
Putin Asserts Russia Fueled US Founding, Claims Historic Support
Putin's declaration places the spotlight on historical narratives amid intensifying geopolitical narratives. Analysts are swiftly assessing the veracity of the claim and its broader implications, while US historians emphasise that formal ties between Russia and the American colonies did not exist prior to the Revolution. No documented material support or diplomatic recognition of that era substantiate relationships between the two nations at that point.
The Kremlin's narrative asserts that Russia aligned itself with the revolutionary cause by offering weapons shipments and financial support. Putin's phrasing suggested a structured engagement, though detractors argue that he misreads chronology—Russia, as an empire led by Catherine the Great, entered diplomatic relations with the United States only after the Treaty of Paris in 1783. That timing places any official Russian involvement after formal independence was already declared, challenging his claim.
ADVERTISEMENT
Western historians note that military aid from European powers—most notably France and Spain—was instrumental in the American victory, while Russia's role has remained nominal or symbolic at most. 'There is no credible evidence that Russia supported the revolution with arms or money during the conflict,' says one academic familiar with 18th‑century European diplomacy.
Putin's remarks come amid a broader tendency to recast historical events to underpin modern foreign policy, a strategy that has been applied in other contexts such as Ukraine. Earlier statements by the Kremlin have portrayed Ukraine as historically inseparable from Russia—a narrative used to justify recent territorial actions. The present claim similarly elevates Russia's historical role in world affairs.
American experts caution that shifting the origin story of US independence to include Russian intervention may serve as an effort to recalibrate the ideological balance between Moscow and Washington. 'It's propaganda aimed at repositioning Russia as an essential player in the birth of the West's oldest democracy,' says one US diplomatic historian.
Fact‑checkers underline that during the American Revolution Russia maintained neutrality, engaged in diplomatic management through the League of Armed Neutrality, and did not provide weapons to the colonists. France's material and military contributions remain well‑documented, alongside loans extended by Spain, but no comparable evidence exists for Russian support at that time.
In Moscow, state‑controlled media echoed Putin's framing as validation of Russia's longstanding, though subtle, influence in shaping Western institutions. Kremlin spokespeople emphasised that the president's comments were meant to underscore Russian diplomacy's historical roots.
Western capitals, however, have responded with measured scepticism. The State Department declined to address the specific claims, noting that America's founding documents were produced with French assistance, whereas Russian engagement began officially only after independence.
The telephonic exchange with Trump also revisited themes from Putin's televised 2024 interview, where he alleged CIA control over US elites and denounced NATO expansion. The latest narrative underscores persistent themes in Putin's foreign policy discourse: challenging Western historical narratives and asserting Russia's central role on the global stage.
Observers now turn to whether this claim will surface in educational materials or diplomatic exchanges, particularly as relations between Russia and the West remain strained. Critics argue that historical distortion can inflame nationalistic sentiment and reshape political memory, while advocates for Russia's narrative maintain it is correcting incomplete historical accounts.
With US political discourse increasingly sensitive to disinformation, the assertion stands to prompt fact‑based counter‑narratives. Historians focused on transatlantic studies anticipate a renewed analysis of archival records that could definitively confirm or reject any undocumented Russian involvement.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US-backed aid scheme in Gaza hires public relations firm staffed by former Obama, Biden staff: Report
The scandal-plagued Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's military contractor, UG Solutions, has hired the crisis communications firm Seven Letter, which is run by former communications staffers in the Joe Biden and Barack Obama administrations, independent journalist Jack Poulson revealed on Friday. This comes amid the revelation that nearly 800 Palestinians have been killed at GHF aid points in Gaza since it began operations in May, the United Nations said. Eyewitnesses have said both the Israeli forces and American military contractors manning the sites fired on them, and two resignees from UG Solutions confirmed those accounts to the Associated Press. Haaretz has also published testimony from Israeli soldiers who were ordered to fire on aid seekers.

Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Palestinian man beaten to death by Israeli settlers was US citizen, Arab-American group confirms
The 23-year-old Palestinian who was beaten to death by Israeli settlers near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank on Friday has been confirmed to be a US citizen, according to the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC). "Under the protection of government officials, Israeli settlers lynched a Palestinian American man from Tampa, Florida," a statement issued by the group said. "Saif al-Din Musalat (also reported as Sayfollah Musallet), born in Port Charlotte, Florida, was visiting family for the summer when he was beaten to death while protesting the construction of a new illegal Israeli outpost on village land in al‑Mazra'a ash‑Sharqiya. An ambulance was blocked from reaching him for nearly two hours," the ADC said. "This horrific murder is yet another example of Israel killing American citizens. As of the issuance of this statement, no one has been arrested, no one has been indicted, and—if the past is any guide—no one will be held accountable for the death of Saif," the statement continued. "This is not an aberration; it is part of a well‑documented pattern of impunity enjoyed by Israeli settlers and security forces who routinely attack Palestinians and Palestinian‑Americans under the protection of occupation authorities and indifference of US officials". The killing of US citizens abroad is more often than not addressed by the highest levels of the US government, including a phone call to the victim's family from the president. But now, the ADC said, when "the perpetrators are Israeli settlers or security forces, many US citizens themselves, Washington's response is silence, delay, or repeating the lies of Israeli authorities". "ADC calls on President Donald J. Trump to direct the State Department to open an immediate, American-led investigation into this heinous murder; demand that Israeli authorities arrest and prosecute the perpetrators without delay; and apply standard diplomatic protocol given to any murdered US citizen, including public condemnation of the crime, and regular briefings to Congress until justice is served," the group urged.


