
Disgusted locals living nightmare as 'blood red' gunge rains down from giant incinerator used to cremate zoo animals and beached whales
The refinery plant, in Bradford, West Yorkshire, turns livestock, zoo animals and even beached whales, into biofuels.
But by-products billowing from the factory chimneys create a rancid cloud over the area, coating cars with a thick greasy residue, making people physically sick, and even killing off vegetation.
Food businesses claim the fetid reek is driving away customers and a petition has been launched calling on Bradford Council to immediately suspend operations at the P. Waddington Animal By-Product Processing Plant.
One trader took samples of the detritus raining down from the white vapour belching from the Waddington stacks for lab analysis - it contained bone, hair and fat.
Residents claim breathing in the vile particles of animal waste is making them ill.
Motor trader Sadeeq Sharif, 53, has a business directly next to the plant, and is constantly having to clean his cars from the falling tiny globules.
'The stuff falls white at first, but over the days and when it gets water on it, it turns a rusty, blood-red colour,' said Mr Sharif, who has run his business Sultania Motors beside the factory for more than 15 years.
Mechanic Thomas Wizla believes he has been suffering with stomach issues and unexplained weight loss due to the debris being pumped into the air through by the refinery plant
'I have a convertible car and I'm scared to park it outdoors, because of the fabric roof, and if that gets destroyed it'll cost me six grand.
'The problem has got worse in recent years. Sometimes you can't bear the smell, and you have to go inside.
'Customers have been known to dump their cars and just run, they don't want to be here one second longer than they have to.
'The grime just builds up on the car bodyworks and windows, it is a constant battle to clean it off.
'The smell from the refinery gets that bad some days that we can hardly work and stand here. When some trucks come you cannot be here, it is that nasty, it's a gut-wrenching stench.'
The Waddington plant has been in operation since 1947, and before that was an abattoir, but locals say the problem has gotten worse in recent years.
Animal carcasses from across Britain are brought by lorry to the site, including roadkill, zoo animals, diseased farm animals, the waste from the livestock food industry and whales washed up on the nation's seashores.
Skin and hide is also treated at the premises.
Offal are also trucked to the factory and there have been a number of spills when rancid animal guts have ended up on the road.
On one occasion a spill of fat caused a car to skid and crash, according to locals.
'A lot of the trucks aren't from here, they are foreigners. The trucks have foreign number plates on, and the drivers don't know the language and they are trying to look for the place,' said Mr Sharif.
'Waddington's spilt so much one day that they had to close the road and bring in industrial cleaners.
'This should not be taking place in the city centre. The whole place is manky.
'It is going 24 hours a day, it never shuts down.'
Thomas Wizla, 47, runs TW Autos, a few doors down from Mr Sharif.
'The smell gets really bad, especially over the last two-and-a-half years,' said Mr Wizla, pointing to the mucky residue on his cars.
'I have had a problem with my stomach for the last years. I have lost 10kg and been to the doctor a number of times. I'm sure it is linked to that plant.
'I am normally a fit, healthy person, but its just here making me sick.
'I have been to Waddington's to complain, but they say it is "nothing to do with us".
'I have taken the stuff that is falling down from the chimneys, which is white at first and then turns rusty-coloured. I have sent those samples to an independent laboratory and he sends me a report.
'What does it say? - hair, bone, and antibiotics.'
The report cost Mr Wizla £500 for the lab report, six months ago.
'Last week we had two ladies leaving their car, and straight away one of them dashed to the toilet to throw up because of the smell,' he said.
'The other lady went to be sick after that.'
Mr Wizla also pointed out the trees, brambles, grasses and flowers on an embankment directly downwind from the chimneys - everything was brown and shrivelled, whereas normal summer greenery was either side.
Viktor Kotenko, 60, also works nearby.
'The smell is very, very bad, it is just horrible,' said Mr Kotenko.
'Sometimes it comes down like rain and you can taste it on your tongue and on your lips - it is a sweet taste.
'And when you wash your face it you can feel it.'
Geoff Bonham, 68, has been in the area for more than 30 year and he says the problem has got worse over the last few years.
'Waddington's say that it is not them causing the smell or being responsible for the bits falling from the sky, but it obviously is,' said Mr Bonham.
'They used to say the smell was from a nearby chicken factory, but that's not the case.
'The stuff is so thick and greasy that if you put your windscreen wipers on you can't see.
'I've been complaining to environmental health for ages, but they say its not detrimental to health.
