NA legislative output soars, deliberation falls
The first year of the current National Assembly saw a surge in the crucial legislative activity, albeit much of that legislation was passed without required scrutiny and deliberation by its members (MNAs), the Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development And Transparency (Pildat) said in a report on Thursday.
The 16th National Assembly held its first sitting on February 29, 2024. Pildat, an independent think tank primarily focused on issues of democracy, governance, and public policy – stated that the house convened for fewer working days and fewer working hours compared to the previous assembly.
"With its first parliamentary year ending on February 28, 2025 (today), Pildat said, the 16th National Assembly "underwent a surge in crucial legislative activity" however, much of the legislation was passed without required scrutiny and deliberation by the MNAs.
The report titled 'Annual Performance Report of 16th National Assembly of Pakistan' compares the performance of the lower house of parliament during its first year with the first years of the 15th, 14th, 13th and 12th assemblies.
The report, authored and reviewed by Areeb Khan, Alena Sadiq and Aasiya Riaz, also highlights key issues faced by the country from February 2024 to February 2025 and how the National Assembly played its role in addressing them.
In its first year, the assembly convened for 93 sittings and worked for 212 hours compared to 96 sittings and 297 hours of the previous assembly. The cost of a working hour of the current assembly came to Rs60.08 million per hour, while the average budget per sitting in the first year stood at Rs136.96 million.
However, legislative output of the 16th National Assembly was significantly higher, with 47 bills passed in its first yeara staggering 370% increase from the 10 bills passed during the first year of the 15th National Assembly, Pildat said.
This heightened legislative activity included critical laws and the 26th Constitutional Amendment, most of which were rushed through without adequate time and scrutiny by the assembly and without being referred to relevant standing committees, according to the report.
"The first year of the 16th National Assembly thus saw the passage of significant legislation affecting judicial independence, tenures of services chiefs, electoral system, lenience to madressahs and curbing physical and digital civic freedoms," said the executive summary of the report.
"While the merits of these measures are hotly contested and debated, their hurried passage has raised further critical concerns about the legislature's ability and commitment to objective, citizen-centric and well-considered decisions."
Pildat said that the attendance of MNAs also declined to an average of 66% in the first year, down from 73% in the first year of the previous assembly. "It must be noted that cost per MNA to the taxpayers stood at Rs37.9 million during the currently assembly's first year.
According to data of the first year, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif attended only 17 sittings out of the total 93 or joined only 18% of the total sittings. Former prime minister Imran Khan had attended only 18 out of 96 or 19% sittings and his predecessor Nawaz Sharif attended seven of the 103 or 7% sittings.
In comparison, Opposition Leader Omar Ayub, attended 62 or 67% sittings in the year, up from 53 or 55% attendance of then Opposition Leader Shehbaz Sharif in first year of previous assembly. Ayub also remained the most vocal MNA with a recorded talk time of 13 hours and 28 minutes.
Overall, the report summed up that the 16th National Assembly showed a relatively weaker performance in terms of agenda items planned and disposed of, with 49.18% of the scheduled agenda items left over during its first year.
