
Five unanswered questions in UK-EU deal
The UK and the European Union have agreed to a major new deal covering areas including trade, defence, fishing and energy. However, negotiations are still taking place on a number of key issues - leaving some important questions unanswered.
How much will the UK pay?
The deal makes several references to a "financial contribution" from the UK to access certain benefits, notably an agreement to reduce checks on food exports to the EU. The prime minister's official spokesman said these were "administrative costs". He insisted they would not be "big" but refused to put a figure on how much the UK would pay. In other areas, terms are still being negotiated so the cost to the UK isn't known yet.For example, the two sides are working towards the UK rejoining the Erasmus+ exchange programme, which allows students to study or do work placements abroad. Rather than simply covering administrative costs, the UK would be expecting to get direct benefits in return and the government has said it will only take part "on significantly improved financial terms".
How many people will benefit from youth visa scheme?
The UK has agreed to work towards a "youth experience scheme" with the EU, which would allow young people from the bloc to apply for a visa to live and work in the UK and vice versa. The government has said any such deal would be "capped and time-limited" but it has not specified how many visas could be issued annually and how long they would be valid for.These details will be the subject of future negotiations.The UK already has similar schemes with 11 countries including Australia, New Zealand and Japan, with people able to stay for up to three years depending on which country they are from. Last year, just over 24,000 youth mobility visas were issued by the UK.
When can British travellers use e-gates?
Since Brexit, British travellers at EU airports have generally been forced to have their passport stamped at manned desks, rather than use automatic gates with facial recognition technology. Some airports already allow British passport-holders to use e-gates - but for those that don't the only alternative is often a lengthy queue. The deal states that there will be "no legal barriers" to Britons using e-gates when travelling to and from EU countries after the introduction of the European Union Entry-Exit System. The long-awaited digital border checks system is due to replace passport stamping for travellers from outside the EU in October.Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said UK holidaymakers will want to get away "without delay" this summer and he wants them to be able to use e-gates "as soon as possible". But it is up to individual EU countries to decide whether British passport holders can use e-gates at their airports. So whether this will be possible in more countries by the summer holidays is unclear.
Will it be easier for British bands to tour Europe?
Since Brexit, British musicians have faced extra costs and red tape when touring Europe - and stars have long called for action to tackle this. Labour's general election manifesto last year pledged to "help our touring artists" as part of negotiations with the EU. But the deal agreed on Monday only recognises the "value" of touring artists and promises to continue efforts "to support travel and cultural exchange". The UK says it will explore "how best to improve arrangements for touring across the European continent".Tom Kiehl, chief executive of UK Music, which represents the industry, welcomed this as "an important first step" but said the sector was seeking "more concrete commitments".
Will UK qualifications be recognised in the EU?
Another promise in Labour's manifesto was to "secure a mutual recognition agreement for professional qualifications to help open up markets for UK service exporters". This would mean professionals - such as doctors, lawyers, accountants and architects - who qualified in one country could practice in another with minimal extra bureaucracy. EU citizens already have the right to do this across the bloc. Such an agreement would make it easier for British companies to move staff between the UK and EU and undertake short-term work in Europe. However, there may be less incentive for the EU to reach a deal on this, given that the current situation makes it harder for UK firms to compete for business in Europe.Monday's deal only promises to set up "dedicated dialogues" on the recognition of professional qualifications. A full agreement in this area could take much longer to negotiate, if the EU will sign up to one at all.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
'Don't kill the ill' vs 'What a relief': Two terminally ill people on the assisted dying vote
Over the past year, Sky News has been following the journeys of two people who are terminally ill and on opposite sides of the assisted dying debate. Philip, a Christian pastor, views it as suicide and says supporters of the bill need more faith. Clare, a former counsellor, thinks it should be a personal choice, which for her could offer a good death. Philip died two days before Friday's historic vote, which saw MPs vote in favour of assisted dying. "Kill the bill, don't kill the ill," he told Sky News days before he died. Philip said better palliative care can make all the difference. "I still believe it's because of money. It would save millions and millions if they bump off people like me and Clare and others." Philip was resting in a bed in his living room when we spoke to him. Doctors had told him he had just days left. He was struggling to eat and experiencing hallucinations. "Just now, I went to kiss [my wife] Pauline and she's not there." He pointed to a corner of a biscuit he'd been eating over the last three days that's "not even as big as my thumb". "That's the maximum amount of food I can eat because I'm blocked with cancer." "Logically, I should be screaming and ranting and shouting. But I've been organising things like