A Trump lawyer's uphill climb to the federal bench
BOVE AND THE WHISTLEBLOWER — The prospects for Emil Bove's nomination to serve as a federal judge were already uncertain. But today, one day before the confirmation hearing for Trump's former criminal defense lawyer-turned-senior Justice Department official, things may have gotten worse.
Attorneys for Erez Reuveni, a former Justice Department lawyer who was fired from the department after acknowledging in court that Kilmar Abrego Garcia had been sent to El Salvador in error, released a scathing whistleblower disclosure alleging that Bove and other senior Trump DOJ officials sought to defy court orders in three separate cases 'through lack of candor, deliberate delay, and disinformation.'
The disclosure heightens the tensions around an already controversial nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
The Trump DOJ has already pushed back vigorously. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche —who worked with Bove on behalf of Trump last year in the president's criminal trial in Manhattan — described Reuveni's claims in a social media post as 'utterly false.'
Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), a former federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York who overlapped with Bove, initially held out hope that Bove would take on the DOJ job while adhering to the standards of bipartisanship and professionalism that prevailed in the office. But given developments in recent months, and particularly in the wake of Reuveni's disclosure today, Goldman's assessment of his former colleague is now sharply negative.
'In just a few short months,' Goldman said today, Bove 'has single-handedly done tremendous damage to the Department of Justice' and 'repeatedly demonstrated that his oath of office and the rule of law are subservient to his personal and political desires. That record disqualifies him from serving as a lifetime judge responsible for objectively interpreting the law.'
Among other things, Reuveni alleges that Bove told a group of lawyers in mid-March, shortly before Trump publicly invoked the Alien Enemies Act as part of his mass deportation effort, that they would need to be prepared for a court order that might quickly put a stop to the removals.
'Bove then made a remark concerning the possibility that a court order would enjoin those removals before they could be effectuated,' Reuveni's lawyers wrote. 'Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'fuck you' and ignore any such court order.'
'Mr. Reuveni perceived that others in the room looked stunned,' the account continues, 'and he observed awkward, nervous glances among people in the room. Silence overtook the room.'
Reuveni also alleges that Bove told officials in the Department of Homeland Security that they could violate an oral court order — one that directed the return of flights to El Salvador as part of the AEA deportations — because the order had not yet been issued in writing. The presiding judge has since concluded that there is probable cause to hold Trump administration officials in criminal contempt as a result of that decision.
Reuveni's submission provides a remarkable account from within Trump's second-term Justice Department — one that, in an earlier era, might have prompted bipartisan calls for an independent investigation. The account sharply criticizes not just Bove but several other senior administration lawyers who have been handling the litigation over Trump's deportation effort.
Bove had already come under sharp criticism from many legal observers over his dismissal of the criminal case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The presiding judge described the DOJ's arguments as 'unsupported by any objective evidence,' 'pretextual' and 'unsubstantiated.'
In white-collar legal circles, however, a second — and subtler — criticism of Bove's handling of the case has also been making the rounds in recent months.
In particular, some experienced lawyers believe that Bove probably could have achieved his and Trump's objective of dismissing the case without creating a weeks-long public spectacle. The argument, essentially, is that Bove made a bad situation much worse by bungling both the internal and external communications around the decision, and that the episode reflected poor political and managerial instincts on top of bad legal judgment.
Senate Democrats oppose Bove's nomination, but it has also opened up a fissure within the conservative legal movement. On one side are establishment Federalist Society types, who oppose Bove's nomination to serve as a judge because they believe he is being picked largely — if not entirely — because Trump views him as a diehard loyalist.
On the other side are Republicans who are stridently backing Bove. They include Andrew Ferguson, the chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, who recently co-authored an op-ed in support of Bove.
Bove's appearance before the Judiciary Committee tomorrow was already one worth keeping an eye on. Republicans have a narrow margin to get Bove through, and he will now also have to respond to a blistering account that threatens to derail his nomination.
Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight's author at akhardori@politico.com.
What'd I Miss?
