logo
Rubio says peace agreement "a long ways off" after Putin summit

Rubio says peace agreement "a long ways off" after Putin summit

Axios2 days ago
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Sunday that "we're not at the precipice" of a peace agreement after President Trump's Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin ended without a deal on Russia's war in Ukraine.
The big picture: Trump, who Axios previously reported set a ceasefire as the goal of the talks, said "we didn't get there" after the meeting. Rubio on Sunday said both sides would have to make concessions, but refused to name any that Putin agreed to.
Now, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, joined by several European leaders, will travel to Washington for a potentially difficult meeting with Trump on Monday.
Driving the news: Rubio, who made appearances across the Sunday political show lineup, told ABC's Martha Raddatz a ceasefire was not the aim, arguing, "You're not going to reach a ceasefire or peace agreement in a meeting" without Ukraine present.
If an agreement isn't reached, Rubio said, there will be consequences — but he emphasized the administration is trying to avoid such measures.
Late last month, Trump threatened to shorten Putin's deadline to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face heavy sanctions, which he said would include "secondary sanctions and tariffs."
Yes, but: Rubio on Sunday argued that if the U.S. levies additional sanctions, the "talking stops."
"If this morning the president woke up and said, 'I'm putting these terrible ... strong sanctions on Russia,' that's fine — [it] may make people feel good for a couple hours," he said on Fox's "Sunday Morning Futures." "But here's what you're basically saying ... talks are over for the foreseeable future."
He reiterated that view on NBC's "Meet the Press," saying that he doesn't believe new sanctions would force Putin to accept a ceasefire.
"We may very well wind up in that place," he said of new sanctions. "I hope not. Because that means that peace talks failed."
The other side: Democrats on Sunday blasted the president over the meeting, which began with a red carpet rollout, and denounced the lack of immediate consequences for Russia.
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) described the summit as a "great day for Russia" in an interview with NBC's Kristen Welker, saying Putin left with "his photo op with zero commitments made and zero consequences."
His Democratic colleague, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), said on ABC's "This Week" that Trump "got played" by Putin and that "[a]ll the threatened sanctions ... apparently have been set aside."
Van Hollen called for the Senate to move ahead on bipartisan legislation that would impose new sanctions on Russia.
Catch up quick: Trump, in a Truth Social post after the summit, said the meeting — and a subsequent phone call with Zelensky and European leaders — went "very well."
He wrote that it "was determined by all" that a peace agreement, rather than a "mere Ceasefire Agreement" would be the best solution. Zelensky had been adamant that there must be a ceasefire before peace talks, Axios' Barak Ravid reports.
The terms that Putin laid out in the summit included that Ukraine cede two of the four regions to which Russia has laid claim and freeze the front lines in the other two, Axios' Barak Ravid and Dave Lawler reported, citing two sources briefed on a call U.S. officials held with other allied leaders.
Flashback: Zelensky's Monday trip to Washington comes around six months after Trump's February Oval Office meeting with the Ukrainian leader boiled over into a heated argument.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte are all expected to attend the meeting with Zelensky.
Friction point: On CBS News' "Face the Nation," Rubio denied that those leaders were joining Zelensky as backup to protect him from being bullied into a deal.
"This is such a stupid media narrative; that they are coming here tomorrow because Trump is going to bully Zelensky into a bad deal," he said.
"We invited them to come," he added. "The president invited them to come."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This conversation is being recorded: Trump's hot mic moment is the latest in a long global list
This conversation is being recorded: Trump's hot mic moment is the latest in a long global list

San Francisco Chronicle​

time16 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

This conversation is being recorded: Trump's hot mic moment is the latest in a long global list

