Pete Hegseth Trashing Former Fox News Colleague Sparks Fury from Critics
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a former Fox & Friends Weekend co-host, publicly criticized his former colleague Jennifer Griffin, calling her "about the worst" during a Thursday morning press briefing, taking issue with her reporting and line of questioning on the administration's recent strikes against Iran.
His remarks, which also lambasted the media and numerous outlets, have sparked backlash from critics and journalists.
Why It Matters
The exchange comes days after the U.S. struck three Iranian nuclear sites, Isfahan, Fordow and Natanz. The Trump administration has lauded the military mission, in which B-2 stealth bombers used bunker bombs on Fordow, which is deep underground inside a mountain.
Trump has said that the strikes resulted in "total obliteration" of the facility, although the Defense Intelligence Agency's (DIA) preliminary report suggests damage and not complete destruction. The DIA is part of the Pentagon, which Hegseth oversees.
Hegseth's rebuke of Griffin comes as members of the Trump administration increasingly use personal attacks in response to dissenting views or media coverage. During the briefing, Hegseth criticized the press for its reporting on the leaked initial damage assessment that cast doubt on the totality of the strikes, echoing sentiments expressed by the president on his social media platform.
(L): Jennifer Griffin attends AI Honors hosted by the Washington AI Network at Waldorf Astoria on June 03, 2025 in Washington, DC. (R): Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon,...
(L): Jennifer Griffin attends AI Honors hosted by the Washington AI Network at Waldorf Astoria on June 03, 2025 in Washington, DC. (R): Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon, Thursday, June 26, 2025, in Washington. Morefor Haddad Media/ AP Photo/Kevin Wolf
What To Know
On Thursday, during the question and answer portion of the briefing, Griffin, Fox News' chief national security correspondent, asked Hegseth, "Do you have certainty that all the highly enriched uranium was inside the Fordow mountain, or some of it, because there were satellite photos that showed more than a dozen trucks there two days in advance—are you certain that none of the highly enriched uranium was moved?"
Uranium enrichment increases the concentration of uranium-235, the isotope necessary to sustain a nuclear chain reaction used in both power generation and nuclear weapons. The process is central to weapons development, which the U.S. and Israel accuse Iran of pursuing, though Tehran insists its nuclear program is solely for energy purposes.
The comment comes after the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, said, "We do not have information on the whereabouts of this material" in reference to 900 pounds of potentially enriched uranium that Iranian officials said had been removed ahead of the strikes. Grossi said the comments on Fox News The Story with Martha MacCallum on Tuesday.
Hegseth responded to Griffin first stating, "of course we are watching ever single aspect," and then took a jab at the veteran journalist, saying, "Jennifer, you've been about the worst. The one who misrepresents the most intentionally."
Griffin, who appeared shocked, responded by pointing out her reporting on the B-2s and the mission as a whole, adding, "So, I take issue with that."
Many have called out Hegseth's response to Griffin and noted her storied journalist background, with another former Fox colleague Brit Hume saying it was an undeserved "attack." Newsweek reached out to Fox New's press team for comment via email on Thursday, and they directed Newsweek to Hume's comments on the matter.
During the press briefing, he accused the media of twisting "half-truths" due to what he described as a deep-seated desire to "cheer against Trump so hard," telling the press room it's "in your DNA" to root against the president.
Trump applauded the press conference, writing on Truth Social, "One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen. The Fake News should fire everyone involved in this Witch Hunt, and apologize to our great warriors, and everyone else!"
What People Are Saying
Brit Hume, Fox News Channel's chief political analyst, said on Thursday: "I'd like to say a word if I may, Dana, about Jennifer Griffin, who was attacked by the Defense Secretary today. An attack she certainly in my view did not deserve. Her professionalism, her knowledge, her experience at the Pentagon is unmatched. I have had and still have the greatest regard for her. The attack on her was unfair."
Ron Filipkowski, the editor-in-chief of the left leaning and Trump-critical MeidasTouch, wrote on X, formerly Twitter: "Hegseth even attacks the Fox correspondent. This whole thing is just attacking the media."
Daniel Koh, former deputy assistant to the president and deputy director of the White House office of intergovernmental affairs, wrote in an X post on Thursday: "What an embarrassment for our country. @JenGriffinFNC— well-respected across the aisle — asked a fair question re: actions in Iran. She handled @PeteHegseth's absurd response with far more professionalism than he showed her. If a question shakes him, he can't handle the job."
Brian Krassenstein, who has over 900,000 followers on X, wrote: "Fox News Reporter Jennifer Griffin just asked an incredibly important question and Hegseth completely loses it, going off on her...America is better than this!"
Republicans Against Trump wrote on X: "What a jerk."
What Happens Next
More detailed intelligence on the impact of the strikes is expected to be released in the coming days, as officials assess the extent of the damage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Immigration Approval Rating Hits New Low, Poll Shows
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating on immigration has dipped to its lowest mark amid his second term in the White House, a new poll from Quinnipiac University finds. Why It Matters Immigration policy remains a defining issue for Trump's presidency after fueling his 2024 election pursuit. The president campaigned fervently last year on the promise of mass deportations and appointed Tom Homan as his border czar to execute his agenda. The administration's approach on deportations—including expanded enforcement raids, the use of military force and legal maneuvering—has intensified partisan divisions and sparked significant public protest, particularly in urban centers like Los Angeles. Federal immigration raids in Los Angeles this month led to large-scale protests, with demonstrations focused on downtown federal buildings. The unrest prompted Mayor Karen Bass, a Democrat, to implement a curfew for portions of the area after incidents of vandalism. What To Know In the new poll released on Thursday, the president has a 41 percent approval rating on immigration, with a 57 percent disapproval mark. The survey shows that 56 percent of voters also disapprove of the tactics employed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), compared to 39 percent who approve. The poll was conducted from June 22 to June 24 among 979 "self-identified registered voters" across the country. The poll's margin of error is 3.1 percent. In a previous Quinnipiac poll, taken from June 5 to June 9, the president's approval rating on immigration was 43 percent with a disapproval score of 54 percent. This poll's margin of error was 2.8 percent. In an April poll, the president had an approval rating on immigration of 45 percent with the pollster and 46 percent in March and February polls. Shortly after his inauguration, the president came into his second term with a 47 percent approval rating on immigration and 46 percent disapproval. This poll was taken from January 23 to January 27, with a 3.1 percent margin of error. Thursday's poll marks Trump's lowest approval rating on the issue, per Quinnipiac, and representative of an overall slide for the president month over month. President Donald Trump speaks to the media at the start of the second day of the 2025 NATO Summit on June 25 in The Hague, Netherlands. (Photo by) President Donald Trump speaks to the media at the start of the second day of the 2025 NATO Summit on June 25 in The Hague, Netherlands. (Photo by) What People Are Saying Political analyst Craig Agranoff, to Newsweek via text message on Thursday: "Trump's approval rating on immigration dropping in the Quinnipiac poll likely stems from the polarized response to his administration's aggressive deportation policies and rhetoric, which have sparked significant public debate. "While it's hard to pinpoint one specific cause, the intensity of recent immigration measures may be driving this shift," Agranoff added. "As for whether Trump cares about public opinion on this issue, his track record suggests he prioritizes his base's support over broader approval, often framing immigration as a core issue to rally his supporters, regardless of fluctuating polls." Trump, earlier this month on Truth Social: "The Biden Administration and Governor Newscum flooded America with 21 Million Illegal Aliens, destroying Schools, Hospitals and Communities, and consuming untold Billions of Dollars in Free Welfare." Trump continued: "All of them have to go home, as do countless other Illegals and Criminals, who will turn us into a bankrupt Third World Nation. America was invaded and occupied. I am reversing the Invasion. It's called Remigration. Our courageous ICE Officers, who are daily being subjected to doxxing and murder threats, are HEROES. We will always have their back as they carry out this noble mission. America will be for Americans again!" Charlie Kirk, founder and president of conservative Turning Point USA, on X, formerly Twitter, this month: "President Trump has a positive net approval rating, and no other issue contributes to his popularity more than immigration: 'He is begging for a fight on immigration because he knows what he's doing so far is working with the electorate.' Bring it on, Democrats." What Happens Next With poll numbers showing rising public opposition, any policy shifts or legal decisions in the coming weeks may further influence national debate and future immigration enforcement measures.
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Axelrod: Iran intel drama driven by Trump's ‘unquenchable thirst for credit'
Democratic political strategist David Axelrod said the drama over the U.S.'s recent strikes in Iran's nuclear facilities and the intel surrounding the outcome has been driven by President Trump's 'unquenchable thirst for credit.' 'The controversy over the facts around the Iran attack stems from the @POTUS 's unquenchable thirst for credit and praise that leads him to overclaim,' Axelrod said in a thread on the social platform X on Thursday. 'To say that the military performed splendidly and inflicted enormous damage would have been enough. But he needed to say it's over, one-and-done, problem solved,' he added. Trump and his top national security brass have intensely pushed back on reporting that strikes on Iran, which occurred over the weekend, set the country's nuclear program back by only months. That conclusion that came from a preliminary intelligence report from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that an investigation had begun into leaks of that classified preliminary report. 'Of course we're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now, because this information is for internal purposes, battle damage assessments,' Hegseth previously told reporters. Trump and his Cabinet officials have been adamant that the Saturday strikes did more damage. On Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said as much in a post on X: 'Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed. If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do.' Axelrod said in his Thursday X thread that there was 'an urgent question as to what, if anything, is left–including the nearly 900 pounds of highly-enriched uranium that he [Trump] and the @VP claimed was buried in Fordo but the whereabouts of which Hegseth acknowledged today was still under review,' noting one of the sites the U.S. struck. The Hill has reached out to the White House and the Pentagon.
