
Vodafone Idea Q4 preview: Losses mount, AGR burden clouds outlook
NEW DELHI
:
Vodafone Idea Ltd is set to report a loss for another quarter amid mounting financial pressure and fresh concerns over its survival owing to pending adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues.
The telecom operator, which will declare March quarter earnings on 30 May, is expected to report a net loss of ₹7,162.5 crore—an average of six brokerage firms' estimates—slightly narrower year-on-year but widening sequentially. Its loss stood at ₹6,609 crore in the preceding quarter and ₹7,675 crore in the year-ago period.
Revenue is projected to come in at ₹11,030 crore, reflecting a 4% improvement from the year-ago period but down marginally from ₹11,117 crore in the preceding quarter.
Better network, slower subscriber churn
A sequential widening of losses is expected due to higher operating costs from expanding the network footprint. Besides, weaker revenue growth owing to continuous subscriber loss is also expected to weigh on Vodafone Idea's financials.
Also Read: Sword of Damocles hangs over Vodafone Idea's bank guarantees
A weak top line and higher expenses are also expected to affect the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda). 'We expect Ebitda to decline 5.2% on-quarter/ +3.1% on-year to ₹4,470 crore on a dip in revenue, and operating cost is likely to rise from expansion in network footprint," said analysts at ICICI Securities in a note dated 5 April.
Vodafone Idea has been improving its 4G services and has also started rolling out 5G, with Mumbai, Chandigarh, and Patna being the first circles. On 15 May, the company launched 5G in Delhi and said it was targeting to expand the services in all 17 circles by August 2025.
Analysts expect the company to spend the guided ₹8,000 crore capex in the second half of 2024-25, implying a sharp increase in capex in the March quarter.
Even though the company has been losing subscribers for some time, analysts said an improvement in the network could slow its subscriber churn. Compared to the loss of 5 million subscribers each in the September and December quarters, the company's subscriber churn is expected to slow down to around 2.5 million in the March quarter, according to analysts' estimates.
This is because of network improvement starting November 2024 and an increase in the company's 4G subscribers. The company is experiencing churn among the lower-end revenue users. As of December end, Vodafone Idea had 200 million mobile subscribers.
'We believe that Vodafone Idea is still some point away from showing positive net adds. We expect Q4 Arpu (average revenue per user) to be largely flat on-quarter," said analysts at BofA Securities in a 7 April note.
Also Read: Two months after second lifeline, Vodafone Idea again raises survival fears
An average of six brokerage firms' estimates shows that Vodafone Idea's Arpu is expected to increase marginally to ₹164 from ₹163 in the previous quarter. A largely flat Arpu can be attributed to two fewer days during the March quarter, which offset the benefit of the company's improved subscriber mix. Further, the July 2024 tariff hike has completely passed through the company's Arpu by end-Q3FY25, analysts at JM Financial said in a 4 April note.
AGR spectre
When the company reports its earnings on Friday, investors will closely look for its commentary on the AGR dues, any clarity from the government on possible relief, fundraising prospects, the company's sustainability post 2025-26, and future tariff hikes.
In a 27 May exchange filing, Vodafone Idea said it would also consider and evaluate any and all proposals for raising funds in one or more tranches, either by way of a rights issue or further public offer or private placement (including preferential allotment or qualified institutions placement) or through any other permissible mode, in its board meet on Friday.
On 17 April, Vodafone Idea submitted a representation to the government, seeking a waiver of interest, penalty, and interest on penalty on its AGR dues. The telco said the AGR liability demand from the government stands at ₹83,400 crore as of March end, with an annual instalment of approximately ₹18,000 crore due starting 31 March 2026 for the next six years. In comparison, Vodafone Idea generated ₹8,400-9,200 crore cash annually in the last three years.
In a court petition, it said it would not be able to operate beyond the current fiscal year without bank funding, which remains elusive as lenders remain wary of its dues linked to AGR. The Supreme Court, however, dismissed the plea on 19 May.
