‘Yellowjackets' Season 3, Episode 4 Recap: Judge, Jury and …
Season 3, Episode 4: '12 Angry Girls and 1 Drunk Travis'
What does justice look like to the Yellowjackets? It's not pretty, it's not logical, it's often deeply unfair, and it's all on display in this week's episode.
The centerpiece is a trial in the woods in the 1990s. The girls, having now found Ben, elect to decide his fate by mimicking an episode 'Law & Order.' They choose lawyers — Tai is the prosecutor and Misty is the defense — and fashion a makeshift courtroom.
It's unclear what they plan to do with Ben if they find him guilty, but death is surely on the table. And yet, they also seem like kids playing dress up — which they are. As is familiar for 'Yellowjackets,' childlike behavior and real stakes make for a potent concoction.
We watch as the Yellowjackets' warped sense of justice extends into the present day. There are two threads that emphasize that. First, there is Jeff and Shauna. Jeff is worried about his and Shauna's massively bad karma, so he signs them up to volunteer at the senior home where Misty works. That becomes too emotionally intense for Shauna after she winds up locked inside a walk-in freezer, so she decides to replace a local cat that has been missing for years by just adopting a different cat. Sure, that will work.
And then there's Tai and Van, who find themselves wondering whether they should be the arbiters of life and death. They drop a Queen of Hearts from a deck of playing cards on the ground to see if it 'chooses' anyone. When a man picks it up, they follow him back to his apartment and Tai nearly makes moves to kill him, thinking that taking his life will give the cancer ridden Van more time.
Van stops Tai from going that far, but the mere fact that the possibility was on the table is evidence of how much all this Wilderness woo-woo has affected their minds.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pierce County Sheriff wants to work with ICE. WA law says he can't. Here's why
Pierce County Sheriff Keith Swank's desire to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, despite Pierce County officials saying he can't under Washington law, has resulted in pending legal action after Swank used an outside attorney to serve three officials with a demand for mediation last week. Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney Mary Robnett has told Swank he cannot seek legal advice from attorney Joan Mell and that only the Prosecuting Attorney's Office can act as Swank's attorney. She also said Mell's legal advice about cooperating with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could expose the county to millions of dollars in potential liability, as previously reported by The News Tribune. On Wednesday Robnett served Mell an order seeking to restrict her from offering legal advice to Swank. Mell has told The News Tribune that Robnett incorrectly advised Swank and was duty-bound as counsel to adhere to his requests, for example, challenging the Keep Washington Working Act, which Swank has called unconstitutional. Swank has also told the News Tribune he feels caught between federal directives to enforce immigration detainers and state law that forbids it. To get an outside perspective, The News Tribune asked Hugh Spitzer, a semi-retired professor at the University of Washington School of Law, about the issue. Spitzer has practiced law in Washington for 50 years and has spent 10 years teaching at the law school on topics including local government and municipal law, Washington state constitutional law and legal ethics and professional responsibility. On Wednesday Spitzer said all sheriffs in Washington are subject to statute and state law. The Pierce County Charter states that part of the county executive's job is to supervise and manage all executive departments established by the charter or the county council, which includes the sheriff's office, he said. 'It doesn't mean that the executive can interfere with a so-called 'core function,' but the executive still has some powers in terms of oversight,' he said. 'And the prosecuting attorney is probably right when she said in her memo that the sheriff can't go out and contract with his own lawyer [because] the prosecuting attorney shall be the legal advisor of the county and appears and represents the county.' An overview of the executive's role, as spelled out in the 2017 Pierce County budget, says 'all executive departments are subject to the personnel, budgeting, expenditure, and any other policies of general application established by the County Executive,' including the Sheriff's Office. Likewise the executive has supervision and management power over 'all County administrative operations including staffing, expenditures, and procedures; strategic direction for the resolution of complex or sensitive County issues; and, execution, enforcement, and support of Pierce County policy and state/federal statutes.' The sheriff is responsible for police services in unincorporated Pierce County and several contracted cities, including patrol, criminal investigation and emergency response, according to the charter. The sheriff also administers the county jail. Spitzer said Swank can hire a lawyer to represent him personally but not as the sheriff because the County Council has control over expenditures like that. Mell did not respond to a question from The News Tribune on Wednesday asking whether Swank was seeking for Pierce County to pay his attorney fees. In terms of working with ICE, Spitzer said although local governments have a lot of flexibility over how they are structured and run, 'ultimately, everything has to be according to general law.' In this case Swank will have to abide by the 2019 bipartisan Keep Washington Working Act that emphasizes immigration enforcement is primarily a federal responsibility. Under the act, local law enforcement cannot arrest people solely for civil immigration offenses. 'The sheriff, if they don't like it, they're welcome to not like it,' Spitzer said. 'But that doesn't mean they can violate their oath and not follow the law by claiming that they understand the constitution better than the Legislature does.' Spitzer said there's a movement in the state and nationally where so-called 'constitutional sheriffs' have a notion that because their offices are mentioned in their state's constitution that they're not subject to statute or their county charters. The only way Swank would be able to cooperate with ICE is if he sued the state 'on his own nickel' and won, Spitzer said. In March, Washington's Attorney General Nick Brown filed a lawsuit against the Adams County Sheriff's Office for illegally aiding federal officials with immigration enforcement in eastern Washington, as previously reported by The Olympian. In April Swank traveled to Washington, D.C. with other sheriffs from across Washington, including Adams County Sheriff Dale Wagner, to give Wagner moral support and 'bring what he sees as a conflict between state and federal law to the attention of the federal government,' as reported by The News Tribune. Mell told The News Tribune in an email Wednesday evening, 'The Sheriff has the right to question and legally challenge State law where it invades his core constitutional duties.' 'A professor saying the Sheriff has to follow the law is not news. Finally Pierce County has a Sheriff willing to challenge the law to ensure he has all the tools in his tool belt to which he is entitled to keep the peace,' she wrote. 'Pierce County is in desperate need of every mechanism available to cut the skyrocketing violence and crime in Pierce County under Robnett and [Executive Ryan] Mello['s] leadership.'