LONDON (AP) — Behold the power of the humble hot mic. The magnifier of sound, a descendant of 150-year-old technology, on Monday added to its long history of cutting through the most scripted political spectacles when it captured more than two minutes of U.S. President Donald Trump and eight European leaders chit-chatting around a White House news conference on their talks to end Russia's war in Ukraine. The standout quote came from Trump himself to French President Emmanuel Macron even before anyone sat down. The American president, reflecting his comments after meeting in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin: 'I think he wants to make a deal for me, you understand, as crazy as it sounds.' How politics and diplomacy sound when the principals think no one is listening can reveal much about the character, humor and humanity of our leaders — for better and sometimes for worse. As public figures, they've long known what the rest of us are increasingly learning in the age of CCTV, Coldplay kiss cams and social media: In public, no one can realistically expect privacy. 'Whenever I hear about a hot mic moment, my first reaction is that this is what they really think, that it's not gone through the external communications filter,' said Bill McGowan, founder and CEO of Clarity Media Group in New York. 'That's why people love it so much: There is nothing more authentic than what people say on a hot mic.' Always assume the microphone — or camera — is turned on Hot mics, often leavened with video, have bedeviled aspiring and actual leaders long before social media. During a sound check for his weekly radio address in 1984, U.S. President Ronald Reagan famously joked about attacking the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. 'My fellow Americans," Reagan quipped, not realizing the practice run was being recorded. "I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.' The Soviet Union didn't find it funny and condemned it given the consequential subject at hand. Putin, too, has fallen prey to the perils of a live mic. In 2006, he was quoted in Russian media joking about Israel's president, who had been charged with and later was convicted of rape. The Kremlin said Putin was not joking about rape and his meaning had been lost in translation. Sometimes a hot mic moment involves no words at all. Presidential candidate Al Gore was widely parodied for issuing exasperated and very audible sighs during his debate with George W. Bush in 2000. In others, the words uttered for all to hear are profane. Bush was caught telling running mate Dick Cheney that a reporter for The New York Times was a 'major-league a--hole.' 'This is a big f———- deal,' then-U.S. Vice President Joe Biden famously said, loudly enough to be picked up on a microphone, as President Barack Obama prepared to sign his signature Affordable Care Act in 2010. Obama was caught on camera in South Korea telling Dmitri Medvedev, then the Russian president, that he'll have 'more flexibility' to resolve sensitive issues — 'particularly with missile defense' — after the 2012 presidential election, his last. Republican Mitt Romney, Obama's rival that year, called the exchange 'bowing to the Kremlin.' 'Sometimes it's the unguarded moments that are the most revealing of all,' Romney said in a statement, dubbing the incident 'hot mic diplomacy.' Live mics have picked up name-calling and gossip aplenty even in the most mannerly circles. In 2022, Jacinda Ardern, then New Zealand's prime minister, known for her skill at debating and calm, measured responses, was caught on a hot mic tossing an aside in which she referred to a rival politician as 'such an arrogant pr—-' during Parliament Question Time. In 2005, Jacques Chirac, then president of France, was recorded airing his distaste for British food during a visit to Russia. Speaking to Putin and Gerhard Schroder, he was heard saying that worse food could only be found in Finland, according to widely reported accounts. Britain's King Charles III chose to deal with his hot mic moment with humor. In 2022, shortly after his coronation, Charles lost his patience with a leaky pen while signing a document on a live feed. He can be heard grousing: "Oh, God, I hate this!' and muttering, 'I can't bear this bloody thing … every stinking time.' It wasn't the first pen that had troubled him. The British ability to poke fun at oneself, he said in a speech the next year, is well known: 'Just as well, you may say, given some of the vicissitudes I have faced with frustratingly failing fountain pens this past year.' Trump owns perhaps the ultimate hot mic moment The American president is famously uncontrolled in public with a penchant for 'saying it like it is,' sometimes with profanity. That makes him popular among some supporters. But even he had trouble putting a lid on comments he made before he was a candidate to "Access Hollywood' in tapes that jeopardized his campaign in the final stretch of the 2016 presidential race. Trump did not appear to know the microphone was recording. Trump bragged about kissing, groping and trying to have sex with women who were not his wife on recordings obtained by The Washington Post and NBC News and aired just two days before his debate with Hillary Clinton. The celebrity businessman boasted 'when you're a star, they let you do it,' in a conversation with Billy Bush, then a host of the television show. On Monday, though, the chatter on both ends of the East Room press conference gave observers a glimpse of the diplomatic game. Dismissed unceremoniously from the White House in March, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy now sat at the table with Trump and seven of his European peers: Macron, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Finland's President Alexander Stubb, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Trump complimented Macron's tan. He said Stubb is a good golfer. He asked if anyone wanted to ask the press questions when the White House pool was admitted to the room — before it galloped inside. The European leaders smiled at the shouting and shuffling. Stubb asked Trump if he's 'been through this every day?' 'He loves it. He loves it, eh?" she said.

Trump's push for peace
Trump's push for peace

USA Today

time16 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump's push for peace

Hello!Rebecca Morin here. It feels like a fall day in DC, but I'm not ready for summer to be over! A mad dash toward peace It was a much different meeting than the one in February. There were laughs, a handshake and a lot of 'thank yous' from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who met with President Donald Trump at the White House on Monday. Trump expressed optimism of peace between Russia and Ukraine after meeting with Zelenskyy and European leaders. By the end of the meetings, Trump told Zelenskyy the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war. Trump in a social media post later said he called Russian President Vladimir Putin to start arranging face-to-face talks between Russia's leader and Zelenskyy, in a location to be determined. Takeaways from Trump's meeting with Zelenskyy. Will a Putin-Zelenskyy meeting happen? Trump said after a proposed meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy, Trump would join the two leaders for a discussion aimed at pushing the warring sides closer together. However, Phillips O'Brien, a historian and professor of strategic war studies at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland, said the meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy "may or may not happen." What to know about the proposed summit. No troops on the ground: Trump on Tuesday said U.S. troops won't be involved in any peacekeeping effort in Ukraine after the war. Trump on Monday had said European nations are the "first line of defense" but added "we're going to help them out also. We'll be involved." What assurances is Ukraine looking for. Overnight attacks: Russia attacked the central Ukrainian city of Kremenchuk with drones overnight, just a day after Trump's meeting Zelenskyy and European leaders. The city's mayor, Vitalii Maletskyi, said the attack was a sign Putin does not want peace. A politics pit stop Epstein files being turned over to lawmakers The Justice Department in four days will begin sending some of the so-called 'Epstein files' from its sex trafficking investigation into the disgraced late financier to the House Oversight Committee, committee Chairman James Comer said Monday. Comer earlier this month issued a subpoena to the DOJ for records related to Epstein, the longtime Trump friend who died by suicide in 2019 as he was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. What to know about the committee's investigation into Epstein. 'Like a horror movie' Exhausting, terrifying and like something out of a horror movie. That's how Jeremy Atherton Lin described the recent appeal that seeks to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the 10-year-old Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in the United States. Experts like Kenneth Gordon, a marital and family lawyer in Florida, say the potential to overturn Obergefell is a "long shot." Obergefell is sound, from a legal perspective, Gordon said, and same-sex marriage is widely accepted by the general public. If Obergefell was overturned, same-sex marriages would likely remain protected due to the Respect for Marriage Act into law by former President Joe Biden. How the LGBTQ+ community feels about the appeal. Got a burning question, or comment, for On Politics?You can submit them here or send me an email atrdmorin@

