
Karen Read: Expert From Trial Explains'Hos Long To Die In Cold' And Deleted Calls
The Karen Read trial, with its swirling allegations of murder, conspiracy and law enforcement cover-up became a national spectacle not just for its courtroom drama, but for the pivotal role that digital evidence played in shaping the narrative.
As a digital forensics expert myself, I found the case to be a textbook example of both the power and the pitfalls of technical evidence in the justice system. My recent conversation with Jessica Hyde, who testified as a digital forensics expert in the trial for the prosecution, underscored how critical our discipline has become; and how easily it can be misunderstood.
The Search: 'Hos Long To Die In Cold'
The trial's most debated digital artifact was a Google search from Jen McCabe's iPhone: 'hos long to die in cold.' The defense's expert in the first trial claimed this search occurred at 2:47 a.m., before the victim was found, implying prior knowledge. Hyde's testimony clarified that the timestamp reflected when the browser tab was opened, not when the search was performed. This misinterpretation arose from an over-reliance on automated forensic tools. "If the tools themselves did the job for us, we wouldn't need us as experts. We have to provide that nuanced meaning, because it is such technical work. You just can't rely on the results of the forensics tools,' Hyde said, echoing a principle I stress in the Continuing Legal Education classes I teach to attorneys.
Call Logs: User Deleted or Automated?
Another flashpoint was the accusation that McCabe deleted call logs to cover her tracks. Hyde's examination and testing revealed that the model and iOS version of McCabe's iPhone retained a maximum of 200 calls per type, automatically overwriting the oldest entries as new ones come in. This is standard device behavior, not evidence of user deletion. I have encountered this exact misconceptions in my own work, and particularly in commercial vehicle and trucking accident cases. As Hyde expressed in our interview, it is essential to test and validate before drawing conclusions.
Neutrality Above All: The True Role of the Expert
Hyde emphasized a point I adamantly agree with: digital forensic experts are not advocates for either side. Our mandate is to remain independent, to interpret data impartially, and to present findings—exculpatory or inculpatory—based solely on the evidence. 'Our entire job is to be neutral,' she explains. 'When we're hired, we're hired as an independent expert. They don't tell me what to find. They tell me my scope, and then I tell them my findings.' This independence is non-negotiable, and as I know from my own casework, it's often misunderstood by the public and even by some legal professionals.
Digital Forensics: Lessons For The Legal System
The Karen Read trial exposed the stakes of digital forensics in modern litigation. Hyde's experience mirrors my own, and highlights the urgent need for more education. Both for legal professionals and for experts themselves. As Hyde noted, 'the field is only getting more complex, with new data sources and evolving technology raising the bar for both technical skill and clear communication.' If an expert cannot explain technical findings in plain language to judges and juries, they can become a liability rather than an asset, independent of their findings.
Ultimately, the Read case is a cautionary tale: digital evidence is only as reliable as the expertise behind its interpretation. In a world where digital footprints are central to so many investigations, the integrity and clarity of our work as digital forensics experts has never mattered more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UnitedHealth says it is under a federal investigation and cooperating
EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) — Shares of UnitedHealth Group dove early Thursday after the health care giant said it was under a Department of Justice investigation. The company said it has started complying with both criminal and civil requests from federal investigators and it was cooperating with them. '(UnitedHealth) has a long record of responsible conduct and effective compliance,' the company said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing. Earlier this year, The Wall Street Journal said federal officials had launched a civil fraud investigation into how the company records diagnoses that lead to extra payments for its Medicare Advantage, or MA, plans. Those are privately run versions of the government's Medicare coverage program mostly for people ages 65 and over. The company's UnitedHealthcare business covers more than 8 million people as the nation's largest provider of Medicare Advantage plans. The business has been under pressure in recent quarters due to rising care use and rate cuts. UnitedHealth Group Inc. said in February that it wasn't aware of the start of any new activity as the paper reported. The company said Thursday that it reached out to the Justice Department 'after reviewing media reports about investigations into certain aspects of the company's participation in the Medicare program.' UnitedHealth runs one of the nation's largest health insurance and pharmacy benefits management businesses. It also operates a growing Optum business that provides care and technology support. Company shares have mostly shed value since December, when UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was fatally shot in midtown Manhattan on his way to the company's annual investor meeting. The stock price dropped 3%, or $9.63, to $283 shortly before markets opened Thursday. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CBS News
25 minutes ago
- CBS News
Man found unresponsive with gunshot wounds near train tracks on Chicago's Far South Side
A homicide investigation is underway after a man was found with gunshot wounds near train tracks on Chicago's Far South Side. According to Chicago police, a 37-year-old man was found unresponsive in the 2000 block of East 103rd Street just after 3:20 a.m. Police said the man, who had gunshot wounds to the torso and leg, was pronounced dead. The circumstances surrounding the shooting were not released by police. A homicide investigation is underway, police confirmed.