Middle East Eye
9 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Pro-Israel professor Shai Davidai leaves Columbia University after 'mutual agreement'
An assistant professor who was accused of harassing pro-Palestinian students as well as staff at Columbia University has left the institution following a "mutual agreement" he will not return to teaching at the Ivy League school, according to a university official. Shai Davidai, a controversial pro-Israel advocate who taught at Columbia's business school, left the university on 8 July. His campus access had been restricted since October following the 'intimidation' of university employees. 'Assistant Professor of Business Shai Davidai has decided to depart Columbia, effective July 8, 2025,' a Columbia University spokesperson wrote in an email to Middle East Eye, adding: "Assistant Professor Davidai has chosen, by mutual agreement with the University, to not return to teaching at Columbia." 'The University thanks him for his service and wishes him the best in his future endeavors.' Davidai said in a post on X on Friday that he left the university because he did not trust 'the anti-Jewish, anti-Israel, and anti-American hate festering on [Columbia's] campus'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'I didn't leave Columbia to 'pursue other endeavors', he said. 'I left because I no longer trust its so-called leadership to confront the anti-Jewish, anti-Israel, and anti-American hate festering on campus. During my six years there, I met plenty of well-paid bureaucrats - but not once did I meet a true leader.' Davidai has been a vocal critic of Columbia and other universities for their response to pro-Palestinian protest encampments on US campuses against the war in Gaza, while also being accused of threatening behaviour to students and faculty at the institution. Davidai had been under investigation by Columbia's Office of Institutional Equality (OIE) into allegations of harassment made against him in February 2024. Davidai shared in a post on X on Thursday that Columbia had 'tried to smear' his name and that he 'wouldn't let them', sharing a letter from Laura Kirschstein, vice-provost at OIE, saying: 'On July 8, OIE closed its investigations relating to you without issuing any findings or conclusions of wrongdoing, and without imposing any discipline or penalty on you.' A university official said that any OIE investigations normally terminate when an individual "is no longer employed at the University" and consequently the investigation into Davidai had closed 'without issuing any findings or conclusions of wrongdoing'. Katherine Franke, a former law professor who had taught at Columbia University, shared on Instagram on Thursday a video of her showing a letter from OIE sent to students who had made allegations against Davidai, which said that the 'OIE process has been terminated without any determination', meaning that Davidai had not been absolved of wrongdoing, just that a determination wasn't made before he had left. Columbia University has been criticised for capitulating to the Trump administration's demands over its allegations of antisemitism. Access denied In October, Columbia University issued a statement regarding Davidai's access to the institution being restricted, saying, 'Columbia…does not tolerate threats of intimidation, harassment, or other threatening behaviour by its employees'. The university also said it had "temporarily limited his access to campus while he [Davidai] undertakes appropriate training on our policies governing the behavior of our employees". After he was barred, he took to Instagram to criticise the decision, saying that it was 'because of October 7th [2023]. Because I was not afraid to stand up to the hateful mob. And because I was not afraid to expose Mr fucking Cas Holloway'. Holloway is the chief operating officer at Columbia. That video has since been taken down, but Davidai shared many social media posts harassing Holloway. It was the second time the non-tenured Israeli professor had been barred from the campus in a year. He had also been barred on 22 April for around a month for threatening to do a pro-Israeli sit-in on a pro-Palestinian encampment. Harassment Davidai in April 2024 called pro-Palestine students "the Hitler Youth" on X (his post has subsequently been taken down) and used his social media accounts, where he has over 108,000 followers, to repeatedly call for the US National Guard to be brought into the protest encampment at Columbia. More than 13,000 students signed a petition asking for him to be fired because he used his 'personal social media accounts to target, harass, and bully students, including Palestinian students who have lost family members in Gaza'. As well as students accusing him of harassing them both in person and on social media, critics said he also endangered staff, students and faculty. For example, he called on Secretary of State Marco Rubio on a post on X for Columbia graduate and Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil to be deported from the US. This happened two days before he was picked up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents dressed in plain clothes. Khalil was subsequently freed on 8 March after 104 days at a detention centre in Jena, Louisiana. In another incident, he tagged former faculty member Mohamed Abdou in posts with the FBI and Homeland Security. Abdou subsequently discovered he was "terminated" from a faculty position while watching on CSPAN, Columbia's antisemitism congressional hearing in April 2024. Abdou said his 'doxxing" and 'termination' was "irreparable'.