'The canary in the mine' - US tariff threat impacts Offaly firm
At a trade forum in Dublin today, Tánaiste Simon Harris will say US tariffs of 10% on exports from Ireland will be the "new normal" but that efforts are continuing to agree zero for zero taxes in some key areas.
The meeting takes place a week before the scheduled lifting of a pause on higher tariffs by US President Donald Trump.
The forum will also receive an economic assessment of the impact of tariffs from Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe.
At Elis Cleanroom in Co Offaly, they describe themselves as "the canary in the mine".
It is, according to the sales manager Bernard Flynn, "a good barometer of what is happening in the industry".
The company, which has a base in Birr, Co Offaly, and in Glanmire, Co Cork, provides specialist laundry services, both sterile and non-sterile, to companies which work in controlled environments, including the medical device and pharmaceutical industries.
"Our service is a very vital service to the pharma and medical device sector so we're right there at the core," Mr Flynn said.
"If they sneeze, we get a cold, essentially.
"So we need to, or we would like to know, what's going to happen and we would like some stability and some certainty".
In the cleanroom section of the business, Elis employs 100 people, while overall, the company employs around 1,300 people in Ireland.
"For last ten years we've had double digit growth," said Mr Flynn.
He added that to continue growing, more customers are needed.
"Year on year, it's been fantastic but the big news now is there has been no news and by that, I mean we've had no announcements of new builds in the last ten months.
"We currently have two brownfield sites being built - Astellas in Tralee, Co Kerry, and Dexcom in Athenry, Co Galway. Outside of that, there have been absolutely no announcements.
"At the moment, things are holding steady but we would like to see a stimulus, something to help us and to give us some clarity, because we're part of a bigger organisation."
Without growth, Mr Flynn said, investment is uncertain.
"Elis is a worldwide organisation, and we have to report back. We get investment based on the future and the growth of the company.
"We've had great investment, year on year on year, but we need to be able to show that there's something coming in the future, in order to continue that investment into our two plants here.
"There's nothing as bad as not knowing."
He added that the industry hopes Minister for Enterprise Peter Burke will work with them to work out the tariffs, whatever they may be.
"We need to work to help reduce the costs for companies and be part of the conversation, so that we can continue to keep employment going," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Tánaiste in Germany to discuss EU-US trade deal
Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris is in Berlin to meet with his new German counterpart Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul. Their discussions will focus on the efforts to secure an EU-US Trade Deal, the current situation in the Middle East, Ukraine, defence and security, as well as European competitiveness and the next EU budget. They will also discuss the positive trajectory in Irish-German relations, which intensified significantly under the Global Ireland programme, including through the opening of Irish consulates in Frankfurt in 2019 and Munich in 2024, and through the development of the Ireland-Germany Joint Plan of Action, now in its third iteration. Speaking ahead of the visit, Mr Harris said: "I look forward to visiting Germany and holding my first official meeting with Minister Wadephul. "Germany is a vital bilateral partner for Ireland at the political level as well as a key economic counterpart, being Ireland's second largest source of foreign direct investment and third largest trading partner. "I will be interested to hear Minister Wadephul's perspective on key issues on the EU and international agenda, particularly the efforts to secure an EU-US Trade deal ahead of Wednesday's deadline. "We will also discuss security and defence, the Middle East, Ukraine, and EU enlargement and reform. I will also set out Ireland's priorities in these areas." The Tánaiste will visit the Siemens Energy Innovation Centre, saying: "Siemens Energy has played a key role in major strategic infrastructure projects in Ireland, including Moneypoint, the Celtic Interconnector and the Greenlink Interconnector. "I am looking forward to this visit on the centenary of the inception of the Shannon Hydroelectric Scheme, which had a transformative impact on the modernisation of Ireland, as well as on Irish-German bilateral relations." The Tánaiste will also have a working lunch with Leader of the CDU/CSU Parliamentary Party Jens Spahn, in the Bundestag. He said: "The meeting with Jens Spahn will be an opportune moment to hear directly about key issues on the minds of German parliamentarians." The Tánaiste will also give remarks and meet with members of the Irish community in Berlin at a reception at the ambassador's residence. He said: "I am looking forward to meeting with members of the Irish community in Berlin. Berlin is home to an active and vibrant Irish diaspora, including a thriving GAA club scene, a young professionals network, as well as artists who played a pivotal role in the Zeitgeist Irland 24 project."