'But I've been away in hospital for three months on an unrelated matter, but when I have come back my sinuses are going and I have a sore throat already.
'The emissions from the plant can be the only reason for my sinus problem and sore throat.'
Mr Bonham said the company, which still goes by the name Waddington but was taken over a few years ago by JG Pears, spills offal on the road.
Mr Bonham said the company, which was very busy at the time of the foot and mouth outbreak, has daily lorry loads of animal carcasses, and recently took delivery of a whale that had washed up in Whitby.
A petition set up on Change.org has more than 1,600 signatures, with people saying they are always having to keep their windows shut to ward off the stench. Locals are so enraged by the issue a community meeting was held last week.
One local who signed the petition said: 'On a daily basis I watch my elderly mother who suffers from rheumatoid arthritis struggling to close the windows because of the daily toxic assault by P Waddington.
'Enough is enough it's time this soul-destroying site is closed.'
Another signatory, who volunteers at the nearby mosque wrote: 'It felt like being poisoned!
'I volunteer at the mosque opposite the factory, and yesterday the stench was so overwhelmingly terrible and offensive, I ran inside for the first time in my life to close the windows, dropped my plans to water the plants from the children's vegetable garden and literally ran to the car holding my breath.
'I have never smelled anything that terrible in my life, and I am not exaggerating.'
Councillor Ismail Uddin, who represents Bowling and Barkerend Ward where the rendering plant is located, is backing the petition.
'There are many food outlets on Leeds Road, just beside Waddington's, and many owners say customers think the bad smell is coming from them,' said Cllr Uddin.
'Bradford Council has launched a "Live Leeds Road" campaign, but the awful smell is not helping.
'On some days the stench can be smelt at the new Bradford Interchange bringing tourists and visitors to our city.
'The first impression they get is that the place stinks.'
Members of the Leeds Road Hindu temple have submitted a letter to Bradford Council highlighting the 'intolerable' situation and 'foul smell' which they said visiting dignitaries had commented on.
Tariq Mahmood, who runs the Mahmood's burger shop near the factory, said: 'Our business attracts people from outside and we are investing a lot of money into the area.
'It reflects really negatively on us as a city.'
The petition, entitled 'Stop the Noxious Fumes from this Animal Carcass Burning Plant in Bradford!' reads: 'We petition Bradford Council for the immediate suspension of operations at the P. Waddington Animal By-Product Processing Plant, located at 54 Buck Street, BD3 9LP.
'This suspension should remain in effect until a comprehensive and independent investigation into the plant's adherence to environmental guidelines and its impact on public health is conducted.'
It outlines the below concerns and demands.
1. Potential Health Risks: Persistent community reports and preliminary research indicate that emissions from the plant could pose various health risks, including respiratory and gastrointestinal problems, as well as mental health issues.
2. Environmental Impact: There is concern about the potential for emissions from the plant to exceed the guidelines set by the Environmental Agency. Recent assessments suggest that they may be up to 5000% in excess of the 1.5 OU/m3 limitation (Odour Units), raising serious concerns about the plant's impact on local air quality and the broader environment.
3. Lack of Transparency and Oversight: Questions have been raised about the accuracy and impartiality of the self reporting of the plant's emissions, particularly considering the potential for underreporting of volatile organic compounds. This underscores the need for enhanced regulatory oversight and independent verification.
Demands:
1. Immediate suspension of operations at the Waddington Plant pending an independent investigation into its adherence to environmental guidelines and its overall health and environmental impacts.
2. A thorough review of the plant's compliance with environmental regulations and guidelines.
3. Inclusion of community stakeholders in future decisions regarding the plant's operations, ensuring transparency and accountability.
'We urge the Bradford Council to take swift and decisive action in response to these concerns, prioritizing the health and safety of our community,' the petition reads.
A spokesperson for Bradford Council said: 'An investigation is currently ongoing into Waddingtons which has not concluded, therefore we are unable to comment at this time.'
PJ Pears, the factory's parent company, said: 'We understand the concerns of some of the residents near the P Waddington installation. We make great efforts to minimise odours beyond the site boundary and operate within the strict requirements of our environmental permit and odour management plan.
'As we have said previously, we are open to meeting with community representatives to discuss this matter further. But up till now, no one has contacted us about this.
'Regarding the petition, some of the information given on the petition webpage is not correct. It is important that discussions about our installation are grounded in the facts.