— Trump agrees to in-person Wednesday meeting with Zelenskyy: President Donald Trump plans to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Wednesday alongside the NATO summit, according to a White House official granted anonymity to discuss the meeting. The meeting comes as focus on Russia's war with Ukraine has taken a backseat to the Israel-Iran conflict. Leading up to the summit, it was not clear whether Zelenskyy would attend amid fears that a visit wouldn't be worth his time without a guarantee of significant facetime with Trump. Earlier this month, Zelenskyy flew to Canada for the meeting of G7 world leaders in hopes of a meeting with the U.S. president, but Trump left the summit early.
— Trump backtracks on 'regime change' talk in Iran: President Donald Trump said today he doesn't want to see regime change in Iran, two days after he floated the idea on social media. 'I don't want it. I'd like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible,' Trump said to reporters aboard Air Force One on his way to the NATO summit. 'Regime change takes chaos, and ideally, we don't want to see so much chaos, so we'll see how it does.' Some of Trump's long-time supporters, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Steve Bannon, criticized the earlier suggestion of regime change, worried the effort would bog down Americans in another costly Middle East expedition. Right-wing influencers today were quick to cheer the president's apparent pivot.
— Senate parliamentarian approves tweaked SNAP cost-share plan: Senate Republicans have saved their plan to push some costs of the nation's anti-hunger program onto states, maintaining a crucial $41 billion spending cut that will help pay for their policy megabill. The Senate parliamentarian today approved Republicans' tweak to give states more time between finding out how much of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program they'll need to pay for, and when they actually need to start paying. That avoids one of GOP leaders' top issues as they work to address several other adverse rulings from the parliamentarian in accordance with the chamber's strict reconciliation rules — all ahead of a July 4 deadline.
— Another man who was deported in violation of court order must be returned to U.S., court rules: The Trump administration must try to bring back to the U.S. another man who was deported to El Salvador in violation of a court order, a federal appeals court ruled today. It's the fourth time since March that federal courts have ordered the administration to return immigrants who were deemed illegally or improperly deported. Officials must begin seeking the return of Jordin Melgar-Salmeron, who was sent to his native country on May 7, 'as soon as possible,' a three-judge panel of the New York-based 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled.
— New York City hits high temps as mayoral candidates make their final push on Primary Day: As voters headed to the polls in New York City in triple-digit temps to cast a vote in the contentious mayoral primary today, the once-clear frontrunner Andrew Cuomo appeared to be on his back foot — and begging. 'We can do it, but it's going to take all of us,' Cuomo said Monday night in a leaked private call with health care worker union members entrusted with getting out the vote for him. 'Please, please, please make the special effort.' Real-feel temps in New York City exceeded 105 degrees today, and older voters — who make up Cuomo's base — faced dangerous conditions across the city. By 12 p.m., the city's board of elections said 605,543 voters — including 384,338 who opted for early voting — checked into polling locations to cast their ballot. What started as a race defined by a decisive frontrunner and a distant, crowded field of candidates has winnowed down to a two-person race, with recent polls showing Zohran Mamdani has closed the gap between him and Cuomo.
AROUND THE WORLD
ANOTHER RUSSIAN ATTACK — Russia hit Ukraine's key industrial city of Dnipro with ballistic missiles today, causing massive destruction that killed 17 people and injured more than 270, local authorities reported. 'This is an unprecedented amount of destruction that the city has not seen in the entire time of [Russia's] full-scale war,' Dnipro Mayor Borys Filatov said in a statement while announcing a day of mourning.
Russia has increased the frequency of its attacks on Ukraine since May when it launched a summer offensive in the conflict, now in its fourth year. It has also ramped up its production of drones: In June alone Moscow launched 2,736 Shahed kamikaze drones at Ukraine, the country's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in an address to the parliament of the Netherlands today. In addition, the Kremlin continues to launch dozens of missiles at Ukraine.
Meanwhile, the recent conflict between Israel and Iran has complicated Ukraine's position, with the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump moving to the Middle East some of the unmanned aerial defense systems it had given Ukraine to counter Russia's air assaults.
