Housewife on paper, Alphards in the drive: Sanusi cracks down on land fraud
ALOR STAR: Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor today issued a stern warning to applicants for state land against making false declarations about their income in order to qualify for the lowest premium rates.
He said that there had been cases involving affluent individuals — particularly contractors — who use their wives' names to apply for land at subsidised rates.
"We've observed a trend where applicants, such as contractors with significant financial means, apply using their wives' names — who are homemakers — despite the husband owning eight Toyota Alphards.
"These individuals are applying under the lowest premium tier, intended for those earning RM1,700 or less per month," he said while responding to a question from Azhar Ibrahim (PN–Ayer Hitam) during the state assembly sitting at Wisma Darul Aman today.
Sanusi reminded applicants to be honest in their declarations, adding that such dishonest practices would result in revenue leakage for the state.
Addressing a question regarding land premium increases, he said that land valuation now fell under the jurisdiction of the Valuation and Property Services Department (JPPH), rather than the District Land Office.
"Nonetheless, the District Land Office will continue to scrutinise each land application, as the premium charged is based on a tiered system according to income level," he added.
Sanusi said that applicants earning RM1,700 or below per month were charged 10 per cent of the land value assessed by JPPH.
Those earning between RM1,701 and RM5,000 are charged 20 per cent; RM5,001 to RM10,000 are charged 30 per cent; while applicants with incomes exceeding RM10,000 are subject to a 40 per cent rate — or any rate determined by the state authority.
Sanusi also informed the House that the state's revenue had shown steady growth over the past three years, rising from RM596 million in 2022 to RM629 million in 2023, and reaching a record high of RM769 million last year — Kedah's highest ever.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
HLIB: Expanded SST signals fiscal discipline
KUALA LUMPUR: Hong Leong Investment Bank (HLIB) said the expanded Sales and Service Tax (SST) reflects the government's firm commitment to fiscal consolidation, with the 2025 fiscal deficit target maintained at 3.8 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), down from 4.3 per cent in 2024. The government expects the SST expansion to yield RM5 billion in additional revenue in the short term (equivalent to 0.24 per cent of GDP), with a long-term annual target of RM10 billion (0.48 per cent of GDP). Under the revised SST structure, a 5 per cent to 10 per cent sales tax will be imposed on selected non-essential goods, while the 6 per cent or 8 per cent service tax will be extended to include sectors such as rental or leasing, construction, financial services, private healthcare, private education, and beauty services. To maintain progressivity, the government structured SST into two tiers based on necessity. Essential goods such as bread, milk, cooking oil, and medicine remain exempt. Premium products such as imported seafood and industrial machinery will be taxed. Services mostly used by high-income groups and non-residents, like private education (annual fees above RM60,000), selected banking services, and private healthcare for foreigners, are also within scope. Relief measures include exemptions for business-to-business transactions, group relief, and residential construction or rental. The expanded scope is part of the government's broader initiative to strengthen the fiscal position by increasing and diversifying revenue sources. A portion of the additional revenue generated will be used to enhance public services and create greater fiscal flexibility. HLIB noted the government's plan to rationalise RON95 fuel subsidies through a more targeted framework. While the mechanism is still being finalised, the government aims to shield 85 per cent to 90 per cent of households from substantial price increases, despite concerns over its implementation complexity. On market impact, HLIB views the SST expansion as largely neutral, as it is narrowly targeted and carefully designed to exclude essential goods and services. "While sectors such as construction, banking, and healthcare may appear exposed, we expect any profit impact to be negligible," HLIB said in a note. In construction services, HLIB foresees limited impact on contractors, as most contract structures allow for cost pass-through mechanisms and new project tenders are likely to be repriced, transferring the incremental cost to the end customer. In the financial services sector, the firm does not expect any material impact to banks, as they primarily serve as tax collection agents on behalf of the government. "Based on our estimates, non-essential fee-based revenue accounts for only around six per cent to seven per cent of total sector operating income. Nevertheless, we believe demand for these services will stay fairly inelastic, given limited substitutability," it said. In the private healthcare services sector, HLIB noted that the tax applies only to foreigners, and medical tourism remains a small revenue contributor (around five to 10 per cent) at this stage. "In our opinion, demand should remain intact, backed by Malaysia's strong clinical reputation and continued pricing advantage vs regional peers, even post-SST. Moreover, healthcare services are inherently price inelastic, and we do not expect operators to absorb the tax. Net-net, we see no earnings impact to the sector," it said.
