Jevon McSkimming – Privacy And Democracy Vs Journalists
'I dont think journalists have yet learnt that their power of the pen or words they publish can perpetually harm a persons livelihood, their familys livelihood and in the case of Mr McSkimming, forever destroy his reputation and career,' says …
Opinion: Kerry Grass, Asia Pacific AML
Is Former NZ Deputy Police Commissioner Jevon McSkimming a victim of a malicious and orchestrated rumour? Was the rumour designed to derail his candidacy from New Zealand's next Police Commissioner and secure the role to Richard Chambers?
Since the time the news broke that NZ's next Police Commissioner was shortlisted to two candidates, I have been following that media trail. It was therefore an interesting article to read, shortly after, that one of the candidates had been stood down from employment duties. The media article reported that there was a pending investigation and gave some detail about the allegation.
What was then unfortunate to read but fairly common in New Zealand's media, was a small number of journalists who continued reporting details of the allegation. Such conduct by journalists I find very frustrating and it would seem they have ignored that Mr McSkimming has minimum rights afforded to him under New Zealand's laws. These laws include the Bill of Rights Act, the Privacy Act and the Employment Relations Act.
Section 27 of the Bill of Rights Act (BORA), afford Mr McSkimming to the Right to Natural Justice. It sets out –
(1) Every person has the right to the observance of the principles of natural justice by any tribunal or other public authority which has the power to make a determination in respect of that person's rights, obligations, or interests protected or recognised by law.
(2) Every person whose rights, obligations, or interests protected or recognised by law have been affected by a determination of any tribunal or other public authority has the right to apply, in accordance with law, for judicial review of that determination.
(3) Every person has the right to bring civil proceedings against, and to defend civil proceedings brought by, the Crown, and to have those proceedings heard, according to law, in the same way as civil proceedings between individuals.
To then read that journalists and the Minister of Police continued to publicly share their personal views and report details of the allegation – is beyond belief.
I don't think journalists have yet learnt that their power of the pen or words they publish can perpetually harm a person's livelihood, their family's livelihood and in the case of Mr McSkimming, forever destroy his reputation and career. This impact still eventuates if he is found innocent of the allegations that journalists and Minister Mitchell are reporting.
There is also the possibility the allegations were designed to derail Mr McSkimming's role as the next Police Commissioner. If so, the orchestration and malicious leaking were successful in the objective.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
26 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Police cordon off Christchurch street over incident
Police at Clyde Road in Bryndwr on Thursday morning. Photo: RNZ / Adam Burns Police have cordoned off a section of Clyde Road in the Christchurch suburb of Bryndwr after an incident. RNZ's reporter on the scene says two police cars remained there on Thursday morning. More to come ... Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Police blame job cuts for not following Cabinet's orders to improve asset management
A police officer is seen carrying a rifle. Photo: RNZ Police admit they ate into their ability to manage their costly assets with big back-office job cuts last year. They promised at the time no impact on frontline services from axeing the 170 jobs to save $50 million, amid the government's public sector cuts . Asked by RNZ about them scoring the worst out of 16 agencies Treasury measured, police said the "reduction in corporate roles in 2024 has impacted the resource available for strategic asset management". It came at a time that some key assets, including about 900 of their 5300 Bushmaster rifles, were too old and need replacing. Police were under a 2023 Cabinet directive to improve asset management, when they cut the corporate jobs. The Treasury report said police were five-to-seven years away from fixing the systems as Cabinet demanded, and could not do it without fresh investment. As for the rifles, Treasury said, "Police must procure a vendor to supply product and services to replace, maintain and sustain its fleet of rifles. "Some current weapons are 20+ years old and well outside their life-of-type." Life-of-type usually refers to submarines past their expected lifespan. A rifles tender went out in June that said the "semi-automatic rifle stock includes a portion of aging firearms reaching end of life and needing replacement". Police said they maintained the old rifles well - "A rifle at end of life does not mean that it is no longer functioning or safe." Out of 5300 rifles, about 800 were "beyond end-of-life", and 100 at or near it. Four thousand were current; only 500 were new, police told RNZ. They also defended their overall asset management, saying they were striving to improve it. But they scored the worst out of 16 agencies in a Treasury report in February. Told by the Cabinet in 2023 to do better, 11 agencies did so. But the police instead cut back on staff doing the work, taking out 170 back-office jobs to save $50m amid the public sector cutbacks the government ordered. At the time, they promised the cuts would have no adverse impacts on frontline policing . But they had impact elsewhere. "A reduction in corporate support staff has impacted resources with expertise in resilience, sustainability and portfolio specific asset management," the police reported back in February. They repeated this four times on one page, about five "non-compliances" with what Cabinet ordered in 2023. They estimated they would not have fixes for these till 2030 and 2032 - and even then this was "dependent on securing an uplift in investment and