Plaid MP calls for new nuclear project at Wylfa, Anglesey
Llinos Medi, along with the Nuclear Industry Association, brought together industry and political leaders for the Wylfa Future Roundtable on June 6.
The aim of the meeting was to discuss the potential of a new nuclear development on Anglesey.
Ms Medi said that this project would be 'transformational' for Ynys Môn and vital for the UK's long-term energy security.
The roundtable was attended by union leaders, academics, Anglesey County Council representatives, businesses, and nuclear industry experts.
They all discussed the future of nuclear power in north Wales.
The event highlighted the 'unique potential' of Wylfa as a leading site for nuclear innovation.
Ms Medi also called on the UK Government to 'urgently clarify its commitment' to the Wylfa project.
She said: "Last week, I was proud to host alongside the Nuclear Industry Association, a cross-party roundtable discussion with unions, academics, Anglesey County Council, local businesses, and industry experts on the future of nuclear at Wylfa.
READ MORE:
Plan to build annexe in 'picture postcard' village is 'lesser of two evils'
Seaside hotel in Gwynedd sold after more than 40 years of family ownership
"This group, representing both the local community and industry, are united in our call for the UK to develop a new nuclear project at Wylfa.
"This would be transformational for jobs and livelihoods on the island and north Wales as well as providing energy security for decades for the entire United Kingdom.
"The UK Government must urgently clarify its commitment to a new project at Europe's best nuclear site at Wylfa."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Spending war of words will only heat up as Holyrood election looms
The battle lines have been well and truly drawn ahead of 2026 Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It didn't take long for the traditional war of words to kick off between ministers north and south of the Border. The Chancellor's spending review was a blizzard of big numbers. Rachel Reeves said it would deliver an average block grant for Scotland of £50.9 billion per year over the next three years. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This is the largest settlement in real terms since devolution was introduced, she said. UK ministers said it amounted to an extra £9.1 billion for the Scottish Government over the review period. Chancellor Rachel Reeves | PA 'That's more money than ever before for them to invest in Scottish public services like our NHS, police, housing and schools,' said Scottish Secretary Ian Murray. Keen Holyrood watchers will not be surprised to hear that Shona Robison, the SNP's Finance Secretary, took a different view. She insisted Scotland was yet again being treated 'as an afterthought'. 'Today's settlement for Scotland is particularly disappointing, with real terms growth of 0.8 per cent a year for our overall block grant, which is lower than the average for UK departments,' she said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Had our resource funding for day-to-day priorities grown in line with the UK Government's overall spending, we would have £1.1 billion more to spend on our priorities over the next three years. 'In effect, Scotland has been short-changed by more than a billion pounds.' Analysis by experts such as those at the Fraser Of Allander Institute (FAI), attached to Strathclyde University, helps cut through some of the noise. The wider UK picture, it said, is one of 'largesse in the short-run' followed by cuts in future years. On the day-to-day spending side, the Scottish Government's funding does indeed grow at an average of 0.8 per cent a year after accounting for inflation. This is lower than forecast by the independent Scottish Fiscal Commission last month. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We have seen some Labour MPs and MSPs describing this event as increasing the block grant by £9.1 billion over the spending review period,' experts at the FAI wrote in a blog post. 'While it is true that Barnett consequentials add up to this figure (across different periods for resource and capital), this doesn't seem like a particularly transparent or helpful way of describing the changes. 'It essentially assumes that no additional funding would have been made available for the Scottish Government in cash terms relative to that in 2025/26 – which is not a credible baseline. 'A much more insightful – though perhaps less cheery – conclusion from looking at the SFC's forecast is that by 2028/29, funding will be £0.7 billion lower than their central estimate published on 29 May.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad David Phillips, from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the increase in the Scottish Government's day-to-day funding was frontloaded, at 1.2 per cent in 2026/27, then 0.6 per cent and 0.7 per cent in subsequent years. 'With devolved elections looming, this poses a risk: it will be easier to fund any pledges/giveaways around the time of the election than later years,' he wrote on social media. 'Parties need to avoid the temptation to promise unfunded 'goodies'; their pledges will need to be carefully scrutinised. 'While the Scottish Government's budget will increase overall, the NHS could easily absorb all of the increase - necessitating cuts to other spending. 'That's particularly likely from 2027/28 onwards, due to combo of smaller increases in UK funding and devolved tax and benefit forecasts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It's perfectly legitimate for the Scottish Government to prioritise benefits and public sector pay rises - but without further tax rises that will squeeze many services even more than in the rest of the UK.' Of course, there were other big announcements for Scotland in the spending review, not least money for a long-awaited carbon capture project in Aberdeenshire. The Acorn facility, which had previously been overlooked in favour of schemes down south, is in line for 'development funding' from the UK Government, although it is not clear how much money is actually on the table. Ms Robison said the Scottish Government had been provided with no figures and no timeframe. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Elsewhere, the Chancellor confirmed up to £750 million in funding for the creation of a supercomputer at Edinburgh University, which could be one of the most powerful in the world. The plan had previously been scrapped by Ms Reeves in the early weeks of her Government taking office. There was also an initial investment of £250 million over the next three years in the Faslane naval base, the home of the UK's nuclear deterrent, while Glasgow will benefit from wider munitions funding. Increased cash for the NHS and housing in England will see more money flow north to Scotland, and SNP ministers will be under pressure to pass this on. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "What we have done previously is we have passed on health resource consequentials and [then] some, going back years and years,' Ms Robison told journalists in Holyrood. "We haven't just matched health resource consequentials, but we've given more than that. So that has been our pattern of investment in the health service previously." But as the Holyrood election looms next year, it is clear the war of words over spending - and who is to blame for the state of public services - will only heat up. In a briefing for Scottish journalists, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said the spending review will mean £2.9 billion extra for Scotland each year.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves seized her moment – whatever the future brings, Labour's economic course is now set
The consensus has long been that the 2025 spending review would be a defining moment for Keir Starmer's government. For once, the consensus proved spot-on. The government's main priorities were set out on Wednesday in a blizzard of Commons announcements from Rachel Reeves, some economically substantive, others more for show. The upshot is that the shape of the British state, as Labour intends it, is now decided until the eve of the next election. There are further crossroads still to come, some of them major, as the years covered by the review unroll. Taxes are likely to rise, probably as soon as the autumn budget, to pay for Reeves's big ticket boosts on Wednesday for defence, health and housing. Council tax could rise too, with possibly dramatic results. The review's emphasis on capital spending means current spending could be squeezed again, perhaps heralding pay battles. Nevertheless, Labour has set its course. The administrative purpose of the spending review is to define where money is spent in the British state. But the review is also a defining political and cultural moment. It sets out the choices by which the government will stand or fall, and which aim to locate an electoral sweet spot. That spot, still elusive and distant despite Labour's Holyrood byelection win last week, is one in which, as Reeves put it, a sense of renewal 'is felt in people's everyday lives'. Politically, this speech was a moment of truth for the chancellor herself. Reeves has had a tough first year. Some of the grind she will have expected, some of it not. The year has been dominated by the winter fuel allowance blunder, which was not hers alone but which she inevitably owns. She has maintained a dogged commitment to her strict fiscal rules – she repeated it in Wednesday's speech – in spite of new global shocks that might allow her to adapt them. Lacklustre macroeconomic out-turns have not helped; inflation and unemployment have both ticked up. Last summer's donations row and questions about the truthfulness of her personal CV have done her no favours either. The bookies were starting to mark down the Cabinet Office minister, Pat McFadden, as a potential successor before Reeves spoke. But Reeves did more than enough in her speech to put the lid on that, at least for now. The muttering against her lacks momentum, since it comes from the usual backbench and union critics. Cabinet support, not least from Starmer himself, is meanwhile described as rock solid. 'She is universally popular and respected for being straight,' a minister says. If Starmer removed her he would find himself in trouble too. Even so, when Reeves addressed MPs on Wednesday she had something to prove. If her career was not on the line, her authority was. A well-connected former Whitehall mandarin put it very clearly to me a couple of days ago. 'It really is a pivotal time for her,' he said. 'It has been a really difficult first year. The inheritance was genuinely bad. But the response has blunted her reputation and her options. The main problem is that the government has still not successfully made clear what kind of Britain it is trying to create. If she is to make that vision clear, then this is the time she absolutely needs to do it.' To understand Reeves, it is important to go back to her record as shadow chancellor. Much of her approach was set out in two speeches. The first, given in Washington DC in May 2023, launched the idea of 'securonomics', which she echoed on Wednesday. The Washington speech was the historically bolder of the two. It amounted to an obituary for the era of borderless economic globalisation. It placed national economic security, both for the country and for the public, at the centre of strategy. The second, Reeves's Mais lecture in March 2024, filled this out more watchfully, because the election was nearing. It emphasised the active role of the state in curbing economic decline and inequality, and emphasising the centrality of growth. The connection between those speeches and the announcements this week is clearly umbilical. The spending review's main focus – defence, health and levelling up – is rooted in the securonomics approach. Reeves may be one of Labour's most pragmatic ministers. But this absolutely does not mean that she is merely a technocrat without priorities. Indeed she has described herself, in my hearing, as a social democrat. I am reasonably certain she still would. Her record and her priorities bear it out. So did Wednesday's speech. Her reform of Treasury policy