Borneo Post
2 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Putrajaya asked to exempt micro, small enterprises from July's SST revision
Datuk William Ng KUCHING (June 10): The Small and Medium Enterprises Association of Malaysia (Samenta) has called for micro and small enterprises to be exempted from the revised Sales and Services Tax (SST). Samenta president Datuk William Ng said the revised SST, which is set to take effect on July 1, should only cover medium and larger businesses. 'At the very least, a revised threshold of RM2 million in annual turnover, up from the current RM500,000, to ensure that only medium and larger businesses fall within the expanded scope,' he said in a statement today. The statement was in response to the announcement by Finance Minister II Datuk Seri Amir Hamzah Azizan that the expanded SST will cover six new categories of services namely leasing, construction, finance, private healthcare, education, and beauty. Under the expanded scope, service tax will now apply to leasing services at a rate of 8 per cent for companies with annual leasing revenue above RM500,000. Ng said SMEs in Malaysia are currently navigating a challenging operating environment marked by high input costs, tighter consumer spending, and softening external demand. He pointed out the upcoming expiration of the United States' reciprocal tariff pause on July 8 threatens to further dampen Malaysia's export competitiveness and expose SMEs to retaliatory trade measures at a time they can least afford. 'Against this backdrop, the expansion of SST without sufficient exemptions or a higher threshold for SMEs risks compounding the cost burden on businesses that are least equipped to absorb it. This impact is not limited to raw material costs but extends to rent and business-to-business services that will now fall under the SST's expanded scope. 'These increases will almost certainly be passed on to consumers, further driving up the cost of living,' he said. He also urged the Royal Malaysia Customs Department to immediately issue sector-specific guidelines to help SMEs determine their tax obligations under the expanded scope. 'Without clarity, many SMEs risk falling into unintentional non-compliance, despite the enforcement grace period until the end of 2025,' he said. He also called on Customs to clarify whether, during this transition period, it is acceptable for businesses to apply SST on the point of invoice, instead of point of collection. 'Many businesses would have issued invoices in prior months, creating uncertainty on tax liability under the expanded regime,' he added. While Samenta supports the idea of a fair and progressive tax system, Ng said this must be done in a calibrated manner with genuine stakeholder consultation and alignment with current economic realities. 'While we were given a briefing on the expanded SST, they cannot consider this a consultation when it is presented as 'fait accompli',' he added. lead Sales and Services Tax Samenta William Ng
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
The stamp duty Pandora's box
STAMP duty is a topic that many think of only when purchasing a property, renting, bank financing and purchasing a company's shares. In actuality, the list of instruments chargeable with stamp duty spans well over 20 pages. The list is found in the first schedule of Stamp Act 1949 (as amended). The said list includes 'Agreements' in broad terms. On June 6, the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) made an announcement that the government would remit stamp duty on employment contracts entered prior to Jan 1, and time is allowed until the end of the year for employment contracts entered during the year. This is good news in providing certainty to businesses while the technicalities are being worked out as to whether the various employment-related documentations are required to be stamped. Given that the ministerial exemption is limited to only employment contracts, businesses such conduct a risk or impact assessment in relation to all other agreements – including those entered into prior to Jan 1. The risk or impact assessment such include the following: > Intercompany agreements for services/financing within the same group of companies, > Agreements with third party customers/vendors for services or lease of equipment, > Tenancy agreements, and > Any other agreements. The list above is not exhaustive. It is important to recognise that not all agreements are subject to a nominal stamp duty of RM10. Some agreements attract an ad valorem duty, which means the duty is a percentage or is in proportion to the instrument/contract value. Risk assessment is important to create a self-awareness on the organisation's affairs and potential exposure, given that LHDN has been actively auditing businesses for stamp duty compliance since beginning of this year. One should not confine the risk assessment exercise to physical documents bearing the title 'Agreement'. Offer, acceptance and consideration are the key elements of a contract – in which case an 'Agreement' may be perceived for stamping purposes. Some may view that even a purchase order or quotation that is signed by both parties involved in a transaction constitutes an 'Agreement'. Likewise, there is also uncertainty about subscriptions or services signed over the Internet whereby there is no actual signature, but the customer simply checks the box to agree with the terms and conditions. It is no secret that the 75-year-old legislation has not kept up with time. Although there had been minor adaptations over the years, a holistic reform of this legislation is certainly overdue to reflect the evolution of business practices, digitalisation and perhaps policy goals. For a start, the policy makers clearly divide instruments which are in-scope for fiscal revenue purposes as compared to a mere token duty for the government to have a record of the transaction. The list of instruments included for the latter purpose should be revisited in light of the successful implementation of e-Invoicing and other existing mechanism. There are many aspects of uncertainty in the stamp act. This includes when stamping is mandatory, which instruments/agreements are in-scope for stamping and whether a given instrument/agreement is subject to nominal duty or ad valorem duty (being a percentage of contract value). This is evident with recent judicial decisions. It is hoped that the necessary legal adaptations would be made to simplify and foster certainty to make compliance easy for diligent taxpayers. Needless to say, guidelines and programmes to promote awareness among businesses on the scope of agreements for stamping are welcome. Further guidelines It is widely anticipated that the LHDN will issue further guidance on stamping of 'agreements' in the coming months, especially given that legislative changes had already been made to implement self-assessment for stamp study effective from Jan 1, 2026. In the meantime, businesses should be performing their own impact and risk assessment to identify any potential compliance gap and identify any grey areas in the Stamp Act 1949. Findings of this voluntary exercise would empower the management of the business with the much-needed information to make informed choices in navigating the situation. Inaction or a 'wait and see' approach would not be a wise choice given that LHDN has been actively auditing businesses on stamp duty compliance matters. Such audits cover the agreements entered in the years prior to 2025. For clarity, an impact or risk assessment is certainly not the act of doing a stock-take of everything that appears to be possibly an 'Agreement' and subjecting all of such agreements to stamping. Addressing key questions The process of performing the assessment must raise and address key questions as to whether each of the case involves an 'instrument' for which stamping is mandatory, and whether any of the existing exemptions is applicable. Where appropriate, businesses may also use the findings of the impact or risk assessment to proactively engage with the authorities. Large and medium businesses should form a project team to assess the impact and risks. Input from non-tax or non-financial functions are essential given that the organisations agreements may be 'scattered' across the organisation (for example, between legal department, sales department, corporate affairs and human resources). With only six months to go for the implementation of self-assessment for stamp duty (and widespread stamp duty audits being already undertaken now), businesses that value good governance and risk management practices should embark on the stamp duty impact and risk assessment project as soon as practicable. Thenesh Kannaa is an executive director of TRATAX Sdn Bhd, an independent tax consulting firm. The views expressed here are the writer's own.