"The rate of agenda items left over indicates a casual approach and practice where significant portion of planned business remains incomplete in the National Assembly," the report said. "With political polarisation at an all-time high, the assembly has struggled to build consensus on national priorities."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Achakzai is Imran's new pick for NA opp leader
In a move that might have come as a rude shock to many PTI leaders, Imran Khan, the jailed founder of the embattled party, has nominated the maverick chief of PkMAP, Mahmood Khan Achakzai, for opposition leader in the National Assembly. Achakzai's nomination has provided grist to the rumour mill, churning out reports that Imran is increasingly unhappy with the PTI leaders over their failure to mount a formidable challenge against the coalition government which he accuses of stealing his party's mandate. The development comes days after the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) disqualified Omar Ayub Khan and Shibli Faraz earlier this month following their convictions in the May 9 cases. Both were formally de-notified as opposition leaders respectively in the National Assembly and the Senate on August 8, along with several other opposition members in the National Assembly and provincial legislatures. PTI Secretary General Salman Akram Raja told reporters outside the Supreme Court on Wednesday that Imran had also nominated Senator Azam Swati as Leader of the Opposition in the Senate. He added that the PTI founder had sought five names from the party for nomination to the post of Leader of the Opposition in the Punjab Assembly. Raja further said that Imran had tasked the party's political committee with finalising its strategy for the upcoming by-elections on seats that fell vacant after the disqualification of lawmakers in the May 9 cases. The committee was scheduled to meet later in the day to make decisions, he added. He confirmed that Achakzai, who currently heads the Tehreek-e-Tahaffuz Ayeen-e-Pakistan (TTAP), would replace Omar Ayub in the National Assembly. In a separate address in Lahore, Raja urged political forces to unite against what he termed oppression and arbitrary arrests. "It does not matter where you come from or which party you belong to - if you have empathy, we are together," he said. "For the permanence of humanity and dignity, this struggle has to be fought." He warned that "anyone can be detained for any reason" under the prevailing circumstances, adding that "the only law in this country is fear." Raja assured party supporters that the PTI leadership would take their struggle to "every available forum." He said the wider movement was not just about the party's politics but about protecting fundamental rights. "What does the supremacy of law and the Constitution mean? It means having the right to protest under Article 17. Article 15 allows free movement. Article 19 gives us the right to raise and spread our voice together," he noted. He also spoke about the plight of farmers and the poor across the country, saying: "I listened to people in Sindh, it brought tears to my eyes. But this suffering is not limited to Sindh - it is everywhere." Calling for a united front, the PTI leader said, "We all have rights and we are all human. If we fail to act, those rights will erode further." Referring to the devastation caused by floods, Raja said they were not purely natural disasters but were aggravated by "human greed and mismanagement." "We need to eradicate this greed in the same way our forests are being cut down. If we do not stand up now, we may lose the ability to raise our voice altogether," he warned.
Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PHC halts opposition leaders' appointment
The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Wednesday issued notices to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), seeking a reply over the disqualification of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leaders Omar Ayub Khan and Senator Shibli Faraz, and their subsequent de-notification as Leaders of the Opposition in the National Assembly and Senate. A two-member bench comprising Justice Waqar Ahmad and Justice Kamran Hayat Miankhel heard the petitions filed by the PTI leaders. During proceedings, the court extended the stay order restraining the appointment of new opposition leaders in both houses of Parliament until the next hearing. Barrister Gohar Khan, counsel for the petitioners, argued that Ayub and Faraz were duly elected Leaders of the Opposition in their respective houses but were de-notified after the ECP declared them disqualified on August 5. He noted that an anti-terrorism court in Faisalabad had earlier sentenced them, along with other PTI members, to 10 years' imprisonment on July 31. The counsel contended that the office of the opposition leader is a constitutional position under Assembly Rule 39, and once elected as a member of Parliament, the ECP has no authority to disqualify a lawmaker. He added that the Supreme Court has previously ruled that the ECP cannot unilaterally disqualify members. "The ECP has acted beyond its constitutional mandate," Barrister Gohar told the bench. He argued that the Speaker National Assembly had not referred any reference against Omar Ayub, nor had the Senate Chairman done so in Shibli Faraz's case. "The commission initiated the action on its own, which is unconstitutional and unlawful," he added. Additional Attorney General Sanaullah, representing the government, submitted that currently there are no opposition leaders in either house, stressing that Parliament cannot function without them. He urged the court to lift the restraining order so that new opposition leaders could be appointed. In response, Barrister Gohar argued that the PTI still holds the largest number of opposition seats and that the position rightfully belongs to the party. "In autumn, not as many leaves fall as our members have been disqualified," he remarked, accusing the ECP of politically motivated action. The Special Secretary Law of the ECP informed the court that the commission's written reply has not yet been submitted and requested more time. The bench extended the stay order, barring the ECP from taking further action against the petitioners, and adjourned the hearing while seeking replies from both the ECP and the Attorney General in the next session.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Forces regain extended detention powers with Senate nod
