Europe Stresses Need to Protect Ukrainian Interests Ahead of Trump-Putin Talks
Trump plans to meet Putin in Alaska on Friday, saying the parties, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, were close to a deal that could resolve the three-and-a-half-year-old conflict.
The US president is open to a trilateral summit with Putin and Zelenskiy, but for now the White House is planning a bilateral meeting as requested by Putin, a White House official said. Russian and Ukrainian officials could not immediately be reached for comment on the prospects of a trilateral meeting.
Details of a potential deal have not been announced, but Trump said it would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". It could require Ukraine to surrender significant parts of its territory, an outcome Zelenskiy and his European allies say would only encourage Russian aggression.
US Vice President JD Vance met British Foreign Secretary David Lammy and representatives of Ukraine and European allies on Saturday at Chevening House, a country mansion southeast of London, to discuss Trump's push for peace.
A joint statement from the French, Italian, German, Polish, British and Finnish leaders and the president of the European Commission welcomed Trump's efforts, while stressing the need to maintain support for Ukraine and pressure on Russia.
"We share the conviction that a diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests," they said, according to Reuters.
"We agree that these vital interests include the need for robust and credible security guarantees that enable Ukraine to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity," the statement said, adding: "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine."
The leaders said "they remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force", and added: "The current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations."
They said negotiations could only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities.
Zelenskiy's chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, who took part in the talks with European leaders and US officials, said Ukraine was grateful for their constructive approach.
"A ceasefire is necessary - but the front line is not a border," Yermak said on X, reiterating Kyiv's position that it will reject any territorial concessions to Russia.
Yermak also thanked Vance for "respecting all points of view" and his efforts toward a "reliable peace".
European representatives put forward a counterproposal, a European official said, declining to provide details.
The Wall Street Journal said the counterproposal included demands that a ceasefire must take place before any other steps are taken and that any territorial exchange must be reciprocal, with firm security guarantees.
"You can't start a process by ceding territory in the middle of fighting," the newspaper quoted a European negotiator as saying.
A US official said hours-long meetings at Chevening "produced significant progress toward President Trump's goal of bringing an end to the war in Ukraine, ahead of President Trump and President Putin's upcoming meeting in Alaska."
The White House did not immediately respond when asked about the European counterproposals.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron spoke and pledged to find a "just and lasting peace" in Ukraine and "unwavering support" for Zelenskiy while welcoming Trump's efforts to end the fighting, a Downing Street spokesperson said.
It was not clear what, if anything, had been agreed at Chevening, but Zelenskiy called the meeting constructive.
"The path to peace for Ukraine should be determined together and only together with Ukraine, this is the key principle," he said in his evening address to Ukrainians.
Macron stressed the need for Ukraine to play a role in any negotiations.
"Ukraine's future cannot be decided without the Ukrainians, who have been fighting for their freedom and security for over three years now," he wrote on X after what he said were calls with Zelenskiy, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Starmer. "Europeans will also necessarily be part of the solution, as their own security is at stake."
Zelenskiy has made a flurry of calls with Ukraine's allies since Trump envoy Steve Witkoff visited Moscow on Wednesday, where, Trump said, he achieved "great progress".
Ukraine and the EU have pushed back on proposals that they view as ceding too much to Putin, whose troops invaded Ukraine in February 2022. Russia justifies the war on the grounds of what it calls threats to its security from a Ukrainian pivot towards the West.
Kyiv and its Western allies say the invasion is an imperial-style land grab.
Moscow has claimed four Ukrainian regions – Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson – as well as the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, which was annexed in 2014.
Russian forces do not fully control all the territory in the four regions, and Russia has demanded that Ukraine pull out its troops from the parts that they still control.
