Evening News Bulletin 3 August 2025
TRANSCRIPT:
The search continues for a woman missing in New South Wales floodwaters;
A former prosecutor of Donald Trump now being investigated in the US;
Australian rider Sarah Gigante into second place in the Tour de France Femmes. Police are urging people not to drive on submerged roads as the search continues for a woman swept away in floodwaters in the New South Wales Hunter Valley. Investigators say the 26 year old was with another woman visiting the Hunter from Sydney, but they had decided to return home due to their concerns about the area flooding. Hunter Valley police superintendent Steve Laksa says the pair attempted to cross a causeway before they were caught in the current. "Do not enter any waterway. If you need assistance, make sure you contact the SES or the NSW Police and seek that assistance." In the US, the Smithsonian has defended its decision to remove references to Donald Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit in Washington DC. The museum has released a statement on X saying the placard about Trump was always meant to be temporary and did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation. The revelation that Trump was no longer listed among impeached presidents has sparked concern that history was being whitewashed to appease the president. But the museum says it had NOT been asked by the administration or other government officials to remove the reference - and that a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments. Federal officials have opened a probe into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who investigated then-candidate Donald Trump before his reelection for a second term. Mr Smith examined Mr Trump's part in the January 6 attack on the Capitol, as well as allegations of classified documents being mishandled. The Office of Special Counsel says it's looking into accusations made by Republicans — without offering evidence — that Smith violated federal law which bans certain public officials from engaging in political activity. Donald Trump himself has led those accusations. "This is a pure witch hunt for purposes of interfering with the elections of the United States of America. It's totally illegal. " The Australian Council of Trade Unions has stepped up its calls for the government to reform the nation's tax system. The union says tax concessions like negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount, which halves the amount of tax paid by those who sell assets owned for a year or more, have incentivised property investment and tied up capital that could otherwise be invested more productively. ACTU secretary Sally McManus says it's worsened housing affordability - with the result that people can no longer afford to live near to where they work. The ACTU has proposed limiting negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount to a single investment property. A Warlpiri elder has used his appearance at the Garma Festival to call on the Prime Minister to end Aboriginal deaths in custody. Reading from a letter penned to the PM, Ned Hargraves has said Anthony Albanese has the power to turn around the outcomes for his community. A coronial inquest found Kumanjayi Walker's death in 2019 was preventable, coroner Elisabeth Armitage saying she could not rule out that racism may have played a part in the teenager's death. Mr Hargraves has told NITV that his community of Yuendumu had lost trust in the police after that fatal shooting, as well as the death of his grandson Kumanjayi White in May. "You have no right to come and take my grandson's life away, and I feel very angry about it and frustrated. Because this is what had happened to him. No more like this happens again. So we say, enough is enough." Australian rider Sarah Gigante has surged into second place in the Tour de France Femmes after stage eight of the race. She is now 2 minutes and 37 seconds behind the leader Pauline Ferrand-Prevot. The previous yellow jersey holder was Gigante's AG Insurance Soudal team-mate Kimberley Le Court Pienaar.
She is now in 11th place after crashing on the descent from the Col du Frene with 63 kilometres remaining.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
13 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
ASX set to rise, US stocks edge broadly lower
Australian shares are poised to edge higher. Shares were modestly lower in New York after data on the US services sector disappointed and oil fell after a report Russia is set to propose an air truce with Ukraine. Results expected on Wednesday include AMP, News Corp, REA Group and Pinnacle Investment Management Group. The Institute for Supply Management's index of services declined last month to 50.1, below all estimates in a Bloomberg survey of economists. The employment index contracted. The group's measure of prices paid for materials and services climbed to the highest since October 2022. 'Spending on services has already slowed significantly from its solid pace last year, and the clear deterioration in the labour market and drag on real incomes from tariffs suggest a marked recovery is unlikely,' Pantheon Macroeconomics said. 'Even so, we think stagnation in the coming months is far more likely than a collapse.' President Donald Trump said that Treasury secretary Scott Bessent had withdrawn his name from consideration as a successor to Jerome Powell as chairman of the Federal Reserve. Market highlights ASX futures are pointing up 16 points or 0.2 per cent to 8744. All US prices as near 2.30pm New York time. Today's agenda Results are expected on Wednesday from AMP, News Corp, REA Group, Pinnacle Investment Management Group, BWP Trust, Centuria Industrial Reit, Charter Hall Long WALE REIT and Emerald Resources NL. The data focus is overseas on Wednesday with NZ's second-quarter employment at 8.45am AEST. TD Securities: 'Monthly filled job data imply a negative employment growth print over the quarter at -0.1 per cent. We expect the participation rate to ease again to 70.7 per cent (prior: 70.8) which on net would push the unemployment modestly higher to 5.2 per cent and in line with the RBNZ's May forecast. 'We see the RBNZ cutting by 25bps in August to 3 per cent with most data outcomes coming in line with forecasts but surveys point to near term downside risks to growth.' Top stories Blow to Chalmers' hopes for summit unity as BHP clashes with PC over tax | The nation's biggest corporate taxpayer has pushed back against the Productivity Commission's cash-flow tax proposal, undermining the treasurer's push for unity at his roundtable. Nine's publishing to out-earn free-to-air television in two years | The newspapers division will be the most valuable part of the business after it sells Domain to US property giant CoStar, analysts say. | Automating tasks could deliver a 4.3 per cent increase in labour productivity growth, the Productivity Commission says, but it won't be easy for humans. | The rising cost of building transmission is prompting questions over whether a comprehensive grid build-out is the best energy transition option for consumers.