The Pakistan armed forces reiterated their commitment to eradicating terrorism, emphasising their solidarity with the nation in this ongoing fight. SCREENGRAB Following its passage in the National Assembly, the Senate on Tuesday approved the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill 2025, restoring powers that allow law enforcement agencies and the armed forces to detain suspects for up to three months, a move that sparked uproar from the opposition benches. Minister of State for Interior and Narcotics Control Muhammad Talal Badar tabled the bill, which amends sub-section (1) of Section 11EEEE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. According to the amendment, "the government or, where the provisions of Section 4 have been invoked, the armed forces or civil armed forces for a period not exceeding three months and after recording reasons thereof, issue order for the preventative detention of any person." The bill states that persons suspected of activities against national security, including target killing, kidnapping for ransom and extortion, can be detained for three months, adding that it applies "against whom sufficient grounds exist of his having been so concerned, for purpose of inquiry". Detentions extending beyond this threshold will be subject to Article 10 of the Constitution, which provides safeguards with respect to arrest and detention. Under the new arrangement, if a detention order is issued by the army or civil forces, the investigation will be handled by a joint investigation team. "The inquiry will be conducted by no police officer below the rank of Superintendent of Police, Intelligence agencies, civil armed forces, armed forces, and other law enforcing agencies," the bill adds. While JUI-F's Senator Kamran Murtaza attempted to move amendments, they were rejected by majority vote as the House passed the law clause-by-clause. According to its statement of objects, the current security outlook requires "a robust response that goes beyond the existing legal framework". The bill explains that previous powers under Section 11EEEE, which lapsed in 2016 due to a sunset clause, needed to be "re-inserted to empower the government, Armed Forces and Civil Armed Forces with the necessary authority to detain individuals who pose a significant threat to national security". The government contends the provision would allow for preventive detention based on credible information or reasonable suspicion, enabling authorities to disrupt terror plots before they mature. 'Urgency must not eclipse wisdom' Defending the legislation, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar told senators, "Currently, the country is facing the menace of terrorism and amendments proposed by Syed Naveed Qamar have already been incorporated to make it more effective." He pointed out the bill had passed judicial scrutiny and included a three-year sunset clause. He further clarified that under Clause 2 of the amendment, the detainee would have presented before the Magistrate within 24 hours. However, PTI's Barrister Syed Ali Zafar urged caution, stating: "Some of its clauses are against the law and Constitution, so the bill should be referred to the committee." "Today we are being asked to amend one of the most powerful — and most controversial — laws in our statute book: the Anti-Terrorism Act," the opposition lawmaker said, adding that the law first came into being under extraordinary circumstances to protect Pakistan from extraordinary threats. "But as lawmakers, we must always remember: every extraordinary power given to the state can both be used and misused," he cautioned. He acknowledged that the anti-terrorism act was made to get rid of the menace of terrorism, which had destroyed the peace of the nation. "There is no doubt that we have to eradicate terrorism from the country and punish the terrorists. There is also no doubt that we will fight against terrorism till the last and that together we will win this battle." However, he cautioned that "urgency must not eclipse wisdom". Barrister Ali Zafar further pointed out that the Supreme Court had examined the provisions of the existing anti-terrorism act and decided that many of its provisions were against the constitution. "It was only after that that the present law was passed, and hence there is no room for any changes in it. By adding any provision in the existing law and making it more draconian, it will only become unconstitutional." He lamented that the amendment proposes that even an SHO and detain anybody for a period of three months in prison, and the person in prison will have no recourse to the courts. "The government can call anyone a terrorist on the grounds of public order and imprison them," he warned. "We must ask ourselves: will this amendment make Pakistan safer, or will it weaken the constitutional rights we swore an oath to protect?" "Our duty is twofold: on the one hand, to protect the lives of our citizens from the scourge of terrorism; on the other, to defend those constitutional freedoms without which Pakistan cannot remain a democratic state," he stressed. "We have to do a balancing act. Security will have to be balanced against liberty and power against accountability," he added. 'No softness toward militancy' PML-N Senator Irfanul Haque Siddiqui argued that no softness could be shown toward armed militancy. "We do not want terrorists roaming freely while innocent people are slaughtered... These acts weaken our federation and create mistrust between the people and the state." He said lawmakers must either surrender to militants or legislate to resist them, arguing such measures can "prevent crime and also curb forced disappearances and arbitrary detentions". Siddiqui appealed for viewing anti-terror legislation in good faith rather than as a political stick, stressing the need for transparent government-opposition communication with the public and media.