Also Read: No plan to merge Vodafone Idea and BSNL: Scindia
Vodafone Idea has been trying to raise bank funding of ₹25,000 crore for quite some time now. However, banks want the AGR matter resolved before processing further loans. 'The government may have to extend the moratorium or increase its stake in the telco," said analysts at IIFL Capital in a 20 May note.
In March, the government offered another reprieve to the company by converting an additional ₹36,950 crore worth of statutory dues into equity. The second dues conversion took the government's stake in Vodafone Idea to 49%.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Vodafone Idea vs SC dispute: Akshaya Moondra's AGR relief remark raises eyebrows; triggers debate on top court's ruling
NEW DELHI: Vodafone Idea CEO Akshaya Moondra's recent statement about continuing talks with the government seeking relief for adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues have triggered legal backlash, with experts saying the comments are misleading. His statement came just days after a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court , comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, on May 19 dismissed Article 32 petitions filed by Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel, and the Tata Group. The petitions had sought waivers on adjusted gross revenue (AGR) interest and penalties, which amount to nearly Rs 80,000 crore. During a June 2 earnings call, Moondra said, 'As far as the government relief is concerned, I think we are engaged with the government... What the government will do, I cannot comment on their behalf. But definitely post the judgment, we continue with our engagement with the government to find a solution to the AGR matter.' The court termed the petitions "misconceived" and said that the AGR issue had already been settled through its 2019 judgment and subsequent review and curative petitions. 'It will be a very sad day if the highest Court of this Country starts entertaining Article 32 writ petitions on the same subject matter after the curative petitions are dismissed,' the bench observed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 3BHK Transformation Possible for ₹4.5 Lakh? HomeLane Get Quote Undo Vodafone Idea's attempt to re-engage the government after such a clear verdict triggered criticism from the legal fraternity. Advocate Gaurav Gupta said the May 19 order reaffirmed that AGR dues were final. He added that any attempt by the government to now offer relief would be against the law established by the Supreme Court. 'Once an issue is decided by the highest court, the options for both the company and government are limited, as the executive cannot override the law established by the Supreme Court,' said Advocate Ashish Dixit. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, who represented Vodafone Idea in court, had conceded during the hearing that all legal avenues, including review and curative petitions, had been exhausted. He requested the court to let the government consider the company's representation. But the bench reminded him, 'If the government wants to help you, we are not coming in the way; who is stopping them from having a look at the representation?' However, Rohatgi admitted the government had refused to do so, citing the binding nature of the court's earlier rulings. The Solicitor General also confirmed that the executive was unable to intervene due to the 2019 verdict and its finality. Despite this, Moondra's remarks suggested that Vodafone Idea continued to expect some resolution from the Centre. Legal experts criticised this as potentially misleading to the public and shareholders. Chief Justice BR Gavai recently warned against distortion of judicial remarks, noting that such misinterpretations can negatively affect public understanding of court rulings. Advocate Mohit Paul reminded that the AGR definition issue was settled in October 2019, when the Supreme Court ruled it includes all revenue, telecom or otherwise, and confirmed the telcos must pay Rs 1.56 trillion including penalties and interest. Since then, all legal efforts, including review and curative petitions, were dismissed. When the telcos filed a fresh round of Article 32 writ petitions in May 2025, the Supreme Court did not entertain them, stating 'everything has its own limits.' Rohatgi's final attempt to withdraw the petition or at least insert a statement allowing petitioners to approach the government was also rejected.