Mayor Eric Adams, NYC call on ICE to end migrant courthouse arrests immediately
Mayor Eric Adams, NYC call on ICE to end migrant courthouse arrests immediately

New York Post

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Mayor Eric Adams, NYC call on ICE to end migrant courthouse arrests immediately

Mayor Eric Adams on Tuesday joined calls for ICE to immediately end the 'illegal' arrests of migrants reporting for their hearings at a Lower Manhattan federal immigration building. The city Law Department filed court papers in support of a lawsuit that seeks to halt the arrests by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement at 26 Federal Plaza, arguing the blitzes are driving fear among the Big Apple's roughly 3 million immigrants. 'From my first days as a rookie cop to my current role as mayor of New York City, my job is, and has always been, to keep law-abiding New Yorkers safe,' Adams said in a statement. 'We should allow New Yorkers to feel secure to attend legal proceedings in their pursuit to obtain legal status.' Advertisement The arrests have driven many to avoid courts, police and other basic city services for fear of detention and removal, sending otherwise law-abiding immigrants underground, claims the suit, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and other legal groups. 5 Mayor Adams is taking his strongest stance against the Trump Administration yet by joining in on a lawsuit seeking to end ICE arrests at Manhattan immigration court. Stephen Yang 5 Adams and the city law department argue that the arrests 'undermines the public interest' by 'deterring City residents from participating in immigration proceedings.' Corbis via Getty Images Advertisement The Adams administration's public support of the suit, filed in Manhattan federal court earlier this month, marks the mayor's strongest stance yet against President Trump's immigration crackdown. Adams has previously appeared to cozy up to the White House, including pushing to rid the city of its sanctuary city status and to bring back ICE to Rikers Island — moves that he has repeatedly defended in court. Hizzoner and the city, in the amicus brief filed Tuesday, argued the ICE arrests at 26 Federal Plaza are not only illegal, but 'undermines the public interest,' by 'deterring City residents from participating in immigration proceedings.' 'Free access to courts is a pillar of the rule of law, but our judicial system cannot work as it should, as it must, if courthouses are used as traps for those who are simply following what the law requires,' the filing states. Advertisement 5 The city's top lawyer, Muriel Goode-Trufant, said that the city has become the 'epicenter of the Trump administration's courthouse arrest campaign.' William Farrington The city's top lawyer, Muriel Goode-Trufant, said that the Big Apple has become the 'epicenter of the Trump administration's courthouse arrest campaign,' constraining the ability for immigrants — and New Yorkers at-large — to seek justice through the legal system. 'With every illegal courthouse arrest, Immigration and Customs Enforcement is chipping away at the bedrock principles of fairness and due process that support our entire system of justice,' Goode-Trufant said in a statement. 5 One of the several lawsuits filed over the ICE arrests scored a victory last week when a judge ordered the agency to immediately improve conditions at a makeshift holding cell inside the federal immigration courthouse at 26 Federal Plaza. NYIC Advertisement A study of federal records by THE CITY revealed that half of all immigration court arrests in the country this spring occurred in Manhattan, but more recently, those busts have ground to a halt as immigrants have largely ceased showing up to courthouses altogether. While this is the first time the Adams administration has supported a wholesale end to the arrests, the city filed briefs earlier this summer in support of individuals caught up in the ICE dragnet — including several public school students. 'No one in our city should feel forced to hide in the shadows or be afraid to use resources, and that includes sending children to school, going to a hospital when sick, calling 911 when in danger, or going to a court hearing when called upon to do so,' Adams said Tuesday. 5 'Free access to courts is a pillar of the rule of law, but our judicial system cannot work as it should, as it must, if courthouses are used as traps for those who are simply following what the law requires,' the filing states. Getty Images One of the several lawsuits filed over the ICE arrests scored a victory last week when a judge ordered the agency to immediately improve conditions at a makeshift holding cell inside the federal immigration courthouse at 26 Federal Plaza. The order was walked back slightly when government lawyers successfully argued that detained immigrants should not have access to toothbrushes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store