three women) as places forever linked to tragic crimes.
While the trial is over, there's much more content still to come, the public's appetite yet to be satiated.
But the final word should be saved for the Patterson and Wilkinson families. This is an awful tragedy, and there are no winners. Ian and Simon have lost loved ones. The Patterson children have lost grandparents and now have to come to terms with the fact their mother caused those deaths intentionally.
Amid the spectacle, it's easy to lose sight of the humanity at the centre. As the media spotlight dims, may the families get the privacy and respect they deserve.
Xanthe Mallett is a Criminologist at CQUniversity Australia
This article was originally published by The Conversation and is republished under a Creative Commons licence. Read the original article
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aussie fisherman's illegal act 'costs him $12,000 and his boat'
Aussie fisherman's illegal act 'costs him $12,000 and his boat'

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Aussie fisherman's illegal act 'costs him $12,000 and his boat'

An east coast fisherman has been hit with a whopping fine and had his boat destroyed after he was caught in a highly illegal act in the country's northeast last week. Officers from the Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol (QBFP) launched an investigation after reports of interference with fishing gear in Cairns. When they visited the man's property, they allegedly uncovered more than just stolen catches — a sawfish rostrum was found along with commercial gill nets. The sawfish's long, tooth-lined snout is its most distinctive feature. It's also protected by law, making its removal illegal. The man was slapped with a $12,000 fine and has lost his boat permanently. Authorities say it will be destroyed. "This man's poor decision to interfere with other people's crab pots has cost him $12,000 and his boat," QBFP Manager Greg Bowness said. Why is interfering with fishing gear illegal? Under Queensland law, touching or lifting another person's crab pot is illegal, even if the intention isn't to steal crabs. The Fisheries Act 1994 strictly prohibits interference with fishing gear that you don't own, to protect both the sustainability of marine life and the integrity of recreational and commercial fishing. While it may seem harmless, this kind of interference undermines the efforts of legitimate fishers and can damage livelihoods. Recreational and commercial fishers alike rely on the fairness of the system, being able to trust that their equipment, and whatever it catches, will be left undisturbed. Alarming haul pulled from major Aussie river MP says it's 'time to release the virus' as invasive species takes over Trailer full of fish exposes disturbing reality in Aussie waterways Sawfish are a protected species in Queensland waters due to their declining population. The discovery of a rostrum in the man's possession raised further questions about his fishing practices. Removing or possessing parts of these endangered animals is a serious offence and can attract additional penalties. Gill nets are also tightly controlled in Queensland due to their potential to harm non-target species, including turtles, dugongs and dolphins. This case serves as a reminder that fisheries officers have wide powers to investigate and prosecute breaches of fishing laws, and that the consequences for doing the wrong thing can be significant. Earlier this month, a Victorian copped a $2,000 fine after authorities discovered he was allegedly using live carp as fishing bait, a serious breach of the law. The Victorian Fisheries Authority (VFA) said he was also allegedly deploying illegal setlines, another significant offence. VFA said "given the risk of the man's fishing activity spreading carp to other Victorian waters", officers proceeded to inspect his property, where they located "a large seine net, and several setlines like those observed in Broken Creek". As a result, the fisher received fines of more than $2,000 for possessing live noxious aquatic species, using carp as live bait, and possessing commercial fishing equipment without authorisation. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

Aussie's cheeky stunt with parked cars prompts $750 fine warning
Aussie's cheeky stunt with parked cars prompts $750 fine warning

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Aussie's cheeky stunt with parked cars prompts $750 fine warning

Aussies are being warned that a tactic to avoid parking fines can land culprits with fines as high as $750 and even jail time, after a cheeky video went viral online. The reminder comes after a NSW resident shared footage of water being poured over the tyres of chalk-marked cars to remove the substance. Ticket inspectors, who operate as authorised officers, use chalk to mark tyres as a method of tracking how long a vehicle has been parked in a specific spot. Some have branded the move "heroic", while others called for it to be "normalised". But Astor Legal's leading criminal lawyer Avinash Singh told Yahoo News it could be seen as an offence in the eyes of the law. This is because removing chalk could hinder a parking ranger from carrying out their duties and prevent them from issuing fines, he explained. "It depends on what state you're in," Singh told Yahoo. "In South Australia, it is definitely illegal, as there is a specific act that deals with it. In other states, there is no specific act, but there are some general pieces of legislation referred to as perverting the course of justice, or attempting to pervert the course of justice." Singh warned that anyone could be "opening themselves up to significant penalties" if caught in the act. Footage of the moment has been viewed over a million times, with many praising the tactic to help fellow Aussies avoid parking fines. Singh believes it's captured the public's attention because many would be wondering if it is really allowed. "The first thing you would think is 'is this even legal, and that's where the curiosity has come from," he said. So, what does the law say? South Australia is the only state that has a specific law that addresses this issue. Section 174AB of the Road Traffic Act 1961 makes it an offence to remove a parking inspector's chalk from a vehicle. The maximum fine for this is $750 if taken to court. According to Singh, the law was implemented because the practice of removing chalk became widespread among residents. In NSW, Section 319 Crimes Act 1900 makes it an offence to do any act, or make any omission, intending in any way to pervert the course of justice. The maximum penalty is imprisonment for 14 years if caught. In Queensland, Section 140 of the Criminal Code 1899 makes it an offence for a person to attempt to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice. The maximum penalty is seven years' jail. In Western Australia, Section 143 of the Criminal Code 1899 makes it an offence for a person to attempt to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice. The maximum penalty is seven years' jail. In Victoria, there is a common law offence of attempting to pervert the course of justice which carries a maximum penalty of 25 years' imprisonment. Despite the laws, Singh explained it would be hard to prove an offence had taken place. "Unless [the parking inspector] directly saw you or had some sort of footage, it would be almost impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt," he explained. He adds that chalking isn't the best way for inspectors to catch out drivers who have overstayed their welcome, and drivers can contest fines by asking for evidence they were correctly timed. "Chalking itself isn't the best method to use because there are some holes to exploit to get out of fines. What is better evidence these days is a time-stamped photograph," he said. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

Update in search for missing kids, baby
Update in search for missing kids, baby

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Update in search for missing kids, baby

Two schoolchildren and a newborn baby missing from the Gold Coast have been found safe and well, police say. The girl and boy were last seen in Pimpama at about 8.50am on Friday, July 18. It was believed they were with a woman and baby known to them. Family and police were concerned for their welfare due to their young age, with their disappearance sparking a widespread search and public appeal for information. Queensland police confirmed on Monday afternoon that the three children and the woman had all been located 'safe and well'. No charges have been laid.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store