The Print
2 days ago
- The Print
More subscribers but low tariffs—why India's telecom sector is under stress
On the handset side, the stats are equally impressive. From importing 75 per cent of the handsets till not very long ago, the country has moved to exporting mobile phones worth ~1.8 trillion a year. And India has wowed the world with 1.8 billion digital transactions annually. Mobile subscribers in the country are close to 1.2 billion, out of 9.1 billion globally. Internet subscribers in India are pegged at over 970 million, compared to 5.56 billion around the world. India's broadband subscribers stand at more than 940 million, against the global figure of 5.3 billion. The Indian telecom story, seen through numbers, could dazzle anyone. But, is it a happy story, 30 years after the first mobile call was made in India in July 1995? First, the numbers. As Telecom Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia told this newspaper in a recent interview, the telecom growth story of India has become the envy of the globe. While that may be the case, the high subscriber numbers and the impressive digital transaction volumes are accompanied by rock-bottom tariffs. Mobile call rates have fallen to around 0.03 paise a minute, from 50 paise a minute 10 years ago. And data cost has seen a steep fall to ~ 9 per GB, from ~287 per GB 10 years ago. Against the average global data cost of $2.49 per GB, India's is 11 cents ($0.11). That gives India an advantage like none other in terms of digital connectivity. However, being the cheapest data capital (a title India may get in the near future) has its own problems — something that policymakers can't wish away. When telecom service providers don't hike tariffs (both calling rates and data prices) for years at a stretch, there's a problem. When 5G data comes at the same price as 4G, there's a problem. When the industry debt runs into trillions of dollars, there's a problem. When leading telcos want conversion of their pending dues into government equity, there's a problem. And when preventing a duopoly in the industry becomes a burden, there's a problem. Beyond the high growth in subscriber numbers and data consumption, the Indian telecom story reflects stress. The number of private telecom players is down to three, and there's been a looming threat of a duopoly for some years now. The government holds a 49 per cent stake in one of the private telcos — Vodafone Idea. The company is in conversation with the government for further relief after the Supreme Court dismissed a joint plea seeking relaxation of dues related to adjusted gross revenue (AGR) — a term used to calculate the government's share of a telco's revenues. While the government does not want to pick up any further equity in Vodafone Idea, as that would theoretically turn the telco into a public sector unit, the company continues to be in talks with the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to explore some kind of relief. With banks not willing to lend to a stressed telco and promoters not wanting to invest further, another round of relief from the government seems to be the last resort in preventing a duopoly. Meanwhile, another private telco — Bharti Airtel — has approached the government for relief on its AGR dues. The DoT is yet to take a call on the matter. Adding to the uncertainty in the telecom space is the clash between existing telcos and proposed entrants in satellite broadband over the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) on spectrum pricing. Telcos, which get spectrum through highly competitive auctions, argue that Trai's recommendation on pricing overlooks the issue of a level-playing field. Satellite broadband players will get spectrum through an administered allocation process, and Trai has recommended 4 per cent of the companies' AGR as the spectrum price. Satellite broadband is expected to play a critical role in connecting the unconnected in India's rural and remote parts, and any delays in its rollout would hurt the country's telecom story. In the 30-year journey of India's mobile telephony — from the age when missed calls were the coolest thing to today's new normal of living life through apps — the digital divide between urban and rural has only been partially bridged, despite the large subscriber numbers and low tariffs. A large part of rural and remote places still falls in no-go data zones, where last-mile connectivity is either not available or patchy. BharatNet, a government project to provide data connection to gram panchayats and villages, has made progress, but the last mile remains an issue. More than anything else, India's telecom story needs a tariff fix. Low tariffs are indeed good for consumers — to a point — but they harm the industry. On 5G alone, the telecom industry has invested trillions of dollars and has hardly seen any returns. Without tariff rationalisation, telcos may not invest where it's needed most — in quality of service. That's already hurting consumers in terms of poor signal and weak data link. Nivedita Mookerji @nivmook is the Executive Editor of Business Standard. Views are personal. (Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)