'Most significantly, it says that 'Recent assessments suggest that they may be up to 5000% in excess of the 1.5 OU/m3 limitation (Odour Units).' This is based on modelling assuming there is zero abatement of odour and emissions in operation. This has been assessed to give an absolute worst-case scenario to measure our abatement systems against. It would not be possible to operate the plant under this scenario and this would be a breach of our permit.
'Under the Environmental Permitting Regulations, facilities must use the Best Available Techniques (BAT) to prevent or minimise emissions and environmental impact. Our permit was granted because the installation uses modern technology and operating procedures to minimise odour in line with current BAT standards.
'The petition also expressed concerns about a 'Lack of Transparency and Oversight.' Environmental health officers from Bradford Metropolitan District Council regularly inspect and audit the installation to ensure compliant operations. All of this carried out to UK regulatory standards.
'Finally, we would like to clarify that it is not an 'animal carcass burning plant'. It is an animal by-product rendering plant. It carefully uses heat to convert animal material not suitable for human consumption into safe, reusable resources, such as biofuels. Facilities like ours play a vital role in making livestock production sustainable and in preventing animal disease outbreaks.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Rochford Council to trial 30-minute free parking scheme
Drivers will be able to park for free for up to 30 minutes in a council's car parks in a move to support local Council in Essex has agreed to try out the free parking scheme at most of its 11 car parks for the next three months "to help boost footfall".The council's leader, Conservative Danielle Belton, said the decision was something requested by business and residents "for a number of years".According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, a meeting of the council's economic development, regeneration, and tourism committee heard the trial could cost the authority up to £42,000 for the three month period. Belton said it could also help with parking issues around schools, as parents could use short-term free spaces at drop off and pick up to council documents, the cost of a 30-minute stay in most surface car parks in the district was reduced last year from 70p to 55p in an effort to stimulate activity on the high said: "Ultimately, the council is dedicated to supporting our local businesses and especially the town centres, and it's a documented fact in other towns that short stay parking can help boost footfall. She added the council had built up more money from the car parks than it had spent, meaning it now had reserves to implement the new policy."The end goal is we see a better footfall in the town, which then creates more of a drive for other businesses to consider coming here, if they see we've offerings where people can pop into town, grab a coffee, grab a takeaway, do some errands, whatever it may be."The free parking will not apply to The Approach near Rayleigh Train Station and Hockley Woods Car Park. Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
The US-EU trade deal in numbers - how it compares to UK deal
Donald Trump has struck an agreement with the European Union that means the US will not impose the 30% tariffs - export taxes - on EU imports that the US president had the EU will still face a new 15% tariff on the goods it sells into is higher than the 10% tariffs the UK faces on goods exports to the US as part of an earlier agreement struck between London and how does the EU agreement compare with the UK's - and are there potential economic benefits now arising for the UK?Most analysts judge the UK's agreement with the US will likely prove more advantageous to the UK than the EU's agreement with the US will be for the EU, given the UK's lower headline tariff they also stress that the detail of the final US-EU agreement is key - and that there remains uncertainty about how the US will treat imports from the EU of steel and pharmaceuticals. What's the difference between the deals? On the face of it, the UK's lower baseline tariff rate (10% vs 15%) could offer an advantage to UK-based firms competing with EU-based companies for sales into the US - allowing UK exports to be more competitively priced for the US market after the tariffs have been applied."In principle, the UK is in a more advantageous position than other countries – so there is the potential to benefit from this," Michael Gasiorek, director of the Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy (CITP) told BBC there are complexities in the two agreements and a lack of clarity around both, which make it tricky to compare them. In the case of car exports, the UK-US agreement specifies that exports of cars from the UK to the US will face a 10% tariff, which is lower than the 15% rate that will be faced by EU firms selling cars in the the UK's 10% rate only applies to a quota of 100,000 vehicles a year, which is roughly the number of cars the UK sells into the US at the vehicle sold above that quota would be hit with the US's 25% tariff on car imports, which would be higher than the 15% tariff facing all EU car 2024 the EU sold around 758,000 vehicles to the US, almost seven times are many as the UK exported to America in that year. The UK-US agreement also says the UK will negotiate an agreement to avoid future US tariffs on pharmaceutical imports. But the US has not imposed those particular tariffs yet, and we don't know what the nature of any UK exception would is also a lack of clarity about whether the US-EU 15% tariff would always apply to pharmaceuticals or not. On Sunday the US president suggested it would not, but EU commission president Ursula Von der Leyen suggested it it's unclear whether the EU's 15% baseline tariff incorporates existing US import tariffs, or whether, as in the case of the UK's 10% tariff, it will be applied