logo
Winter Fuel Payment scams rise and how to avoid them

Winter Fuel Payment scams rise and how to avoid them

The payment was only available to pensioners receiving Pension Credit or other means-tested benefits.
It will now be made to anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year, but many pensioners are unsure on whether they qualify.
"There's a lot of confusion about who qualifies and who doesn't," says Fiona Peake, Personal Finance Expert at Ocean Finance.
"Simply put, if you're over state pension age and your total annual income is £35,000 or less, you'll receive the payment. This includes income from private pensions, freelance work, and interest on non-ISA savings."
The full details were announced here.
Millions of pensioner households faced unaffordable energy costs last winter.
While the changes will provide some relief to these households, there will still be pensioners unable to afford the high cost of energy and living in cold damp homes.
So now the Government must focus… https://t.co/ncvxLnEdPI — End Fuel Poverty Coalition (@EndFuelPoverty) June 9, 2025
"It'll land in your bank account automatically, likely in November or December," says Fiona. "No forms, no calls, no claims. For those who know they'll be over the income limit, there'll be a way to opt out of the payment completely, to avoid having to repay it later but the government hasn't said exactly how yet.
"The Winter Fuel Payment will be a lifeline for nearly two million older households who are living in fuel poverty, but the new eligibility criteria make things more complicated. A single pensioner earning £36,000 a year could have to pay back the full amount, while a couple earning £69,000 could keep every penny. That creates grey area scammers love to exploit."
Devolved authorities in Scotland and Northern Ireland will each receive a funding uplift so they too can meet the new threshold.
Independent Age chief executive Joanna Elson said: 'We are pleased that the UK Government has listened to the voices of older people on a low income and reconsidered what was an incredibly damaging change to the winter fuel payment.
'By widening the eligibility criteria, more older people in financial hardship will now receive this vital lifeline in time for winter.
'Our helpline receives thousands of calls from older people making drastic cutbacks just to get by and the changes to the winter fuel payment made this worse. For millions living on low incomes, the entitlement supports them to turn their heating on and stock up on food during the colder months.
'While the changes to the winter fuel payment are positive, they are not a silver bullet that will end pensioner poverty.'
Recommended reading:
What to do if you think you have been the victim of a scam
First up, don't panic, and don't blame yourself - it's easily done. The sooner you report it, the better.
Siobhan Blagbrough, Financial Crime Manager at Ocean Finance, says: 'Fraudsters often pounce on government announcements to trick people when the public is most likely to be unsure of the rules. We're already seeing fake messages pretending to be from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), urging pensioners to 'apply now' or risk missing out on their £300 payment.
"These scam texts often include fake links and ask for personal details or for people to reply 'YES' to claim the payment. These messages are bogus. The DWP has confirmed that eligible households will receive the money automatically, and no application is needed.
'If you've already clicked a link or given details, contact your bank immediately. You can also report it to Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040. Above all, trust your instincts. Genuine government payments won't be sent via text messages with links or requests for personal information.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Move faster on firms' public contracts ban, Grenfell survivor urges Government
Move faster on firms' public contracts ban, Grenfell survivor urges Government

Leader Live

time27 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Move faster on firms' public contracts ban, Grenfell survivor urges Government