retaining dedicated resource". Again, this line was repeated four times. The next agency with the most number of failures to comply - four - was the Defence Force. Eleven out of the 16 agencies had complied. Police told RNZ: "NZ Police strives to continuously improve asset management towards compliance with the Cabinet circular." "The Commissioner has prioritised operational asset management this financial year." RNZ asked what assurance police could give the public that they would not cut out vital back office roles in future. The Police Association union last August quoted a police employee saying, "We think this will be a scattergun headcount-reduction exercise made in a silo by people who don't understand the work people do, who they do it for, and who also won't personally be affected by the outcome of the 'realignment' exercise." A police spokesperson said the force faces considerable pressure with its capital funding and was constantly making prioritisation decisions. "Police's reduction in corporate roles in 2024 has impacted the resource available for strategic asset management, but recent changes to leadership the Commissioner introduced through his leadership realignment have also brought a range of assets, (including our property portfolio, vehicle fleet, firearms, and other operational assets such as tasers and body armour) together under single leadership and this is enabling improvements in how those assets are managed." RNZ approached Minister Mark Mitchell for comment. Mitchell has heralded putting over a billion dollars into police in the last two Budgets . Most was for the front line, with a slice for a human resources and payroll IT upgrade. Police Minister Mark Mitchell. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The Cabinet directive demanded police have an asset register for "critical assets" listing their condition and risks. They now expect to have set one up by 2032, but "compliance is dependent on securing business case funding". They got the nod late last year to do a business case to replace the old Bushmasters, in a project rated "medium" risk, the document showed. Police told RNZ their rifle stocks included new ones, and others "at end of life, or beyond end of life" at the other end of the spectrum. End-of-lfe was about an asset being fully depreciated. "This is typical of asset management ... This means the asset no longer has a monetary value and can be replaced," said Inspector Jason Ross, acting director of operational capability, in a statement. "Our rifle fleet is regularly and well maintained by our National Armoury and all firearms are operationally and functionally checked before every deployment. Should any issue be identified during these checks, the rifle is removed from service and repaired or replaced." As well as new rifles, they were also looking into maybe getting an outside service to manage the rifles rather than their own armoury. They also want a digital asset tracking tool. "This will enable police to have a rifle fleet that meets current and future operating capability needs," Ross said. It aligned with how they were managing their body armour. The Treasury report covered the quarter to December 2024, but was the latest available. Along with it, the Minister of Finance Nicola Willis and her Associate Chris Bishop warned colleagues that many agencies "remain well below" their expectations on giving Cabinet accurate budget advice about projects on time; fewer than 60 percent were up to scratch. Ministers had a big role in making sure project planning, delivery and asset management got better; they should "understand the state of their agency's asset management performance and ability to manage critical replacement, renewals and maintenance within existing funding". Treasury scored Police middle of the pack of 25 agencies for planning big projects, higher for delivering them on time and on budget. They have $1.2 billion of investments planned, and $2.1b being delivered - the largest project is the $1.8b Public Safety Network. Along with a nod on rifles, Police won the nod to do more planning on public order policing improvements, sparked by the 2022 occupation of Parliament grounds. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Highest-paid public sector chairs – how they compare with the private sector
The company's 2025 survey of directors, which covered 342 organisations across both sectors and 342 chairs, found that private sector chairpersons earn more than double the fees of their public sector counterparts, across an overall median for all entity sizes. Strategic Pay's sample puts median pay for private sector non-executive chairs at $132,815, while the public sector median is just $62,000. Strategic Pay managing director Cathy Hendry. Hendry noted that there is 'always a public sector discount … it's a long-term trend'. She said the lower pay in the public sector is driven by affordability and the source of the funding, which typically comes with much higher public scrutiny. Indeed, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon felt the heat of that public scrutiny last month, when news broke that new guidance would allow public boards to award hefty pay hikes. Labour finance spokeswoman Barbara Edmonds emphasised that the National coalition has found 'no money to help families with rising costs, but when it comes to … pay rises for Crown board members, then suddenly their pockets are full'. For his part, Luxon suggested that low board pay might damage the Government's ability to recruit the right people: 'This is just acknowledging that we need to make sure that we can attract good people … [it's] important that we actually are able to attract really good governance, of the Health NZ board for example.' Systematic fee increases began 7 months ago The Treasury has its own framework for board fee calculation, the Crown Companies Fees Methodology, and this applies to a limited subset of Crown-owned companies, including the state-owned enterprises. Last year, it advised ministers, based on benchmarking it commissioned from Strategic Pay, that 83% of all Treasury-managed Crown boards have fees below 70% of comparative market rates (both the Treasury and Strategic Pay declined to release the benchmarking work; Hendry said it is commercially sensitive). Last August, the Cabinet agreed on a two-step fee increase for these entities (excluding several, such as Southern Response Earthquake Services, which was within the target rate, and NZ Green Investment Finance, whose chair Cecilia Tarrant is on $98,000, which already enjoyed fees above the target rate). Ministers agreed on a January 1 change that increased board fees for 17 entities to 85% of the level Strategic Pay calculated the Crown rate should be – the Crown rate was set 10% below the market rate. A second increase, to bring fees up to the Crown rate, is scheduled for January 1 2026. Across both the public and the private sector, a rough rule of thumb holds that board chairs do twice as much work as regular board members. The Treasury's framework pays board chairs twice the fee of ordinary members; however, shareholding ministers approve a total annual director fee budget, and it's possible, though uncommon, for boards to allocate the chair fees that are below the figure calculated under the Treasury formula. The pay hikes are not related to good performance – the likes of Landcorp and NZ Post, where chair fees are rising 41% and 84% respectively, have been laggards – but the related Cabinet Paper makes it clear that the Government hopes the higher fees will help to attract better candidates. Both Landcorp and NZ Post have new chairs, appointed in the past year. The biggest annual fee increase accrues to Mark Binns, chair of Crown Infrastructure Partners, the remit of which has expanded considerably over his tenure. His pay will more than double. Before the rise, Binns' fee stood at $63,000. That rose to $109,620 at the beginning of the year, and will reach $128,960 in 2026. KiwiRail disclosed chair David McLean's fee was $89,000 in fiscal 23/24. On the Treasury's figures, that fee rose to $142,260 at the beginning of 2025 and will reach $167,360 at the beginning of next year (an 88% increase). The new chair is Sue Tindall. Fees for Crown Infrastructure Partners chair Mark Binns are set to more than double. Photo / Mark Mitchell Among those with smaller but still significant increases is Jim Mather, chairman of RNZ. His fees rose to $71,280 at the beginning of the year, and are set to increase to $83,860 at the beginning of 2026 -- a total increase of 41%. In contrast, Alistair Carruthers, the chairman of TVNZ, stands out as an anomaly. Despite the revisions to the fees framework and the Treasury's calculation that he is underpaid, Carruthers received no fee increase this year. The state-owned broadcaster has been struggling through cost-cutting efforts, including job losses, though it is not unique in this. Carruthers and his board opted not to take up the first round of fee increases offered by Media and Communications Minister Paul Goldsmith, who is responsible for signing off on TVNZ board pay. The big exception: Lester Levy, Health NZ Lester Levy, chairman of the re-established board of behemoth Crown entity Health NZ, is the major public sector exception. His headline pay is extraordinary across all sectors, and so is the work required of him. Levy will earn a maximum of $450,000 a year, which breaks down into an expected maximum of $325,000, with a further $125,000 held in contingency, a Ministry of Health spokeswoman confirmed. The figures are predicated on a daily fee of $2500, for up to 130 days' work (the contingency represents an additional 50 days' work). The headline pay of Health NZ board chairman Lester Levy is extraordinary across all sectors, and so is the work required of him. Photo / Mark Mitchell By comparison, the recently updated Cabinet Fees Framework sets a maximum chair fee of $162,200 per annum for the largest and most complex public sector entities; this fee level is predicated on a workload of 50 days' work. The previous chair of HNZ, Dame Karen Poutasi, drew an annualised fee of $219,000 in fiscal 23/24. The spokeswoman said the daily fee rates for the current HNZ board, including the chair, are unchanged from 23/24. In fiscal 24/25, the board was replaced by Levy as commissioner and three deputy commissioners. The spokeswoman said the current HNZ board is in its 'establishment phase' and the current arrangement will last for the next 18 months, at which point it will be reviewed and the ministry anticipates a move to a 'more business-as-usual way of working'. HNZ is the country's single largest health care provider, its largest employer, and the Government's largest Crown entity. It received $27.2 billion in funding in fiscal 23/24, its last disclosed financial year, which fell $722 million short of spending; it is a notable financial mess. Increases for most public board chairs In July, the Public Service Commission issued new guidance providing for sizable fee increases for the vast majority of public boards, their chairs, and other government appointees such as advisory committee members and commissioners. For the largest and most complex public bodies, board chair fees can now reach up to $162,000 (the previous cap was $90,000) – an 80% increase over previous guidance. The matrix of factors that determine which chairs and boards should be best paid includes the operating budget, asset value, and business complexity of the relevant entity. The framework is not prescriptive, and the new levels set don't compel Crown entities to review their fees; the ministers responsible can review fees at any time, and by convention, this typically happens every two to three years. The Minister for the Public Service, Judith Collins, told the Herald that it's common for monitoring departments to conduct reviews across multiple entities within their portfolio, to ensure consistency. Kate MacNamara is a South Island-based journalist with a focus on policy, public spending and investigations. She spent a decade at the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation before moving to New Zealand. She joined the Herald in 2020.