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Keeping student fees down and reducing VAT would cost €3 billion we don't have
Political decision-making and attention-seeking have morphed into one. Getting attention or avoiding it are old habits – the new normal is that analysis underpinning choices with big consequences too frequently amounts to a calculation about how it affects the news cycle. Its all-pervasiveness means there are no longer good litmus tests for policymaking. The debate over student fees is an example of the wrong thing for the wrong reason. Another is the threat to again reduce the VAT rate on hospitality businesses to 9 per cent, down from 13.5 per cent. Minister for Higher Education James Lawless spoke the truth when he said that the €1,000 reduction in student fees was a once-off measure, funded by a cost-of-living package that would not be repeated. The Tánaiste and Fine Gael Simon Harris leader jumped in feet-first, made a big issue of it, and insisted that fees would be reduced. But reduced from what? The €3,000 they were before the series of 'once-off' reductions, or the €2,000 they were last year? The sustainability of third-level funding was not allowed to cloud the issue. A spat was started, and the spotlight was on. Manufacturing difference and reducing students fees would cost €100 million per year. Bringing VAT down again to 9 per cent for the hospitality sector would cost €734 million. Cumulatively that is more than €3 billion cut out of the tax base in the remaining life of the Government. That is big money in a country with only three sources of tax large enough to make any real difference – income tax, corporation tax and VAT. Just days away from learning what the next turn in the Donald Trump tariff saga will be, we are being egged on to slash a dangerously narrow tax base further. It is only weeks since the International Monetary Fund described our fiscal position as 'highly exposed to external policy shifts and shocks' and recommended 'broadening the tax base through VAT, property tax and personal income tax reforms'. READ MORE The Department of Finance 's Tax Strategy Group in its report on VAT last July pointed out that the EU Commission, the OECD and others such as the Commission for Taxation and Welfare recommended broadening the VAT base and narrowing the scope of reduced rates to stabilise VAT revenues. The Commission for Taxation and Welfare proposed widening the VAT base and limiting the use of zero and reduced rates of VAT. There is no requirement, it said, for a business to pass on any VAT reduction to the consumer at reduced prices. When the State spent €1.2 billion on the last VAT reduction for the hospitality sector it went into the pockets of proprietors, not customers. To repeat the dose would, in the opinion of the Tax Strategy Group, constitute 'an enormous fiscal transfer of taxpayers' money to the sector which the evidence available at present does not support'. To add to the dreary nonsense of experts who don't have to get elected, or even get on the news, on Monday the governor of the Central Bank reiterated warnings about the narrowness of the income tax and VAT base. He specifically warned against the widespread application of reduced and zero rates to a variety of goods and services. In a digital era where attention is currency, and clicks shape policy, the frenetic pursuit of the spotlight passes for political expertise. In fact, it's a downward spiral where good money and credibility are thrown away in the false hope of electoral approval for bad policies. The remark of the wily Luxembourg politician Jean-Claude Juncker that 'we all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it' has become a backstop for time servers. Their own supposed expertise in getting elected is the real nonsense. Fine Gael chased the crowd and lost badly in three elections. It is in Government with an apathetic Fianna Fáil because time and again the opposition, principally Sinn Féin, failed to persuade people they are up to the job. They have not only lost their way; they have also lost the compass. The problem is not that the Government parties can't do economics, they can't do politics. They have neither the backbone nor the bandwidth to carry the arguments they once believed in but now hardly remember. It is a measure of how far Ireland has come that the power of the publicans has passed intact to restaurateurs and hairdressers. That is progress indeed. Days before Trump rolls the dice on tariffs again, big chunks of our tax base are blithely gambled on in pursuit of the approbation of a grasping and politically unreliable middle class.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Middle class parents are the winners in third-level fee cut. That's why Fine Gael don't want to touch it