Bereaved and survivors of the blaze will gather on Saturday in west London for the annual commemoration of the disaster which claimed 72 lives. It is likely to be the final anniversary which takes place with the tower still standing in its current form, as demolition work could begin in September. Former tower resident Edward Daffarn, who had previously raised safety concerns and predicted a 'catastrophic event' at the tower seven months before the fire, said this year's memorial will be 'all the more poignant' for that reason. But Mr Daffarn is hopeful a new documentary about the blaze, due to air on Netflix next week, will spur Government efforts to take action against companies linked to fire. He told the PA news agency: 'One thing that this documentary needs to do is it needs to put pressure on the Government to ensure that the companies involved are not able to access public funding, and I'm hoping that this documentary will accelerate that process.' The Cabinet office confirmed in February that seven companies were facing possible bans – cladding firm Arconic, insulation firm Kingspan, former Celotex owners Saint-Gobain, fire inspectors Exova, design and build contractor Rydon, architect Studio E and subcontractor Harley Facades. It is understood investigations were launched into all of them in March, looking into whether any engaged in professional misconduct for the purposes of the Procurement Act 2023, potentially leading them to be debarred from public contracts. No timeline has been given for how long it might be before outcomes are known. The final Grenfell Tower Inquiry report, published in September, concluded victims, bereaved and survivors were 'badly failed' through incompetence, dishonesty and greed. The west London tower block was covered in combustible products because of the 'systematic dishonesty' of firms who made and sold the cladding and insulation, inquiry chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick said. He called out 'deliberate and sustained' manipulation of fire-safety testing, misrepresentation of test data and misleading of the market. Mr Daffarn said the documentary will be the first 'that truly exposes and brings into people's living rooms' the 'cowardice of the corporates and how profit was put before people'. He said; 'I hope that people who watch the documentary come to understand that although Grenfell happened eight years ago, there's a lot that still hasn't been resolved and, as a consequence, the companies involved with Grenfell just seem to want to brush everything under the carpet and carry on making money. 'And I think the documentary clearly exposes how little these companies and individuals have been held to account for their roles in Grenfell.' On Government efforts, which Sir Keir Starmer first announced last September, to debar companies, Mr Daffarn said the process is 'too slow' and bereaved and survivors are 'still waiting' for companies to face consequences. He said anyone left angered by the documentary could avoid buying products from companies criticised in the report to 'make sure that those companies understand that there is a consequence of their actions'. Bereaved and survivors have long campaigned for criminal charges to be brought over the disaster. Police and prosecutors have previously said investigators would need until the end of 2025 to complete their inquiry, with final decisions on potential criminal charges by the end of 2026. The near 10-year wait for justice has been described by families as 'unbearable'. The decision to bring the tower block down was confirmed earlier this year and prompted mixed reaction, with some people feeling their views had not been properly taken into consideration. Sharing his own opinion, and acknowledging the difficulty others feel in seeing the tower regularly, Mr Daffarn said: 'I think the anniversary is made all the more poignant by the fact that this is the last time that we will meet with the tower in situ. 'We haven't got justice yet. It feels wrong to be pulling the tower down while so much remains unresolved.' The Government said while some had hoped the building could remain in place as a reminder of what happened, others had reported this would be 'too painful'. The demolition process is expected to take around two years. A Government spokesperson said: 'As we approach the eighth anniversary of the Grenfell Tower tragedy, our thoughts remain with the bereaved families, survivors and the immediate community. 'This government remains committed to ensuring that what happened at Grenfell is never forgotten, and to delivering the change needed so it can never happen again.'

Starmer's approach to global trade is clearly not ‘pragmatic' at all
Starmer's approach to global trade is clearly not ‘pragmatic' at all

