
Oman court fines furniture business RO 1,000 for Consumer Law violations
The case began when a customer filed a complaint with the Consumer Protection Department in Barka after the business failed to deliver five customised bedframes on time. The customer had paid an advance of RO 450 towards a total contract value of RO 870, with an agreement that the products would be ready within three weeks.
Despite repeated delays, the establishment did not meet the deadline, prompting the consumer to escalate the matter. After efforts to resolve the dispute amicably failed, the case was handed to the Public Prosecution, which referred it to the court.
The court convicted the business representatives of two offences: failing to provide the agreed service properly and not issuing a clear invoice in Arabic as proof of the transaction. Each representative was fined RO 500 for the first offence and RO 400 for the second. The penalties were merged, with the higher fine enforced, and the defendants were ordered to bear legal costs.
The Consumer Protection Authority reiterated the importance of compliance with consumer laws and regulations. It said it would take legal action against violators to protect consumer rights and maintain the integrity of commercial transactions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Observer
15 hours ago
- Observer
Rules issued for Promising Companies Market
BUSINESS REPORTER MUSCAT, AUG 10 The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has announced the issuance of regulations for the Promising Companies Market, a dedicated sub-market within the Muscat Stock Exchange (MSX) created under Royal Decree No. 18/2025. This initiative is part of broader efforts to strengthen Oman's capital market framework, open new financing channels for national companies, and prepare them for a smooth, phased integration into the main market. The regulations aim to create a well-defined legal and operational structure for listing promising enterprises—particularly startups, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and private or family-owned businesses—within a regulatory environment tailored to their needs. The framework provides financial and operational incentives to help such companies grow, improve governance, and achieve long-term sustainability. Under the new rules, companies can join the Promising Companies Market via two pathways: direct listing or indirect listing. Direct listing involves a company entering the market without raising capital or offering a portion of its shares for private subscription. To qualify, a firm must have recorded net profits over the past three years, achieved an average annual revenue growth of at least 14.4% during that period, and have a shareholder base of at least 20. Indirect listing entails raising capital or offering at least 20% of the company's shares through a private subscription. This method requires a minimum of two years of operational and financial performance. Notably, companies still in the establishment phase can opt for indirect listing without meeting the two-year requirement or submitting audited financial statements, provided they fulfil other stipulated conditions. The listing process has been designed for efficiency. Once all requirements are met, the FSA must respond to applications within three business days; if no reply is issued in that time, the application is deemed approved. However, the MSX reserves the right to delist companies that breach the regulations, following established procedures. Participation in the Promising Companies Market is limited to specific categories of qualified investors, including securities firms, insurance companies, the Social Security Fund, investment funds, and high-net-worth individuals with significant financial or market expertise. Companies listed on the market must comply with the International Financial Reporting Standards for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (IFRS-SME). This includes disclosing unaudited semi-annual financial statements within 30 days of the half-year's end and audited annual statements within 90 days of the fiscal year's close. They must also adhere to rules governing the disclosure of material information. To maintain market stability, founders' shares are subject to restrictions. For established companies, founders cannot sell shares for one year after listing, though up to 10% may be withdrawn under MSX guidelines. For companies under formation, share sales are prohibited until one fiscal year after registration, with possible extensions at the FSA's discretion. The regulations also outline service fees for listing and issuance, designed to minimise financial burdens on eligible firms. According to the FSA, this framework is a milestone in implementing the Royal Decree and reflects national goals to empower the private sector, foster value-added enterprises, and create an attractive investment climate that broadens Oman's economic base. — ONA


Observer
15 hours ago
- Observer
Oman Endowment Foundation unveils maiden real estate initiative
MUSCAT, AUG 10 In its first major action since being established by Royal Decree last November, the Oman Endowment Foundation (OEF) has invited local and international real estate developers to submit their prequalification credentials for potential partnerships in the development of awqaf properties in the Sultanate of Oman. OEF was created under Royal Decree No. 28/2024 with the objective of maximizing returns on endowment and Bayt Al-Mal assets through sustainable and innovative investments. Announcing its first real estate initiative, the Muscat-based Foundation said: 'In line with its strategic objectives, OEF invites qualified local and international real estate developers, alliances, and specialized investors to submit their prequalification documents for potential partnerships. This initiative includes select investment lands designated for real estate development.' According to the Foundation, future partnerships and investment models will be structured to suit different project needs. One approach is the Usufruct or Long-Term Lease Model, in which the developer is granted the right to use the endowment land for a defined period without any transfer of ownership. The developer assumes full responsibility for financing, developing, and operating the project, as well as bearing all associated commercial and financial risks. In return, OEF secures a fixed or escalating income stream, such as annual rent, while retaining complete ownership of the land both during and after the usufruct period. Another is the Sweat Equity Model, where the developer receives an equity stake in exchange for providing full project funding, technical management, and development expertise, and for assuming all operational and financial risks. In this model, the land remains under the Foundation's ownership or may be contributed as an equity stake if mutually agreed. OEF also offers an Equity Partnership, or Musharakah Model, based on a joint partnership between the Foundation and the investor. Here, OEF contributes the land as an in-kind share valued at fair market price at the start of the venture, while the investor contributes cash capital of equal or complementary value. The project is implemented jointly, with profits and losses shared in proportion to each party's capital contribution. Both partners retain rights in strategic decision-making, and any exit or termination is governed by the partnership agreement. 'OEF's initiative focuses on real estate projects that can be developed efficiently to generate significant returns and societal benefits,' the Foundation explained. 'This initiative is a core component of OEF's long-term vision and its strategy for endowment growth. OEF expects selected partners to conduct comprehensive highest-and-best-use analyses and detailed financial assessments for each land parcel during the subsequent Request for Proposal (RFP) stage.' The deadline for submission of qualifications is August 24, 2025, with the shortlist of qualified firms expected to be announced on September 7, 2025.