The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump attacks on CNN, Fox underscore effort to stifle questions, put media on backfoot
The Trump administration is calling out reporters by name as it seeks to push its narrative about U.S. strikes on Iran, seeking to put the media on defense while stifling any talk about intelligence reports that fall short of saying Tehran's nuclear capabilities were obliterated. The attacks are targeting a broad swathe of the press that includes specific reporters cable news outlets as different as CNN and Fox News. Defense Sec. Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News personality himself, from a Pentagon podium on Thursday morning said 'Jennifer, you've been about the worst' as part of a broad attack on the media. He was singling out Jennifer Griffin, a respected defense reporter who asked if the department was certain that all of Iran's highly enriched uranium was at the Fordow nuclear facility. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt from her own podium later on Thursday singled out CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand, saying she had written 'a lie from the intelligence community to seek a narrative she wanted to prove.' The personal attacks are unusual and underscore the administration's determination to put the media on defense and win a public relations air war over success of the attacks on Iran. The administration is confident of its success because it has worked before, and because of general distrust of the media. 'These people are never going to lose any polling points attacking the media, we know that for sure,' one national political reporter told The Hill on Thursday. 'But this is getting pretty personal and feels like it's getting more intense each day.' Trump also called out Bertrand by name on Wednesday, demanding that the network fire her for her reporting on the intelligence and referencing her previous reporting relating to Hunter Biden, Russian influence in the 2016 election and the coronavirus pandemic. CNN issued a forceful statement hours later defending Bertrand. 'CNN's reporting made clear that this was an initial finding that could change with additional intelligence,' a spokesperson for the network said. 'We have extensively covered President Trump's own deep skepticism about it. However, we do not believe it is reasonable to criticize CNN reporters for accurately reporting the existence of the assessment and accurately characterizing its findings, which are in the public interest.' The network's top political anchor, Jake Tapper, called Trump's attack 'preposterous,' and said the president was 'going after, shooting the messengers in an increasingly ugly way.' The New York Times, another target of the administration's ire, also issued a statement on Wednesday defending its reporting on the leaked memo and vowing to 'continue to report fully on the administration's decision making, including his dispute with the Defense Intelligence Agency.' Hegseth, a former colleague of Griffin, suggested a personal beef during his press conference on Thursday. 'Jennifer, you've been about the worst. The one who misrepresents the most intentionally,' the Defense secretary told Griffin after she asked if he was completely confident all the highly enriched uranium was inside the Fordow mountain where the strikes had taken place. Griffing was quick to defend herself. 'In fact, I was the first to describe the B-2 bombers, the refueling, the entire mission with great accuracy,' she shot back at the secretary. 'So I take issue with that.' Minutes later, Brit Hume, one of Fox's longest serving political analyst, chastised Hegseth on the network's air over the outburst. 'Her professionalism, her knowledge, her experience at the Pentagon is unmatched,' Hume said. 'I have had and still have the greatest regard for her. The attack on her was unfair.' Trump and his allies have repeatedly sought to discredit the leaked intelligence, saying the Iranian nuclear program has been totally 'obliterated,' and vowing to investigate the intelligence that was leaked to media outlets. Leavitt suggested that whoever leaked the intelligence to media outlets 'should be in jail' while going after Bertrand. 'This is a reporter who has been used by people who dislike Donald Trump in this government to push fake and false narratives,' she said. The intensifying rhetoric is raising concerns among press freedom groups, and calling to mind other moves the administration has taken to crack down on media coverage it views as unsupportive of its agenda. 'This is a familiar pattern by now: journalists report something Trump doesn't like, and he lashes out. He wants the press to parrot his talking points, and when they don't, he tries to bully them into submission,' said Clayton Weimers, executive director of Reporters with Borders. 'That's why he's suing CBS, the Des Moines Register, and the Pulitzer Board. It's why he banned the AP from the White House and wants to pad the White House briefing room and press pool with friendly right-wing voices.' Tim Richardson, program manager for journalism and disinformation at PEN America, told The Hill on Thursday the administration is trying to vilify journalists 'who accurately characterized that intelligence, rather than addressing the substance of his own administration's intelligence report.' 'These attacks erode public trust in fact-based reporting and embolden harassment against journalists who ask hard questions, especially in times of international conflict,' Richardson added. Former Defense Sec. Leon Panetta said Hegseth appears to disdain the media. 'There's no question that the way he has approached this reflects a lot of personal judgment and paranoia, very frankly, about the role of the press,' Panetta said. 'Rather than trying to paint the press as coming from one direction or the other, that's a trap. It's a trap because, frankly, we have press on all sides, on the left and the right, in the middle, all basically speaking to the truth.' Seth Stern, director of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation, added The White House's response to the leaked intelligence reporting 'shows that their crackdowns on journalists and whistleblowers have nothing to do with national security and everything to do with saving themselves from embarrassment.' Some argue that while Trump might be winning political points attacking the press over the intel leak episode, he could also be taking a risk if the Iranian nuclear facilities are proven to not be completely 'obliterated.' 'The irony is that Trump would get MORE credit if he weren't so relentlessly craven about claiming–and overclaiming–it,' David Axelrod, a longtime Democratic political operative and Trump critic wrote on the social platform X. 'It was cynical even by Trump's standards for him to suggest that to question the instant, conclusive analysis he offered Americans in the hours after the B-2 mission, was in any way an attack on the brave men and woman who carried it out. It was more than cynical. It was cowardly.'