The National

time29 minutes ago

  • The National

Starmer's approach to global trade is clearly not ‘pragmatic' at all

The UK Government estimates that annual economic output will be a stunning 0.1% higher by 2040 than it would have been without the India trade deal. In contrast, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) noted in Spring 2023 that Brexit's impact in the long run reduces our overall output by around 4% compared with what we would have had we remained in the EU. The amount gained by the 'landmark' India deal is therefore one-fortieth of the amount lost due to Brexit. READ MORE: UK-India post-Brexit free trade deal agreed after years of negotiation Prime Minister Starmer has described the Indian trade deal as a 'pragmatic' approach to global trade. Such an approach would, however, involve the UK Government restoring frictionless trade with the UK's largest trading partner, the European Union. If the UK Government were looking to deliver a 'pragmatic' approach on the economic front, Sir Keir would be looking to get the UK back into the European single market as soon as possible. This would be far more productive than trying to deliver trade deals with far-off countries and deliver immensely higher economic benefits than the paltry 0.1% generated by the India trade deal. Alex Orr Edinburgh THE world must be having laugh at Starmer as they did with Boris Johnson. Starmer considered he had done well to claim first prize with his Trump deal, being the first in the world to do so. Then along came Joseph Stiglitz, an American Nobel-prize-winning economist, on Laura Kuenssberg's Sunday show stating that Trump's method for changing his business bargaining tariffs is to choose the weakest first, then move on to the other countries, which is indeed what he did with the UK. READ MORE: Scottish care sector chief compares Keir Starmer to Enoch Powell in damning comments Stiglitz was a breath of fresh air in his interview, even stating that Scotland did things differently to Westminster especially where student fees are concerned. Starmer behaved like a school boy bringing an apple for his teacher when he presented Trump with an invitation for tea with King Charles. 'What a pushover', Trump must have thought, 'this guy is gonna be no trouble.' And so it was with Starmer claiming a success story with his 10% tariff in exchange for the 1.8% tariff on UK goods to America. Even more than before Brexit when we were part of the EU market. Alan Magnus-Bennett Fife STARMER'S Trump appeasement and grovelling is reaching the point where we're all reaching for the sick bag. Put aside the smarm-fest that was the 'royal' invitation. Put aside the bizarre trade deal, with oligarch-pal and yacht-botherer Peter Mandelson first lapping it up at Trump's left shoulder before looking like a puppet with cut strings when a real reporter (Scottish) pointed out it was all smoke and mirrors. Put aside all the UK's debasement. READ MORE: Police and fire brigade attend fire at Keir Starmer's house I ask again, when is enough going to be enough? Presidential adviser Stephen Miller, creep of creeps, has just announced a possible end to habeas corpus – the foundation stone of the most basic democracies. This follows the deportation of US citizens by ICE and Trump's befuddlement over whether or not he has to 'follow the constitution'. I just wait to see who Westminster will send along to represent Britain (England) at Trump's birthday military parade. Yes – the military parade for the draft dodger who has mocked veterans and banned transgender people from serving in the US military. Might I nominate Tony Blair as the perfect envoy to watch real heroes march by as slimeballs look down from a gold balcony? Amanda Baker Edinburgh I KNOW that modern journalists are generally illiterate about anything to do with religion these days but I would have thought that a journalist for The National would know a little more about the Scottish Catholic Church than shown in your article of May 9 on the election of Pope Leo XIV. The journalist quotes 'international development charity Cafod' about the Pope, obviously oblivious to the fact that this is the aid and development agency of the Catholic Church in England and Wales. Scotland's equivalent, Sciaf (Scottish Catholic International Aid Fund) is ignored, as is any source from the Scottish Catholic Church. READ MORE: Richard Murphy: Pope Leo can yield power stronger than political force The Vatican is the only state in the world which recognises Scotland as a separate entity from the rest of the UK. The then Pope Leo XXIII restored the Scottish hierarchy in 1878 and the current Scottish Bishops' Conference was born. The current pontiff has taken the name of Leo because he wants to acknowledge Leo XXIII's first modern Catholic Social Teaching encyclical, Reurum Novarum, which protected the rights of workers at the height of the industrial revolution – a sign that he will follow in the footsteps of Pope Francis. By the way, Sciaf, which transforms the lives of the poor, not making them comfortable in their poverty, is at the top of the recipients of funds for projects from the Scottish Government's overseas development fund (which would be much bigger had we been independent, of course). Please note for the future! Dr Duncan MacLaren KCSG Glasgow Former Director of SCIAF and former Secretary General of the Vatican-based Caritas Internationalis I HAD to laugh about the RBS bank notes article in last Monday's National. For the last two years, the ATM inside the Falkirk branch of the RBS only appears to dispense English bank notes (seven out of seven visits). All part of the anglicisation of Scotland, after the Tories changed the name of the parent company from RBS to the NatWest (National Westminster) Group in 2020? A Wilson Stirlingshire

Rachel Reeves' £300 Winter Fuel Payment change and how pensioners can claim
Rachel Reeves' £300 Winter Fuel Payment change and how pensioners can claim

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Rachel Reeves' £300 Winter Fuel Payment change and how pensioners can claim