towards growth outside London is a striking example. Few in the cabinet have such a visceral commitment to social and economic mobility. For her, as she made clear on Wednesday, this is personal. Nevertheless, some of what Reeves said in opposition is simply no longer valid. In particular, the assumption in both speeches that the US shares Britain's values and is a partner for stability has been comprehensively trashed by Donald Trump. Nor, despite the fact that they were given after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, do Reeves's speeches from opposition contain any hint of the much higher priority now earmarked for defence spending. True, Reeves is not a chancellor who panders to the parts of the Labour coalition whose priorities are unchanged since the middle of the last century. But, as the railways and energy already show, she is open to different ownership models. She was quick to settle with the unions on pay last summer. And she absolutely does not believe, as Liz Truss did, that the key is for government to get out of the way. Ever since she became chancellor, many have been uncertain about whether Reeves can pitch a vision strongly enough to connect with the wider public. She allowed herself to be dubbed an iron chancellor, but she then got involved in the donations furore. Why does she insist on such a tight policy at the Treasury, some ask? The answer is either that she and Starmer think they have no alternative in the circumstances; or, it's that they are doing it this way because they actually believe in it. Yesterday's Commons speech was clearly an attempt to show that it is the former not the latter, and given fewer constraints the outlook might be very different. Reeves said repeatedly that her choices were 'Labour choices'. So often was this claim made that it all became a bit insistent, but the purpose was clear. It was to stake out distinct centre-left ideological ground for tackling the hazards of the 2020s. Though some will dispute it, it is the thread that runs through the whole of Reeves's career. The test now is whether that essentially social democratic approach of growing the economy and then redistributing the proceeds will work in today's world, especially given the entrenched imbalances of the British economy and the increasing volatility of British politics. Martin Kettle is a Guardian columnist
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Winter Fuel Payment scams rise and how to avoid them
The payment was only available to pensioners receiving Pension Credit or other means-tested benefits. It will now be made to anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year, but many pensioners are unsure on whether they qualify. "There's a lot of confusion about who qualifies and who doesn't," says Fiona Peake, Personal Finance Expert at Ocean Finance. "Simply put, if you're over state pension age and your total annual income is £35,000 or less, you'll receive the payment. This includes income from private pensions, freelance work, and interest on non-ISA savings." The full details were announced here. Millions of pensioner households faced unaffordable energy costs last winter. While the changes will provide some relief to these households, there will still be pensioners unable to afford the high cost of energy and living in cold damp homes. So now the Government must focus… — End Fuel Poverty Coalition (@EndFuelPoverty) June 9, 2025 "It'll land in your bank account automatically, likely in November or December," says Fiona. "No forms, no calls, no claims. For those who know they'll be over the income limit, there'll be a way to opt out of the payment completely, to avoid having to repay it later but the government hasn't said exactly how yet. "The Winter Fuel Payment will be a lifeline for nearly two million older households who are living in fuel poverty, but the new eligibility criteria make things more complicated. A single pensioner earning £36,000 a year could have to pay back the full amount, while a couple earning £69,000 could keep every penny. That creates grey area scammers love to exploit." Devolved authorities in Scotland and Northern Ireland will each receive a funding uplift so they too can meet the new threshold. Independent Age chief executive Joanna Elson said: 'We are pleased that the UK Government has listened to the voices of older people on a low income and reconsidered what was an incredibly damaging change to the winter fuel payment. 'By widening the eligibility criteria, more older people in financial hardship will now receive this vital lifeline in time for winter. 'Our helpline receives thousands of calls from older people making drastic cutbacks just to get by and the changes to the winter fuel payment made this worse. For millions living on low incomes, the entitlement supports them to turn their heating on and stock up on food during the colder months. 'While the changes to the winter fuel payment are positive, they are not a silver bullet that will end pensioner poverty.' Recommended reading: What to do if you think you have been the victim of a scam First up, don't panic, and don't blame yourself - it's easily done. The sooner you report it, the better. Siobhan Blagbrough, Financial Crime Manager at Ocean Finance, says: 'Fraudsters often pounce on government announcements to trick people when the public is most likely to be unsure of the rules. We're already seeing fake messages pretending to be from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), urging pensioners to 'apply now' or risk missing out on their £300 payment. "These scam texts often include fake links and ask for personal details or for people to reply 'YES' to claim the payment. These messages are bogus. The DWP has confirmed that eligible households will receive the money automatically, and no application is needed. 'If you've already clicked a link or given details, contact your bank immediately. You can also report it to Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040. Above all, trust your instincts. Genuine government payments won't be sent via text messages with links or requests for personal information.'