Associated Press
a day ago
- Associated Press
DEA's Marijuana Defiance Deepens: Rogue Bureaucrats Undermine DOJ, Supreme Court, and Rule of Law
Terrance Cole's First Test: Will He Restore DEA Diversion To Legitimacy As the DEA Diversion spirals into constitutional crisis, all eyes now turn to incoming Administrator Terrance Cole. With the Supreme Court, DOJ, and Congress aligned on the illegality of the agency's ALJ system, Cole faces a clear mandate: dismantle the DEA's kangaroo court framework, remove corrupt leadership like Thomas Prevoznik, Matthew Strait and attorney Aarathi Haig, restore sound marijuana policy and return the agency to the rule of law. His next moves will determine whether the DEA Diversion can be salvaged-or whether it must be restructured from the ground up. WASHINGTON, DC / ACCESS Newswire / June 8, 2025 / While the Department of Justice has publicly withdrawn its defense of DEA unconstitutional administrative law judges (ALJs), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) continues to flout executive orders, Supreme Court precedent, and congressional intent-all while using tainted legal proceedings to obstruct cannabis science and protect entrenched interests. This brazen defiance is no longer theoretical-it is operational. The DEA is actively weaponizing a judicial system that the U.S. Supreme Court has declared unconstitutional in Axon v. FTC and Jarkesy v. SEC. Despite Attorney General Pam Bondi's directive that the DOJ will no longer defend this structure, the DEA marches forward, conducting hearings before ALJs who cannot be removed by the President-an arrangement that violates the Appointments Clause and undermines the separation of powers. The DOJ Says It's Over-The DEA Didn't Get the Memo In direct contradiction to Bondi's notice to Congress-including Judiciary Committee leaders like Senator Chuck Grassley-DEA officials have scheduled yet another ALJ hearing against MMJ BioPharma Cultivation, a federally compliant research firm seeking to advance treatments for Multiple Sclerosis and Huntington's Disease. This is not just bureaucratic overreach-it's deliberate sabotage. Worse, the DEA is exploiting the legal ambiguity around 'harm' to sidestep accountability. By claiming that MMJ and similar companies must first suffer irreparable injury before federal courts can intervene, the agency is playing a dangerous game-daring businesses to be destroyed before they can challenge illegal proceedings. 'The DEA's abuse of the harm requirement is nothing short of gaslighting,' said MMJ CEO Duane Boise. 'They tell us to wait for damage, then slam the door shut when that damage arrives.' The Real Harm Is Institutional The true injury here isn't just to MMJ or its scientists-it's to the American system of checks and balances. When an executive agency refuses to comply with a Supreme Court ruling and ignores its own Justice Department's constitutional analysis, it becomes something far more dangerous: an unelected, unaccountable power unto itself. The Architects of Obstruction: Prevoznik, Strait, and Haig DEA bureaucrats Thomas Prevoznik, Matthew Strait, and Aarathi Haig have emerged as the chief engineers of this lawless agenda. Haig, already under fire for her ineligibility to practice law in New Jersey due to bar compliance failures, remains the lead attorney against MMJ. Her continued participation not only violates 28 U.S.C. § 530B but further erodes the integrity of the agency's actions. Prevoznik and Strait, meanwhile, continue to stall legitimate cannabis research applications while ignoring illegal THC imports and exports. This two-tiered system punishes innovators and protects political allies. Congress Must Step In-or Be Complicit Lawmakers must recognize that the DEA is no longer just dragging its feet-it is actively resisting constitutional order. That resistance demands immediate action: If Congress fails to act, it will confirm what many Americans already suspect-that federal agencies like the DEA can operate beyond the law, without consequence, and without oversight. The Rule of Law Is Not Optional The DEA's refusal to follow the Supreme Court and its own Department of Justice is a constitutional crisis in real time. It is not just an affront to MMJ-it is a betrayal of every American who believes in due process, scientific integrity, and accountable government. If the DEA cannot respect the law, then the law must be used to dismantle the DEA. MMJ is represented by attorney Megan Sheehan. CONTACT: Madison Hisey [email protected] 203-231-8583 SOURCE: MMJ International Holdings press release
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
DEA's Marijuana Defiance Deepens: Rogue Bureaucrats Undermine DOJ, Supreme Court, and Rule of Law