When the Nobel Prize winning US economist Milton Friedman – who was much admired by Ronald Regan and Margaret Thatcher – remarked that 'nothing is so permanent as a temporary Government programme' he most certainly didn't have the Irish higher education grant system in mind. But the kerfuffle over the suggestion that the €1,000 reduction in the ' student contribution' towards third-level fees may be axed looks set to prove him right once again. Introduced in Budget 2022 as part of a cost-of-living package, the temporary measure reappeared in the following two budgets and the expectation was that it would also feature in next year's budget, the details of which will which be announced in October. That would certainly seem to be the view of Simon Harris , leader of junior Coalition partner Fine Gael, who has thrown shade on the suggestion at the weekend by the Minster for Higher Education, Fianna Fáil's James Lawless, that the measure would not feature next year. Harris – who introduced the cut when he was doing Lawless's job – remarked somewhat elliptically that we will 'see where the Budget brings us'. READ MORE The issue will no doubt provide much political sport over the dog days of summer but what is not up for debate is that the arguments for its retention are electoral rather than economic. [ Third-level fees: No funding earmarked to avoid the €1,000 hike this year, Taoiseach says Opens in new window ] The main beneficiaries of the cut are middle-class, higher-income voters. The €1,000 reduction has little impact on the ability of students from lower-income families to access third level education. There are roughly 250,000 third level students and around a quarter of them get a grant. There are various levels of grant ranging from the full package (covering the costs of accommodation, living and student contribution) to grants covering part of the student contribution. The income thresholds for the various levels go from €27,400 for the full package to €136,000 for the minimum grant. Roughly two-thirds of recipients are on the full grant. The Department of Education says students from families earning less than €55,924 will not have to pay the student contribution this year. Defining what constitutes the middle class in contemporary Ireland is not straightforward. In many ways, it's more a state of mind than an income bracket. However, the think tank Social Justice Ireland (SJI) reckons that a middle-income earner is someone on between €40,000 and €100,000 a year. If you accept the SJI categorisation, then all students from lower-income families should get their student contribution covered. Likewise, a fair chunk of the bottom half of the middle-income bracket get all or some of it covered. The real winners from the across-the-board reduction in student contribution are those at the top end of the middle-income bracket and the lower end of the high-income bracket. They are the Irish middle class. And they were undoubtedly feeling the pressure as inflation and energy prices soared in 2022. The cut in the student contribution would have made a significant difference to many families back then, but inflation has abated, wages have gone up and people have adapted. The reduction costs the exchequer almost €100 million a year, which is roughly a quarter of what the Government spends on third level student supports such as grants. If the policy of this Government is – as stated in its programme for Government – 'fair and equal access to quality further and higher education regardless of socioeconomic status, ability or geographical location' a hallmark of its time in office, then it is a no -brainer that the €100 million should now be used to increase the size of grants and raise the income thresholds. It is not that simple, of course. More than half of Irish income tax is paid by the top 10 per cent of earners, who take home more than €100,000 a year, says the parliamentary budget office, which crunches the numbers for Oireachtas members. It is an unbalanced and unstable system, as we saw in the 2008 crash when income tax revenues evaporated, but it keeps the economy competitive. The impact of the lopsided levying of income tax is felt most by those who earn just over €100,000. They may earn a lot, but they also pay a lot of tax and can struggle to fulfil the conventional aspirations of middle-class life such as higher education for their offspring. There are a couple of carrots thrown our way, including child benefit – which is not means tested – and a heavily subsidised private education system which sees the State pay teachers' salaries at elite private schools. There are also generous allowances to ensure that we can pass on our wealth – mostly in the form of the family home – to our children. All of which are political no-go areas. The real problem for the Government is that the temporary reduction in college fees seems to have become part of this unwritten social contract with the middle class. Changing it will come at a political price.