Economic Times
2 days ago
- Economic Times
Buy Lemon Tree Hotels, target price Rs 174: ICICI Securities
Lemon Tree Hotels' key products/revenue segments include Income from Rooms, Restaurants & Other Services and Other Operating Revenue for the year ending 31-Mar-2024. Financials For the quarter ended 31-03-2025, the company has reported a Consolidated Total Income of Rs 379.40 crore, up 6.63% from last quarter Total Income of Rs 355.80 crore and up 13.65 % from last year same quarter Total Income of Rs 333.84 crore. The company has reported net profit after tax of Rs 108.77 crore in the latest quarter. The company?s top management includes Govind Keswani, Malhan, Albertus Hazeleger, Madhav Keswani, Jamshed Desai, Saikia, Anand, Garg, Nandan Sahai. Company has Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP as its auditors. As on 31-03-2025, the company has a total of 79 crore shares outstanding. Live Events Investment Rationale Lemon Tree Hotels reported Q4FY25 consolidated revenue of Rs 3.8 billion (up 15% YoY) in-line with I-Sec estimates as portfolio ARRs (including Mumbai Aurika) grew 7% YoY, while occupancy for the quarter stood at 77.6%, which increased 557bps YoY. This translated into a RevPAR of Rs 5,462, rising 15% YoY. Hence, Q4FY25 EBITDA of Rs 2 billion was up 19% YoY at a margin of 54%, which was up 154bps YoY. ICICI Securities expects the company's net debt to reduce to ~Rs 11 billion by Mar'27E (Rs 17 billion, as of Mar'25) driven by scale-up in Aurika Mumbai ARRs to over Rs 12,000. The brokerage retains the BUY rating with an SoTP-based target price of Rs 174, based on 22x Mar?27E EV/EBITDA. Key risks are demand slowdown in occupancies and room rates. Promoter/FII Holdings Promoters held 22.49 per cent stake in the company as of 31-Mar-2025, while FIIs owned 20.89 per cent, DIIs 19.66 per cent. (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel ICICI Securities has a buy call on Lemon Tree Hotels with a target price of Rs 174. The current market price of Lemon Tree Hotels is Rs 141.3. Lemon Tree Hotels. incorporated in 1992, is a Mid Cap company with a market cap of Rs 11188.90 crore, operating in the Tourism & Hospitality Tree Hotels' key products/revenue segments include Income from Rooms, Restaurants & Other Services and Other Operating Revenue for the year ending the quarter ended 31-03-2025, the company has reported a Consolidated Total Income of Rs 379.40 crore, up 6.63% from last quarter Total Income of Rs 355.80 crore and up 13.65 % from last year same quarter Total Income of Rs 333.84 crore. The company has reported net profit after tax of Rs 108.77 crore in the latest company?s top management includes Govind Keswani, Malhan, Albertus Hazeleger, Madhav Keswani, Jamshed Desai, Saikia, Anand, Garg, Nandan Sahai. Company has Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP as its auditors. As on 31-03-2025, the company has a total of 79 crore shares Tree Hotels reported Q4FY25 consolidated revenue of Rs 3.8 billion (up 15% YoY) in-line with I-Sec estimates as portfolio ARRs (including Mumbai Aurika) grew 7% YoY, while occupancy for the quarter stood at 77.6%, which increased 557bps YoY. This translated into a RevPAR of Rs 5,462, rising 15% YoY. Hence, Q4FY25 EBITDA of Rs 2 billion was up 19% YoY at a margin of 54%, which was up 154bps YoY. ICICI Securities expects the company's net debt to reduce to ~Rs 11 billion by Mar'27E (Rs 17 billion, as of Mar'25) driven by scale-up in Aurika Mumbai ARRs to over Rs 12,000. The brokerage retains the BUY rating with an SoTP-based target price of Rs 174, based on 22x Mar?27E EV/EBITDA. Key risks are demand slowdown in occupancies and room held 22.49 per cent stake in the company as of 31-Mar-2025, while FIIs owned 20.89 per cent, DIIs 19.66 per cent. (Disclaimer: Recommendations given in this section or any reports attached herein are authored by an external party. Views expressed are that of the respective authors/entities. These do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for, endorse any of its contents and hereby disclaims all warranties, express or implied, relating to the same. Please consult your financial adviser and seek independent advice.