Observer
20 hours ago
- Observer
FSA appeals against verdict in Sweets of Oman case
MUSCAT: The Financial Services Authority (FSA), regulator of Oman's capital market and insurance sector, has appealed against a Primary Court ruling in Muscat that acquitted three board members of publicly listed Sweets of Oman, while imposing a substantial financial penalty on one board member and several executive management staff in an embezzlement case. The appeal, filed on July 29, 2025, is in response to the ruling of the Primary Court issued on June 30, 2025, in the suit brought against members of the Board of Directors of Sweets of Oman SAOG for their term of office from 2017 to 2019, along with a number of the company's executive employees. The case concerned a criminal matter related to serious violations that caused financial harm to the company and its shareholders, committed by one board member in collaboration with several executive management employees. The Primary Court, in its verdict, ordered certain members of the board and executive management to return an amount of RO 5 million in favor of the company and its shareholders, in addition to bearing court fees and expenses. It, however, acquitted three board members of liability, citing the lack of a causal link between them and the proven damages, as determined in the court's reasoning. This acquittal has now been contested by the Authority through its recent appeal filed recently. The court's ruling followed reports confirming that the company's losses and damages resulted from gross negligence in fulfilling the Board's legal and oversight duties, with major shortcomings in five key areas: failure to oversee bank loans, including obtaining loans without assessing their feasibility or impact and recording them at non-genuine values in the financial statements; approval of financial statements without internal audit review and confirmation of fictitious inventory at a branch; addition of financial assets without legal approval, a board resolution, or clear funding sources; failure to apply policies for writing off doubtful debts under International Accounting Standards; and suspicions of collusion by certain executive employees in inflating revenues and understating liabilities, coupled with the Audit Committee's failure to fulfil its duties in line with corporate governance principles for public joint-stock financial companies. The Authority emphasized that these practices resulted in the presentation of inaccurate and misleading financial data, harming the company's financial position and the interests of its shareholders. This ruling reflects the Omani judiciary's affirmation of the principle of personal liability for members of boards of directors of public joint-stock companies, which does not end with the expiry of their term of office but extends for five years from the date of the act or omission, under Article (18) of the Commercial Companies Law. FSA stressed the necessity for board members to carry out their legal and oversight responsibilities with competence and awareness, ensuring proper guidance of executive management without excessive interference in daily operations or neglect in follow-up and monitoring, thereby safeguarding financial procedures and protecting shareholders' rights. This approach is reinforced by Article (206) of the Commercial Companies Law, which states: 'The members of the Board of Directors shall be jointly liable towards the company, shareholders, and third parties for damages resulting from their joint actions in violation of the law, actions exceeding their powers, or any fraud, forgery, or error they commit during the performance of their duties, as well as for failing to act with the care of a prudent person under given circumstances.' It is noteworthy that the ruling was issued after the court merged two lawsuits filed against the company's board members and certain executive employees. The Financial Services Authority filed the first lawsuit in December 2022, followed by a second lawsuit filed by several major shareholders in July 2023. The Authority reaffirms its full commitment to promoting the principles of governance, transparency, and accountability, and to exercising its regulatory role in monitoring compliance by companies under its supervision and their boards of directors with applicable laws and regulations, based on the powers granted to it under the Commercial Companies Law No. (18/2019), including Article (207). It also calls on all parties to strictly comply with the applicable laws and regulations, and to refrain from any practices that could undermine the integrity and efficiency of markets or harm the rights of shareholders and investors. Caption: