logo
Trump tariffs live updates: Trump, Starmer sign US-UK trade deal at G7 summit

Trump tariffs live updates: Trump, Starmer sign US-UK trade deal at G7 summit

Yahoo6 hours ago

President Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer signed a trade deal that they had agreed to last month at the G7 summit in Canada.
Trump said the relationship with Britain was "just fantastic," as he stood to Starmer. "We signed it and it's done," he added.
Starmer said the agreement covers car tariffs and aerospace, but gave no further details, including when the changes would take effect.
US trade talks with the European Union and Canada are also in focus this week as the president and other world leaders gather at the G7.
A report in the German newspaper Handelsblatt on Monday hinted the EU could agree to a baseline 10% US tariff on all European Union exports, in exchange for avoiding higher tariffs on cars, medicines, and electronics. The European Commission denied that report.
Meanwhile, Trump said on the first day of the G7 gathering that a trade deal with Canada was possible.
"We have different concepts. I have a tariff concept. Mark has a different concept," Trump said, standing alongside Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. "We're going to see if we can get to the bottom of it today."
Canada's exports have been hit hard in Trump's trade salvos so far, as Trump has doubled duties on steel and aluminum imports to 50%. Meanwhile, Canada's auto exports to the US face 25% duties. Some products not included in the countries' existing trade agreement also face 25% levies.
The furious push comes after Trump told reporters last week that he would soon send letters to trading partners setting unilateral tariff rates, raising questions about the status of negotiations — as well as fears of a possible escalation back to his "Liberation Day" tariffs that roiled markets. Trump instituted a pause on his most punishing duties that expires July 9.
The diverging signals came as the US made key progress with China, as the nations agreed to a framework and implementation plan to ease tariff and trade tensions.
Trump and other US officials indicated the deal should resolve issues between the two countries on rare earth mineral exports. Trump said the US would impose a total of 55% tariffs on Chinese goods. Yahoo Finance's Ben Werschkul reports, citing a White House official, that Trump arrived at that figure by adding together an array of preexisting duties and not any new tariffs.
Meanwhile last week, a federal appeals court held a decision saying his tariffs can temporarily stay in effect. The US Court of International Trade had blocked their implementation last month, deeming the method used to enact them "unlawful."
Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet
Here are the latest updates as the policy reverberates around the world.
President Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said they had signed a trade deal that the leaders had agreed to last month.
Trump said the relationship with Britain was "just fantastic" as he stood next to Starmer. "We signed it and it's done," he added.
Starmer said that the agreement covers "car tariffs and aerospace," but the leaders gave no further details, including when the changes would take effect.
The US and United Kingdom are on track to begin implementing their trade agreement, Bloomberg reported Monday.
The deal, announced early last month, is the sole agreement President Trump has reached with trade partners during his 90-day "pause" from the steep tariffs he announced in early April.
Bloomberg reports:
Read more here.
President Trump kicked off three days of meetings in Canada, where trade will be front and center as well as a focus on national security issues.
"I'm a tariff person, I've always been a tariff person," Trump said after meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the start of a G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alberta.
Yahoo Finance's Ben Werschkul reports:
Read more here.
Frank-Steffen Walliser, the CEO of luxury British automaker Bentley, said that trade remains an overhanging issue for the brand despite a preliminary agreement between the US and UK.
Bentley, a subsidiary of Volkswagen (VWAGY), is coming off a tough year as it looks to electrify its vehicle lineup.
Yahoo Finance's Pras Subramanian reports:
Read more here.
With US trade talks with the European Union in focus, there's a lot at stake for the two sides as they look to complete a preliminary deal by President Trump's July 9 deadline. If no agreement is reached by July 9, the US is set to increase broad tariffs on EU imports to 50% from 10%. The EU is hoping to have that deadline extended while negotiations continue.
The European trading bloc is the US's largest trading partner; in 2024, it exported $600 billion worth of goods and imported $370 billion of US products.
Despite the Trump administration's tariffs, the EU's trade surplus with the US has expanded each month since January. Both imports and exports increased in April, netting a total US trade deficit of around $115 billion.
President Trump originally pegged his "Liberation Day" tariff rates to trade deficits, suggesting that this metric would be important to any final proposal, though the talks have also highlighted specific sectors and other areas of cooperation.
President Trump on Monday suggested he was optimistic about trade negotiations with Canada during the opening day of the G7 meeting.
"I think our primary focus will be trade, and trade with Canada, and I'm sure we can work something out," he said, per Yahoo Finance Canada.
"We have different concepts. I have a tariff concept. Mark has a different concept," Trump added, standing alongside Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. "We're going to see if we can get to the bottom of it today."
Trade is one of several items taking focus at the G7 gathering, with Trump's latest self-imposed tariff deadline is looming in July. Canada already faces a bevy of duties that affect its imports: 50% on steel and aluminum and 25% on foreign autos.
Read more here.
At Home filed for bankruptcy on Monday and said tariffs played a central role in its financial struggles.
The chain of 260 stores sells home goods and has been struggling to manage its debt load for several years as the housing market slowed down and inflation-wary customers pulled back on spending. This year, tariffs proved to be a final blow, the company's CFO wrote in court documents.
"The volatility of the current tariff environment came at a time when the management team was working to address the company's existing issues," CFO Jeremy Aguilar wrote. "These newly imposed tariffs and the uncertainty of ongoing U.S. trade negotiations intensified the financial pressure on the company, accelerating the need for a comprehensive solution."
At Home sources a large percentage of its goods from China, and the tariff uncertainty made it hard for it to plan its key Halloween and Christmas orders ahead of time. Earlier this year, it was in talks to raise money and amend an agreement with lenders to shore up its finances but realized it needed a more "comprehensive strategy" after the new tariffs were announced.
The chain is entering bankruptcy with a plan to continue operating, close some stores, and hand ownership to its lenders.
Trump's Tariffs are affecting consumers beyond retail — they are also impacting aspects of everyday life. Families who would typically avoid the big amusement parks like Disney World in favor of more regional parks, which allow them to travel locally and avoid expensive flights are now saying they may stay home due to the economic uncertainty brought on by tariffs.
AP reports:
Read more here.
CNN reports:
Read more here.
As President Trump's tariff deadline looms, what will happen when the countdown ends on Liberation Day 2.0? Yahoo Finance's Washington Correspondent Ben Werschkul looks into Trump's plan of action:
Read more here.
Despite a trade truce between the US and China last week in London, a key area remains unresolved. Export restrictions tied to national security are still being discussed, and Beijing has not committed to grant export clearance for some specialized rare earth magnets, according to two sources.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
According to reports in the German newspaper Handlesblatt, senior Brussels negotiators are considering whether to accept US tariffs of 10% on all EU exports into the US, in hopes it will prevent higher duties on cars, drugs, and electronics.
Per Reuters, EU officials said the offer would come under certain conditions and would not be permanent.
Handelsblatt reported that the EU is ready to cut tariffs on US-made vehicles and may ease technical and legal hurdles to make it easier for US manufacturers to sell their cars in Europe.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
China reported mixed economic performance for May on Monday, as retail sales jumped while factory output slowed due to higher US tariffs.
AP reports:
Read more here.
Thailand's commerce minister has expressed confidence that he will be able to negotiate tariffs as low as 10% with the US.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
As part of tariff negotiations, the US has requested that Vietnam reduce the use of Chinese tech devices that are assembled in the country before exporting to America, according to several people familiar with the matter.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
South Korea has launched a task force to help handle tariff and non-tariff negotiations with the US. The group will manage discussions across industry and the energy sector, a statement from the Industry Ministry for South Korea revealed on Monday.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
Canada will host world leaders from across the globe at the G7 summit this week in Kananaskis. Among the many goals for Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney: Demonstrate he can handle US President Donald Trump, the Financial Times reports, with one Canadian official characterizing the gathering as "preparing the red carpet for Godzilla."
Read more here (premium)
As leaders gather this week in Canada for the G7 summit, Israel's strike on Iran is sure to be a topic of discussion among the gathering. But as CNN reports, world trade and President Donald Trump's tariffs will also be top of mind:
Read more here
President Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said they had signed a trade deal that the leaders had agreed to last month.
Trump said the relationship with Britain was "just fantastic" as he stood next to Starmer. "We signed it and it's done," he added.
Starmer said that the agreement covers "car tariffs and aerospace," but the leaders gave no further details, including when the changes would take effect.
The US and United Kingdom are on track to begin implementing their trade agreement, Bloomberg reported Monday.
The deal, announced early last month, is the sole agreement President Trump has reached with trade partners during his 90-day "pause" from the steep tariffs he announced in early April.
Bloomberg reports:
Read more here.
President Trump kicked off three days of meetings in Canada, where trade will be front and center as well as a focus on national security issues.
"I'm a tariff person, I've always been a tariff person," Trump said after meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the start of a G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alberta.
Yahoo Finance's Ben Werschkul reports:
Read more here.
Frank-Steffen Walliser, the CEO of luxury British automaker Bentley, said that trade remains an overhanging issue for the brand despite a preliminary agreement between the US and UK.
Bentley, a subsidiary of Volkswagen (VWAGY), is coming off a tough year as it looks to electrify its vehicle lineup.
Yahoo Finance's Pras Subramanian reports:
Read more here.
With US trade talks with the European Union in focus, there's a lot at stake for the two sides as they look to complete a preliminary deal by President Trump's July 9 deadline. If no agreement is reached by July 9, the US is set to increase broad tariffs on EU imports to 50% from 10%. The EU is hoping to have that deadline extended while negotiations continue.
The European trading bloc is the US's largest trading partner; in 2024, it exported $600 billion worth of goods and imported $370 billion of US products.
Despite the Trump administration's tariffs, the EU's trade surplus with the US has expanded each month since January. Both imports and exports increased in April, netting a total US trade deficit of around $115 billion.
President Trump originally pegged his "Liberation Day" tariff rates to trade deficits, suggesting that this metric would be important to any final proposal, though the talks have also highlighted specific sectors and other areas of cooperation.
President Trump on Monday suggested he was optimistic about trade negotiations with Canada during the opening day of the G7 meeting.
"I think our primary focus will be trade, and trade with Canada, and I'm sure we can work something out," he said, per Yahoo Finance Canada.
"We have different concepts. I have a tariff concept. Mark has a different concept," Trump added, standing alongside Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. "We're going to see if we can get to the bottom of it today."
Trade is one of several items taking focus at the G7 gathering, with Trump's latest self-imposed tariff deadline is looming in July. Canada already faces a bevy of duties that affect its imports: 50% on steel and aluminum and 25% on foreign autos.
Read more here.
At Home filed for bankruptcy on Monday and said tariffs played a central role in its financial struggles.
The chain of 260 stores sells home goods and has been struggling to manage its debt load for several years as the housing market slowed down and inflation-wary customers pulled back on spending. This year, tariffs proved to be a final blow, the company's CFO wrote in court documents.
"The volatility of the current tariff environment came at a time when the management team was working to address the company's existing issues," CFO Jeremy Aguilar wrote. "These newly imposed tariffs and the uncertainty of ongoing U.S. trade negotiations intensified the financial pressure on the company, accelerating the need for a comprehensive solution."
At Home sources a large percentage of its goods from China, and the tariff uncertainty made it hard for it to plan its key Halloween and Christmas orders ahead of time. Earlier this year, it was in talks to raise money and amend an agreement with lenders to shore up its finances but realized it needed a more "comprehensive strategy" after the new tariffs were announced.
The chain is entering bankruptcy with a plan to continue operating, close some stores, and hand ownership to its lenders.
Trump's Tariffs are affecting consumers beyond retail — they are also impacting aspects of everyday life. Families who would typically avoid the big amusement parks like Disney World in favor of more regional parks, which allow them to travel locally and avoid expensive flights are now saying they may stay home due to the economic uncertainty brought on by tariffs.
AP reports:
Read more here.
CNN reports:
Read more here.
As President Trump's tariff deadline looms, what will happen when the countdown ends on Liberation Day 2.0? Yahoo Finance's Washington Correspondent Ben Werschkul looks into Trump's plan of action:
Read more here.