the funeral," he said, explaining that his belief in Jesus means he's at peace with death, however it comes. At times he cries and very often, he winces in pain. Asked what it would mean if the vote was passed, Philip said it would be "a terrible step downwards". Assisted dying would desensitise the British public to death, he explained. "I personally am totally against it, because you're missing out on what God's planned for you. "Because even now, he knows what's going to happen in me, he knows what's going to happen in the other people." He added: "You'll miss the support of people who love you. Because there are people who love you. If you just reach out to them." Philip died on Wednesday morning, two days before the bill's third reading and ascension to the House of Lords. Clare is sitting in her friend's garden in Cirencester, Gloucestershire, surrounded by nature and absorbing the news that the vote has passed. She tells Sky News: "Oh what a relief! Thank goodness. Thank you to all those people who were brave." Clare has breast cancer which has spread to her bones. Her doctors say her lungs have hardened, making it more difficult for her to breathe. "I'm breathless all the time especially if I'm talking. I can't walk very far without being breathless. Now my heart has to work very, very hard to keep my oxygen levels up." Clare has supported the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill from its inception and calls it a "difficult subject". "People are very fearful," she says, before acknowledging that concerns remain for vulnerable people at risk of coercion. "Lots of people have been in controlling relationships, and I really understand how that works. "I've got daughters and I can understand situations where people are thinking, 'oh, I don't want to be a burden on somebody else' and all of that. But I think it's [worth] remembering that this is one choice out of many." Clare is aware it is unlikely the law will change before she dies. "It won't for [be there] me and it hasn't come in time for lots of people, has it?" she says. "All the people that have gone before that would've liked this choice to avoid suffering and indignity." Clare turns 60 this year and is marking her birthday with 60 memorable days. "I'm enjoying life," she says with a big smile. "I don't want to die, but we all have to go."


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
South Korea's chief trade envoy plans US visit June 22-27
SEOUL, June 21 (Reuters) - South Korea's trade minister Yeo Han-koo will visit the United States from June 22 to 27, the trade ministry said on Saturday. The visit will include discussions with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and the third round of bilateral technical discussions, a ministry official told Reuters. Further details about the meetings were not disclosed. South Korea, which is currently facing a 10% blanket tariff and a 25% country-specific duty temporarily paused for 90 days, agreed with the U.S. during initial trade negotiations in late April to craft a trade deal reducing tariffs by July 8. Asia's fourth-largest economy unexpectedly contracted in the first quarter amid U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs and domestic political unrest following former President Yoon Suk Yeol's martial law decree in December.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The whole free world has an interest in derailing Iran's nuclear schemes
SIR – Allister Heath is correct in his condemnation of Sir Keir Starmer and Labour for their failings over Israel and Iran ('Trump and Netanyahu are saving the decadent West from its demons', Comment, June 19). I have been impressed by the Israelis' operations against Iran so far, and hope they will be supported to finish the job. Those who value Western freedom should be backing them, and Britain should be standing shoulder-to-shoulder with its allies. Yet Sir Keir, David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, and Lord Hermer, the Attorney General ('Hermer: War on Iran may be illegal', report, June 19), have proved an embarrassment. It is also worth remembering that the weakness of multiple European and American leaders allowed Iran to reach the point it is at now. Huw Bell Wetherby, West Yorkshire SIR – Has there ever been an occasion when Lord Hermer's interventions and advice have reflected what most of us consider to be the national interest? Bob Hart Newark, Nottinghamshire SIR – With our Government in the hands of international lawyers, our enemies may rest assured that we are more likely to prosecute our own soldiers than a war against them. Michael Staples Seaford, East Sussex SIR – Charles Moore (Comment, June 17) is absolutely right that we owe real debts to Ukraine and Israel. Ukraine deserves full-hearted support against the tyranny of Vladimir Putin, which menaces all of Europe. Israel has been on the front line fighting Islamist tyranny for almost 50 years. Western calls for 'de-escalation' in Israel's astonishing and understandable offensive against that tyranny are misplaced. Never forget that the Ayatollahs of Iran have spent almost five decades trying to murder the Jewish people of Israel. By contrast, the Israelis seek only to destroy Iran's genocidal regime, and hope then to live in peace with the Iranian people, as they did until the Islamists overthrew the Shah in 1979. William Shawcross London W2 SIR – After the G7, which Donald Trump left early, Britain and its European allies must realise they can no longer be sure of American support in the defence of Ukraine or their own borders. We've seen the vulnerability of Ukraine, Israel and Iran to attacks from the air, and have nothing like their air-defence capabilities. Arbitrary percentages of GDP, which include all manner of non-defence-related expenditure, are blatantly insufficient. Now is the time to cut the rhetoric and prepare adequately for the threats we know are out there. Gp Capt Ron Powell (retd) Barry, Glamorgan