Terrance Cole's First Test: Will He Restore DEA Diversion To Legitimacy As the DEA Diversion spirals into constitutional crisis, all eyes now turn to incoming Administrator Terrance Cole. With the Supreme Court, DOJ, and Congress aligned on the illegality of the agency's ALJ system, Cole faces a clear mandate: dismantle the DEA's kangaroo court framework, remove corrupt leadership like Thomas Prevoznik, Matthew Strait and attorney Aarathi Haig, restore sound marijuana policy and return the agency to the rule of law. His next moves will determine whether the DEA Diversion can be salvaged-or whether it must be restructured from the ground up. WASHINGTON, DC / / June 8, 2025 / While the Department of Justice has publicly withdrawn its defense of DEA unconstitutional administrative law judges (ALJs), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) continues to flout executive orders, Supreme Court precedent, and congressional intent-all while using tainted legal proceedings to obstruct cannabis science and protect entrenched interests. This brazen defiance is no longer theoretical-it is operational. The DEA is actively weaponizing a judicial system that the U.S. Supreme Court has declared unconstitutional in Axon v. FTC and Jarkesy v. SEC. Despite Attorney General Pam Bondi's directive that the DOJ will no longer defend this structure, the DEA marches forward, conducting hearings before ALJs who cannot be removed by the President-an arrangement that violates the Appointments Clause and undermines the separation of powers. The DOJ Says It's Over-The DEA Didn't Get the Memo In direct contradiction to Bondi's notice to Congress-including Judiciary Committee leaders like Senator Chuck Grassley-DEA officials have scheduled yet another ALJ hearing against MMJ BioPharma Cultivation, a federally compliant research firm seeking to advance treatments for Multiple Sclerosis and Huntington's Disease. This is not just bureaucratic overreach-it's deliberate sabotage. Worse, the DEA is exploiting the legal ambiguity around "harm" to sidestep accountability. By claiming that MMJ and similar companies must first suffer irreparable injury before federal courts can intervene, the agency is playing a dangerous game-daring businesses to be destroyed before they can challenge illegal proceedings. "The DEA's abuse of the harm requirement is nothing short of gaslighting," said MMJ CEO Duane Boise. "They tell us to wait for damage, then slam the door shut when that damage arrives." The Real Harm Is Institutional The true injury here isn't just to MMJ or its scientists-it's to the American system of checks and balances. When an executive agency refuses to comply with a Supreme Court ruling and ignores its own Justice Department's constitutional analysis, it becomes something far more dangerous: an unelected, unaccountable power unto itself. The Architects of Obstruction: Prevoznik, Strait, and Haig DEA bureaucrats Thomas Prevoznik, Matthew Strait, and Aarathi Haig have emerged as the chief engineers of this lawless agenda. Haig, already under fire for her ineligibility to practice law in New Jersey due to bar compliance failures, remains the lead attorney against MMJ. Her continued participation not only violates 28 U.S.C. § 530B but further erodes the integrity of the agency's actions. Prevoznik and Strait, meanwhile, continue to stall legitimate cannabis research applications while ignoring illegal THC imports and exports. This two-tiered system punishes innovators and protects political allies. Congress Must Step In-or Be Complicit Lawmakers must recognize that the DEA is no longer just dragging its feet-it is actively resisting constitutional order. That resistance demands immediate action: Terminate the use of ALJs in all DEA enforcement matters. Remove agency officials who violate ethical or constitutional mandates. Transfer cannabis research oversight to FDA or NIH. Hold hearings on DOJ-DEA discord and bureaucratic insubordination. If Congress fails to act, it will confirm what many Americans already suspect-that federal agencies like the DEA can operate beyond the law, without consequence, and without oversight. The Rule of Law Is Not Optional The DEA's refusal to follow the Supreme Court and its own Department of Justice is a constitutional crisis in real time. It is not just an affront to MMJ-it is a betrayal of every American who believes in due process, scientific integrity, and accountable government. If the DEA cannot respect the law, then the law must be used to dismantle the is represented by attorney Megan Sheehan. CONTACT:Madison HiseyMHisey@ SOURCE: MMJ International Holdings View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire Sign in to access your portfolio