CBS News
25 minutes ago
- CBS News
DNA leads to an arrest 4 decades after murder, sexual assault of teens in California
Police have made an arrest in Arizona four decades after the cold-case murder and sexual assault of two teenagers who were attacked in a parked car in Northern California, officials said Wednesday. On December 19, 1984, the Shasta County Sheriff's Office was called to an incident in Burney, California by the California Highway Patrol. They found two 18-year-old victims, a male and a female, according to a news release from the office. The male victim, identified by police as Terrance Arndt, had sustained a gunshot wound. He was transported to an area hospital but died from his injuries. The female victim, who police did not identify, had been sexually assaulted. An investigation found that Arndt and the female victim were parked in Arndt's car talking near an area high school when an unknown person pulled up in a vehicle. Arndt tried to protect the female victim, but was shot. The female victim was then assaulted and left for dead, Shasta County Sheriff Michael L. Johnson said in a news conference. After the suspect left the scene, she drove Arndt's car for help until she was able to reach police. Johnson said that the crime "rocked the community for many years." An extensive investigation followed, Johnson said, including "thousands of hours" of case work. Detectives collected forensic evidence from the female victim's clothes, according to forensic genetic genealogy company Othram, and investigators also developed a DNA profile of the suspect. A man was arrested and charged in connection with the case, Othram said, but later cleared by the DNA profile. The DNA profile was entered into the Combined DNA Index System, a national database used by law enforcement to compare DNA profiles. There were no matches to any known individuals, Othram said. In 2024, the Shasta County Sheriff's Office revisited the case using forensic genetic genealogy, Johnson said. That led police to a suspect, identified as Roger Neil Schmidt Sr. Schmidt, now 64, would have been 23 at the time of the crime, police said. He also "strongly resembled" a sketch developed based on an account from the female victim, the sheriff's office said. Police determined that Schmidt was currently living in Tucson, Arizona but had lived in Burney, California in 1984. Detectives from the Shasta County Sheriff's Office traveled to the city to coordinate with the Tucson Police Department and obtain a search warrant. Police were able to collect a DNA sample from Schmidt and confirm that it matched the profile. Schmidt was arrested in Tucson on Saturday and charged with murder and sexual assault, police said. He made his first court appearance on Monday, CBS affiliate KOLD reported. He was in a wheelchair and using an oxygen tank. Schmidt is expected to be extradited to Shasta County, the sheriff's office said. Johnson said he hopes the arrest brings closure to the female victim and Arndt's family. He said that the families were informed of the arrest before the news conference. According to SFGate, Arndt was a star athlete at Burney High School before enrolling at Shasta College in Redding, California, where he lived at the time of his murder. "The resolution to this case is a bit bittersweet for us," Johnson said. "Although it's a monumental accomplishment for the investigators, for the agency and the closure of having a suspect in custody, it doesn't negate the fact that there is a family and families that have been forever impacted and will forever live with the trauma and the aftermath that was left behind for them."