NATO'S NEW PARIAH — Canada used to be NATO's biggest headache for its chronic defense underspending. Now, at this year's summit, everybody agrees: Spain's the problem, with Slovakia coming a close second in stoking anger among alliance members.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez's 11th-hour insistence that his country doesn't need to hit NATO's new 5 percent of GDP defense spending target, and managing to get a carve-out in an agreement on the spending goal, has turned Madrid into the alliance's new pariah. 'I have no words to express my disgust,' one European defense official, who like others was granted anonymity to speak candidly, said on the sidelines of the summit.
Sanchez was followed by Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico on Monday, who posted on X that his country 'has other priorities in the coming years than armament,' and can get by without increasing spending. At last year's summit in Washington, frustration with Canadian defense spending was high, with Ottawa simply refusing to increase its defense budget to anywhere near NATO's 2 percent of GDP guideline. The new government of Prime Minister Mark Carney has pledged an extra $9 billion in defense expenditures, finally bringing the country to 2 percent and getting it out of the alliance's doghouse.
Nightly Number
RADAR SWEEP
ROUGH RIDING — Taking a taxi to work is the new normal for commuters in Johannesburg. After the city's passenger-rail system shut down in 2020, an overwhelming majority of public transport riders turned to 14 or 15-seater taxis to commute from the sprawling city outskirts. Despite high fares and frequent violence, taxi riders have few other options as government public transport projects fail or remain unaffordable for most. Zinhle Xaba explains the challenges of expanding public transport in South Africa for Bloomberg.
Parting Image
Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


American Military News
3 hours ago
- American Military News
Trump admin sues Washington over 'anti-Catholic' law
President Donald Trump's Justice Department announced on Monday that it was taking legal action and filing a lawsuit against a new law in Washington State, claiming that it violates the First Amendment by forcing Catholic priests to break the 'confidentiality seal of Confession' by reporting certain confessions to government officials. In a Monday press release, the Justice Department confirmed that it had filed legal action against Washington state over a new state law, known as Senate Bill 5375. The Justice Department claimed that the state's new law 'violates the free exercise of religion for all Catholics, and requires Catholic priests to violate the confidentiality seal of Confession.' According to The Post Millennial, Washington's Senate Bill 5375, which was signed into law by Gov. Bob Ferguson (D-Wash.), requires Catholic priests to report confessions to government authorities if the confessions involve cases of suspected child neglect or abuse. READ MORE: FBI's targeting of Catholics, pro-lifers exposed by House GOP The Justice Department argued on Monday that Senate Bill 5375 forces Catholic priests to 'violate their vows to uphold the confidentiality seal that accompanies the sacred rite of Confession, subjecting them to immediate excommunication from the Catholic Church.' In Monday's press release, the Justice Department said its lawsuit shows that the Democrat-run state's new law violates the First Amendment's Free Exercise of Religion Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by targeting Catholic priests and members of Catholic churches while establishing a double standard of confidentiality for religious and secular institutions. Harmeet K. Dhillon, assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, said, 'Laws that explicitly target religious practices such as the Sacrament of Confession in the Catholic Church have no place in our society.' 'Senate Bill 5375 unconstitutionally forces Catholic priests in Washington to choose between their obligations to the Catholic Church and their penitents or face criminal consequences, while treating the priest-penitent privilege differently than other well-settled privileges,' Dhillon added. 'The Justice Department will not sit idly by when States mount attacks on the free exercise of religion.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘F*** you!' Trump 'whistleblower bomb' goes off detailing lawless DOJ plot: Melber report
Emil Bove, a senior DOJ official, suggested the department should tell courts 'f*** you' and ignore court orders it opposed, according to a whistleblower with firsthand knowledge of senior DOJ planning under Trump. MSNBC Chief Legal Correspondent Ari Melber reports on the significance of the formal whistleblower complaint, and interviews longtime DOJ veteran prosecutor Andrew Weissman. (Subscribe to Ari's YouTube now:
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Complaint alleges DOJ official Emil Bove said he was willing to violate court orders
A top Justice Department official nominated by President Donald Trump to fill a federal appeals court vacancy allegedly suggested the Trump administration should defy judicial orders that sought to restrict their aggressive efforts to deport undocumented immigrants earlier this year, according to a whistleblower complaint from a fired DOJ career official. The 27-page complaint, provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Justice Department's top watchdog and obtained by ABC News, alleges that Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove and other top DOJ officials strategized how they could mislead courts regarding the administration's immigration enforcement efforts and potentially ignore judges' rulings outright. The allegations from Erez Reuveni -- who was fired from the department in April after he appeared in federal court in Maryland and admitted to a judge that the government had mistakenly deported accused MS-13 member Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador -- were delivered to the Senate on the eve of a confirmation hearing for Bove to serve on the powerful 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. MORE: Trump taps controversial top DOJ official for federal circuit court vacancy "Mr. Reuveni's disclosures detail violations of law, rules or regulations, and the abuse of authority by DOJ and White House personnel, as well as the creation of substantial and specific health and safety threats to noncitizens," Reuveni's attorneys said in the letter. "These high-level governmental personnel knowingly and willfully defied court orders, directed their subordinate attorneys to make misrepresentations to courts, and engaged in a scheme to withhold relevant information from the court to advance the Administration's priority of deporting noncitizens," the letter said. Reuveni's whistleblower complaint details several internal meetings where he alleges Bove and other officials debated over how they could evade legal scrutiny in implementing President Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th century wartime authority used to remove noncitizens with little-to-no due process. At a meeting on March 14, the complaint alleges that Bove said the department should consider saying "f--- you" to the courts and "ignore any such court order." "Mr. Reuveni was stunned by Bove's statement because, to Mr. Reuveni's knowledge, no one in DOJ leadership -- in any Administration -- had ever suggested the Department of Justice could blatantly ignore court orders," the letter says, repeating the expletive. "Mr. Reuveni was in disbelief, because, on the contrary, the Department of Justice consistently advises its clients of their obligation to follow court orders, not to ignore them." In a statement to The New York Times responding to the letter -- which was first reported by the paper -- Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche described Reuveni as a "disgruntled former employee" and said that his accusations about Bove and other DOJ leadership "are utterly false." "I was at the meeting described in the [New York Times] article and at no time did anyone suggest a court order should not be followed," Blanche said. The allegations by Reuveni fall at the center of an effort by D.C. District Chief Judge James Boasberg to potentially hold top administration officials in contempt for violating a March 15 order to turn a plane of undocumented immigrants deported under the Alien Enemies Act around before it arrived in El Salvador. That inquiry was put on a temporary hold by an appeals court panel in the D.C. Circuit in April. Bove, according to Reuveni's account, made clear to officials the day before Boasberg's order that the planes carrying the deported individuals "needed to take off no matter what," and that is when he made the comment about potentially defying court orders. Officials in the room "looked stunned" following Bove's alleged remarks, and those in the room left the meeting still "understanding that DOJ would tell DHS to follow all court orders," according to Reuveni. In Reuveni's telling, the meeting was just one in a series of instances that demonstrated efforts by White House and DOJ leadership to defy court orders "through lack of candor, deliberate delay, and disinformation." MORE: DOJ places senior lawyer on leave in case of mistakenly deported man "Discouraging clients from engaging in illegal conduct is an important part of the role of a lawyer," the letter states. "Mr. Reuveni tried to do so and was thwarted, threatened, fired, and publicly disparaged for both doing his job and telling the truth to the court." Senate Democrats are expected to highlight Reuveni's account at Bove's judicial confirmation hearing Wednesday to bolster their claims that Bove, who previously served as President Trump's personal defense attorney, has abused his position at DOJ to advance Trump's political agenda. "These serious allegations, from a career Justice Department lawyer who defended the first Trump Administration's immigration policies, not only speak to Mr. Bove's failure to fulfill his ethical obligations as a lawyer, but demonstrate that his activities are part of a broader pattern by President Trump and his allies to undermine the Justice Department's commitment to the rule of law," Senate Judiciary ranking member Dick Durbin said in a statement reacting to Reuveni's letter. "And I implore my Senate Republican colleagues: do not turn a blind eye to the dire consequences of confirming Mr. Bove to a lifetime position as a circuit court judge," Durbin said.