on top of existing import answer to that could have an influence on the relative advantage of UK exports. If the UK's tariffs are "stacked" but those of the EU are not, the overall effective tariff imposed on some EU goods could end being lower than what's imposed on some UK text of the EU-US agreement has yet been published, making it impossible to be certain at this stage. What about steel? UK steel exported to the US is currently subject to a 25% tariff, which is lower than the 50% global rate on imports of the metal imposed by Donald Trump in president granted the UK this partial exemption to allow time for implementation of the US-UK trade officials are working with their US counterparts to resolve technical issues that they hope will mean UK firms will be able to export steel to the US up to a certain quota that avoids even this 25% US officials have briefed that under the EU-US deal, EU steel will remain subject to the US's global 50% tariff on metal would seem to significantly benefit UK steel exporters relative to their EU counterparts when it comes to selling to the the EU Commission president has also suggested that Brussels and Washington remain in talks about a quota system, whereby EU steel exports under the quota would also be subject to a lower could ultimately erode any relative advantage for UK steel theory, EU manufacturers - in steel and other sectors - could move some of their production to the UK to benefit from lower tariffs when exporting to the USBut some analysts are sceptical about the likelihood of this."I doubt companies in modern supply chains are going to make big, long-term relocation decisions based on marginal tariff differences," says David Henig, the UK director of the European Centre For International Political Economy (ECIPE)."To take advantage of any such tariff differences businesses need to feel reasonably secure that the differences will last. Given the uncertainty surrounding US trade policy, that certainty is currently not there," agrees Michael Gasiorek. What about wider economic impacts? The US is the UK's single largest national trade 2024, the UK exported £196bn of goods and services to the US, 22.5% of all the countries of the European Union collectively account for a larger share of UK trade than the US. In 2024, the UK exported £358bn of goods and services to the EU, 41% of all exports."Demand for EU exports from the United States is likely to fall and, if that were to lead to a slowdown in the European Union, that would be bad for the United Kingdom as it would lead to a reduction in demand for our exports from our largest trading partner," Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) told economists also expect Trump's tariffs to ultimately slow the growth of the US economy, which would also harm UK firms exporting to the US. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?


The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Driving test warning as top school warns situation ‘cannot get much worse'
Learner drivers across Britain are facing waits of more than five months to book a test, with new figures revealing that four out of five test centres have the maximum possible waiting time. As of 5 May, 258 locations – 81 per cent of all sites – had a 24-week backlog for a driving test, a significant increase from 161 at the start of the year. AA Driving School, which obtained the data from the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA), warned that the situation "cannot get much worse". The average waiting time across all test centres has now reached 22 weeks, up from 14 weeks in February 2024. The DVSA attributes the delays to a surge in demand and candidates booking tests much earlier than previously. Officials hope that an increase in the number of tests conducted will help to reduce these extensive waiting times. The number of future bookings in the DVSA's system was 122,000 higher in June compared with the same month last year. Public spending watchdog the National Audit Office recently announced it will investigate the 'root causes' of delays to booking tests, and 'how the DVSA is responding'. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said in April the Labour Government 'inherited an enormous backlog' but was 'acting fast'. She told the Commons Transport Select Committee her department aimed to reduce the average waiting time to seven weeks by summer 2026. A Government consultation on amending the test booking system closed last week. This featured a plan aimed at stopping bots mass-booking new slots so they can be resold on the black market for inflated prices. The Department for Transport also instructed the DVSA to offer additional overtime payments to incentivise instructors to conduct more tests. Staff at the agency qualified to conduct tests are being asked to voluntarily return to the front line, while the number of permanent trainers for new examiners is being doubled. Emma Bush, managing director of AA Driving School, said: 'With the vast majority of driving test centres now showing waits at the maximum the system will allow, the situation cannot get much worse. 'New measures designed to start bringing down waiting times were implemented at the start of April by the DVSA. 'There are signs of recovery though, putting both the industry and learners on tenterhooks for more signs of improvement in the coming months. 'While we would expect these changes to take a few months to show a positive impact, it is still disappointing to see that learners are continuing to face an uphill battle when it comes to booking their driving test.' DVSA chief executive Loveday Ryder said: 'DVSA's goal is to make booking a driving test easier and fairer for learner drivers. 'We are making progress on our plans. 'We're really grateful to everyone who has responded to our recent consultation, including learners, parents and driving instructors. 'We're now analysing the survey responses. 'Using your feedback, we'll be able to plan our next steps on improving car test booking rules.'