Earlier this month, Rachel Reeves said more people would qualify for Winter Fuel Payments - and now, more details of the changes and who will be eligible have been revealed Millions more pensioners will receive the Winter Fuel Payment this year after a major change to the eligibility criteria was announced by Labour today. Winter Fuel Payments used to be awarded to everyone over state pension age - but more than 10 million pensioners lost out on the cash last winter after new rules were introduced that limited who can get them. ‌ The update sparked major backlash from MPs and charities, who warned it would leave many older people in poverty at a time when energy bills are still high. ‌ Earlier this month, Rachel Reeves said more people would qualify for the payments "this winter" - and now, more details of the changes and who will be eligible have been revealed. What has been announced today? Under the current rules, you only receive the Winter Fuel Payment in England and Wales if you're over state pension age and receiving a means-tested benefit, such as Pension Credit. They used to be universally available to anyone over state pension age, regardless of their income or if they are in receipt of benefits. But now, the Government has announced that Winter Fuel Payments will be available to anyone over state pension age who has an income of, or below, £35,000 a year. If you earn above £35,000 a year, you will receive the payment - but then you will have to pay it back. The payment will be automatically recovered by HMRC via PAYE, or through self-assessment return. ‌ You can opt out of receiving the payment, with details to be confirmed. Winter Fuel Payments will still be issued per household, but the income eligibility is based per person. For example, if you have two people living together and one earns £30,000 a year and the other earns £40,000, one person would keep their share of the Winter Fuel Payment but the other would pay it back. Labour says approximately nine million pensioners will receive Winter Fuel Payments this year. In Scotland, the Winter Fuel Payment has been replaced with a new Pension Age Winter Heating Payment. ‌ What has Rachel Reeves said? This change will cost around £1.25billion in England and Wales and will save around £450million, subject to certification by the Office for Budget Responsibility, compared to the system of universal Winter Fuel Payments. Rachel Reeves said: 'Targeting Winter Fuel Payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government. 'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest. ‌ 'But we have now acted to expand the eligibility of the Winter Fuel Payment so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out. This will mean over three quarters of pensioners receiving the payment in England and Wales later this winter.' What have charities said? Independent Age Chief Executive Joanna Elson CBE said: 'We are pleased that the UK Government has listened to the voices of older people on a low income and reconsidered what was an incredibly damaging change to the Winter Fuel Payment. 'By widening the eligibility criteria, more older people in financial hardship will now receive this vital lifeline in time for winter. Our helpline receives thousands of calls from older people making drastic cutbacks just to get by and the changes to the Winter Fuel Payment made this worse. ‌ 'For millions living on low incomes, the entitlement supports them to turn their heating on and stock up on food during the colder months. While the changes to the Winter Fuel Payment are positive, they are not a silver bullet that will end pensioner poverty. 'Around two million older people still live in poverty, and measures must be taken to ensure the long-term financial security of all people in later life. 'There needs to be a cross-party consensus on the adequate income needed in later life to avoid financial hardship. Once this is established, every older person should be supported to receive this amount. Nobody should have to live in poverty as they age.' ‌ How much are Winter Fuel Payments worth? Winter Fuel Payments are worth £200 for eligible households, or £300 for eligible households with someone aged over 80. Your eligibility will be based on your age by the end of the qualifying week. The qualifying week changes every year, but for winter 2025/26, the qualifying week will be September 15 to September 21, 2025. How do I claim Winter Fuel Payments? Winter Fuel Payments are paid automatically - this means you should not need to apply for the cash. It will be paid directly into your bank account, normally from November, with most people paid by January. ‌ Payments can be paid all the way up until the following March. As we've mentioned above, if you earn above £35,000 a year, then you will have to pay the money back. Winter Fuel Payments are tax-free payment and do not affect any benefits you may receive. Who isn't eligible for Winter Fuel Payments? For the last round of Winter Fuel Payments, you weren't eligible if you: Were in hospital getting free treatment for more than a year Were in prison during the qualifying week Were living in a care home during the qualifying week You also weren't eligible if you lived in a care home for more than 13 weeks, including the qualifying week. Labour has not released any further details on whether this eligibility will still apply for this year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store