Ukraine says its troops still have a small foothold in Russia's Kursk region a year after they crossed the border to try to gain leverage in any negotiations. Russia said it had expelled Ukrainian troops from Kursk in April.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
3 minutes ago
- Arab News
A heartfelt apology for past misdemeanors can go a long way
Most countries and institutions have a checkered past that they often find difficult to deal with, first by admitting it and then apologizing, followed by learning the necessary lessons and eventually compensating those affected by their misdeeds, even generations later. In the UK, the country is still haunted by the legacy of its involvement in the slave trade, including how it profited from it and how this still affects the descendants of slaves and their countries of origin, with many instances where even today individuals and institutions are still benefiting. Back in 2007, Prime Minister Tony Blair, in a very welcome move, was the first British leader to express his 'deep sorrow' for his country's role in the slave trade. After the slave trade was abolished within the British Empire, it took 200 years for this sentiment to be expressed. But Blair was also criticized by Black rights and other organizations for not going further and issuing a formal apology. One is still yet to be made. More recently, King Charles, during a visit to Kenya, repeated his 'greatest sorrow and regret' at the 'wrongdoings' of the colonial era, but stopped short of an apology. Ultimately, during the transatlantic slave trade, Britain transported and enslaved an estimated 3 million people from Africa. But the abolition of this trade was not the end of slavery, as the ownership of human beings was still permitted — only the trade from Africa to Britain's colonies was abolished, which, although an important step toward the eventual liberation of all those who had been enslaved, saw no apology issued. It leaves open the question: does it mean anything if one expresses sorrow without an apology? And even if an apology is formally issued, what does this mean when it comes two centuries after the slave trade ceased to exist in the country? And most importantly, can we learn from these wrongdoings and genuinely acknowledge that, even today, the descendants of slaves and their countries of origin are paying a price for what happened and should be compensated for that? Worse is the inaction of the same countries that were at the heart of the slave trade when it comes to combating contemporary forms of slavery. Hence, a recently published comprehensive review by the University of Edinburgh, titled 'Slavery, Colonialism and Philanthropy at the University of Edinburgh,' which examines its historical ties to slavery and colonialism, marked an important step toward admitting and addressing the extremely problematic ties between a major British institution and the slave trade. The review, which was led by academics and involved extensive community engagement, also came up with a long list of recommendations for the university to implement in order to overcome this dark aspect of its past. What would probably terrify any contemporary academic at this renowned Scottish University, as any other involved with slavery, is that it played a major role in the creation of racist theories while profiting from slavery. The report confirms that the university benefited from the profits of African enslavement and colonialism through individual contributions and still benefits in that way to this very day. The very idea that the institution 'was a haven for professors and alumni who developed theories of racial inferiority and white supremacism, such as the idea that Africans were inferior to whites and that non-white peoples could be colonized for the profit of European nations,' is obviously shocking. This must encourage all academic institutions to review their safeguards to ensure that their research is neither motivated by a wish to appease their donors, nor is it too conformist, maybe afraid, to challenge the conventional wisdom of the time and publish research that lacks scientific rigor. No institution, let alone an academic one, deserves to maintain its credibility when its researchers compromise what is probably the most precious trait that all scholars must hold on to: their integrity. It is a truism that the past cannot be changed, but it is possible to learn from it. And it is equally important to rectify the mistakes by which certain behaviors caused damage that still reverberates in our societies all these years later. In response to a similar report published several years ago that established that the University of Glasgow benefited from the equivalent of tens of millions of pounds donated from the profits of slavery, the university launched the world's first master's degree in reparatory justice. This was done in partnership with the University of the West Indies as part of a global campaign for financial reparations for transatlantic slavery that has justly entered the discourse as an important tool to compensate for the financial damage and hurt caused by slavery. Similarly, one of the recommendations of the University of Edinburgh report is the creation of a 'Research and Community Centre for the Study of Racism, Colonialism and Anti-Black Violence' to enhance awareness of these issues. Moreover, the report acknowledges that 'Black staff and student population numbers have remained relatively unchanged over the past five years,' showing that not enough is being done in terms of remedying the persecution and discrimination of the past, which is very much a reflection of the situation in wider society. In the UK, the country is still haunted by the legacy of its involvement in the slave trade, including how it profited from it. Yossi Mekelberg There is courage in commissioning such an investigation, in being honest in publishing its findings and in looking for ways to repair the historical wrongdoings that still plague the university. For too long, there has been a prevailing illusion that citizens who are in principle equal in the eyes of the law are also treated equally in society. This is not what members of minorities would attest to as their daily experience, neither in their formative years in education nor when they look for a job and even in their social life. The Windrush scandal is a prime example of how the UK mistreated people, many of them descendants of slaves, who made an immense contribution to rebuilding the country after the Second World War and are still caught up in the ongoing societal and institutional racism. A heartfelt apology by institutions that have directly or even indirectly benefited from slavery could go a long way toward lifting the psychological barrier felt by their descendants vis-a-vis their engagement with society and state. And one coming from the government and the monarch would send a message that the country has owned up to its wrongdoing, even if it came 200 years later.
Al Arabiya
3 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Former UK defense minister and Republican Chair clash over Ukraine future
In this episode of Global News Today, presented by Tom Burges Watson, a fiery debate erupts over the future of Ukraine ahead of the summit in Alaska this week between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. We also bring you the latest on the humanitarian situation in Gaza, as Saudi Arabia's cabinet condemns Israel's decision to expand military operations in the Palestinian territory.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Rubio speaks to Russian FM Lavrov ahead of summit
WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke by telephone Tuesday with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to prepare for the summit in Alaska between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the State Department said. 'Both sides confirmed their commitment to a successful event,' State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters. Bruce confirmed that Putin had requested the meeting, which will take place Friday in the US state of Alaska. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has described the meeting as a 'personal victory' for Putin, who had been shunned by the West since his invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Rubio, in a radio interview earlier Tuesday, rejected criticism of the summit. Trump 'feels like, 'Look, I've got to look at this guy across the table. I need to see him face to face. I need to hear him one on one. I need to make an assessment by looking at him,'' Rubio told the 'Sid and Friends' show. 'People have to understand — for President Trump, a meeting is not a concession,' Rubio said.
