
UBS AG published its 1Q25 financial report (Ad hoc announcement pursuant to Article 53 of the SIX Exchange Regulation Listing Rules)
UBS (NYSE:UBS) (SWX:UBSN) today published the UBS AG first-quarter 2025 financial report and the 31 March 2025 UBS Group Pillar 3 Report. These reports are available for download on the UBS website.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains statements that constitute 'forward-looking statements,' including but not limited to management's outlook for UBS's financial performance, statements relating to the anticipated effect of transactions and strategic initiatives on UBS's business and future development and goals or intentions to achieve climate, sustainability and other social objectives. While these forward-looking statements represent UBS's judgments, expectations and objectives concerning the matters described, a number of risks, uncertainties and other important factors could cause actual developments and results to differ materially from UBS's expectations. In particular, the global economy may suffer significant adverse effects from increasing political tensions between world powers, changes to international trade policies, including those related to tariffs and trade barriers, and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, as well as the continuing Russia–Ukraine war. UBS's acquisition of the Credit Suisse Group has materially changed its outlook and strategic direction and introduced new operational challenges. The integration of the Credit Suisse entities into the UBS structure is expected to continue through 2026 and presents significant operational and execution risk, including the risks that UBS may be unable to achieve the cost reductions and business benefits contemplated by the transaction, that it may incur higher costs to execute the integration of Credit Suisse and that the acquired business may have greater risks or liabilities than expected. Following the failure of Credit Suisse, Switzerland is considering significant changes to its capital, resolution and regulatory regime, which, if proposed and adopted, may significantly increase our capital requirements or impose other costs on UBS. These factors create greater uncertainty about forward-looking statements. Other factors that may affect UBS's performance and ability to achieve its plans, outlook and other objectives also include, but are not limited to: (i) the degree to which UBS is successful in the execution of its strategic plans, including its cost reduction and efficiency initiatives and its ability to manage its levels of risk-weighted assets (RWA) and leverage ratio denominator (LRD), liquidity coverage ratio and other financial resources, including changes in RWA assets and liabilities arising from higher market volatility and the size of the combined Group; (ii) the degree to which UBS is successful in implementing changes to its businesses to meet changing market, regulatory and other conditions; (iii) inflation and interest rate volatility in major markets; (iv) developments in the macroeconomic climate and in the markets in which UBS operates or to which it is exposed, including movements in securities prices or liquidity, credit spreads, currency exchange rates, residential and commercial real estate markets, general economic conditions, and changes to national trade policies on the financial position or creditworthiness of UBS's clients and counterparties, as well as on client sentiment and levels of activity; (v) changes in the availability of capital and funding, including any adverse changes in UBS's credit spreads and credit ratings of UBS, as well as availability and cost of funding to meet requirements for debt eligible for total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC); (vi) changes in central bank policies or the implementation of financial legislation and regulation in Switzerland, the US, the UK, the EU and other financial centers that have imposed, or resulted in, or may do so in the future, more stringent or entity-specific capital, TLAC, leverage ratio, net stable funding ratio, liquidity and funding requirements, heightened operational resilience requirements, incremental tax requirements, additional levies, limitations on permitted activities, constraints on remuneration, constraints on transfers of capital and liquidity and sharing of operational costs across the Group or other measures, and the effect these will or would have on UBS's business activities; (vii) UBS's ability to successfully implement resolvability and related regulatory requirements and the potential need to make further changes to the legal structure or booking model of UBS in response to legal and regulatory requirements and any additional requirements due to its acquisition of the Credit Suisse Group, or other developments; (viii) UBS's ability to maintain and improve its systems and controls for complying with sanctions in a timely manner and for the detection and prevention of money laundering to meet evolving regulatory requirements and expectations, in particular in the current geopolitical turmoil; (ix) the uncertainty arising from domestic stresses in certain major economies; (x) changes in UBS's competitive position, including whether differences in regulatory capital and other requirements among the major financial centers adversely