ABC News
13 minutes ago
- ABC News
Australia's productivity roundtable should consider what actually makes life harder
Only a fortnight to go before the Treasurer's National Economic Reform Roundtable! With submissions rolling in to the Canberra summit, the nation finds itself in the exciting middle stage of our triphasic national economic policy cycle: "Let A Thousand Flowers Bloom". That is to say, we've moved past Phase One (Grumbling About Why Politicians Don't Do Bold Reform Anymore) and are enjoying the brief efflorescence of Big Ideas before we initiate Phase Three (Methodically Weed-Killing Every Single One Because They All Make Someone Sad). See also: Kevin Rudd's 2020 Summit, Tony Abbott's 2013 Budget, Malcolm Turnbull's Ideas Boom, and whatever it was that Scott Morrison was going to do before the world caught the spicy cough. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has valiantly called for participants to bring budget-neutral ideas that are not motivated by sectoral self-interest. But these are hard habits to kick, and in the Big Ideas so far submitted, the customary palimpsest of tax reform is already evident; big business has some compelling ideas for how they could pay less tax, the unions for how they could pay more, and so on. Here's a submission outlining how we could have more of the things we like, and how those things could be funded by taxing more of the things you like. Thank you, the end. Carbon pricing! A cashflow tax! Retooled R&D incentives! Taxes broadened! Tax rates flattened! If there's one sector where productivity isn't a problem right now, it's economists with big ideas writing beefy submissions on how to address the nation's productivity rate, curving gently earthward these last ten hectic years. Submissions no ordinary citizen will read. Why would we? Productivity is something only economists understand, like the non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment, or the difference between real and nominal GDP. But what if the conversation about productivity didn't start at an economics reform summit? What if it started in the nation's kitchens? At the school gate? In the dentist's waiting room? Because that's where a huge chunk of Australia's productivity gains could be made. And where some of the least-acknowledged productivity engines in the country currently lose a lot of time blowing smoke. What if we reframed our way of talking about drags on productivity so that you wouldn't need an economics degree to whistle along? Even the term "productivity drag" is deceptive. It is, literally, a human phenomenon in economic drag. What it really means, in the baldest terms, is "headache-inducing and unnecessary complication that gets in the way of getting sh*t done." So if we're going to be in the business of asking big questions, let's make sure we ask not just the big economic questions, but the big human ones. Remembering that they're not always the same thing. Questions like: Why does the school day end at 3pm, when in the vast majority of households with two parents and kids aged under 14, both parents now work? In the 1970s, only 40 per cent of such families had both parents in employment. The more common arrangement — in 55 per cent of households even by the late 70s — was that dad worked, and mum took care of the rest. But today, in 73 per cent of two-parent families, mum and dad both work. Which means we are now running a national economy where the backup plan for sick days, school pick-up, dental appointments, and Oh-My-God-I-Forgot-My-Book-Week-Costume is… Well. It's a matter of day-to-day improvisation. And while the human brain's relentless capacity for innovation has coughed up artificial intelligence, and seamless transition to a new iPhone, and a means of firing Katy Perry into space, it hasn't managed to work out a stress-free way of getting a child's teeth looked at in the middle of the day at a dentist across town, with extra time for janky online approvals at both ends to bounce the juvenile owner-operator of the teeth from the custody of the school, plus traffic. Nor can we design a human interface for the Australian aged care system that enables a normally intelligent adult to look after an elderly parent without taking six months off work and feeling like they're the first human on earth to attempt the task. This is a failure of economic design. A brutal one. Because in this country while we have umpteen trained theorists looking at in-built incentives in the tax system or whatever, we still haven't found a way of absorbing the fact that one in seven school children will require mental health assistance every calendar year in Australia, and adding another fact — that children seeking assistance from a trained mental health professional currently wait an average 99 days for an appointment — and deciding that in total this amounts to a national productivity issue. Who's spending hours on the phone chasing appointments for these children? Losing sleep worrying about them, and standing in as best they can in the meantime? Who's forcing themselves through snowdrifts of confusing paperwork for NDIS registration or in-home care or even just the daily Sisyphean task of finding clean socks, or the shirt without the weird paint stain because everyone just remembered it's school photo day? We know who's doing it. Australian Institute of Family Studies researcher Jennifer Baxter asked perceptive questions during her COVID-era research and elicited evidence that in around 78 per cent of heterosexual couples, mum is carrying most or all of the mental load. Every family is different, of course. Many will buck the trend. (Including mine! I'm finishing this column in peace, in a busy week, because my other half has prepped dinner in advance.) But there's no doubt at all about the broader pattern here. Australian women are better educated than their male counterparts, live longer, do more unpaid work and — where they do get paid for work — get paid less than men. In productivity terms, they are a powerhouse waiting to happen. They account for 70 per cent of the part-time work in Australia, and 70 per cent of the housework. Usually, the flexibility of the former facilitates the