Despite a trade truce between the US and China last week in London, a key area remains unresolved. Export restrictions tied to national security are still being discussed, and Beijing has not committed to grant export clearance for some specialized rare earth magnets, according to two sources.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
According to reports in the German newspaper Handlesblatt, senior Brussels negotiators are considering whether to accept US tariffs of 10% on all EU exports into the US, in hopes it will prevent higher duties on cars, drugs, and electronics.
Per Reuters, EU officials said the offer would come under certain conditions and would not be permanent.
Handelsblatt reported that the EU is ready to cut tariffs on US-made vehicles and may ease technical and legal hurdles to make it easier for US manufacturers to sell their cars in Europe.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
China reported mixed economic performance for May on Monday, as retail sales jumped while factory output slowed due to higher US tariffs.
AP reports:
Read more here.
Thailand's commerce minister has expressed confidence that he will be able to negotiate tariffs as low as 10% with the US.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
As part of tariff negotiations, the US has requested that Vietnam reduce the use of Chinese tech devices that are assembled in the country before exporting to America, according to several people familiar with the matter.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
South Korea has launched a task force to help handle tariff and non-tariff negotiations with the US. The group will manage discussions across industry and the energy sector, a statement from the Industry Ministry for South Korea revealed on Monday.
Reuters reports:
Read more here.
Canada will host world leaders from across the globe at the G7 summit this week in Kananaskis. Among the many goals for Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney: Demonstrate he can handle US President Donald Trump, the Financial Times reports, with one Canadian official characterizing the gathering as "preparing the red carpet for Godzilla."
Read more here (premium)
As leaders gather this week in Canada for the G7 summit, Israel's strike on Iran is sure to be a topic of discussion among the gathering. But as CNN reports, world trade and President Donald Trump's tariffs will also be top of mind:
Read more here

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Now we are six: G7 leaders try to salvage their summit after Trump's early exit
Now we are six: G7 leaders try to salvage their summit after Trump's early exit

Washington Post

time9 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Now we are six: G7 leaders try to salvage their summit after Trump's early exit

KANANASKIS, Alberta — Six of the Group of Seven leaders are trying on the final day of their Tuesday to show the wealthy nations' club still has the clout to shape world events despite the early departure of President Donald Trump. Prime Minister Mark Carney and his counterparts from the U.K., France, Germany, Italy and Japan will be joined by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and NATO chief Mark Rutte to discuss Russia's relentless war on its neighbor . World leaders had gathered in Canada with the specific goal of helping to defuse a series of pressure points, only to be disrupted by a showdown over Iran's nuclear program that could escalate in dangerous and uncontrollable ways. Israel launched an aerial bombardment campaign against Iran on Friday, and Iran has hit back with missiles and drones. Trump left the summit in the Canadian Rocky Mountain resort of Kananaskis a day early late Monday, saying: 'I have to be back, very important.' It came as conflict between Israel and Iran intensifies and the U.S. leader declared that Tehran should be evacuated 'immediately' — while also expressing optimism about a deal to stop the violence. Before leaving, Trump joined the other leader in issuing a statement saying Iran 'can never have a nuclear weapon' and calling for a 'de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza.' Getting unanimity — even on a short and broadly worded statement — was a modest measure of success for the group. At the summit, Trump warned that Tehran needs to curb its nuclear program before it's 'too late.' He said Iranian leaders would 'like to talk' but they had already had 60 days to reach an agreement on their nuclear ambitions and failed to do so before the Israeli aerial assault began. 'They have to make a deal,' he said. Asked what it would take for the U.S. to get involved in the conflict militarily, Trump said Monday morning, 'I don't want to talk about that.' But by Monday afternoon, Trump warned ominously on social media, 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' Shortly after that, Trump decided to leave the summit and skip a series of Tuesday meetings that would address the war in Ukraine and trade issues. The sudden departure only heightened the drama of a world that seems on verge of several firestorms. Trump already has imposed severe tariffs on multiple nations that risk a global economic slowdown. There has been little progress on settling the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. Trump's stance on Ukraine puts him fundamentally at odds with the other G7 leaders, who back Ukraine and are clear that Russia is the aggressor in the war. The U.S. president on Monday suggested there would have been no war if G7 members hadn't expelled Putin from the organization in 2014 for annexing Crimea. Trump on Monday demurred when asked if he supported Russia, saying 'I only care about saving lives.' With talks on ending the war at an impasse, Starmer said Britain and other G7 members were slapping new tariffs on Russia in a bid to get it to the ceasefire negotiating table. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is due to attend the summit Tuesday at Carney's invitation, along with other leaders including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and NATO chief Mark Rutte. Trump declined to join in the sanctions on Russia, saying he would wait until Europe did so first. 'When I sanction a country that costs the U.S. a lot of money, a tremendous amount of money,' he said. Trump had been scheduled before his departure to meet with Zelenskyy and with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. On the Middle East, Merz told reporters that Germany was planning to draw up a final communique proposal on the Israel-Iran conflict that will stress that 'Iran must under no circumstances be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons-capable material.' Trump also seemed to put a greater priority on addressing his grievances with other nations' trade policies than on collaboration with G7 allies. The U.S. president has imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum as well as 25% tariffs on autos. Trump is also charging a 10% tax on imports from most countries, though he could raise rates on July 9, after the 90-day negotiating period set by him would expire. He announced with Starmer that they had signed a trade framework Monday that was previously announced in May, with Trump saying that British trade was 'very well protected' because 'I like them, that's why. That's their ultimate protection.' ___ Associated Press writers Will Weissert in Banff, Alberta, and Josh Boak in Calgary, Alberta, contributed to this story.

Perspective: How the ‘big, beautiful bill' misses the mark on faith-based higher education
Perspective: How the ‘big, beautiful bill' misses the mark on faith-based higher education

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Perspective: How the ‘big, beautiful bill' misses the mark on faith-based higher education

Not all value can be measured in dollars. Consider a cautionary tale shared by Harvard philosopher Michael Sandel. While he was studying as an Oxford Rhodes Scholar in the 1970s, one of the all-women's colleges, St. Anne's, became tangled in a debate over evolving sexual mores. Resident halls for men and women had traditionally been separated, but pressure grew to relax rules and allow men to stay overnight at St. Anne's. According to Sandel, some of the older female faculty, who he refers to as 'traditionalists,' thought it was morally wrong for men and women to share a room overnight. But times and norms were changing, making the positions held by the traditionalists seem quaint and outdated. So they decided to state their objection on economic grounds. Specifically, they argued that allowing men to stay overnight at St. Anne's would increase maintenance and utility expenses (even suggesting mattresses would need to be replaced more often). In response to the traditionalists, the reformers pushing for change proposed that male guests pay a small fee each time they stayed overnight. Ultimately, the school ruled in favor of the reformers. There is a lesson in this story: when a moral argument is presented in economic terms, it will receive an economic answer. As Sandel puts it, 'The language of virtue had not translated very well into the language of utility.' While the story is half a century old, Sandel's warning has several modern applications. One area of relevance is the 'big, beautiful bill' before Congress. Already passed in the House of Representatives, the bill reflects President Donald Trump's domestic agenda, including tax cuts, government rollbacks, and increased military spending. The bill also aims to address inefficiencies in higher education, reducing mandatory spending in higher education by $350 billion over 10 years by reducing Pell Grant eligibility and spending, limiting federal aid, and eliminating several loan programs. 'As debate over the details continues, one thing is clear: this proposal represents a serious effort to modernize higher education policy,' writes Beth Akers of the American Enterprise Institute. 'It's time to move past the status quo and toward a system that protects students, respects taxpayer investment, and rewards institutions that deliver real economic value.' One of the more noteworthy elements of the bill relates to 'risk sharing' proposals for institutions of higher education. Specifically, these policies would require colleges and universities to reimburse the federal government for unpaid debt on federal student loans, effectively making schools liable for student defaults. Understandably, provisions like this are meant to retool the incentive structure to protect students and, as one commentator writes, 'restore accountability in higher education, increase efficiency, and reduce costs.' As the budget has moved into the Senate, risk-sharing proposals have taken the form of a 'gainful employment' condition where federal aid is predicated upon a graduate earning more than a non-graduate. In other words, schools would be pushed to minimize impractical, low-ROI programs (remember former President Barack Obama's pejorative quip about art history majors?) and advance training and credentialing that offer students the best opportunity