affect UBS's ability to compete in certain lines of business; (xi) changes in the standards of conduct applicable to its businesses that may result from new regulations or new enforcement of existing standards, including measures to impose new and enhanced duties when interacting with customers and in the execution and handling of customer transactions; (xii) the liability to which UBS may be exposed, or possible constraints or sanctions that regulatory authorities might impose on UBS, due to litigation, contractual claims and regulatory investigations, including the potential for disqualification from certain businesses, potentially large fines or monetary penalties, or the loss of licenses or privileges as a result of regulatory or other governmental sanctions, as well as the effect that litigation, regulatory and similar matters have on the operational risk component of its RWA; (xiii) UBS's ability to retain and attract the employees necessary to generate revenues and to manage, support and control its businesses, which may be affected by competitive factors; (xiv) changes in accounting or tax standards or policies, and determinations or interpretations affecting the recognition of gain or loss, the valuation of goodwill, the recognition of deferred tax assets and other matters; (xv) UBS's ability to implement new technologies and business methods, including digital services, artificial intelligence and other technologies, and ability to successfully compete with both existing and new financial service providers, some of
which may not be regulated to the same extent; (xvi) limitations on the effectiveness of UBS's internal processes for risk management, risk control, measurement and modeling, and of financial models generally; (xvii) the occurrence of operational failures, such as fraud, misconduct, unauthorized trading, financial crime, cyberattacks, data leakage and systems failures, the risk of which is increased with persistently high levels of cyberattack threats; (xviii) restrictions on the ability of UBS Group AG, UBS AG and regulated subsidiaries of UBS AG to make payments or distributions, including due to restrictions on the ability of its subsidiaries to make loans or distributions, directly or indirectly, or, in the case of financial difficulties, due to the exercise by FINMA or the regulators of UBS's operations in other countries of their broad statutory powers in relation to protective measures, restructuring and liquidation proceedings; (xix) the degree to which changes in regulation, capital or legal structure, financial results or other factors may affect UBS's ability to maintain its stated capital return objective; (xx) uncertainty over the scope of actions that may be required by UBS, governments and others for UBS to achieve goals relating to climate, environmental and social matters, as well as the evolving nature of underlying science and industry and the possibility of conflict between different governmental standards and regulatory regimes; (xxi) the ability of UBS to access capital markets; (xxii) the ability of UBS to successfully recover from a disaster or other business continuity problem due to a hurricane, flood, earthquake, terrorist attack, war, conflict, pandemic, security breach, cyberattack, power loss, telecommunications failure or other natural or man-made event; and (xxiii) the effect that these or other factors or unanticipated events, including media reports and speculations, may have on its reputation and the additional consequences that this may have on its business and performance. The sequence in which the factors above are presented is not indicative of their likelihood of occurrence or the potential magnitude of their consequences. UBS's business and financial performance could be affected by other factors identified in its past and future filings and reports, including those filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). More detailed information about those factors is set forth in documents furnished by UBS and filings made by UBS with the SEC, including the UBS Group AG and UBS AG Annual Reports on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2024. UBS is not under any obligation to (and expressly disclaims any obligation to) update or alter its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UBS Upholds Buy Recommendation on Deckers Outdoor (DECK)
On June 5, UBS analysts maintained a Buy rating on Deckers Outdoor Corporation (NYSE:DECK) with a price target of $169. The analysts expect Decker's EPS to top market estimates over the coming year as sales projections increase for its Hoka brand. They also anticipate UGG to keep up its record as a major global casual footwear brand. A customer browsing a retail store, finding the perfect footwear for their casual outfits. The analysts were confident that Deckers Outdoor Corporation (NYSE:DECK) could deliver a low double-digit compound annual sales growth. They forecast that this growth could drive Deckers' forward PE ratio over 20x, compared to the present 16.7x. The $169 price target by UBS reflects a 60% upside for DECK. The stock has plummeted nearly 47% over the last six months, which signals a buying opportunity. After discussions with company management on June 4, the analysts were optimistic about Deckers Outdoor Corporation (NYSE:DECK)'s potential for growth. Despite the market showing caution with reference to the Hoka brand's capacity to sustain robust growth, UBS believes that DECK is perfectly tackling concerns about industry competition, evolving fashion trends, and dependence on Clifton and Bondi franchises. The analysts see double-digit revenue growth for Hoka in the next few years. Deckers Outdoor Corporation (NYSE:DECK) designs and markets premium footwear and apparel worldwide with brands like UGG and HOKA. The company was established in 1973 and is headquartered in Goleta, California. While we acknowledge the potential of DECK as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 11 Stocks That Will Bounce Back According To Analysts and 11 Best Stocks Under $15 to Buy According to Hedge Funds. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lemonade Inc (LMND) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Revenue Growth Amidst Challenges
Revenue: Increased 27% year-on-year to $151 million in Q1 2025. In Force Premium (IFP): Grew 27% to just above $1 billion. Customer Count: Increased by 21% to 2.5 million. Premium per Customer: Increased 4% to $396. Annual Retention Rate (ADR): Decreased to 84% from 86% in the prior quarter. Gross Earned Premium: Increased 24% to $234 million. Gross Loss Ratio: 78% for Q1, compared to 79% in Q1 2024. Adjusted Gross Profit: Improved 25% year-on-year. Net Loss: $62 million, or a loss of $0.86 per share. Adjusted EBITDA Loss: $47 million in Q1. Total Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments: Approximately $996 million. Growth Spend: $38 million in Q1, nearly double the prior year quarter. Technology Development Expense: Increased 5% to $22 million. General and Administrative (G&A) Expense: Increased 20% to $36 million. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with LMND. Release Date: May 06, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Lemonade Inc (NYSE:LMND) reported a 27% year-on-year growth in Q1 2025, marking the sixth consecutive quarter of accelerating top-line growth. The company achieved a 25% year-on-year improvement in adjusted gross profit, despite the impact of California wildfires. Lemonade Car's quarter-over-quarter in-force premium (IFP) growth outpaced the rest of the business for the first time, signaling strong momentum. The company is on track to achieve EBITDA breakeven by the end of 2026, with expectations of generating positive adjusted free cash flow in 2025. Lemonade Inc (NYSE:LMND) has successfully leveraged AI to maintain or reduce fixed costs while significantly increasing its book size, demonstrating strong operational efficiency. The California wildfires had a notable impact on Q1 results, contributing 16 percentage points to the gross loss ratio. Annual dollar retention (ADR) decreased to 84%, down from 86% in the prior quarter, partly due to efforts to improve profitability in the home insurance book. The gross loss ratio for Q1 was 78%, slightly higher than the previous year's 79%, indicating ongoing challenges in managing claims costs. Operating expenses, excluding loss and loss adjustment expense, increased by 29% year-on-year, driven by growth spend and the impact of the FAIR plan assessment. Net loss for Q1 was $62 million, or $0.86 per share, compared to a net loss of $47 million or $0.67 per share in the prior year, reflecting ongoing financial challenges. Q: Can you elaborate on the timeline for reaching EBITDA profitability and what levers will drive this? A: Daniel Schreiber, CEO, explained that Lemonade aims to achieve adjusted EBITDA breakeven by the end of 2026, with 2027 being the first full year of positive adjusted EBITDA. The company expects gross profit to grow faster than fixed costs, driven by AI efficiencies, bringing them closer to profitability. Q: What impact did the California wildfires have on gross profit, and how are tariffs affecting your full-year guidance? A: Tim Bixby, CFO, noted that the California wildfires had a $44 million gross impact, aligning with prior estimates. The tariff impact is expected to be modest, with single-digit percentage effects on claims. Lemonade is comfortable with its full-year guidance, assuming a modest headwind from tariffs. Q: How is Lemonade's Car business performing, and what are the plans for geographic expansion? A: Daniel Schreiber, CEO, highlighted that Lemonade Car is growing faster than the rest of the business, with a focus on refining the product before expanding geographically. The company is currently available to 40% of the U.S. market and plans to expand further once the product is optimized. Q: How is AI impacting Lemonade's competitive position in the insurance industry? A: Daniel Schreiber, CEO, emphasized that Lemonade's AI capabilities allow for better data utilization and risk assessment compared to traditional insurers. The company's digital infrastructure enables it to connect data points effectively, providing a competitive advantage in pricing and customer acquisition. Q: What percentage of new car sales are cross-sales from existing Lemonade customers? A: Tim Bixby, CFO, stated that about half of new car sales are cross-sales from existing customers, up from a third previously. This trend is expected to continue, leveraging Lemonade's existing customer base for more efficient growth. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.


Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
CEG, OKLO, and SMR Get Set to Power the AI Boom via Nuclear Energy
The nuclear energy sector is experiencing a resurgence unseen in decades, driven largely by its potential to power the burgeoning AI revolution. Major technology companies such as Meta (META), Microsoft (MSFT), and Alphabet (GOOGL) are competing to secure reliable energy sources for their expanding data centers, and nuclear power's clean, consistent output has positioned it as a key player in this race. Confident Investing Starts Here: Leading this revival are three companies—Constellation Energy (CEG), Oklo (OKLO), and NuScale Power (SMR) —each bringing a distinct approach to the nuclear landscape. Over the past year, all three have outperformed the market, capturing investor attention amid rising energy demand. Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) | The Nuclear Titan Locking in Tech Giants Constellation Energy is the 800-pound gorilla of U.S. nuclear power, and it's just landed a deal that's got everyone's attention. Just two days ago, CEG signed a 20-year power purchase agreement with Meta to deliver 1.1 gigawatts from its Clinton Clean Energy Center in Illinois, starting in 2027. This isn't an ordinary contract, but rather a lifeline for a plant that was on the verge of closure when its zero-emissions credits expire. The deal, which also boosts Clinton's output by 30 megawatts, underscores CEG's ability to secure tech giants. Microsoft is already on board with a Three Mile Island restart. What makes CEG a one-of-a-kind destination for tech titans is its scale. With 94 reactors across the U.S., they're a one-stop shop for tech companies chasing net-zero goals while powering AI workloads. Their shift away from co-located data center plans to grid-connected projects, as noted in last month's update, indicates they're adapting to regulatory hurdles, such as FERC's rejection of expanded co-location deals. Moreover, the Meta deal demonstrates that CEG can pivot and still secure massive contracts. Sure, their stock's run-up makes it a bit daunting to be bullish on today, but with AI data centers projected to eat up 9% of U.S. electricity by 2030, CEG's infrastructure could be a cash cow in waiting. Is Constellation Energy Stock a Good Buy? Currently, most analysts are bullish on CEG stock. The stock features a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on eight Buy and five Hold ratings assigned in the past three months. No analyst rates the stock a sell. CEG's average stock price target of $319.45 implies ~10% upside over the next twelve months, despite shares having already rallied 30% year-to-date. Oklo (NYSE:OKLO) | The Startup with a Nuclear Vision Oklo, the newest entrant in the nuclear energy space and backed by OpenAI's Sam Altman, is focused on small modular reactors (SMRs)—compact, flexible power plants ideally suited for data centers. The company's stock has surged 440% over the past year, fueled by high-profile agreements such as its December deal with Switch to supply 12 gigawatts through 2044. Additionally, a recent memorandum with Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power to advance their 75-megawatt Aurora Powerhouse fast reactor has further accelerated momentum. While Oklo remains pre-revenue and is currently investing heavily in technology development, with commercial operations still several years away, its 'power-as-a-service' model—where the company builds, owns, and operates reactors—could revolutionize how data centers secure reliable power without significant upfront costs. Recent executive orders easing nuclear regulations have also provided a regulatory boost. However, significant risks remain, including ongoing R&D challenges and the high costs of scaling production. For investors who believe SMRs are key to powering the AI revolution, Oklo's long-term vision holds considerable promise. Is OKLO Stock a Good Buy? On Wall Street, Oklo stock carries a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on six Buy and three Hold ratings. No analyst rates the stock a sell. Oklo's average stock price target of $54.40 implies about 15% upside potential over the next twelve months. NuScale Power (NYSE:SMR) | The SMR Pioneer with a Head Start NuScale Power holds a distinct advantage as the first U.S. company to secure Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval for its small modular reactor (SMR) design—the 77-megawatt VOYGR module. But the company isn't resting on this milestone; it is rapidly advancing a 2-gigawatt agreement with Standard Power to supply data centers in Pennsylvania and Ohio. Despite posting losses as it invests in expanding its supply chain, NuScale's Q1 report revealed an impressive 857% year-over-year revenue increase. The recent Meta-Constellation Energy deal also boosted NuScale's stock, signaling strong market confidence in its role in nuclear's resurgence. What distinguishes NuScale from its competitors is its pragmatic approach. Its light-water reactor technology is more established and less experimental than Oklo's fast reactors, making it a safer candidate for near-term deployment. However, supply chain constraints and complex project coordination remain significant challenges that could delay progress. Still, with tech giants like Google and Amazon entering SMR agreements, NuScale's first-mover advantage positions it well to meet growing energy demands. Its factory-built, modular design aligns perfectly with data centers' requirements for scalable, reliable power. Is NuScale Power a Good Stock to Buy? NuScale Power is currently covered by eight Wall Street analysts, who generally hold a bullish outlook. The stock carries a Moderate Buy consensus rating, reflecting five Buy ratings, two Holds, and one Sell over the past three months. However, SMR's average price target of $27.42 suggests approximately 12% downside potential over the next twelve months. Why Nuclear Energy Is the Smart Bet for AI's Future The resurgence of the nuclear sector is no coincidence, as the soaring energy demands of AI are reshaping the industry landscape. Constellation Energy (CEG) brings scale, Oklo (OKLO) leads with innovation, and NuScale Power (SMR) holds a regulatory advantage. Each faces its own challenges—CEG's stock trades at a premium valuation, Oklo is still managing significant cash burn, and NuScale navigates operational risks. Nevertheless, the potential upside is substantial. With tech giants committing to multi-gigawatt agreements and nuclear capacity projected to quadruple by 2050, these companies are at the forefront of a transformative energy revolution and merit close attention.