accomplishment of the latter. Australian women work part-time at internationally-remarkable rates so that they can manage the unpaid work that is still generally understood to be their responsibility. In New South Wales' Public Instruction Act of 1880 — the legislative instrument that established the secular public education system in Australia's largest state and set the school hours that are unchanged to this day — the assumptions are magnificently broad. For instance, clause 79 of the accompanying regulatory schedule provides that: "In schools containing female children but no female teacher, it will be the duty of the teacher's wife to teach needlepoint to the girls during at least four hours in each week." It's funny to read this antiquated text. But also, it's worth remembering that the assumptions underpinning school hours have not changed since 1880. This is kind of wild. And as fast as our assumptions about the rest of the world are changing, there isn't much change to the assumption that women will pick up the extra slack when it comes to caring for other humans, young or old. It's proper work, in that it requires dedication and expertise, and it's not rendered less valuable economically by the mere fact of being powered by love and concern. But because we don't count this work using the usual economic measure (ie, paying for it), it sometimes escapes conventional calculations and is just assumed to happen magically, as if fairies do it. Imagine what could be achieved if the productivity drags were removed from the life of the juggling parent! Imagine — for instance — if schools were serviced by dedicated teams of dentists and psychologists and speech pathologists who were right there to help kids exactly when they needed help! Imagine if managing all this was easy, instead of hard! Imagine if sports and activities were part of the school day, towards the end, so that parents could get their work done and pick up kids who'd made it to footy without having to be ferried there by a distracted parent trying to do a Zoom at the same time, or fretting about having to double back to work later? Productivity is an economic concept, but it's fired — or should be fired — by the universal human experience of being driven mad by unnecessary bullsh*t that makes life harder. Let's lean in to it!
ABC News
43 minutes ago
- ABC News
Automatic systems unlawfully cancelled 964 jobseekers' payments in two years, watchdog finds
Almost a thousand jobseekers had their income support payments unlawfully terminated over two years, the federal watchdog has found, cautioning the breach likely had a "profound if not catastrophic" impact on vulnerable people. The cancellations occurred automatically under the Targeted Compliance Framework, a system set up to monitor "mutual obligations", which are the conditions people have to meet to continue receiving payments, like job hunting and attending interviews. New laws introduced after the Robodebt scandal require agencies to consider the jobseeker's circumstances before cutting off a payment, which did not occur in 964 cancellations between April 2022 and July 2024. "Imagine that if you were already living under the poverty line, so you can't necessarily afford to pay rent, to feed yourself, to clothe yourself, but imagine then that that income is cut off for four weeks or more," Commonwealth Ombudsman Iain Anderson said. "What are you supposed to do? That's the type of catastrophe that we are talking about." The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations paused the cancellation of payments in July last year, but the watchdog found it took too long to act after identifying the issue. It then informed the Commonwealth Ombudsman in December that it had not implemented the new legislation, which was passed two years earlier, sparking an investigation into how the lapse occurred. In his findings, the Ombudsman invoked conclusions from the Robodebt royal commission that warned automated processes in the delivery of support payments can have serious impacts on highly vulnerable people. "[The Robodebt royal commissioner] noted that automation requires a lot of care and skill to make sure that things don't go wrong," Mr Anderson said. "And while this is not the same as Robodebt, in that it wasn't a deliberate intention of doing things wrongly, there just wasn't the adequate care and skill being employed to ensure parliament's instructions in terms of the legislation were properly implemented." The department was involved in developing the new laws, according to the Ombudsman, which shifted the requirement from the secretary "must" cancel payments to "may" if they determine the recipient failed to meet their obligations without an acceptable excuse. "That big change required the individual circumstances of each jobseeker to be considered before their payment was cancelled, and that's the step that they didn't do — instead the system went on automatically cancelling payments," he said. The report makes seven recommendations, including that the department not resume cancellations until the errors have been corrected and that systems are put in place to provide ongoing assurance that the framework complies with the law. All the recommendations be accepted by the department and Services Australia. The Ombudsman is also investigating whether the decision-making process that leads to cancellations is fair and reasonable, and the role of employment agencies, with the findings to be released in a second report later this year. Under the framework, recipients accrue demerit points if they fail to meet their obligations without a valid reason, which can lead to their payments being suspended, reduced or cut off. More than 883,000 Australians are currently on the scheme, according to government data. A separate review by Deloitte into the framework's computer system — which was completed in June but is yet to be publicly released — found it had become "increasingly unstable, with volatility directly impacting compliance function operation" and increasing the possibility of unexpected results "including flawed determinations". Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth did not respond to a request for comment.