to be gainfully employed and well-compensated. These proposals will resonate with many people. There is a reason the perceived value of higher education has declined more than any other institution over the past 15 years. Student debt is at an all-time high. College price tags continue to rise. And Silicon Valley leaders regularly voice their skepticism of college as a necessary avenue for workplace relevance. After the 2007-2009 financial crisis, the market for post-secondary education began to favor consumers over providers — a 'buyer's market.' In other words, the supply of educational programs began to outpace waning demand for the degrees and experiences on offer. The shift in negotiating power from school to prospective student primarily relates to deliverables: What does a student get for what they pay (or borrow)? For an increasing share of the population, the perceived benefits of a university education are outweighed by the costs. While reasons for changing perceptions vary, higher education confidence has undoubtedly been affected by an onslaught of negative PR. This includes harrowing images of student protestors commandeering their campus and vocalizing extremist antisemitic chants, stories from books like 'The Coddling of the American Mind' that describe colleges and universities that fail to cultivate intellect and instead perpetuate fragility, or a university president's public refusal to label genocidal language as hate speech. In sum, institutions of higher education should, to use an economic expression, 'internalize the consequences' for where they have fallen short — and federal policy is an effective means to achieve this. So it is understandable why many Americans support the outcomes these policies aim toward, and financial 'skin in the game' makes sense for holding schools accountable, reducing costs and driving new efficiencies. But there are some problems. As Sandel's cautionary story reminds us, we lose something when we reduce all value to dollars and cents. Determining the value of a college or university experience will be directly proportionate to answering the question, 'What is the purpose of higher education?' The proposals under Senate consideration reflect the unstated but clear assumption that post-secondary education exists to foster the economic potential of tomorrow's workforce, making appraisals of higher education's worth directly proportionate to the earnings amassed by their graduates. While career development is indeed a core aspect of university education, institutions of higher education are not monodimensional. Moreover, the raison d'etre of many schools aspire to values and goods across a variety of domains. As a case in point, consider faith-based colleges and universities, such as those who comprise the Council of Christian Colleges and Universities (CCCU). An accountability framework that reduces a faith-based school's value to the future earning potential of graduates will minimize or alter its self-understanding and effectively punish those institutions for advancing a service ethos driven by their religious convictions. As an example, my son, an education major at a prominent CCCU institution, is encouraged upon graduation to serve challenging and under-resourced school environments as an act of Christian faith. Yet under the proposed accountability criteria, his institution could be penalized for fostering that sense of service and calling. For CCCU schools, as well as other religiously oriented and mission driven schools, there are better ways to think about value. The late American pastor A.W. Tozer once gave an illustration of three men entering a forest: a poet, a naturalist and a lumberjack. Each views the attributes of the forest in different ways. The poet sees metaphor. For him, the tall and mighty trees are analogous to kings superintending their province. The naturalist sees nuance. He can discern birdsong, plant life and animal activity unavailable to the untrained eye. Finally, the lumberjack sees economic value. For the market-sensitive eye, the vast expanse of lumber signals commercial potential: a chair, a musical instrument, a house. Though Tozer had a different purpose in mind, his illustration recognizes the possibility of valuing something for a diversity of reasons. It is not that the lumberjack is wrong in his appraisal. Rather, understanding a complex arrangement with multifaceted value through an economic lens alone is a narrow way to look at things. Something is lost. Referring to legislative proposals in the 'big, beautiful bill,' Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy, the Republican chair of the HELP committee, wants colleges and universities to be effective and accountable. 'We need to fix our broken higher education system, so it prioritizes student success and ensures Americans have the skills to compete in a 21st century economy,' he said. Few would disagree. Institutions of higher education should be held accountable and strive toward greater affordability and access. But risk sharing or gainful employment proposals that distill accountability to commercial conditions risk misunderstanding the multiple dimensions of value faith-based schools offer and, further, effectively punishes them for fulfilling their mission. 'An education that refines our sentiments, that teaches us to cherish the true and the good, is a gift beyond measure,' writes Peter Wehner. 'At their best, this is what Christian colleges and universities have to offer, and it's a lot.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store